GT2560R / GT28R any one fitted or used them??
#1
GT2560R / GT28R any one fitted or used them??
Just wondering what people opinions of them were?
I want a turbo that can flow enough for between 250 and 280 brake that has minimal lag and good spool up time. I have heard a few contradicting stories about stage 3 turbos and t34's. Im aiming for 240bhp realistically but secretly hoping for a few donkeys more.
Im not after nothing and then a big bang @ 4-5000rpm, im looking for smooth power delivery and torque, but something that pulls hard to 6500rpm instead of tailing off etc.
I'm looking at using a kent cvh34 with my set up, any ideas how these cope with high(ish) boost?
Any power curves people have would be great
Cheers
Rob,
I want a turbo that can flow enough for between 250 and 280 brake that has minimal lag and good spool up time. I have heard a few contradicting stories about stage 3 turbos and t34's. Im aiming for 240bhp realistically but secretly hoping for a few donkeys more.
Im not after nothing and then a big bang @ 4-5000rpm, im looking for smooth power delivery and torque, but something that pulls hard to 6500rpm instead of tailing off etc.
I'm looking at using a kent cvh34 with my set up, any ideas how these cope with high(ish) boost?
Any power curves people have would be great
Cheers
Rob,
Trending Topics
#8
Lol, just want to get a few comparisons and hints on fitting it before i take the plunge.
Nissan s15's seem to be the biggest donators of them, unless i find a new one for good money. Went to see one a while ago which was fairly knackered.
Rob,
Nissan s15's seem to be the biggest donators of them, unless i find a new one for good money. Went to see one a while ago which was fairly knackered.
Rob,
#10
me?
It was (lol)
Standard bore
Standard cam (i think)
Standard compression
Standard head
Stage 2 t3 (pretty much like the 2wd cossy turbo)
Scorpion exhaust
Pretty standard lol
And made 185bhp and 205 ft.lbs @18psi
My new engine is
standard skimmed mahles 7.7:1 Cr
DIY ported head with standard valves
matched inlet and exhaust manifolds
Blue printed bottom end
forged h-section conrods with the obligatory arp's
possibly a kent CVH34 cam
And possible the gt28r
All on efi.
Pass on what power it will make, just more than it did before lol, Maybe 250? and similar torque (unless i've done a really really bad job on the head )
Rob,
It was (lol)
Standard bore
Standard cam (i think)
Standard compression
Standard head
Stage 2 t3 (pretty much like the 2wd cossy turbo)
Scorpion exhaust
Pretty standard lol
And made 185bhp and 205 ft.lbs @18psi
My new engine is
standard skimmed mahles 7.7:1 Cr
DIY ported head with standard valves
matched inlet and exhaust manifolds
Blue printed bottom end
forged h-section conrods with the obligatory arp's
possibly a kent CVH34 cam
And possible the gt28r
All on efi.
Pass on what power it will make, just more than it did before lol, Maybe 250? and similar torque (unless i've done a really really bad job on the head )
Rob,
Last edited by Rob_DOHC; 22-01-2011 at 02:25 PM.
#13
PassionFord Post Whore!!
#15
PassionFord Post Whore!!
tbh tho is it really worth spending 1k on a gt turbo for that sort of power ?
i would fit something like this to a nice manifold.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Turbo-Charger-...item1c18a20785
i would fit something like this to a nice manifold.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Turbo-Charger-...item1c18a20785
#17
yea, the subaru range was another option, the to4b and the IHI turbos etc. Think they do a small one VF30??? that looks fairly ideal as well. But from what i have heard gt2560's have slightly better spool, a bit more head room and are easily found......
I don't want to be spending a grand. more like 4-700.
Edit, the VF23 seems like something good to look into.
http://www.surreyscoobies.co.uk/index.php?page=Turbos
Rob,
I don't want to be spending a grand. more like 4-700.
Edit, the VF23 seems like something good to look into.
http://www.surreyscoobies.co.uk/index.php?page=Turbos
Rob,
Last edited by Rob_DOHC; 22-01-2011 at 03:23 PM.
#18
Balls Deep!
iTrader: (4)
Rob why have you gone for such a low CR, are you going for 300bhp+ at some point mate?
Last edited by Karlos G; 22-01-2011 at 04:21 PM.
#19
Rob why have you gone for such a low CR, are you going for 300bhp+ at some point mate?
No, probably not. i can't be fucked to chase numbers. They came up for a really good price, and at the time i couldn't justify the price of forged pistons, and now i have bought them i can't justify buying more
I dont really understand your recommendation here Gary, the GT2854R will be slightly laggier and flows for less BHP, unless I have misread the compressor/turbine maps?
Essentially i want 250-280brake with minimal spool up time and lag. If i could find a turbo with the same characteristics of the stage 2 t3 but with a greater flow potential it would be a done deal. But i get im going to have to compromise some where.....
Rob,
#20
Balls Deep!
iTrader: (4)
lol
Fair play Rob, will just be a bit laggier and need more boost to make the same power as a stock CR engine.
The turbine maps show the GT2854R flowing more yes, but thats exhuast side so more flow = more lag.
If you look at the compressor maps the GT2854R will only flow for about 275bhp flat out and the GT2560R will flow just under 350bhp.
So, less BHP and more lag vs more BHP and less lag..
Fair play Rob, will just be a bit laggier and need more boost to make the same power as a stock CR engine.
The turbine maps show the GT2854R flowing more yes, but thats exhuast side so more flow = more lag.
