Ford Sierra/Sapphire/RS500 Cosworth This forum is for discussion of all things pertaining to the Ford Sierra Cosworth.

Turbosport.net clutch/ flywheel?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22-02-2018, 05:34 PM
  #1  
5hane
I'm Finding My Feet Here Now
Thread Starter
 
5hane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 106
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default Turbosport.net clutch/ flywheel?

Hello,

wondering if anyone has any experience with the turbosport.net lightweight clutch/ flywheel combinations?

The cars main purpose is to be used for track days, but i will want to drive to and from the track. As well as Nurburgring trips, they weigh 2.5 kg which is very light compared to standard.

They seem to be very good value, and whilst my engine is apart i would like to get the crank/ clutch and front pulley balanced, so seems a good time to invest!





Thanks!
Old 22-02-2018, 05:41 PM
  #2  
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!

 
Caddyshack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Guildford
Posts: 10,841
Received 1,031 Likes on 944 Posts
Default

Every time I have asked Mark Shead about light flywheels he only ever says 2wd standard or early escos 4x4 which leads me to believe you don't need the lighter ones at all. My 2.2 stroker will run 8000rpm max I think and 630bhp, he still says the same flywheel
Old 22-02-2018, 05:52 PM
  #3  
5hane
I'm Finding My Feet Here Now
Thread Starter
 
5hane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 106
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Fair enough! cant argue with that!

What clutch will you be using?
Old 22-02-2018, 07:00 PM
  #4  
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!

 
Caddyshack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Guildford
Posts: 10,841
Received 1,031 Likes on 944 Posts
Default

I have the helix high clam setup from Reyland
Old 22-02-2018, 08:20 PM
  #5  
Adam-M
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Adam-M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Scotland
Posts: 3,120
Received 315 Likes on 288 Posts
Default

I think cars with lightweight flywheels drive horrible
Old 22-02-2018, 09:14 PM
  #6  
cossynut2
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
cossynut2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Holbury,Southampton
Posts: 4,562
Received 393 Likes on 358 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Adam-M
I think cars with lightweight flywheels drive horrible
I have had no issues with my lightened flywheel/Helix 6 paddle clutch set up.
My 2wd Saff drives/accelerates nicely.
What do you mean by drives horrible?
Old 23-02-2018, 09:00 AM
  #7  
cossie2
Regular Contributor
 
cossie2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Croatia
Posts: 287
Received 30 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Adam-M
I think cars with lightweight flywheels drive horrible
true...had one with twin plate clutch set up,,all the time you need to rev it up...it is good for track but if you use it daily it is not good

Trending Topics

Old 23-02-2018, 09:14 AM
  #8  
Adam-M
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Adam-M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Scotland
Posts: 3,120
Received 315 Likes on 288 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cossynut2
I have had no issues with my lightened flywheel/Helix 6 paddle clutch set up.
My 2wd Saff drives/accelerates nicely.
What do you mean by drives horrible?
Is yours a lightweight one like on the post or a lightened standard flywheel I.e still a heavy bugger but had a kilo or two shaved off?

I think pulling away and gear changes aren’t smooth and need lots or revs and cars seem to bog down easier on launch as less inertia.
Old 23-02-2018, 09:58 PM
  #9  
cossynut2
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
cossynut2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Holbury,Southampton
Posts: 4,562
Received 393 Likes on 358 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Adam-M
Is yours a lightweight one like on the post or a lightened standard flywheel I.e still a heavy bugger but had a kilo or two shaved off?

I think pulling away and gear changes aren’t smooth and need lots or revs and cars seem to bog down easier on launch as less inertia.
Mine is a Reyland one, lightened standard one. If you came for a drive in mine you would see it has no downsides.
Old 24-02-2018, 06:55 AM
  #10  
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!

