gt 35 compressor stall
#122
Originally Posted by Ima-Racing500
Dan...you do seem to have a big mouth..ROFL...bigger than mine at times.
Please REMEMBER...no one is forced to go high compression BIG bhp...you seem to think Paul holds a shotgun to the head and says in a German accent "you veal obey my commands or you veal be wrapped with piano wire"
Please REMEMBER...no one is forced to go high compression BIG bhp...you seem to think Paul holds a shotgun to the head and says in a German accent "you veal obey my commands or you veal be wrapped with piano wire"
Peeps that goes to EA seem to go the high comp route which means he must be selling/convincing them that is the way to go.
#124
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Gloucester
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lewis...... I'll hold you to that!
Guys, to be fair though... I cannot expect a car that made 576bhp on the rollers to be reliable. It was very reliable at 510bhp though, so perhaps I should have left it at that? As an everyday car (with carpet?), was I asking for trouble? However, nobody forced me to put a GT35 on it and I dont hold any grudges.
One thing I will add is that for 11 months I had a very quick car. Hopefully that normal service will resume soon.
I would not let my bad luck put anybody else off having my car mapped by Paul though as there is no question whatsoever about his mapping capabilities.
Guys, to be fair though... I cannot expect a car that made 576bhp on the rollers to be reliable. It was very reliable at 510bhp though, so perhaps I should have left it at that? As an everyday car (with carpet?), was I asking for trouble? However, nobody forced me to put a GT35 on it and I dont hold any grudges.
One thing I will add is that for 11 months I had a very quick car. Hopefully that normal service will resume soon.
I would not let my bad luck put anybody else off having my car mapped by Paul though as there is no question whatsoever about his mapping capabilities.
#125
10K+ Poster!!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: not far away
Posts: 10,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
or Julian Godfrey if I ever wanna become a rallycross legend
As said the only people I would use is Julian Godfrey, MSD, KARL and Martin/ZOO
So sorry to hear about your engine Ian, hope all turns out well
#128
Originally Posted by cossymad
or.... build your own cars/ engines and don't slate others when it fails?
The biggest problem with the tuning industry is that peeps get done all the time but for some strange reason feel they must stay loyal to said tuner and carry on using them. This is why most tuners get away with it and if a customer stands up and says fook them they are shite get looked as a cont by some peeps and then the tuners supporters start their rubbish.
It very easy to see who really gives a fook about the quality of their work and how to treat their customers just by using this bb and from word og mouth.
#129
PassionFord Post Troll
Originally Posted by Dan@Gremlinnet.com
Originally Posted by cossymad
or.... build your own cars/ engines and don't slate others when it fails?
The biggest problem with the tuning industry is that peeps get done all the time but for some strange reason feel they must stay loyal to said tuner and carry on using them. This is why most tuners get away with it and if a customer stands up and says fook them they are shite get looked as a cont by some peeps and then the tuners supporters start their rubbish.
It very easy to see who really gives a fook about the quality of their work and how to treat their customers just by using this bb and from word og mouth.
#130
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ian firstly sorry to hear about your motor its not a nice thing to happen to anyone and I hope you get it sorted m8
Paul hasnt forced anyone to use these turbos and anyone who says he has my talking shite as far as am aware only myself and Ian were the only EA cars built and mapped by Paul using the GT35. My first failure had nothing to position of the wastegate it was more to do with the spec of the engine I was sold, after having a rebuild the engine is running 100% better off than its ever did, am completely happy with the build quality so Mike your comments are abit unfair about my car being a time bomb .
Paul hasnt forced anyone to use these turbos and anyone who says he has my talking shite as far as am aware only myself and Ian were the only EA cars built and mapped by Paul using the GT35. My first failure had nothing to position of the wastegate it was more to do with the spec of the engine I was sold, after having a rebuild the engine is running 100% better off than its ever did, am completely happy with the build quality so Mike your comments are abit unfair about my car being a time bomb .
#132
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: essex
Posts: 3,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When people spend alot of money on their engines, they are paying for power, not necessarily realiability. If you had the choice to spend money on realiability, the route of tuning you would take would be a completely different one, I assume.
I think it is unfair to slate a paricular tuner, at all, anyone as the full story is rarely heard.
