air fuel
I don't know of other ones, but I can vouch for this:
http://wbo2.com/
It even has a good inbuilt datalogger and PC interface and still it's about the cheapest one out there, DIY or ready built.
http://wbo2.com/
It even has a good inbuilt datalogger and PC interface and still it's about the cheapest one out there, DIY or ready built.
If you only want to know you are running rich or lean why do you need a wideband sensor?
My display uses a normal lambda sensor and I find that adequite for simple checking to prevent an engine meltdown!
Thanks
Darren
My display uses a normal lambda sensor and I find that adequite for simple checking to prevent an engine meltdown!
Thanks
Darren
PassionFords Creator
iTrader: (12)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 28,824
Likes: 95
From: Blackpool, UK Destination: Rev limiter
A narrorband sensor will still say its rich whilst the top of your pistons are rattling around in the crankcase after meltdown, thats why
They just dont have the capability to read mixture at WOT as they are designed for mixtures concentrated around 14.7:1 and are not accurate at all with very rich mixtures.
The one Jesse has linked to is a decent one, and ive tested it against my own £6K+ machine and its reasonably accurate
The one Jesse has linked to is a decent one, and ive tested it against my own £6K+ machine and its reasonably accurate
I agree that they will cope arround 14.7 (lambda 1), above and below is a bit subjective.
My point is that they give suffient detail to ensure that the engine is not running lean, I personally have had quite a good result from these sensors.
I find that they will give suffient detail to 13:1 a/f ratio which is fine for me.
I`m looking into making a wideband sensor controller, but personally believe that it is best to tune on a rolling road and use in car sensors as a backup mechanism rather than tuning.
Thanks
Darren
My point is that they give suffient detail to ensure that the engine is not running lean, I personally have had quite a good result from these sensors.
I find that they will give suffient detail to 13:1 a/f ratio which is fine for me.
I`m looking into making a wideband sensor controller, but personally believe that it is best to tune on a rolling road and use in car sensors as a backup mechanism rather than tuning.
Thanks
Darren
Trending Topics
PassionFords Creator
iTrader: (12)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 28,824
Likes: 95
From: Blackpool, UK Destination: Rev limiter
Originally Posted by turbodisplay
I agree that they will cope arround 14.7 (lambda 1), above and below is a bit subjective.
My point is that they give suffient detail to ensure that the engine is not running lean, I personally have had quite a good result from these sensors.
I find that they will give suffient detail to 13:1 a/f ratio which is fine for me.
I`m looking into making a wideband sensor controller, but personally believe that it is best to tune on a rolling road and use in car sensors as a backup mechanism rather than tuning.
Thanks
Darren
My point is that they give suffient detail to ensure that the engine is not running lean, I personally have had quite a good result from these sensors.
I find that they will give suffient detail to 13:1 a/f ratio which is fine for me.
I`m looking into making a wideband sensor controller, but personally believe that it is best to tune on a rolling road and use in car sensors as a backup mechanism rather than tuning.
Thanks
Darren
They are a good 30% out by 13:1 on average, remember, i use these every day and see the reference output compared to my industry standard Labcell unit. Another thing that gives cause for concern is that these narrowband cheap units tend to read richer as they get hot, so as the engine leans, the EGT goes up and the sensor reads richer... not a great scenario....
Bottom Line: Dont trust it, the manufacturers dont, and nor should we.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oilman
Trader Parts for Sale.
10
Sep 23, 2015 07:32 PM



