fAO Eagle
As you locked the other thread I couldnt reply.
I PM'd you saying that I had no idea what you were on about as I hadnt abused anyone in a tag, so had no idea why you were claiming I was, and could you please tell me what tag you were referring to so I knew what on earth nonsense you were talking about.
Your reply was that you had no idea either.
I PM'd you saying that I had no idea what you were on about as I hadnt abused anyone in a tag, so had no idea why you were claiming I was, and could you please tell me what tag you were referring to so I knew what on earth nonsense you were talking about.
Your reply was that you had no idea either.
ermm sorry

wrong of you to assume that ..... why would i lock something that so obviously would have made you reply 
I PM'd you saying that I had no idea what you were on about as I hadnt abused anyone in a tag, so had no idea why you were claiming I was, and could you please tell me what tag you were referring to so I knew what on earth nonsense you were talking about.
Your reply was that you had no idea either.
Your reply was that you had no idea either.
so sometimes the whole truth is not always the right way to go ..
you would not have been singled out or just for the fun of it ...
so ..
i thank you for your interest in this and thought that some sort of simple reply might have in someway given you an answer...
so now i hope this has answered your question ..
so please go back to my previous posting and try to understand that obviously showing you the exact post you did so might have put the reporting person in a position ..
so sometimes the whole truth is not always the right way to go ..
you would not have been singled out or just for the fun of it ...
so ..
i thank you for your interest in this and thought that some sort of simple reply might have in someway given you an answer...
so now i hope this has answered your question ..
so sometimes the whole truth is not always the right way to go ..
you would not have been singled out or just for the fun of it ...
so ..
i thank you for your interest in this and thought that some sort of simple reply might have in someway given you an answer...
so now i hope this has answered your question ..
Honesty tends to be the best policy IMHO, lieing to users like you are doing, only leads to confusion and mistrust.
Last edited by Chip; Jan 27, 2010 at 01:54 PM.
no you said i had locked it ......
it does not say as this has been locked by a mod/admin....
Rather than lie to the users of the forum like you are now saying you did to myself, I would advise that in future to look less of an incompetant or dishonest moderator in the first place you simply say "I am not prepared to tell you" although the completely stupid thing about that is it still wouldnt tell you who had reported you anyway like you are saying it would, even if you said what tag it was, as I could call you a cunt in a tag on this thread but it might be Dojj who reports that tag when he sees it, so even knowing what tag it was wouldnt actually give away the information you are saying it would anyhow.
Honesty tends to be the best policy IMHO, lieing to users like you are doing, only leads to confusion and mistrust.
Honesty tends to be the best policy IMHO, lieing to users like you are doing, only leads to confusion and mistrust.
awwwchip .. nice reply ... well glad you have the bit between your teeth ..
lets face it chip ...
you got caught out by doing something wrong .. you didn't like it ..
so you obviously know all the tags you place and to whom you are being abusive/offensive to so why ask which one reported you ?
lie to you .. no i still think your weired....
but as this will now go off topic .. i will leave it upto you to do so....
happy new year .....
Last edited by Eagle; Jan 27, 2010 at 02:07 PM.
I wasnt aware of any tag I had added which broke the rules, I wanted to know what you were on about, so I could see if it was a mistake that you made deleting it, or a mistake I made interpreting the rules.
If im going to be infracted for something, then presumably it means that its something the mod team dont want me doing again, but without me having the first clue what you were on about, and with you saying you didnt know either, that doesnt really help does it?
Originally Posted by Eagle
so you obviously know all the tags you place and to whom you are being abusive/offensive to so why ask which one reported you ?
Originally Posted by Eagle
lie to you .. no
Now you are saying that wasnt true, and that you simply didnt want to tell me.
So yes, you lied to me.
Originally Posted by Eagle
but as this will now go off topic .. i will leave it upto you to do so....
didnt miss it at all, it was just obvious trolling when you now understood fully what I meant anyway, so I saw no need to reply to you as it served no purpose to do so.
Oh, so is that what this room is for then?
In that case can we have another room where the mods actually deal with passionford policies and problems rather than just act like cocks when they get caught out lieing to the users?
no im leaving you to do what you do best
and reeeeeling you in nicely
and reeeeeling you in nicely
In that case can we have another room where the mods actually deal with passionford policies and problems rather than just act like cocks when they get caught out lieing to the users?
Last edited by Chip; Jan 27, 2010 at 03:18 PM.
Trending Topics
im sorry ? not at all .. ia answered your question but as usuall you intend on making it a full on public execution .. like you always do ..
so just helping you acheive your goal
and no i answered your question but like usuall you have to make it a full on confrontation .. so .. poliices and probs might end up in dummy room yet .. so blow ya socks off chip .. i answered your question but you didnt like the answer .. shimples..
so just helping you acheive your goal
and no i answered your question but like usuall you have to make it a full on confrontation .. so .. poliices and probs might end up in dummy room yet .. so blow ya socks off chip .. i answered your question but you didnt like the answer .. shimples..
i just looked in here and noticed the thread and replied to it ...
didnt realise itwas locked till chippy pointed it out ..
i know what you said but i am using the get out of jail clause and can't tell you .. sorry i will lie to you ..

