Looks like it may be complete soon
#401
cossie fan (unluckerly)
Well car is running again & most now know it was going to Brunters on Monday for a Topspeed run that was called off last night by a decision by Health & Safety . Apparently a Sierra was not designed to run at Speeds of over 200mph, therefore it cant be allowed to attempt it .
#405
Happily retired
Thread Starter
2 days running ive forgotten the camera .
Can report the car is now complete , the undertray going on for the first time in 4.5 years. Didnt do any mapping today as Mark was working on other cars & we now dont have the Monday deadline. Taking the weekend off as I need a rest been a busy week.
Can report the car is now complete , the undertray going on for the first time in 4.5 years. Didnt do any mapping today as Mark was working on other cars & we now dont have the Monday deadline. Taking the weekend off as I need a rest been a busy week.
#406
Got a lot of respect for you doing this!
At 65 most would be laid back in a green velour recliner, snoring with a glass of brandy in hand and John Wayne blasting out on the TV
At 65 most would be laid back in a green velour recliner, snoring with a glass of brandy in hand and John Wayne blasting out on the TV
#407
Happily retired
Thread Starter
Opps!!!
Had a phone call from Mark today he wanted to get some mapping done before a Topspeed run on Thursday (Insurance probs sorted) .
As soon as the run started Mark was taking huge chunks of fuel out & the car was fast but not silly. We were able to map to 2.8bar & also add ignition not possible on the road with the GT42RS. The car was slower at 2.8bar on the Borg Warner than 2.3bar on the GT42.
All we did was change the Turbo so its the Turbo thats the problem.
I had purchased an S400SX with 1.1 exhaust but it now appears thats not what we received . Its 18 months ago so no come back.
Its my fault it was Speced in the States & purchased by me as a direct replacement for a GT42RS & capable of making more Power with better spool. Mark has measured everything & we now know that what we wanted was never possible, lack of knowledge from the States mean we have a brilliant 700+ Turbo but not one that will puff past 800. I asked for a T4 fitting not a T6 & after looking at the website that means a smaller exhaust wheel & it becomes a S400SX/3 not a S400SX.
Haveing driven loads of these cars we both agree the BW is 650 fast at 2.8bar & the GT42 is 730 silly at 2.3bar on pump.
We are glad that the lack of horses was found today & not next Thursday during a Topspeed day.
We are now undecided what to do, we could go back to the GT42 but need the car for ND so it will be after after that as their are a few mods to undo .
The new Garrett billet looks tempting at this point so maybe development is not over yet.
Greg will get fed up polishing his helmet .
Had a phone call from Mark today he wanted to get some mapping done before a Topspeed run on Thursday (Insurance probs sorted) .
As soon as the run started Mark was taking huge chunks of fuel out & the car was fast but not silly. We were able to map to 2.8bar & also add ignition not possible on the road with the GT42RS. The car was slower at 2.8bar on the Borg Warner than 2.3bar on the GT42.
All we did was change the Turbo so its the Turbo thats the problem.
I had purchased an S400SX with 1.1 exhaust but it now appears thats not what we received . Its 18 months ago so no come back.
Its my fault it was Speced in the States & purchased by me as a direct replacement for a GT42RS & capable of making more Power with better spool. Mark has measured everything & we now know that what we wanted was never possible, lack of knowledge from the States mean we have a brilliant 700+ Turbo but not one that will puff past 800. I asked for a T4 fitting not a T6 & after looking at the website that means a smaller exhaust wheel & it becomes a S400SX/3 not a S400SX.
Haveing driven loads of these cars we both agree the BW is 650 fast at 2.8bar & the GT42 is 730 silly at 2.3bar on pump.
We are glad that the lack of horses was found today & not next Thursday during a Topspeed day.
We are now undecided what to do, we could go back to the GT42 but need the car for ND so it will be after after that as their are a few mods to undo .
The new Garrett billet looks tempting at this point so maybe development is not over yet.
Greg will get fed up polishing his helmet .
#410
Happily retired
Thread Starter
Thursday is deffo off as no point going with 100bhp less on race than we require. It is being looked at over the weekend & a decision made on Monday, heard from him a few times this afternoon so fairly sure i know what he wants to fit .