 
Caddyshack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Guildford
Posts: 10,841
Received 1,031 Likes on 944 Posts
Default

The Reyland ones are 7.7kg and 5kg, the turbosport one (pictured)is 2.3k but they do a heavier one, the standard is around 11kg to 12kg
Old 24-02-2018, 09:00 AM
  #11  
cossie2
Regular Contributor
 
cossie2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Croatia
Posts: 287
Received 30 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

7.7 kg is more than good,right now i have that one,before i had 4.5 kg....bad decision..
Old 24-02-2018, 09:34 AM
  #12  
cossynut2
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
cossynut2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Holbury,Southampton
Posts: 4,562
Received 393 Likes on 358 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Caddyshack
The Reyland ones are 7.7kg and 5kg, the turbosport one (pictured)is 2.3k but they do a heavier one, the standard is around 11kg to 12kg
I can't remember which one I got from Reyland but it certainly works well with my set-up.
Old 24-02-2018, 11:17 AM
  #13  
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!

 
Caddyshack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Guildford
Posts: 10,841
Received 1,031 Likes on 944 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cossynut2
I can't remember which one I got from Reyland but it certainly works well with my set-up.
That's good to know, I think the key is keeping some weight on there and not going silly with it.
Old 25-02-2018, 10:25 PM
  #14  
markk
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (2)
 
markk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lancs
Posts: 10,638
Received 104 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

While the mass is important, what is more important is the location of the mass.

No one can argue with physics (though they probably will on this site).

F=ma.
If you want to accelerate the mass plays a huge part. The same goes for negative aceleration.
Why do people lighten vehicle weight again?

Last edited by markk; 25-02-2018 at 10:28 PM.
The following users liked this post:
turbotrev (26-02-2018)
Old 26-02-2018, 05:26 PM
  #15  
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!

 
Caddyshack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Guildford
Posts: 10,841
Received 1,031 Likes on 944 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by markk
While the mass is important, what is more important is the location of the mass.

No one can argue with physics (though they probably will on this site).

F=ma.
If you want to accelerate the mass plays a huge part. The same goes for negative aceleration.
Why do people lighten vehicle weight again?
So, based on experience what weight would you put on?

Totally on board with adding lightness (currently swapping every bolt I can for titanium)
Old 26-02-2018, 05:34 PM
  #16  
markk
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (2)
 
markk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lancs
Posts: 10,638
Received 104 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Caddyshack;6763787]So, based on experience what weight would you put on?<br /><br />Totally on board with adding lightness (currently swapping every bolt I can for titanium)[\quote]

All depends on application. For me, very little traffic work, but still behaves extremely well on the rally car at less that 3kg plus twin plate clutch. Engine acceleration counts. On a road car, pleasant manners are needed. Maximum aceleration isn't always needed. The MoI can be on the outside of the flywheel and still be lowish weight.Once at higher engine speeds the MoI becomes less important.I'd be going half way or std weight for a car I had to drive. For a car I drive because i want to then its light everytime.

Last edited by markk; 26-02-2018 at 05:35 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Caddyshack (26-02-2018)
Old 26-02-2018, 06:04 PM
  #17  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Caddyshack
Every time I have asked Mark Shead about light flywheels he only ever says 2wd standard or early escos 4x4 which leads me to believe you don't need the lighter ones at all. My 2.2 stroker will run 8000rpm max I think and 630bhp, he still says the same flywheel
That’s fine with a 240mm standard size clutch but with the twin plate clutches most are a smaller size hence the lighter smaller flywheel

How can lighter be worse?

Cheers Paul
Old 26-02-2018, 06:06 PM
  #18  
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!

 
Caddyshack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Guildford
Posts: 10,841
Received 1,031 Likes on 944 Posts
Default

A car runs a flywheel for a reason and it's not just to mount a clutch on.
Old 26-02-2018, 06:09 PM
  #19  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

I know.

But how is lighter worse?

I had a lightweight ttv flywheel in my car and it was no worse than a standard flywheel

Plus side was it was over half the weight and will put less stress on the crank esp at high revs

Cheers Paul
Old 26-02-2018, 06:22 PM
  #20  
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!

 
Caddyshack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Guildford
Posts: 10,841
Received 1,031 Likes on 944 Posts
Default

Yeah, I think half may be the limit before the drivability becomes a problem. I drove a mates 911 RSR with a very light flywheel and on a hill start it just wanted to stall or fry the clutch....I think that is the problem with going too light. I suspect anything under 5kg might become a pain in traffic
Old 26-02-2018, 06:26 PM
  #21  
markk
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (2)
 
markk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lancs
Posts: 10,638
Received 104 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

My triple plate with a 2.5kg was no bother. But, i knew how to drive it.
My mum would struggle though. Change it for a heavy flywheel and my mum could drive it.
Thats the difference.
Old 26-02-2018, 06:30 PM
  #22  
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!

