General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

head gasket failure from Detonation ( Data Log added today )

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 03:15 PM
  #1  
leecavturbo's Avatar
leecavturbo
Thread Starter
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,055
Likes: 0
Default head gasket failure from Detonation ( Data Log added today )

would a sharpe edge/point on a piston crown bring on Det ?
i checked the data logger and there was no afr/charge temp issues
and timing was mega safe, the piston valve cutouts had been remodelled due to a earlier valve / piston collison which mashed the pistons, now i have a dead head gasket which looks like det damage, and on that cylinder/piston there was a sharpe edge/overhang from where the cutouts had been dremmelled is that the possible cause for det?
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 03:39 PM
  #2  
Garage19's Avatar
Garage19
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 1
From: Nr Ipswich
Default

Yes. Could be creating a hot spot leading to det.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 03:57 PM
  #3  
Mark Shead's Avatar
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,472
Likes: 223
From: Marlow Bucks
Default Re: head gasket failure from Detonation

Originally Posted by leecavturbo
would a sharpe edge/point on a piston crown bring on Det ?
i checked the data logger and there was no afr/charge temp issues
and timing was mega safe, the piston valve cutouts had been remodelled due to a earlier valve / piston collison which mashed the pistons, now i have a dead head gasket which looks like det damage, and on that cylinder/piston there was a sharpe edge/overhang from where the cutouts had been dremmelled is that the possible cause for det?
How do you know the timing was safe?

Mark
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 04:44 PM
  #4  
leecavturbo's Avatar
leecavturbo
Thread Starter
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,055
Likes: 0
Default Re: head gasket failure from Detonation

Originally Posted by madevelopments
Originally Posted by leecavturbo
would a sharpe edge/point on a piston crown bring on Det ?
i checked the data logger and there was no afr/charge temp issues
and timing was mega safe, the piston valve cutouts had been remodelled due to a earlier valve / piston collison which mashed the pistons, now i have a dead head gasket which looks like det damage, and on that cylinder/piston there was a sharpe edge/overhang from where the cutouts had been dremmelled is that the possible cause for det?
How do you know the timing was safe?

Mark
it was mapped by a reputable tuner including det cans and had a small amount of advance reduced from optimum whilst i was still running in this engine ?
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 04:48 PM
  #5  
Mark Shead's Avatar
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,472
Likes: 223
From: Marlow Bucks
Default Re: head gasket failure from Detonation

Mark[/quote]
it was mapped by a reputable tuner including det cans and had a small amount of advance reduced from optimum whilst i was still running in this engine ?[/quote]

Was the engine mapped at boost before running in,
The way I read it was it was then you ran it in this is the bit I am unsure about as I dont understand the way you worded it.

Mark
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 04:52 PM
  #6  
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 1
Default

Mark, they mapped it on a low boost setting, and it was still on that low boost setting during running in IIRC
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 04:55 PM
  #7  
Mark Shead's Avatar
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,472
Likes: 223
From: Marlow Bucks
Default

Originally Posted by chip-3door
Mark, they mapped it on a low boost setting, and it was still on that low boost setting during running in IIRC
So the engine was run at max load at max rpm but running low boost.

Mark
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 04:58 PM
  #8  
leecavturbo's Avatar
leecavturbo
Thread Starter
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,055
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by madevelopments
Originally Posted by chip-3door
Mark, they mapped it on a low boost setting, and it was still on that low boost setting during running in IIRC
So the engine was run at max load at max rpm but running low boost.

Mark
yes
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 05:00 PM
  #9  
Mark Shead's Avatar
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,472
Likes: 223
From: Marlow Bucks
Default

Originally Posted by leecavturbo
Originally Posted by madevelopments
Originally Posted by chip-3door
Mark, they mapped it on a low boost setting, and it was still on that low boost setting during running in IIRC
So the engine was run at max load at max rpm but running low boost.