Read Ian's last post, and Angel45 carefully.
No-one sits here slating 250hp engines that fail, yet pushing 600!!!!! It's inevetable that something will brake
My car fucked up the other day.....Ford's what a bunch of noshers....you should have seen the wiring, and the design of the CPS and ECU loom routes is just aweful. You have been warned. DO NOT BUY ANOTHER CAR FROM THERE....cowboys bla bla bla
I think it is unfair to slate a paricular tuner, at all, anyone as the full story is rarely heard.
Read Ian's last post, and Angel45 carefully.
No-one sits here slating 250hp engines that fail, yet pushing 600!!!!! It's inevetable that something will brake
My car fucked up the other day.....Ford's what a bunch of noshers....you should have seen the wiring, and the design of the CPS and ECU loom routes is just aweful. You have been warned. DO NOT BUY ANOTHER CAR FROM THERE....cowboys bla bla bla
#134
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would also like to add when the engine formley known as Spades engine bit the dust Paul was the first to offer help and advice , I was thinking about calling it a day then but without Pauls help and assistance my car wouldnt be in one piece
Ian IMO you are Fucking mad taking your car to SCS but @ the end of the day your car your money
Ian IMO you are Fucking mad taking your car to SCS but @ the end of the day your car your money
#135
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Essex... and Birmingham!
Posts: 21,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ian@Racetek,
Guys, to be fair though... I cannot expect a car that made 576bhp on the rollers to be reliable
Guys, to be fair though... I cannot expect a car that made 576bhp on the rollers to be reliable
#136
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: essex
Posts: 3,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
porkie wrote;
If it goes bang either....
a. We will not find out
b. It would not be anybodies fault
I disagree, I'm going to kick the living shit out of mine and I expect it to be 101% reliable and I bet it is as well. I would not have spent the money if I didn't think it would last.... that would be stupid in my opinion!
a. We will not find out
b. It would not be anybodies fault
#137
PassionFord Post Troll
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Kent
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If everything is designed correctly with parts strong enough and fuelling etc is spot on. Why would anything fail? (other than a component failure, i.e injector etc)
saying your pushing a 250bhp engine to 600bhp well you aren't really as most of the components inside AREN't from a 250bhp engine.
Anyway, I'm more than happy with Pauls mapping on my car. Goes really well.
saying your pushing a 250bhp engine to 600bhp well you aren't really as most of the components inside AREN't from a 250bhp engine.
Anyway, I'm more than happy with Pauls mapping on my car. Goes really well.
#138
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: essex
Posts: 3,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If everything is designed correctly with parts strong enough and fuelling etc is spot on. Why would anything fail? (other than a component failure, i.e injector etc)
obvious statemeant of the day
#139
Advanced PassionFord User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The point being that the GT35 is a shite turbo on a YB...as you saw this car on the thread made 550bhp at 28psi...turning it up caused problems...but hey wether lo comp or hi...more than 28psi from a turbo like this is asking for trouble!!!!But if the customer comes in and says i want 600bhp lets go for it...all you can do is what the customer wants..this kinda BHP 550 plus aint never gonna be reliable for long.
Looking at it sensibly how the hell can a tuner warranty an engine that he hasnt actually developed...if Paul had said look lets go 600bhp on your motor..then fair enuff..but i suspect he was asked to produce more power......
I'd say stick to a lo comp 500bhp motor...and stay at that as anything more is experimental at the mo and no one CAN offer you 600plus BHP with a 12 months warranty YET.....with the 500bhp i understand you do..is that true Mike????Does Harvey warranty the 500 conversion?
Looking at it sensibly how the hell can a tuner warranty an engine that he hasnt actually developed...if Paul had said look lets go 600bhp on your motor..then fair enuff..but i suspect he was asked to produce more power......
I'd say stick to a lo comp 500bhp motor...and stay at that as anything more is experimental at the mo and no one CAN offer you 600plus BHP with a 12 months warranty YET.....with the 500bhp i understand you do..is that true Mike????Does Harvey warranty the 500 conversion?
#140
PassionFord Post Troll
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Kent
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
whats with the twat comment
I'm saying the statement about you expect a high power engine to blow up is bollocks.
Mike says the external wastegate WASN'T designed properly.
