What do you sll think of the Vauxhall Astra VXR?

javascript:emoticon('
Sourire

I really like the vauxhall Astra VXR, Just wonderd what you all thought of them? Are they and all round good car? I personally think they look smart as fuck.
Opinions please.
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,412
Likes: 186
From: Norfolk Drives: Couple of Fords
Not driven either, but looks wise I think the VXR looks loads better than the styling disaster that is the Focus ST.
I'm sure when it comes down to how they drive and handle the Ford would be better though!
I'm sure when it comes down to how they drive and handle the Ford would be better though!
Originally Posted by massivewangers
Not driven either, but looks wise I think the VXR looks loads better than the styling disaster that is the Focus ST.
I'm sure when it comes down to how they drive and handle the Ford would be better though!
I'm sure when it comes down to how they drive and handle the Ford would be better though!
great in a straight line (as long as you hold onto the steering wheel)
round corners it's terrible
they sent it round the track with the stig at the wheel and he almost crashed going round corners, understeers worse than a smart car
round corners it's terrible
they sent it round the track with the stig at the wheel and he almost crashed going round corners, understeers worse than a smart car
When mags like EVO, Top Gear and Autocar have tested them round a track it's always acquitted itself reasonably well.
Take a test drive in one and see what you reckon - it's reasonably easy to get a test drive in one
Take a test drive in one and see what you reckon - it's reasonably easy to get a test drive in one
Trending Topics
Don't believe everything you see on Top Gear, they handle fine.
'Ring video, doesn't look terrible at all: http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?...0347052662167&
'Ring video, doesn't look terrible at all: http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?...0347052662167&
Originally Posted by CalibreDan
Don't believe everything you see on Top Gear, they handle fine.
Contrast his Vectra VXR review with the EVO mag review of the same car.....
I guess not everyone likes the same thing though
not a big fan of vauxhalls, but i must say i have seen a few on the roads round here
with xenons' 19's and the TV in the dash setup they do look smart as fook though
but the renault sport megane is growing on me too. dont really think they ST looks as exciting as these two, but i can imagine its a better drive
with xenons' 19's and the TV in the dash setup they do look smart as fook though
but the renault sport megane is growing on me too. dont really think they ST looks as exciting as these two, but i can imagine its a better drive
Originally Posted by dojj
great in a straight line (as long as you hold onto the steering wheel)
round corners it's terrible
they sent it round the track with the stig at the wheel and he almost crashed going round corners, understeers worse than a smart car
round corners it's terrible
they sent it round the track with the stig at the wheel and he almost crashed going round corners, understeers worse than a smart car

As has been said on here already the TG test was a load of pants with Clarksons general Vauxhall dislike and in fact the car they used was an early development car with different suspension so again does not reflect the cars sold to the public.
If you want to find out more information and actually get comments from people who actually drive the cars check out VXR Online at :-
http://www.vxronline.co.uk/
Originally Posted by Not.Normal
Originally Posted by dojj
great in a straight line (as long as you hold onto the steering wheel)
round corners it's terrible
they sent it round the track with the stig at the wheel and he almost crashed going round corners, understeers worse than a smart car
round corners it's terrible
they sent it round the track with the stig at the wheel and he almost crashed going round corners, understeers worse than a smart car

Originally Posted by Not.Normal
As has been said on here already the TG test was a load of pants with Clarksons general Vauxhall dislike and in fact the car they used was an early development car with different suspension so again does not reflect the cars sold to the public.
If you want to find out more information and actually get comments from people who actually drive the cars check out VXR Online at :-
http://www.vxronline.co.uk/

If you want to find out more information and actually get comments from people who actually drive the cars check out VXR Online at :-
http://www.vxronline.co.uk/
the problem has always been the same with fwd vauxhalls, they have too much torque and it totaly overpowers the chassis
the 1.8 sri cavalier was fine, but even the 2.0 ones went mad at the wheels, and when you had a whole huge 130 brake pushing through the front wheels and you had no idea where you were going because it ust went where it wanted to go when you pressed the loud pedal....