 
Caddyshack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Guildford
Posts: 10,841
Received 1,031 Likes on 944 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by markk
My triple plate with a 2.5kg was no bother. But, i knew how to drive it.
My mum would struggle though. Change it for a heavy flywheel and my mum could drive it.
Thats the difference.
That probably sums it up.

There is a nice satisfaction from rev matching, sustained changes, a double de clutch and smooth driving but to the average muggle it would be a pain if you HAD to drive that way although if you can it is enjoyable even on an everyday car.

Last edited by Caddyshack; 26-02-2018 at 06:32 PM.
Old 26-02-2018, 06:45 PM
  #23  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotrev
I know.

But how is lighter worse?

I had a lightweight ttv flywheel in my car and it was no worse than a standard flywheel

Plus side was it was over half the weight and will put less stress on the crank esp at high revs

Cheers Paul
The flywheel stores the energy through its weight a YB is hopeless with a light weight flywheel unless it is on very short gearing which lowers 1sth gear so you can pull away

Mark
The following users liked this post:
Caddyshack (26-02-2018)
Old 26-02-2018, 07:03 PM
  #24  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

But in reality does the driveability matter that much?
Especially with paddle clutches anyway, they all pull away horrible.

And also for most people these ain’t daily drivers, these cars cover a few thousand miles tops and are normally tuned up hence needing race style clutches... reliability over driveability??

Cheers Paul
Old 26-02-2018, 07:04 PM
  #25  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mark Shead
The flywheel stores the energy through its weight a YB is hopeless with a light weight flywheel unless it is on very short gearing which lowers 1sth gear so you can pull away

Mark
I never noticed any difference when changing to a lightweight wheel though?

And why would twin/triple plate clutches come with such lightweight flywheels?

Cheers Paul
Old 26-02-2018, 07:09 PM
  #26  
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!

 
Caddyshack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Guildford
Posts: 10,841
Received 1,031 Likes on 944 Posts
Default

When I drive a car for fun it has to be nice to drive.

As you say they pull away horrible, maybe that's the flywheel weight being the problem?

I don't think your flywheel is as light Trev, as said half standard is probably the limit but I suspect 2-3kg might ruin a road car.

I have a paddle on normal flywheel and that is like a standard car to drive, I just try not to slip it as I think that is not good for them.

Last edited by Caddyshack; 26-02-2018 at 07:11 PM.
Old 26-02-2018, 07:17 PM
  #27  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotrev
I never noticed any difference when changing to a lightweight wheel though?

And why would twin/triple plate clutches come with such lightweight flywheels?

Cheers Paul
It was not light then lol.

Mark
Old 26-02-2018, 09:21 PM
  #28  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Caddyshack
When I drive a car for fun it has to be nice to drive.

As you say they pull away horrible, maybe that's the flywheel weight being the problem?

I don't think your flywheel is as light Trev, as said half standard is probably the limit but I suspect 2-3kg might ruin a road car.

I have a paddle on normal flywheel and that is like a standard car to drive, I just try not to slip it as I think that is not good for them.
I meant as in every paddle clutch, they all judder when you pull away and are moving slow in traffic.
Mine was no worse after fitting a really light flywheel.
But we all need this race clutches fitting due to the rise in hp.
It’s nver gonna drive like a nice normal road car.

My old ttv flywheel was 4.6kgs and felt the same as a standard flywheel.

You can’t compare a race paddle clutch to a normal organic road car clutch, of course they are gonna be different when pulling away in first gear.

Cheers Paul
Old 26-02-2018, 09:22 PM
  #29  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mark Shead
It was not light then lol.

Mark
It was Mark, 4.6 kilos, More than half a standard flywheel weigh.
That’s gotta be kinder to the crank and better for pick up being less rotation mass?