#413
Advanced PassionFord User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bristol
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Probably a good thing that I had to cancel Brunters etc yesterday, I'm lead in bed with a temperature of 102, feeling like death, man flu.....
Last edited by MAD Ade; 19-09-2010 at 09:46 AM.
#415
Regular Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Warlingham
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
sorry to hear the bw was no good for your application rod. Can i ask though what you/mark thought of the bw turbo itself compared to say a gt40 ( or whatever garrett equivilent is ). ie drivabilty, spool, transient boost recovery etc.
Does extended tip technology live upto its hype or is it better to stick wth the tried and tested garretts???????
warren
Does extended tip technology live upto its hype or is it better to stick wth the tried and tested garretts???????
warren
Opps!!!
Had a phone call from Mark today he wanted to get some mapping done before a Topspeed run on Thursday (Insurance probs sorted) .
As soon as the run started Mark was taking huge chunks of fuel out & the car was fast but not silly. We were able to map to 2.8bar & also add ignition not possible on the road with the GT42RS. The car was slower at 2.8bar on the Borg Warner than 2.3bar on the GT42.
All we did was change the Turbo so its the Turbo thats the problem.
I had purchased an S400SX with 1.1 exhaust but it now appears thats not what we received . Its 18 months ago so no come back.
Its my fault it was Speced in the States & purchased by me as a direct replacement for a GT42RS & capable of making more Power with better spool. Mark has measured everything & we now know that what we wanted was never possible, lack of knowledge from the States mean we have a brilliant 700+ Turbo but not one that will puff past 800. I asked for a T4 fitting not a T6 & after looking at the website that means a smaller exhaust wheel & it becomes a S400SX/3 not a S400SX.
Haveing driven loads of these cars we both agree the BW is 650 fast at 2.8bar & the GT42 is 730 silly at 2.3bar on pump.
We are glad that the lack of horses was found today & not next Thursday during a Topspeed day.
We are now undecided what to do, we could go back to the GT42 but need the car for ND so it will be after after that as their are a few mods to undo .
The new Garrett billet looks tempting at this point so maybe development is not over yet.
Greg will get fed up polishing his helmet .
Had a phone call from Mark today he wanted to get some mapping done before a Topspeed run on Thursday (Insurance probs sorted) .
As soon as the run started Mark was taking huge chunks of fuel out & the car was fast but not silly. We were able to map to 2.8bar & also add ignition not possible on the road with the GT42RS. The car was slower at 2.8bar on the Borg Warner than 2.3bar on the GT42.
All we did was change the Turbo so its the Turbo thats the problem.
I had purchased an S400SX with 1.1 exhaust but it now appears thats not what we received . Its 18 months ago so no come back.
Its my fault it was Speced in the States & purchased by me as a direct replacement for a GT42RS & capable of making more Power with better spool. Mark has measured everything & we now know that what we wanted was never possible, lack of knowledge from the States mean we have a brilliant 700+ Turbo but not one that will puff past 800. I asked for a T4 fitting not a T6 & after looking at the website that means a smaller exhaust wheel & it becomes a S400SX/3 not a S400SX.
Haveing driven loads of these cars we both agree the BW is 650 fast at 2.8bar & the GT42 is 730 silly at 2.3bar on pump.
We are glad that the lack of horses was found today & not next Thursday during a Topspeed day.
We are now undecided what to do, we could go back to the GT42 but need the car for ND so it will be after after that as their are a few mods to undo .
The new Garrett billet looks tempting at this point so maybe development is not over yet.
Greg will get fed up polishing his helmet .
#416
Happily retired
Thread Starter
sorry to hear the bw was no good for your application rod. Can i ask though what you/mark thought of the bw turbo itself compared to say a gt40 ( or whatever garrett equivilent is ). ie drivabilty, spool, transient boost recovery etc.
Does extended tip technology live upto its hype or is it better to stick wth the tried and tested garretts???????
warren
Does extended tip technology live upto its hype or is it better to stick wth the tried and tested garretts???????
warren
#417
Regular Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Warlingham
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#418
Happily retired
Thread Starter
Well Turbo is ordered from Australia, no stocks in UK & expensive from the States if you can find one . We live in a crazy world when its mega difficult to buy something thats advertised everywhere. Should be here by Monday so hopefully we will be testing shortly after that.