things haven't changed with the letest generation vectra's either, either there is to much power or the traction control would kick in way to harshly
my mate had one for a few weeks which seemed to be better, but they just can't get the power down
put bigger and bigger tyres on it by all means, but it doesn't mask the problem that you have too much power going through the front wheels
Originally Posted by dojj
yes, my mate works at the vauxhall dealer just down the road and i tend to get a "test drive" with him in most of the newer motors (gong back as far as having a pootle in a lotus carlton as well
Originally Posted by dojj
i somehow dooubt that even jc could get the stig to power understeer into a cameraman, no matter how much he hates them cars
Originally Posted by dojj
the problem has always been the same with fwd vauxhalls, they have too much torque and it totaly overpowers the chassis
the 1.8 sri cavalier was fine, but even the 2.0 ones went mad at the wheels, and when you had a whole huge 130 brake pushing through the front wheels and you had no idea where you were going because it ust went where it wanted to go when you pressed the loud pedal....
things haven't changed with the letest generation vectra's either, either there is to much power or the traction control would kick in way to harshly
my mate had one for a few weeks which seemed to be better, but they just can't get the power down
put bigger and bigger tyres on it by all means, but it doesn't mask the problem that you have too much power going through the front wheels
the 1.8 sri cavalier was fine, but even the 2.0 ones went mad at the wheels, and when you had a whole huge 130 brake pushing through the front wheels and you had no idea where you were going because it ust went where it wanted to go when you pressed the loud pedal....
things haven't changed with the letest generation vectra's either, either there is to much power or the traction control would kick in way to harshly
my mate had one for a few weeks which seemed to be better, but they just can't get the power down
put bigger and bigger tyres on it by all means, but it doesn't mask the problem that you have too much power going through the front wheels
Everyone to their own and being this is Ford based site I can understand you brand loyalty, but we can all agree that high power through FWD its not going to make the best handling car in the world. Its just a shame that all the manafacture's are still going this route (I expect for cost reasons) I mean isn't the ST gonna have 280bhp. Now you can't honestly tell me that this is gonna be a great handling car based on your comments above
having a platform to handle the power is a lot more difficult that just dropping in a bigger engine
why do you think that ford limited the power output on the st?
they've put a bigger engine in to make more torque to make it mroe driveable
vxhl have decided to follow the max power route and have just upped the boost
i have yet to find the "perfect" car, soemthing that i can thrash about in as well as be able to take my kid shopping in
i just find teh mondeo a much easier more comfortable ride which is why i've got one, i've also got a fire breathing sierra estate but i can't see myself dropping junior off to school in that
the schools 100 yards away and it don't get over the speed humps
the only way to find the right car for you is to go out and have a go in one, and, aftermuch testing, i find that all the vxhals tend to fal in to the same trap as pervious models, too much power, not enough control
their engiens are cracking thoguh, much better fuel economy and a fair bit more torquey through the seat of your pants, but the rest of teh package lets it down quite drasticly
why do you think that ford limited the power output on the st?
they've put a bigger engine in to make more torque to make it mroe driveable
vxhl have decided to follow the max power route and have just upped the boost
i have yet to find the "perfect" car, soemthing that i can thrash about in as well as be able to take my kid shopping in
i just find teh mondeo a much easier more comfortable ride which is why i've got one, i've also got a fire breathing sierra estate but i can't see myself dropping junior off to school in that
the schools 100 yards away and it don't get over the speed humps
the only way to find the right car for you is to go out and have a go in one, and, aftermuch testing, i find that all the vxhals tend to fal in to the same trap as pervious models, too much power, not enough control
their engiens are cracking thoguh, much better fuel economy and a fair bit more torquey through the seat of your pants, but the rest of teh package lets it down quite drasticly
Originally Posted by dojj
great in a straight line (as long as you hold onto the steering wheel)
round corners it's terrible
they sent it round the track with the stig at the wheel and he almost crashed going round corners, understeers worse than a smart car
round corners it's terrible
they sent it round the track with the stig at the wheel and he almost crashed going round corners, understeers worse than a smart car

Originally Posted by dojj
the problem has always been the same with fwd vauxhalls, they have too much torque and it totaly overpowers the chassis
why do you think that ford limited the power output on the st?
they've put a bigger engine in to make more torque to make it mroe driveable
why do you think that ford limited the power output on the st?
they've put a bigger engine in to make more torque to make it mroe driveable
Originally Posted by T4KAF
real real bad 4 torquesteer,and shite handling,vauxhall havnt advanced any since mk2 astra 16valve if u ask me!!!
best tell anyone on here with an rst that their cars are also total shite, because I promise you the vxr will be a better handling car in every respect.