Mark
yes
So if it was run that hard why did you need to run it in

Mark
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 05:16 PM
  #10  
leecavturbo's Avatar
leecavturbo
Thread Starter
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,055
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by madevelopments
Originally Posted by leecavturbo
Originally Posted by madevelopments
Originally Posted by chip-3door
Mark, they mapped it on a low boost setting, and it was still on that low boost setting during running in IIRC
So the engine was run at max load at max rpm but running low boost.

Mark
yes
So if it was run that hard why did you need to run it in

Mark
it was freshly built, then mapped , i wanted / preferred to run it in on low boost which the mapper seemed to agree with, then return after 500 - 1000 miles or so to make sure there was no problems then full planned boost mapping ?
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 05:18 PM
  #11  
Mark Shead's Avatar
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,472
Likes: 223
From: Marlow Bucks
Default

So it failed before the return trip for mapping, What restrictions where placed on the running in, and what fuel was used for mapping and when the gasket failed.

Mark
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 05:23 PM
  #12  
leecavturbo's Avatar
leecavturbo
Thread Starter
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,055
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by madevelopments
So it failed before the return trip for mapping, What restrictions where placed on the running in, and what fuel was used for mapping and when the gasket failed.

Mark
mapped on regular unleaded and run exclusively on unleaded, restrictions ? none as such, apart from that i am a firm believer in not altering anything i have paid for to be setup, i.e not running any more boost than it was mapped for. etc etc ?????
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 05:27 PM
  #13  
leecavturbo's Avatar
leecavturbo
Thread Starter
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,055
Likes: 0
Default

Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 05:31 PM
  #14  
Mark Shead's Avatar
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,472
Likes: 223
From: Marlow Bucks
Default

What was you doing when it failed,
Also did you drive the car while mapping.

Mark
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 05:32 PM
  #15  
Mark Shead's Avatar
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,472
Likes: 223
From: Marlow Bucks
Default

More picts of pistons and head would be good

Mark
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 05:38 PM
  #16  
leecavturbo's Avatar
leecavturbo
Thread Starter
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,055
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by madevelopments
More picts of pistons and head would be good

Mark
piston has 6-7 very small det marks at the exhaust side, so has the head on cylinder No2
was driving on boost , probably very near full throttle , approx 4000rpm 4th gear had accelerated at this level for merely 4-5secs at the time of failure, all upto to normal running temps etc !
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 05:44 PM
  #17  
ECU Monitor Enthusiast's Avatar
ECU Monitor Enthusiast
BANNED
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 12,483
Likes: 0
From: Wiltshire
Default

A possibility....

Looks like to me, the headgasket has been squashed due to incorrect
head torque procedure causing a sharp edge leading to eventual gasket
failure. Det may be there but I suspect this is only a result of the failure
and not the original cause.

Just my 2 cents worth, still bad shame
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 05:47 PM
  #18  
Mark Shead's Avatar
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,472
Likes: 223
From: Marlow Bucks
Default

Any other marks on other cyl,
Have you checked the head and block to make sure its straight, You can damage a engine also if the gasket has blow,
Has it been using oil or water since rebiuld.

Mark
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 05:57 PM
  #19  
leecavturbo's Avatar
leecavturbo
Thread Starter
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,055
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by madevelopments
Any other marks on other cyl,
Have you checked the head and block to make sure its straight, You can damage a engine also if the gasket has blow,
Has it been using oil or water since rebiuld.

Mark
no oil / water usage, the head was checked and skimmed cus it was not perfect before fitting , i had a tick when on boost for a week or so, which i could not put my finger on ( like a exhaust gasket tick ) but sounded like a fooked cv too ! i returned the car to my mapper, he ran it listening for the tick but he could not here it, he road tested the car too, but he did not find a fault , he decided to do some more mapping while i was there and increase the boost to 1 bar as the engine had done some more miles since, but still not run my planned full boost figure! on the way home the tick was still evident however he had run full load,full rpm runs without incident so i attributed the tick to a drivetrain problem that i would investigate or would fail then i could repair it, but it would appear it was the head gasket ?
first mapping.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 06:13 PM
  #20  
Mark Shead's Avatar
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,472
Likes: 223
From: Marlow Bucks
Default

So how was the 1 bar boost map done,
What you will need to do is fix then chack for any other faults then return to the mapper, Then biuld boost up slowly and check the mapping to be safe,
Then do the same as when it went wrong again with mapper carefully check for safety.