Twat
obvious statemeant of the day
I'm saying the statement about you expect a high power engine to blow up is bollocks.
Mike says the external wastegate WASN'T designed properly.
Originally Posted by cossymad
If everything is designed correctly with parts strong enough and fuelling etc is spot on. Why would anything fail? (other than a component failure, i.e injector etc)
obvious statemeant of the day
#141
Originally Posted by cossymad
When people spend alot of money on their engines, they are paying for power, not necessarily realiability. If you had the choice to spend money on realiability, the route of tuning you would take would be a completely different one, I assume.
I think it is unfair to slate a paricular tuner, at all, anyone as the full story is rarely heard.
Read Ian's last post, and Angel45 carefully.
No-one sits here slating 250hp engines that fail, yet pushing 600!!!!! It's inevetable that something will brake
My car fucked up the other day.....Ford's what a bunch of noshers....you should have seen the wiring, and the design of the CPS
I think it is unfair to slate a paricular tuner, at all, anyone as the full story is rarely heard.
Read Ian's last post, and Angel45 carefully.
No-one sits here slating 250hp engines that fail, yet pushing 600!!!!! It's inevetable that something will brake
My car fucked up the other day.....Ford's what a bunch of noshers....you should have seen the wiring, and the design of the CPS
In your opinion Paul's work is cool and I bet no matter what evidence someone put up saying that not being the case you would always try and reply with something, it's kind of like people can't accept peeps they look up to actually turn out to be shite!!LOL, bit like gaybird and SCS LOL
(a joke btw Mike!)
Tuners that do any of the following should stay out of business IMO:
1. Tuner that takes on job above their abilities.
2. Tuner that does does not take pride in the quality of their work - but this raises a problem that someones 'pride in the quality of their work' may be actually be shite, they just don't know it!!
3. Tuner who makes a mistake but can't put his hand up to it and sort something out, instead just fobs off customer, i.e shite cusomter service.
Like I said look around and it's easy to see the real quality tuners around...
#142
Originally Posted by Ima-Racing500
The point being that the GT35 is a shite turbo on a YB
GT35 is fine on a YB if the engine is specced properly, end of!
#143
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: essex
Posts: 3,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
component failure is the cause of engine failure (regardless of cause)
Dan I was not saying that at all
also what evidence has been shown to me?
If the real reasons were examined, before the slating began, then maybe opinions would be different.
All tuners get slated whether on or off here so make your own minds up. [/quote]
Dan I was not saying that at all
also what evidence has been shown to me?
If the real reasons were examined, before the slating began, then maybe opinions would be different.
All tuners get slated whether on or off here so make your own minds up. [/quote]
#144
But if the customer comes in and says i want 600bhp lets go for it...all you can do is what the customer wants..this kinda BHP 550 plus aint never gonna be reliable for long.
#146
Advanced PassionFord User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes a grand turbo Dan...aslong as you stay at around 28psi and 550bhp.... After you get issues.
Remember that RR 550bhp would equate to 600plus on a dyno....and Ians probably around 650bhp
So no less powerful than Martins engine with that turbo i beleive????Could he have turned the boost up more???Karls aswell is on one aint he???Only seen a RR sheet for 600bhp aswell.
Remember that RR 550bhp would equate to 600plus on a dyno....and Ians probably around 650bhp
So no less powerful than Martins engine with that turbo i beleive????Could he have turned the boost up more???Karls aswell is on one aint he???Only seen a RR sheet for 600bhp aswell.
#147
Remember that RR 550bhp would equate to 600plus on a dyno....and Ians probably around 650bhp
And I do not beleive Ian engine was 650bhp at the fly on pump fuel from a high compression engine!! Well it might it the once before it goes bang!!
Use some sense, look at Rods and Prokie's engine as a guide...
#148
Advanced PassionFord User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep Porkies is a dynoed 600bhp at what boost more than 28psi????In car around 550bhp.
Rods the same.
Please tell me that cossie400's cxar is specced wrong along with Ians..as they all produce around the same BHP...so i think that shoots your theories Dan!
Rods the same.
Please tell me that cossie400's cxar is specced wrong along with Ians..as they all produce around the same BHP...so i think that shoots your theories Dan!