Relaxed this afternoon with a few hours in the garden. Its then I realise ive given way too much time to my car over the last month or so. Will spend more time in the garden tomorrow before sorting out a wiring problem for Mark on Thursday. RELAX !!! .
Relaxed this afternoon with a few hours in the garden. Its then I realise ive given way too much time to my car over the last month or so. Will spend more time in the garden tomorrow before sorting out a wiring problem for Mark on Thursday. RELAX !!! .
#419
Happily retired
Thread Starter
The Turbo has arrived from Australia . Not seen it yet as ive Annie's brother over from Canada & thats my priority at the mo.
Below are the maps comparing the old with the new .
Below are the maps comparing the old with the new .
#420
Borg Warner EFR Equipped!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: In the unit, building a 450bhp Time Attack Focus!
Posts: 5,810
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Crikey! That compressor map looks phenomenal! What is the target boost to run on this new turbo Rod?
Very best of luck with the end goal, you've certainly done the development and fingers crossed it'll reap the rewards
Very best of luck with the end goal, you've certainly done the development and fingers crossed it'll reap the rewards
#421
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Mark
#426
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: stoke-on-trent
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
doesnt even look like a s400 rod, from that picture i would say its a s300-63 which actually is rated to around 700bhp which makes sense that your maxing it out in the 600bhp range.
didnt you check the compressor wheel sizes when you bought it?
didnt you check the compressor wheel sizes when you bought it?
#428
Happily retired
Thread Starter
The Turbo that didnt make the Power is a S400S-3 it was sold as a S400SX (gt4202 replacement) & clearly wasnt .
The 1st picture on post 423 is a GTX4202
The 2nd picture is a s300? which Mark will use up to 700bhp it has nothing to do with my car .
#430
Happily retired
Thread Starter
Well it wont make less thats for sure . It could be pushed past 900bhp im sure but Mark wants to remain safe on ignition but at the same Boost it will make more Power than the 838. This Turbo can puff 3bar all day throughout the rev range but im sure 2.8bar will be all it will be asked to produce. We are limiting Power anyway so not too interested to see what it maxxes out at.
Setting a record approaching 215 requires lots of Power so thats what we are aiming for. It has 2 chances it will or it wont .
Setting a record approaching 215 requires lots of Power so thats what we are aiming for. It has 2 chances it will or it wont .
#431
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: stoke-on-trent
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Your now confusing even me .
The Turbo that didnt make the Power is a S400S-3 it was sold as a S400SX (gt4202 replacement) & clearly wasnt .
The 1st picture on post 423 is a GTX4202
The 2nd picture is a s300? which Mark will use up to 700bhp it has nothing to do with my car .
The Turbo that didnt make the Power is a S400S-3 it was sold as a S400SX (gt4202 replacement) & clearly wasnt .
The 1st picture on post 423 is a GTX4202
The 2nd picture is a s300? which Mark will use up to 700bhp it has nothing to do with my car .
the second and third picture is a s300, which is a much smaller turbo, you can tell straight away buy looking at the compressor housing and wheel
this is a s475 turbo
you got the completely wrong turbo, im guessing either the boxes were mixed up buy the seller or you have been conned, if you had got the proper turbo you would have seen the expected results lol.
unless you fitted a turbo to your saff thats not the same as the picture you have there.
for reference a s475 in the uk has already done 703bhp@1.8bar which is the same as 937bhp on a piston engine
#432
Happily retired
Thread Starter
the second and third picture is a s300, which is a much smaller turbo, you can tell straight away buy looking at the compressor housing and wheel
this is a s475 turbo
you got the completely wrong turbo, im guessing either the boxes were mixed up buy the seller or you have been conned, if you had got the proper turbo you would have seen the expected results lol.
unless you fitted a turbo to your saff thats not the same as the picture you have there.
for reference a s475 in the uk has already done 703bhp@1.8bar which is the same as 937bhp on a piston engine
this is a s475 turbo
you got the completely wrong turbo, im guessing either the boxes were mixed up buy the seller or you have been conned, if you had got the proper turbo you would have seen the expected results lol.
unless you fitted a turbo to your saff thats not the same as the picture you have there.
for reference a s475 in the uk has already done 703bhp@1.8bar which is the same as 937bhp on a piston engine
I know exactly what Turbos I have . Please read before you say things like you have . Of course the S300 is a smaller Turbo I state clearly its not my Turbo .