Mark
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 06:18 PM
  #21  
leecavturbo's Avatar
leecavturbo
Thread Starter
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,055
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by madevelopments
So how was the 1 bar boost map done,
What you will need to do is fix then chack for any other faults then return to the mapper, Then biuld boost up slowly and check the mapping to be safe,
Then do the same as when it went wrong again with mapper carefully check for safety.

Mark
i don't know mapping ,he had the car for approx 1 hour then returned with him saying its now been mapped at 1 bar !, are you saying that not all load points may have been covered ?
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 06:35 PM
  #22  
ECU Monitor Enthusiast's Avatar
ECU Monitor Enthusiast
BANNED
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 12,483
Likes: 0
From: Wiltshire
Default

1 hour for a map even a partial one isnt long enough IMO

Dont discount the headgasket suggestion though
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 06:36 PM
  #23  
Mark Shead's Avatar
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,472
Likes: 223
From: Marlow Bucks
Default

Originally Posted by leecavturbo
Originally Posted by madevelopments
So how was the 1 bar boost map done,
What you will need to do is fix then chack for any other faults then return to the mapper, Then biuld boost up slowly and check the mapping to be safe,
Then do the same as when it went wrong again with mapper carefully check for safety.

Mark
i don't know mapping ,he had the car for approx 1 hour then returned with him saying its now been mapped at 1 bar !, are you saying that not all load points may have been covered ?
For me on Autronic with a car thats already been mapped is plenty of time to cover all the mapping points needed,
Its a pity you didnt drive the car while being mapped then you could tell me what had been done and I could have helped,
Based on the map being said to be very good with what you have said then all you can do is fix then go back and check to see if there is a problem,
There may be another fault some where so be carefull.

Mark
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 06:39 PM
  #24  
leecavturbo's Avatar
leecavturbo
Thread Starter
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,055
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by madevelopments
Originally Posted by leecavturbo
Originally Posted by madevelopments
So how was the 1 bar boost map done,
What you will need to do is fix then chack for any other faults then return to the mapper, Then biuld boost up slowly and check the mapping to be safe,
Then do the same as when it went wrong again with mapper carefully check for safety.

Mark
i don't know mapping ,he had the car for approx 1 hour then returned with him saying its now been mapped at 1 bar !, are you saying that not all load points may have been covered ?
For me on Autronic with a car thats already been mapped is plenty of time to cover all the mapping points needed,
Its a pity you didnt drive the car while being mapped then you could tell me what had been done and I could have helped,
Based on the map being said to be very good with what you have said then all you can do is fix then go back and check to see if there is a problem,
There may be another fault some where so be carefull.

Mark
what are your comments on the spikey piston ? but the others where not ?
and that was the failed cylinder ?
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 06:40 PM
  #25  
leecavturbo's Avatar
leecavturbo
Thread Starter
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,055
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SECS
1 hour for a map even a partial one isnt long enough IMO

Dont discount the headgasket suggestion though
no he had mapped it previously, it was a alteration to map going from .6 to 1 bar !
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 06:45 PM
  #26  
Mark Shead's Avatar
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,472
Likes: 223
From: Marlow Bucks
Default

Originally Posted by SECS
1 hour for a map even a partial one isnt long enough IMO

Dont discount the headgasket suggestion though
Simon he would of only needed to map prob 6 rpm points and 2 extra load table, And would have only prob needed 5 to 10 presses to do this,
1 Hour is easy long enough for a person who know the Ecu and how to map.