#149
Originally Posted by Ima-Racing500
Yep Porkies is a dynoed 600bhp at what boost more than 28psi????In car around 550bhp.
Rods the same.
Please tell me that cossie400's cxar is specced wrong along with Ians..as they all produce around the same BHP...so i think that shoots your theories Dan!
Rods the same.
Please tell me that cossie400's cxar is specced wrong along with Ians..as they all produce around the same BHP...so i think that shoots your theories Dan!
#150
Originally Posted by ian m
and Tony @ Turbosystems are the ONLY 2 garages that i have never heard any complaints about
Very sorry to here your bad news Ian..... like many I don't personally know you, but I can certainly sympathise. What ever you do, I hope you are eventually pleased!
#151
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
Phil,
Ian's engine made 576bhp (on Paul's rollers ) @ 27/8psi, this was the supposed limit of the boost due to the (alleged 8.9:1 ) c/r. However, it super-spiked at 35psi due to the wastegate's poor design and complete inability to release excess boost at high gas speeds and subsequently the engine lunched itself. It had all the right bits, just a very poor wastegate design.
Ian's engine made 576bhp (on Paul's rollers ) @ 27/8psi, this was the supposed limit of the boost due to the (alleged 8.9:1 ) c/r. However, it super-spiked at 35psi due to the wastegate's poor design and complete inability to release excess boost at high gas speeds and subsequently the engine lunched itself. It had all the right bits, just a very poor wastegate design.
#152
Advanced PassionFord User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mike i know what it made and know the actual comp ratio....BUT i must say i am stunned by your input really i only used to see you as a defender not a stirrer!
#154
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
Been hangin' around you too long .
If something is blatantly obviously and fundementally wrong, then I would not defend it. Just like a (eventually ) acknowledged that Dan had a fair point about the install probs he had with Harvey's mechanics (who no longer work there, with one of them having been sacked - take note Dan ).
If something is blatantly obviously and fundementally wrong, then I would not defend it. Just like a (eventually ) acknowledged that Dan had a fair point about the install probs he had with Harvey's mechanics (who no longer work there, with one of them having been sacked - take note Dan ).
#155
Mike,
Let not start on about mine!!LOL Install was shite and so was the engine build when it came to attention to detail, like leaking sump, countless fooked threads (inlet and exhaust manifold were hanging off!!LOL)which needed helicoling. Which lead to me taking it out and try and sort it with help from a local garage. Engine failed from what , who knows why and who's if anybody's fault it was. But at the end of the day it come back to why I had to take the engine out in the first place etc etc. why I was contanstly trying to sort it out when ever the bodged piece of crap was given back to me etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc.
Don't care what has changed at SCS but these companies WILL do a better quality of work all day long everyday of the year IMO (and deep down I reckon you may even agree with me!!LOL ):
Reyland, Zoo, Karl @ NMS, Stu/Kenny @ MSD
Let not start on about mine!!LOL Install was shite and so was the engine build when it came to attention to detail, like leaking sump, countless fooked threads (inlet and exhaust manifold were hanging off!!LOL)which needed helicoling. Which lead to me taking it out and try and sort it with help from a local garage. Engine failed from what , who knows why and who's if anybody's fault it was. But at the end of the day it come back to why I had to take the engine out in the first place etc etc. why I was contanstly trying to sort it out when ever the bodged piece of crap was given back to me etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc.
Don't care what has changed at SCS but these companies WILL do a better quality of work all day long everyday of the year IMO (and deep down I reckon you may even agree with me!!LOL ):
Reyland, Zoo, Karl @ NMS, Stu/Kenny @ MSD
#156
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Essex... and Birmingham!
Posts: 21,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by cossymad
porkie wrote;
If it goes bang either....
a. We will not find out
b. It would not be anybodies fault
I disagree, I'm going to kick the living shit out of mine and I expect it to be 101% reliable and I bet it is as well. I would not have spent the money if I didn't think it would last.... that would be stupid in my opinion!
a. We will not find out
b. It would not be anybodies fault
b. So would Mike
You think THAT would be able to stay a secret??? are you smoking crack???
#159
Originally Posted by Ima-Racing500
Dan....out of interest if say one of the tuners you big up fucked up for somebody else,would you then join in and give them a kicking?...