I do not want the Turbo you show cos its a real dog, we are following the testing of these in Australia the 300 series work the 400's dont or as are tester said its a 'goat'. All big Turbos make the Power its how it does it that counts. I made the error of believing American bullshit on the 400's.
They are not comparing well with the new Garrett GTX42 series so thats why we have changed direction. Getting the best is about development & thats what we are doing . If mistakes are made we discard those parts & then finds one that actually works.
#433
Advanced PassionFord User
#434
Happily retired
Thread Starter
#435
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: stoke-on-trent
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know exactly what Turbos I have . Please read before you say things like you have . Of course the S300 is a smaller Turbo I state clearly its not my Turbo .
I do not want the Turbo you show cos its a real dog, we are following the testing of these in Australia the 300 series work the 400's dont or as are tester said its a 'goat'. All big Turbos make the Power its how it does it that counts. I made the error of believing American bullshit on the 400's.
They are not comparing well with the new Garrett GTX42 series so thats why we have changed direction. Getting the best is about development & thats what we are doing . If mistakes are made we discard those parts & then finds one that actually works.
I do not want the Turbo you show cos its a real dog, we are following the testing of these in Australia the 300 series work the 400's dont or as are tester said its a 'goat'. All big Turbos make the Power its how it does it that counts. I made the error of believing American bullshit on the 400's.
They are not comparing well with the new Garrett GTX42 series so thats why we have changed direction. Getting the best is about development & thats what we are doing . If mistakes are made we discard those parts & then finds one that actually works.
you mentioned the turbo you bought came with a smaller turbine wheel, the smallest a s400 comes with is a 83mm turbine wheel which flows 100lbs(1000bhp) of air hence im not sure what you have had delivered, a friend fitted one recently with a t4 rear housing and that had a 83mm turbine wheel aswell.
the gtx series is better than the normal ETT, but thats why bw produced the ET-R series wheels to compete.
Im just unsure what you actually have because other uk people are getting the expected results
#436
Happily retired
Thread Starter
you mentioned the turbo you bought came with a smaller turbine wheel, the smallest a s400 comes with is a 83mm turbine wheel which flows 100lbs(1000bhp) of air hence im not sure what you have had delivered, a friend fitted one recently with a t4 rear housing and that had a 83mm turbine wheel aswell.
You dont have all the facts only believing what the internet tells you.
There are two types of T4 flanges one is called the 'full Race' & wont fit a Cosworth its 1" taller, we were sent one to try & indeed it didnt fit. The GT42 'copy' they produce does however fit & that comes with a 74mm wheel .
#437
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: stoke-on-trent
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
he must have the 'full race' one as you call it then, being a rotary he had to have a custom manifold made anyway and the 2 companys that sell that turbo both said it comes with a 83mm turbine wheel, we ordered it and that was the size that came, didnt realised they can fit a tiny turbine wheel to it aswell.
ill be running a 1.1 a/r t6 on mine so wont have that issue, shame you couldnt run the full sized jobby but then its the cost of making a new manifold again!
ill be running a 1.1 a/r t6 on mine so wont have that issue, shame you couldnt run the full sized jobby but then its the cost of making a new manifold again!
#438
Happily retired
Thread Starter
Their is a Vmax before the months end that ive entered but that looks a bit tight now .
I wanted to run 'balls out' in a mag for 213 & try to beat 207 off gas at Vmax.
We should now have the Power to do this or get very close.
Will be very annoyed if the weather pushes this into next year, really do want to finish this caper before years end.
#439
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: stoke-on-trent
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
after all your updates recently i was expecting you to get yours run much earlier than mine but wit the issues you have had i might end up being pretty close to you, got my fia approved seats coming next monday and then ill be doing my turbo setup, managed to get it all costed including custom manifold for £1k so pretty happy about that!
It will be interesting to see what the new billet comp wheel does for your car and see if it matches the impressive comp map they have been showing off, i know someone who went from a 4202 to a 4294gtx and gained 30whp so will be good to see your results
It will be interesting to see what the new billet comp wheel does for your car and see if it matches the impressive comp map they have been showing off, i know someone who went from a 4202 to a 4294gtx and gained 30whp so will be good to see your results