Originally Posted by alistairolsen
Originally Posted by dojj
the problem has always been the same with fwd vauxhalls, they have too much torque and it totaly overpowers the chassis
why do you think that ford limited the power output on the st?
they've put a bigger engine in to make more torque to make it more driveable
why do you think that ford limited the power output on the st?
they've put a bigger engine in to make more torque to make it more driveable
Originally Posted by dojj
Originally Posted by alistairolsen
Originally Posted by dojj
the problem has always been the same with fwd vauxhalls, they have too much torque and it totaly overpowers the chassis
why do you think that ford limited the power output on the st?
they've put a bigger engine in to make more torque to make it more driveable
why do you think that ford limited the power output on the st?
they've put a bigger engine in to make more torque to make it more driveable
i think you are missing the point here
vauxhall, instead of trying to figure out a way to tame the pwoer and torque from their engines (which are fairly good and probably that little bit better than the ford usints at most times) they have not bothered
whereas ford have kept the power the same sort of levels with the st as opposed to the rs but the torque has gone up across the range because of the extra 300 cc and cylinder, therefore making the driveability that much better
in the astra it's all or nothing, with the st it's a liniear power delivery which makes things much smoother and less snappy, even thought they are just as quick as each other in the real world straight line stakes
vauxhall, instead of trying to figure out a way to tame the pwoer and torque from their engines (which are fairly good and probably that little bit better than the ford usints at most times) they have not bothered
whereas ford have kept the power the same sort of levels with the st as opposed to the rs but the torque has gone up across the range because of the extra 300 cc and cylinder, therefore making the driveability that much better
in the astra it's all or nothing, with the st it's a liniear power delivery which makes things much smoother and less snappy, even thought they are just as quick as each other in the real world straight line stakes
Originally Posted by dojj
i think you are missing the point here
vauxhall, instead of trying to figure out a way to tame the pwoer and torque from their engines (which are fairly good and probably that little bit better than the ford usints at most times) they have not bothered
whereas ford have kept the power the same sort of levels with the st as opposed to the rs but the torque has gone up across the range because of the extra 300 cc and cylinder, therefore making the driveability that much better
in the astra it's all or nothing, with the st it's a liniear power delivery which makes things much smoother and less snappy, even thought they are just as quick as each other in the real world straight line stakes
vauxhall, instead of trying to figure out a way to tame the pwoer and torque from their engines (which are fairly good and probably that little bit better than the ford usints at most times) they have not bothered
whereas ford have kept the power the same sort of levels with the st as opposed to the rs but the torque has gone up across the range because of the extra 300 cc and cylinder, therefore making the driveability that much better
in the astra it's all or nothing, with the st it's a liniear power delivery which makes things much smoother and less snappy, even thought they are just as quick as each other in the real world straight line stakes
Astra VXR
Stability On - 1.38.25
Stability Off - 1.40.65
Cornering G - 0.71
Focus ST
Stability On - 1.42.15
Stability Off - 1.43.30
Cornering G - 0.70
In fact the ST was the slowest of all hot hatches tested. Now i'm not having a pop at the ST as its a fine car. Its more a case of explaining to you that you need to get your facts straight as oposed to letting your feelings do the talking.
Originally Posted by Not.Normal
Originally Posted by dojj
yes, my mate works at the vauxhall dealer just down the road and i tend to get a "test drive" with him in most of the newer motors (gong back as far as having a pootle in a lotus carlton as well
Originally Posted by dojj
i somehow dooubt that even jc could get the stig to power understeer into a cameraman, no matter how much he hates them cars
Originally Posted by dojj
the problem has always been the same with fwd vauxhalls, they have too much torque and it totaly overpowers the chassis
the 1.8 sri cavalier was fine, but even the 2.0 ones went mad at the wheels, and when you had a whole huge 130 brake pushing through the front wheels and you had no idea where you were going because it ust went where it wanted to go when you pressed the loud pedal....
