dojj

iTrader: (3)

i don't think it's a question of apoligizing, i think it's just a question of this post turning into a cheap po at "chavs" and the "chavs" not understanding the light-heatedness that we are posting in

everyone is a virgin here at some point, but it seems that most of the virgins are either members of rsm or people who have been banned for some reason, and thats where you have the conflict

i was told by someone who's a lot older than me that there are always 3 sides to a story
one for the instigator
one for the defender
and what actually happened
we don't seem to be getting to what actually happened BUT it does sem that a few of the posters here have kissed and made up age old differences from the past, surely that is worthy of keeping the thread alive for the time being

i've closed threads before and all it's done is blown everything out of all proportion because the original poster has gone all "freedom of speach" on me and then you forget the whole point you were trying to make in the first place

ps, lots of posts along the lines of "hello mate" "hi, long time no see" etc should be done on msn

Eagle

iTrader: (2)

in what way ????

you deliberatly intended to slander the name of another user on this board with NO PROOF ... all because he told you lot to bugger off in his own words ..

you have had ample time to just admidt you were intent on harassing him and to actually show some form of apology in any way you felt was correct..


to accuse me of being the biggest stirrer again with no proof leaves me with just one option ..
i will not sit here and allow you to try and accuse me of anything with out proof ..