will pm you in a few mins
Well thats start I guess
You answered my first question with a lie, then when I said that made no sense you answered that comment with the fact that you were lieing.
Its up to you if you choose to take away from this episode that in future it might be better to be honest towards this sites paying customers, or you might choose not to.
Doesnt really make a great deal of difference to me TBH if you choose to be honest in future or not, or even that much at the time, hence I never bothered to start a thread about it at the time myself.
My only reason for being involved this time was to try and help Ed_van_dijk and to help Stu understand Ed_van_dijk's query as he was clearly confused over what was being asked, and then to reply to you when you spoke directly to me, which I couldnt do in the other thread as it was locked, so I replied here rather than ignore you, as im polite like that.
Im also honest, which makes a total of 1 out of the two of us it would appear, but maybe in time you can improve that statistic
On a slight off topic, its basingstoke meet tonight mate, be good to see you again
Originally Posted by Eagle
not at all .. ia answered your question but as usuall you intend on making it a full on public execution .. like you always do ..
so just helping you acheive your goal
and no i answered your question but like usuall you have to make it a full on confrontation .. so .. poliices and probs might end up in dummy room yet .. so blow ya socks off chip .. i answered your question but you didnt like the answer .. shimples..
so just helping you acheive your goal
and no i answered your question but like usuall you have to make it a full on confrontation .. so .. poliices and probs might end up in dummy room yet .. so blow ya socks off chip .. i answered your question but you didnt like the answer .. shimples..
Its up to you if you choose to take away from this episode that in future it might be better to be honest towards this sites paying customers, or you might choose not to.
Doesnt really make a great deal of difference to me TBH if you choose to be honest in future or not, or even that much at the time, hence I never bothered to start a thread about it at the time myself.
My only reason for being involved this time was to try and help Ed_van_dijk and to help Stu understand Ed_van_dijk's query as he was clearly confused over what was being asked, and then to reply to you when you spoke directly to me, which I couldnt do in the other thread as it was locked, so I replied here rather than ignore you, as im polite like that.
Im also honest, which makes a total of 1 out of the two of us it would appear, but maybe in time you can improve that statistic

On a slight off topic, its basingstoke meet tonight mate, be good to see you again
Last edited by Chip; Jan 27, 2010 at 03:56 PM.
no mate i didnt lock it,
i just looked in here and noticed the thread and replied to it ...
didnt realise itwas locked till chippy pointed it out ..
i know what you said but i am using the get out of jail clause and can't tell you .. sorry i will lie to you ..
will pm you in a few mins
i just looked in here and noticed the thread and replied to it ...
didnt realise itwas locked till chippy pointed it out ..
i know what you said but i am using the get out of jail clause and can't tell you .. sorry i will lie to you ..

will pm you in a few mins
ok chippy .. if you beleive i am that way i can not make you change it ..
i never lied to you .. just used my moderating training to not point at a specific thing as it was reported by the person involved...
hence my first reply.. not a lie .. not dishonest ...
i never lied to you .. just used my moderating training to not point at a specific thing as it was reported by the person involved...
hence my first reply.. not a lie .. not dishonest ...
And your reply to me by pm when I asked what the tag was:
Originally Posted by Eagle
i have no idea
Now one of those two statements IS a lie, or I wouldnt be saying so.
Hardly, it was last year this happened in my case, if you look under my name it was so long ago that the infaction has expired now anyway, so it doesnt effect me in the slightest either way, I only mentioned it at all in the context of helping out Ed in the other post.
Last edited by Chip; Jan 27, 2010 at 06:09 PM.
x
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Disabled Account
General Car Related Discussion.
4
Jun 14, 2005 06:17 PM
cabrio zo
General Car Related Discussion.
11
Feb 23, 2005 09:42 AM