things haven't changed with the letest generation vectra's either, either there is to much power or the traction control would kick in way to harshly
my mate had one for a few weeks which seemed to be better, but they just can't get the power down
put bigger and bigger tyres on it by all means, but it doesn't mask the problem that you have too much power going through the front wheels
the 1.8 sri cavalier was fine, but even the 2.0 ones went mad at the wheels, and when you had a whole huge 130 brake pushing through the front wheels and you had no idea where you were going because it ust went where it wanted to go when you pressed the loud pedal....
things haven't changed with the letest generation vectra's either, either there is to much power or the traction control would kick in way to harshly
my mate had one for a few weeks which seemed to be better, but they just can't get the power down
put bigger and bigger tyres on it by all means, but it doesn't mask the problem that you have too much power going through the front wheels
Everyone to their own and being this is Ford based site I can understand you brand loyalty, but we can all agree that high power through FWD its not going to make the best handling car in the world. Its just a shame that all the manafacture's are still going this route (I expect for cost reasons) I mean isn't the ST gonna have 280bhp. Now you can't honestly tell me that this is gonna be a great handling car based on your comments above
Yes, I am Ford @ heart, I have been working with and around them since I was 4 years old (well over 25 years now) and I would still buy a Monaro over a Falcon for example (just as proof that I am not biased towards Fords, although a GT500 Mustang might sway my decision
).
Quite a quick car, I had a play with one in the ECos, well he wanted to have a go at me actually....
70-120 defo held his own!! (I only pulled a couple of car lengths on him)... dust after that Im afraid, though I reckon he was still getting up to 150ish
Have to say though I think he was VERY dissapointed I slowed to 65 on the MWay and he still wouldnt come pass me
Quite pretty cars I reckon
70-120 defo held his own!! (I only pulled a couple of car lengths on him)... dust after that Im afraid, though I reckon he was still getting up to 150ish
Have to say though I think he was VERY dissapointed I slowed to 65 on the MWay and he still wouldnt come pass me

Quite pretty cars I reckon
Before I settled on my Focus RS, I had a go in both a VXR and an ST and, to be honest, I liked the VXR better. Mainly because it's a stunning looking car (the ST is a bit on the ugly side) but also because it is a damn fine car to drive - Clarkson & CO got this one wrong (IMHO)
Only thing that stopped me was the alarming depreciation they suffer
Only thing that stopped me was the alarming depreciation they suffer
I test drove one a year ago now and scared myself silly so I rather like them! I drove the full fat, 19" wheels, blue calipers jobbie... It was fan-flaming-tastic in a straight line like some have said and I was on a national speed limit, single lane road in the countryside. I went round a roundabout (quite a job in that), floored it as I came out of the roundabout, like I do in my trusty Fiesta, and very nearly said an up close & personal hello to a hedge.
The look on the dealership fella's face was quality if nothing else.
The look on the dealership fella's face was quality if nothing else.
Originally Posted by iansoutham
Sorry, but Dojj is not talking rubbish here. I actually WORK for a Vauxhall dealer (not the mate he is talking about though) and get to drive ALL the new cars when I want, including the Monaro VXR. Out of all the VXR range, the Monaro is the most "fun", although repair bills will be high, especially transmission and engine bills, the Vectra VXR is by far the best overall, the Zafira VXR is "different" and the Astra VXR is utter crap. Have you even tried reversing one and looking out of the rear window? It is a bloody porthole, not a window, it DOES torque-steer on anything but the most smooth road surfaces (like a racetrack, but how many people only drive on tracks instead of roads). It is a CHAV-mobile, aimed @ CHAVs. It is like the Focus RS in my opinion (all brand names and built to sell to "boyracers"), and I hate the Focus RS (sorry to all FRS owners in advance)
Yes, I am Ford @ heart, I have been working with and around them since I was 4 years old (well over 25 years now) and I would still buy a Monaro over a Falcon for example (just as proof that I am not biased towards Fords, although a GT500 Mustang might sway my decision
).The transmission likewise is pretty bulletproff unless you abuse it?
The only issue I see is tyres and petrol tbh cos its a big fast car, like any big fast car.
I find it interesting youd swap one for a gt500 'stang tho, which while being a nice looking car is a total abortio of a design utilising technology first employed int he horse and cart to get around corners. It really is a SHOCKING car.
Your feelings on the particular market sector into which the astra and focus fall is interesting, but largely irellevant to this discussion im afraid, and if the worst you can come up with is "the rear windows too small" then go and buy a people carrier, as ALL modern mid size hatchbacks are pish by comparison to those of yesteryear.
