General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

whats average power loss between dyno & rollers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16-09-2006, 05:22 PM
  #1  
M K
10K+ Poster!!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
M K's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Essex
Posts: 10,865
Received 61 Likes on 60 Posts
Default whats average power loss between dyno & rollers

me and a mate were talking about the power/torque losses between dyno figures & rolling road figures,

have i heard correct that torque can not be measured as accurately on a roling road due to not being able to load the engine up fully??? where as on an engne dyno the load can be applied direct to flywheel ect?

but bhp is normally the same as it would be on a dyno?


any info appreciated
Old 16-09-2006, 05:29 PM
  #2  
gus
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (1)
 
gus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: essex
Posts: 10,507
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

interested in this too
Old 16-09-2006, 05:29 PM
  #3  
ECU Monitor Enthusiast
BANNED
BANNED
iTrader: (1)
 
ECU Monitor Enthusiast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 12,483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

None. Your question is flawed.


A dyno measures accurately the engines performance.

A rolling road can ONLY measure TORQUE which it converts to BHP
using run down friction losses/drag etc...

A rolling road is ONLY accurate if these losses are measured correctly
and the opetaor does his job properly.

(Dabbing the brakes during run down adds BHP)

Also, rolling roads unless they have an RPM lead connected to the engine
will not offer an accurate Torque/BHP/Rpm reading.
Old 16-09-2006, 05:31 PM
  #4  
gus
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (1)
 
gus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: essex
Posts: 10,507
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

learn something new everyday
Old 16-09-2006, 05:34 PM
  #5  
-beefy-
formerly beefy-rst-2
iTrader: (6)
 
-beefy-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: cleveland rsoc
Posts: 10,072
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

so what ur saying is keep an eye on ur tail lights during the run down on ur rr session , to see if the operators having u over ??

Old 16-09-2006, 05:35 PM
  #6  
ECU Monitor Enthusiast
BANNED
BANNED
iTrader: (1)
 
ECU Monitor Enthusiast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 12,483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

beefy-rst-2

Yes BUT, handbrakes dont put the brake lights on though
Old 16-09-2006, 05:38 PM
  #7  
rapidcossie
10K+ Poster!!
 
rapidcossie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: scotland
Posts: 14,907
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

it depends whats on the engine when its on the dyno...

air filter/exhaust etc.

dyno figs are generaly higher aswel as its easy to control inlet/water temps etc
Old 16-09-2006, 05:40 PM
  #8  
vroooom ptssssh
It Wasnt Me!
 
vroooom ptssssh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Scottyland
Posts: 22,752
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

SECS, Only really applies to 42wd/rwd cars, fwd you'd see the brake lights go on
Old 16-09-2006, 06:12 PM
  #9  
M K
10K+ Poster!!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
M K's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Essex
Posts: 10,865
Received 61 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

so what will i see do you think on the rollers if on the engine dyno i saw 300bhp & 356lb/ft

or is it dependant on the type of roller used as well as operators method?



also i agree it will differ due to contolled parameters on the dyno such as act. water, oil ect

Old 16-09-2006, 06:16 PM
  #10  
gus
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (1)
 
gus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: essex
Posts: 10,507
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

you will probably see you gearbox falling to bits
Old 16-09-2006, 06:54 PM
  #11  
Tim
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Tim's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 3,888
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

i think you will loose 40 hp from what ive seen before,ie dingos on harvys dyno to rr etc etc.
Old 16-09-2006, 07:02 PM
  #12  
GaryEvo
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
GaryEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NORWICH
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by beefy-rst-2
so what ur saying is keep an eye on ur tail lights during the run down on ur rr session , to see if the operators having u over ??

only if the dyno uses the coast down method not all dynos do!!
Old 16-09-2006, 09:08 PM
  #13  
Anonymous
Banned
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My Dynoed 504bhp made 399 on the RR & before you say the car was crap it held the then RWD Topspeed record at 183.3mph. MikeR made 398 from his 511bhp engine also a 180mph car so I rekon that the loss is 20% as these 2 examples show.
Rod
Old 17-09-2006, 12:56 AM
  #14  
XRT_si
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (2)
 
XRT_si's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London
Posts: 6,861
Received 54 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

But FWD losses are different to RWD losses? then again that must be quite marginal too.
Old 17-09-2006, 11:23 AM
  #15  
foreigneRS
Testing the future
 
foreigneRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: W. Sussex
Posts: 17,597
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SECS
A rolling road can ONLY measure TORQUE which it converts to BHP
using run down friction losses/drag etc....
not quite. it converts torque at the rollers to power at the rollers using only the rotational speed of the rollers. nothing to do with losses unless you start talking about power at the wheels (losses through the tyres), power before the diff (losses through diff, driveshaft joints, wheel bearings, tyres etc), or power at the flywheeel (include any propshaft losses, gearbox losses etc)

Originally Posted by SECS
A rolling road is ONLY accurate if these losses are measured correctly
and the opetaor does his job properly.