I can’t see a downside from my own experience using one for two years

Cheers Paul

Last edited by turbotrev; 26-02-2018 at 09:24 PM.
Old 26-02-2018, 09:23 PM
  #30  
markk
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (2)
 
markk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lancs
Posts: 10,638
Received 104 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotrev
4.6 kilos.
That’s gotta be kinder to the crank being less rotation mass.

I can’t see a downside from my own experience using one for two years

Cheers Paul
makes no difference to the crank. Its a balanced mass.
Old 26-02-2018, 09:26 PM
  #31  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by markk
makes no difference to the crank. Its a balanced mass.
But a lot less of a rotational mass being my point.

Like for one of the reasons people run alloy cam pulleys

Cheers Paul
Old 26-02-2018, 09:52 PM
  #32  
markk
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (2)
 
markk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lancs
Posts: 10,638
Received 104 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotrev
But a lot less of a rotational mass being my point.

Like for one of the reasons people run alloy cam pulleys

Cheers Paul
lol, alloy cam pulleys, yes people really run them to reduce inertia. Bit of bling maybe, very little other reasons.

Mass only affects the rate of aceleration whether that be positive or negative. If it was out of balance it would affect the crank.
Old 26-02-2018, 09:59 PM
  #33  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

But a light flywheel would reduce inertia also so that can only be a good thing??

Cheers Paul
Old 27-02-2018, 07:19 AM
  #34  
Adam-M
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Adam-M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Scotland
Posts: 3,120
Received 315 Likes on 288 Posts
Default

There no doubt that there’s a performance gain I.e revs faster, totally beleive they can make it easier to bog down ( Subaru’s have flywheels like brake discs and are worst car to launch)

My civic type r has a factory fitted lightweight flywheel and pulling and away and gear changes are a pain to get right and smooth.

If it was a track car then wouldn’t bother me
Old 27-02-2018, 04:13 PM
  #35  
turbospud1
I'm Finding My Feet Here Now
 
turbospud1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

it certainly makes it rev faster,drives just like markk describes
got that setup,ap 7 1/4 twin plate paddle clutch

Last edited by Turbosystems; 27-02-2018 at 04:25 PM.
Old 27-02-2018, 05:45 PM
  #36  
cossynut2
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
cossynut2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Holbury,Southampton
Posts: 4,562
Received 393 Likes on 358 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotrev
I meant as in every paddle clutch, they all judder when you pull away and are moving slow in traffic.
Mine was no worse after fitting a really light flywheel.
But we all need this race clutches fitting due to the rise in hp.
It’s nver gonna drive like a nice normal road car.

My old ttv flywheel was 4.6kgs and felt the same as a standard flywheel.

You can’t compare a race paddle clutch to a normal organic road car clutch, of course they are gonna be different when pulling away in first gear.

Cheers Paul
I am fitting a concentric hydraulic clutch conversion on my 2wd Saff which has a lightened flywheel and a Helix 6 paddle clutch. Supposed to make quite a difference to the feel of the clutch.
The following users liked this post:
turbotrev (28-02-2018)
Old 27-02-2018, 06:41 PM
  #37  
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!

 
Caddyshack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Guildford
Posts: 10,841
Received 1,031 Likes on 944 Posts
Default

I have a helix 6 with Reyland high clamp, it is a bit heavier than my 1.9gti but not bad for a 500lbft capable system, I had the centre push then swapped to side push.
Old 28-02-2018, 01:04 PM
  #38  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Because I’m upping the engine power more this year I too will be going twin plate with a light flywheel and centre push hyd clutch setup.
Don’t think I’ll risk the turbosport one though, I’ll prob go ap

Cheers Paul
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ricky_3dr
General Car Related Discussion.
18
09-01-2006 03:33 PM
Turbo lag
General Car Related Discussion.
15
20-03-2005 12:57 PM
GAZ W
General Car Related Discussion.
17
16-12-2004 10:41 PM
RS2000CUSTOM
General Car Related Discussion.
6
21-07-2004 07:26 AM
kay2
Pictures, video & Photoshop Forum
2
27-04-2004 08:44 AM



Quick Reply: Turbosport.net clutch/ flywheel?



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:15 AM.