Originally Posted by alistairolsen
Riiiight, why woud the monaro have hih maintenance bills? its an unstressed standard ls2 engine?? certainly going to last a lot longer than ANY 2l 4 pot turbo.
The transmission likewise is pretty bulletproff unless you abuse it?
The only issue I see is tyres and petrol tbh cos its a big fast car, like any big fast car.
I find it interesting youd swap one for a gt500 'stang tho, which while being a nice looking car is a total abortio of a design utilising technology first employed int he horse and cart to get around corners. It really is a SHOCKING car.
Your feelings on the particular market sector into which the astra and focus fall is interesting, but largely irellevant to this discussion im afraid, and if the worst you can come up with is "the rear windows too small" then go and buy a people carrier, as ALL modern mid size hatchbacks are pish by comparison to those of yesteryear.
The transmission likewise is pretty bulletproff unless you abuse it?
The only issue I see is tyres and petrol tbh cos its a big fast car, like any big fast car.
I find it interesting youd swap one for a gt500 'stang tho, which while being a nice looking car is a total abortio of a design utilising technology first employed int he horse and cart to get around corners. It really is a SHOCKING car.
Your feelings on the particular market sector into which the astra and focus fall is interesting, but largely irellevant to this discussion im afraid, and if the worst you can come up with is "the rear windows too small" then go and buy a people carrier, as ALL modern mid size hatchbacks are pish by comparison to those of yesteryear.
Horse & cart technology maybe, and yes, time has moved on, but it WORKS!!! You have to drive the car, not the car drive you. And a 'Stang is more of a drivers car than a VXR or FRS EVER will be!!!
And I would still have a Vectra VXR over an Astra VXR
Originally Posted by iansoutham
Originally Posted by alistairolsen
Riiiight, why woud the monaro have hih maintenance bills? its an unstressed standard ls2 engine?? certainly going to last a lot longer than ANY 2l 4 pot turbo.
The transmission likewise is pretty bulletproff unless you abuse it?
The only issue I see is tyres and petrol tbh cos its a big fast car, like any big fast car.
I find it interesting youd swap one for a gt500 'stang tho, which while being a nice looking car is a total abortio of a design utilising technology first employed int he horse and cart to get around corners. It really is a SHOCKING car.
Your feelings on the particular market sector into which the astra and focus fall is interesting, but largely irellevant to this discussion im afraid, and if the worst you can come up with is "the rear windows too small" then go and buy a people carrier, as ALL modern mid size hatchbacks are pish by comparison to those of yesteryear.
The transmission likewise is pretty bulletproff unless you abuse it?
The only issue I see is tyres and petrol tbh cos its a big fast car, like any big fast car.
I find it interesting youd swap one for a gt500 'stang tho, which while being a nice looking car is a total abortio of a design utilising technology first employed int he horse and cart to get around corners. It really is a SHOCKING car.
Your feelings on the particular market sector into which the astra and focus fall is interesting, but largely irellevant to this discussion im afraid, and if the worst you can come up with is "the rear windows too small" then go and buy a people carrier, as ALL modern mid size hatchbacks are pish by comparison to those of yesteryear.
Horse & cart technology maybe, and yes, time has moved on, but it WORKS!!! You have to drive the car, not the car drive you. And a 'Stang is more of a drivers car than a VXR or FRS EVER will be!!!
And I would still have a Vectra VXR over an Astra VXR
And no, live axles dont work, theyre in the same league as carbs, there is just no reason to use them nowadays
[quote="alistairolsen"][quote="iansoutham"]
And no, live axles dont work, theyre in the same league as carbs, there is just no reason to use them nowadays
I'm sure Nascars use a live rear axle
And when a rally car like a mk2 escort is STILL competitive in club and national motorsport nearly 30 years after its launch I dont think there is many arguments to suggest a live axle cant be made to work very well
Originally Posted by alistairolsen
And no, live axles dont work, theyre in the same league as carbs, there is just no reason to use them nowadays
And when a rally car like a mk2 escort is STILL competitive in club and national motorsport nearly 30 years after its launch I dont think there is many arguments to suggest a live axle cant be made to work very well