Mark
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 07:18 PM
  #27  
DangerousBryan's Avatar
DangerousBryan
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,201
Likes: 21
From: sheffield,s.yorks
Default

i thought nobles only mapped on the rollers? i could be wrong of course.
do you know if it was mapped on the rollers lee or was it done on the road?
bryan
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 08:32 PM
  #28  
davidreader5's Avatar
davidreader5
PassionFord Regular
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 466
Likes: 1
From: south wales
Default

HI,

What do the spark plug's look like (colour etc )

DAVE R.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 09:56 PM
  #29  
leecavturbo's Avatar
leecavturbo
Thread Starter
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,055
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by davidreader5
HI,

What do the spark plug's look like (colour etc )

DAVE R.
perfect
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 03:26 AM
  #30  
PAUL V's Avatar
PAUL V
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 788
Likes: 4
From: shropshire
Default

But is that std head gasket you are running ?
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 08:50 AM
  #31  
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 1
Default

That was a standard gasket yes.

Should be fine at those boost levels though, ive run them with more cylinder pressure than that without failure in the past.

I think simon@SECS may possibly be onto something with the overtorqued theory, ive seen them fail because of that before.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 11:42 AM
  #32  
Chris S's Avatar
Chris S
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
From: SHEFFIELD
Default

i was under the assumpition standard gaskets where to be used with stretch bolts and steel gasketswith studs??
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 04:17 PM
  #33  
leecavturbo's Avatar
leecavturbo
Thread Starter
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,055
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by chip-3door
That was a standard gasket yes.

Should be fine at those boost levels though, ive run them with more cylinder pressure than that without failure in the past.

I think simon@SECS may possibly be onto something with the overtorqued theory, ive seen them fail because of that before.
was not std gasket chip " Spesso " 1.9mm
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 11:07 PM
  #34  
PAUL V's Avatar
PAUL V
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 788
Likes: 4
From: shropshire
Default

Originally Posted by leecavturbo
Originally Posted by chip-3door
That was a standard gasket yes.

Should be fine at those boost levels though, ive run them with more cylinder pressure than that without failure in the past.

I think simon@SECS may possibly be onto something with the overtorqued theory, ive seen them fail because of that before.
was not std gasket chip " Spesso " 1.9mm
I used to run the swindon one on mine as the std composite one used to always blow.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 11:09 PM
  #35  
leecavturbo's Avatar
leecavturbo
Thread Starter
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,055
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PJ ENGINEERING (PROX)
Originally Posted by leecavturbo
Originally Posted by chip-3door
That was a standard gasket yes.

Should be fine at those boost levels though, ive run them with more cylinder pressure than that without failure in the past.

I think simon@SECS may possibly be onto something with the overtorqued theory, ive seen them fail because of that before.
was not std gasket chip " Spesso " 1.9mm
I used to run the swindon one on mine as the std composite one used to always blow.
Spesso was quoted to me as good but lets not blame the gasket me thinks something else to blame
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 11:55 PM
  #36  
PAUL V's Avatar
PAUL V
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 788
Likes: 4
From: shropshire
Default

Originally Posted by leecavturbo
Originally Posted by PJ ENGINEERING (PROX)
Originally Posted by leecavturbo
Originally Posted by chip-3door
That was a standard gasket yes.

Should be fine at those boost levels though, ive run them with more cylinder pressure than that without failure in the past.

I think simon@SECS may possibly be onto something with the overtorqued theory, ive seen them fail because of that before.
was not std gasket chip " Spesso " 1.9mm
I used to run the swindon one on mine as the std composite one used to always blow.
Spesso was quoted to me as good but lets not blame the gasket me thinks something else to blame
I think you have the same problme i had back in 1997 not much info on Turbo LET/EX Engines unlike the Cosworth YB engine. I bult a very strong LET with a T3 on it and the guy who mapped it melted it on the rollers, I just dont think a set up on the rolling road is the right way to try and map any turbo car.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 04:32 PM
  #37  
leecavturbo's Avatar
leecavturbo
Thread Starter
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,055
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PJ ENGINEERING (PROX)
Originally Posted by leecavturbo
Originally Posted by PJ ENGINEERING (PROX)
Originally Posted by leecavturbo
Originally Posted by chip-3door
That was a standard gasket yes.

