Ford Sierra/Sapphire/RS500 Cosworth This forum is for discussion of all things pertaining to the Ford Sierra Cosworth.

Max power on standard 4x4 intercooler

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 14, 2017 | 01:38 PM
  #1  
turbotrev's Avatar
turbotrev
Thread Starter
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,051
Likes: 89
From: Sutton
Default Max power on standard 4x4 intercooler

What is roughly the maximum power you can achieve with a regular stage 3 conversion on a t34.48 running a 4x4 intercooler?
Best to change to a 500 style one or is the 4x4 one still efficient up to the 360/380hp range?

Cheers Paul
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2017 | 04:07 PM
  #2  
Mad_Mat's Avatar
Mad_Mat
New Owner
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 734
Likes: 93
From: Herts Beds Bucks
Default

Best to change to a 500 style one - Yes definitely. Heat is the enemy.
or is the 4x4 one still efficient up to the 360/380hp range - I doubt it unless its -10c outside.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2017 | 04:22 PM
  #3  
Mad_Mat's Avatar
Mad_Mat
New Owner
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 734
Likes: 93
From: Herts Beds Bucks
Default

As I understand it.

Small turbo + lots of boost = high charge temps hence the need for a more effective intercooler to keep the charge temps under control.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2017 | 05:55 PM
  #4  
Adam-M's Avatar
Adam-M
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,120
Likes: 316
From: Scotland
Default

I agree with mat I bet the charge temps would be very high at that power on the standard intercooler.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2017 | 07:08 PM
  #5  
Caddyshack's Avatar
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 10,837
Likes: 1,033
From: Guildford
Default

If you can, skip the 500 standard and go for something like the airtec 500 style 100mm and I think the ultimate is prob the spec r.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2017 | 10:07 PM
  #6  
Ridgey's Avatar
Ridgey
PassionFord Post Whore!!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,391
Likes: 140
From: Warrington
Default

Ive always used the rule of over 300 and a car that is used hard then a large 500 style cooler is advisable.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2017 | 05:04 PM
  #7  
turbotrev's Avatar
turbotrev
Thread Starter
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,051
Likes: 89
From: Sutton
Default

Originally Posted by Caddyshack
If you can, skip the 500 standard and go for something like the airtec 500 style 100mm and I think the ultimate is prob the spec r.
It's not for my car it's for a mate.

I think the 100mm airtec is a little overkill for under 400hp.

I myself will go for the 100mm airtec or spec r cooler but I'm looking at 650hp+

Cheers Paul
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2017 | 05:45 PM
  #8  
Caddyshack's Avatar
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 10,837
Likes: 1,033
From: Guildford
Default

Low intake temps are good no matter the power, I think you can get smaller airtec ones which weigh less.

I found at 469 bhp that my temps were 20 degrees higher on the rs500 one compared to airtec at peak.

I guess it depends what you have to pay for the rs500 in comparison but given the choice I would go overkill but that's just my personal opinion.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2017 | 05:58 PM
  #9  
Caddyshack's Avatar
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 10,837
Likes: 1,033
From: Guildford
Default

I think even an RS500 one is becoming inefficient at 400 bhp..compared to alternatives, sure it will be ok but you will still see quite high intake temps, especially on a hot day.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2017 | 09:30 PM
  #10  
turbotrev's Avatar
turbotrev
Thread Starter
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,051
Likes: 89
From: Sutton
Default

I said rs500 style (like airtec etc,) not literally an rs 500 item.
He's def not gonna buy a spec-r cooler for a grand for use on a stage 3+ under 400hp

Cheers Paul
Reply




All times are GMT. The time now is 04:52 AM.