Originally Posted by
Eagle
im sorry
Well thats start I guess
Originally Posted by Eagle
not at all .. ia answered your question but as usuall you intend on making it a full on public execution .. like you always do ..
so just helping you acheive your goal
and no i answered your question but like usuall you have to make it a full on confrontation .. so .. poliices and probs might end up in dummy room yet .. so blow ya socks off chip .. i answered your question but you didnt like the answer .. shimples..
You answered my first question with a lie, then when I said that made no sense you answered that comment with the fact that you were lieing.
Its up to you if you choose to take away from this episode that in future it might be better to be honest towards this sites paying customers, or you might choose not to.
Doesnt really make a great deal of difference to me TBH if you choose to be honest in future or not, or even that much at the time, hence I never bothered to start a thread about it at the time myself.
My only reason for being involved this time was to try and help Ed_van_dijk and to help Stu understand Ed_van_dijk's query as he was clearly confused over what was being asked, and then to reply to you when you spoke directly to me, which I couldnt do in the other thread as it was locked, so I replied here rather than ignore you, as im polite like that.
Im also honest, which makes a total of 1 out of the two of us it would appear, but maybe in time you can improve that statistic
On a slight off topic, its basingstoke meet tonight mate, be good to see you again
