whats average power loss between dyno & rollers
#1
whats average power loss between dyno & rollers
me and a mate were talking about the power/torque losses between dyno figures & rolling road figures,
have i heard correct that torque can not be measured as accurately on a roling road due to not being able to load the engine up fully??? where as on an engne dyno the load can be applied direct to flywheel ect?
but bhp is normally the same as it would be on a dyno?
any info appreciated
have i heard correct that torque can not be measured as accurately on a roling road due to not being able to load the engine up fully??? where as on an engne dyno the load can be applied direct to flywheel ect?
but bhp is normally the same as it would be on a dyno?
any info appreciated
#3
BANNED
BANNED
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 12,483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
None. Your question is flawed.
A dyno measures accurately the engines performance.
A rolling road can ONLY measure TORQUE which it converts to BHP
using run down friction losses/drag etc...
A rolling road is ONLY accurate if these losses are measured correctly
and the opetaor does his job properly.
(Dabbing the brakes during run down adds BHP)
Also, rolling roads unless they have an RPM lead connected to the engine
will not offer an accurate Torque/BHP/Rpm reading.
A dyno measures accurately the engines performance.
A rolling road can ONLY measure TORQUE which it converts to BHP
using run down friction losses/drag etc...
A rolling road is ONLY accurate if these losses are measured correctly
and the opetaor does his job properly.
(Dabbing the brakes during run down adds BHP)
Also, rolling roads unless they have an RPM lead connected to the engine
will not offer an accurate Torque/BHP/Rpm reading.
Trending Topics
#9
so what will i see do you think on the rollers if on the engine dyno i saw 300bhp & 356lb/ft
or is it dependant on the type of roller used as well as operators method?
also i agree it will differ due to contolled parameters on the dyno such as act. water, oil ect
or is it dependant on the type of roller used as well as operators method?
also i agree it will differ due to contolled parameters on the dyno such as act. water, oil ect
#12
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NORWICH
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by beefy-rst-2
so what ur saying is keep an eye on ur tail lights during the run down on ur rr session , to see if the operators having u over ??
#13
My Dynoed 504bhp made 399 on the RR & before you say the car was crap it held the then RWD Topspeed record at 183.3mph. MikeR made 398 from his 511bhp engine also a 180mph car so I rekon that the loss is 20% as these 2 examples show.
Rod
Rod
#15
Testing the future
Originally Posted by SECS
A rolling road can ONLY measure TORQUE which it converts to BHP
using run down friction losses/drag etc....
using run down friction losses/drag etc....
Originally Posted by SECS
A rolling road is ONLY accurate if these losses are measured correctly
and the opetaor does his job properly.
(Dabbing the brakes during run down adds BHP)
and the opetaor does his job properly.
(Dabbing the brakes during run down adds BHP)
Originally Posted by SECS
Also, rolling roads unless they have an RPM lead connected to the engine
will not offer an accurate Torque/BHP/Rpm reading.
will not offer an accurate Torque/BHP/Rpm reading.
#17
BANNED
BANNED
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 12,483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by foreigneRS
Originally Posted by SECS
A rolling road can ONLY measure TORQUE which it converts to BHP
using run down friction losses/drag etc....
using run down friction losses/drag etc....
Originally Posted by SECS
A rolling road is ONLY accurate if these losses are measured correctly
and the opetaor does his job properly.
(Dabbing the brakes during run down adds BHP)
and the opetaor does his job properly.
(Dabbing the brakes during run down adds BHP)
Originally Posted by SECS
Also, rolling roads unless they have an RPM lead connected to the engine
will not offer an accurate Torque/BHP/Rpm reading.
will not offer an accurate Torque/BHP/Rpm reading.
I was actually correct.
#18
Testing the future
Originally Posted by SECS
So despite your deliberate attempt to discredit my statements,
I was actually correct.
I was actually correct.
it's a discussion, i was pointing out some inaccuracies and omissions from your post for the benefit of other readers, nothing more.
didn't realise that you were an expert on dynamometers as well
#20
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Also a engine dyno will have inaccuracy's that can be used to gain figures.
Also a engine in a cell, wont have all the extra's fitted like in a car.
eg, alternator, powersteering.
A proper RR, will be able to load a engine up fully, like a engine dyno.
And will be able to hold the engine at a set RPM, with full throttle,boost in use.
Also a engine in a cell, wont have all the extra's fitted like in a car.
eg, alternator, powersteering.
A proper RR, will be able to load a engine up fully, like a engine dyno.
And will be able to hold the engine at a set RPM, with full throttle,boost in use.
#21
Testing the future
Originally Posted by fiesta cossie
Also a engine dyno will have inaccuracy's that can be used to gain figures.
Also a engine in a cell, wont have all the extra's fitted like in a car.
eg, alternator, powersteering.
A proper RR, will be able to load a engine up fully, like a engine dyno.
And will be able to hold the engine at a set RPM, with full throttle,boost in use.
Also a engine in a cell, wont have all the extra's fitted like in a car.
eg, alternator, powersteering.
A proper RR, will be able to load a engine up fully, like a engine dyno.
And will be able to hold the engine at a set RPM, with full throttle,boost in use.
most of the unreliability of the figures from a rolling road are due to the operator, not the equipment
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post