(Dabbing the brakes during run down adds BHP)
as above, the torque figure at the rollers will almost always be relatively accurate, as it measured very simply using a load cell or similar. what may not be correct is the power calculated from it due to inaccuracies in the 'measurement' of the engine speed. it may not be as much torque as is produced on the road either, due to the load not being as high and airflow not being high enough to achieve the level of charge cooling seen on the road.

Originally Posted by SECS
Also, rolling roads unless they have an RPM lead connected to the engine
will not offer an accurate Torque/BHP/Rpm reading.
correct. most use the cars rev counter to set the engine revs at something like 4000 rpm which corresponds to a certain roller speed. the roller speed is then used in the calculation for power, so if the rev counter is inaccurate, everything else will be.
Old 17-09-2006, 12:21 PM
  #16  
Chipped UK LTD
Regular Contributor
 
Chipped UK LTD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Many factors alter the final figure.

Tyre pressure
Wheel ballencing (on the drive wheels)
State of tyre
Make of tyre
Acceleration control
Old 17-09-2006, 12:36 PM
  #17  
ECU Monitor Enthusiast
BANNED
BANNED
iTrader: (1)
 
ECU Monitor Enthusiast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 12,483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by foreigneRS
Originally Posted by SECS
A rolling road can ONLY measure TORQUE which it converts to BHP
using run down friction losses/drag etc....
not quite. it converts torque at the rollers to power at the rollers using only the rotational speed of the rollers. nothing to do with losses unless you start talking about power at the wheels (losses through the tyres), power before the diff (losses through diff, driveshaft joints, wheel bearings, tyres etc), or power at the flywheeel (include any propshaft losses, gearbox losses etc)

Originally Posted by SECS
A rolling road is ONLY accurate if these losses are measured correctly
and the opetaor does his job properly.

(Dabbing the brakes during run down adds BHP)
as above, the torque figure at the rollers will almost always be relatively accurate, as it measured very simply using a load cell or similar. what may not be correct is the power calculated from it due to inaccuracies in the 'measurement' of the engine speed. it may not be as much torque as is produced on the road either, due to the load not being as high and airflow not being high enough to achieve the level of charge cooling seen on the road.

Originally Posted by SECS
Also, rolling roads unless they have an RPM lead connected to the engine
will not offer an accurate Torque/BHP/Rpm reading.
correct. most use the cars rev counter to set the engine revs at something like 4000 rpm which corresponds to a certain roller speed. the roller speed is then used in the calculation for power, so if the rev counter is inaccurate, everything else will be.
So despite your deliberate attempt to discredit my statements,
I was actually correct.

Old 17-09-2006, 12:45 PM
  #18  
foreigneRS
Testing the future
 
foreigneRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: W. Sussex
Posts: 17,597
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SECS
So despite your deliberate attempt to discredit my statements,
I was actually correct.

fuck off with the paranoia you twat

it's a discussion, i was pointing out some inaccuracies and omissions from your post for the benefit of other readers, nothing more.

didn't realise that you were an expert on dynamometers as well
Old 17-09-2006, 12:46 PM
  #19  
ECU Monitor Enthusiast
BANNED
BANNED
iTrader: (1)
 
ECU Monitor Enthusiast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 12,483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ouch, did I touch a nerve there


What ever
Old 17-09-2006, 02:31 PM
  #20  
Fiecos Dan
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Fiecos Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: S/E Kent, Thanet
Posts: 4,775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Also a engine dyno will have inaccuracy's that can be used to gain figures.

Also a engine in a cell, wont have all the extra's fitted like in a car.
eg, alternator, powersteering.


A proper RR, will be able to load a engine up fully, like a engine dyno.
And will be able to hold the engine at a set RPM, with full throttle,boost in use.
Old 17-09-2006, 02:58 PM
  #21  
foreigneRS
Testing the future
 
foreigneRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: W. Sussex
Posts: 17,597
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fiesta cossie
Also a engine dyno will have inaccuracy's that can be used to gain figures.

Also a engine in a cell, wont have all the extra's fitted like in a car.
eg, alternator, powersteering.


A proper RR, will be able to load a engine up fully, like a engine dyno.
And will be able to hold the engine at a set RPM, with full throttle,boost in use.
quite right

most of the unreliability of the figures from a rolling road are due to the operator, not the equipment
Old 17-09-2006, 03:29 PM
  #22  
OOG
I'm Finding My Feet Here Now
 
OOG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Plymouth
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ah the good old can of worms labeled "Rolling Road Accuracy"
Old 17-09-2006, 03:43 PM
  #23  
M K
10K+ Poster!!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
M K's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Essex
Posts: 10,865
Received 61 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

cheers or the info people,

will have to compare when i put it on some rollers at some point
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mark94
Ford Mondeo Including ST
5
10-10-2023 06:52 PM
tankybaby66
Cars for Sale
49
06-02-2016 02:24 PM
Brickhouse
General Car Related Discussion.
14
03-10-2015 07:28 PM
Iain Mac
General Car Related Discussion.
7
30-09-2015 09:39 PM
Fudgey
General Car Related Discussion.
21
30-09-2015 06:19 PM



Quick Reply: whats average power loss between dyno & rollers



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:50 PM.