If you look at the compressor maps the GT2854R will only flow for about 275bhp flat out and the GT2560R will flow just under 350bhp.
So, less BHP and more lag vs more BHP and less lag..
#21
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 12,748
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My turbo is a GT2871R which is quite big for a 16 CVH. Bit laggy but the best has yet to come from it as it's not been fully mapped yet. It is not ideal for 240-280 BHP however as it's too big.
#22
PassionFord Post Whore!!
karlos ,theres not alot in it on the exhaust side . why would you want a 350hp capable compressor if the aim is 250ish? the bigger the comp the more lag you get too
like i said i wouldnt buy one anyway ! far to much out lay for that kind of power
like i said i wouldnt buy one anyway ! far to much out lay for that kind of power
#23
PassionFord Post Whore!!
#27
PassionFORD Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmm if you are not number chasing a worked Cossie T3 would be really good coming in but couldn't tell you if it will start getting lethargic later on just thinking that a GT28 variant may be on the laggy side. GT2560 may be the better turbo to get the most power without having to work it so hard and be pulling well up top too but again couldn't say how laggy it would be. You can work the T3 though up to about 25psi or so from what I understand and it will still be OK.
#28
Balls Deep!
iTrader: (4)
Just my thoughts of course!
Last edited by Karlos G; 23-01-2011 at 01:24 PM.
#29
Cheers for the ideas lads, think it will be something from the IHI range or the GT2560, purely for availability's sake, new and used.
Gary i think our aims are a bit different mate, your after a shit lot of power and don't mind paying for it, im after a lot less power, but minimal lag etc, which i don't mind paying for.
Essentially im trying to decide if its worth the extra money over a stage 3 t3. If it comes on boost 500-1000 rpm sooner and gives me a much larger power band and hence a much better fast road car, im happy.
Rob,
Gary i think our aims are a bit different mate, your after a shit lot of power and don't mind paying for it, im after a lot less power, but minimal lag etc, which i don't mind paying for.
Essentially im trying to decide if its worth the extra money over a stage 3 t3. If it comes on boost 500-1000 rpm sooner and gives me a much larger power band and hence a much better fast road car, im happy.
Rob,
#30
Hmm if you are not number chasing a worked Cossie T3 would be really good coming in but couldn't tell you if it will start getting lethargic later on just thinking that a GT28 variant may be on the laggy side. GT2560 may be the better turbo to get the most power without having to work it so hard and be pulling well up top too but again couldn't say how laggy it would be. You can work the T3 though up to about 25psi or so from what I understand and it will still be OK.
A happy compromise for me is 250ish bhp with power coming in strongly from 2500-3000 rpm. I don't know if this is possible.
Rob,
#31
PassionFORD Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's obviously the best case scenario with a really drivable engine. I reckon the T3 or the GT25 could do that but for future's sake I'd probably go for the GT25 more scope for power later on.
#32
PassionFord Post Whore!!
rob my old cvh made 261hp @ 16psi on a stg3 t3.
started boosting about 2600rpm and made peak power around 6200 iirc
had a ported head
newman cam and solid lifters
gotech
a pair of my manifolds
8-5-1 cr.
started boosting about 2600rpm and made peak power around 6200 iirc
had a ported head
newman cam and solid lifters
gotech
a pair of my manifolds
8-5-1 cr.
#34
PassionFord Post Whore!!
p-s thats all the boost i could run to keep it safe on the standard rods.
#38
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Hello Rob,
The main bottleneck your engine combination has is the standard cylider head.
Sure one can just keep increasing the boost, but this has diminishing returns.
A more efficient turbo may help somewhat - but not much.
The standard head (and inlet manifold) do not flow enough air to make the power you are looking for (at a reasonable boost level).
Crazycage made 261 hp at just 16 psi boost.
Don't spend your hard earned dollars on a "better" turbo. You certainly will need a .48 turbine housing to get above 230 hp.
Spend your money on the head flow and inlet manifold flow. I also suggest having these mods done by someone who knows what they are doing. Just making the ports larger doesn't mean anything.
I have spent significant time developing cvh heads - there is a significant amount of power properly reshaping the ports. I would say a gain of 50 hp at 15 psi boost is very possible with a properly modified cylinder head.
It is true that big flow numbers do not mean everything, but poor flow will ensure poor power output.
Just my 2 cents.
The main bottleneck your engine combination has is the standard cylider head.
Sure one can just keep increasing the boost, but this has diminishing returns.
A more efficient turbo may help somewhat - but not much.
The standard head (and inlet manifold) do not flow enough air to make the power you are looking for (at a reasonable boost level).
Crazycage made 261 hp at just 16 psi boost.
Don't spend your hard earned dollars on a "better" turbo. You certainly will need a .48 turbine housing to get above 230 hp.
Spend your money on the head flow and inlet manifold flow. I also suggest having these mods done by someone who knows what they are doing. Just making the ports larger doesn't mean anything.
I have spent significant time developing cvh heads - there is a significant amount of power properly reshaping the ports. I would say a gain of 50 hp at 15 psi boost is very possible with a properly modified cylinder head.
It is true that big flow numbers do not mean everything, but poor flow will ensure poor power output.
Just my 2 cents.
#40
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
A garrett T3 .48 turbine with 60 trim compressor will be very adaquate for the 250 to 280 hp range.
If money is no object, than a roller bearing turbo would be best.
I am not sure DIY ported head with standard valves is not a bottleneck.
I am sure it still will be.
If money is no object, than a roller bearing turbo would be best.
I am not sure DIY ported head with standard valves is not a bottleneck.
I am sure it still will be.