Should be fine at those boost levels though, ive run them with more cylinder pressure than that without failure in the past.

I think simon@SECS may possibly be onto something with the overtorqued theory, ive seen them fail because of that before.
was not std gasket chip " Spesso " 1.9mm
I used to run the swindon one on mine as the std composite one used to always blow.
Spesso was quoted to me as good but lets not blame the gasket me thinks something else to blame
I think you have the same problme i had back in 1997 not much info on Turbo LET/EX Engines unlike the Cosworth YB engine. I bult a very strong LET with a T3 on it and the guy who mapped it melted it on the rollers, I just dont think a set up on the rolling road is the right way to try and map any turbo car.
my opinion was, if mapped on rollers then it will be safer on the road ? becus in the dyno the load can be greater than that on the road , and the airflow in the cell is less than on the road , therefor more cooling to the intercooler, but i just thought that, what about air pressure to the airfilter, if in the cell there could be less ambient air pressure for intake system to inhale but on the open road plenty making a weak afr ? ? ?
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 06:24 PM
  #38  
ECU Monitor Enthusiast's Avatar
ECU Monitor Enthusiast
BANNED
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 12,483
Likes: 0
From: Wiltshire
Default

Originally Posted by leecavturbo
...Spesso was quoted to me as good but lets not blame the gasket me thinks something else to blame
I wasnt blaming the gasket, more the installation.

Looks like the cylinder ring has been over clamped on the side where
the damage has been caused to me.
This could have been cause by wrong tightening sequence, block
and/or head warped.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 06:30 PM
  #39  
Mark Shead's Avatar
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,472
Likes: 223
From: Marlow Bucks
Default

Originally Posted by leecavturbo
Originally Posted by PJ ENGINEERING (PROX)
Originally Posted by leecavturbo
Originally Posted by PJ ENGINEERING (PROX)
Originally Posted by leecavturbo
Originally Posted by chip-3door
That was a standard gasket yes.

Should be fine at those boost levels though, ive run them with more cylinder pressure than that without failure in the past.

I think simon@SECS may possibly be onto something with the overtorqued theory, ive seen them fail because of that before.
was not std gasket chip " Spesso " 1.9mm
I used to run the swindon one on mine as the std composite one used to always blow.
Spesso was quoted to me as good but lets not blame the gasket me thinks something else to blame
I think you have the same problme i had back in 1997 not much info on Turbo LET/EX Engines unlike the Cosworth YB engine. I bult a very strong LET with a T3 on it and the guy who mapped it melted it on the rollers, I just dont think a set up on the rolling road is the right way to try and map any turbo car.
my opinion was, if mapped on rollers then it will be safer on the road ? becus in the dyno the load can be greater than that on the road , and the airflow in the cell is less than on the road , therefor more cooling to the intercooler, but i just thought that, what about air pressure to the airfilter, if in the cell there could be less ambient air pressure for intake system to inhale but on the open road plenty making a weak afr ? ? ?
In some ways you are correct but not in the most important heat and cyl temp,
The harder the car is ran up through the gears the higher cyl temp there is, You cannont duplicat this buy just doing power runs on the rollers.

Mark
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 06:39 PM
  #40  
leecavturbo's Avatar
leecavturbo
Thread Starter
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,055
Likes: 0
Default

if you look at 2mins & 37secs in ( 2:37.2 ) ,is the moment i knew something was wrong, its like a recurring bad dream lmao . not at any point did i have more than 79% throttle. but what does concern me is the extremely consistent 27deg of air intake temp ! ?
you can see the gearchanges and boost as i drove before

http://www.migweb.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=244296
Reply



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:09 AM.