The multiple accounts have been dealt with.
Your personal paronoia is regarding the fact you feel you have a stalker is for you to deal with yourself!

 

how many usernames you had phil ?

 

Fair enough no proof of hack..I never sid he did that...although not many on here have the ability to do it so the suspicion is there....but innocent untill proven guilty...

Talking of guilty he IS guilty of using multiple user accounts & has admitted this to the mods.....but none of that matters as he's being welcomed back with open arms so all must be good

 

How the hell he thinks that is ANYTHING to do with the people who run this board, is completely beyond me, he needs to be talking to doctors to solve that one not moderators!

 

Can I have simons copy of the rules please to read...as he obviously has a different set to everyone else......






OH hold on he doesnt need the rules. My bad...

 

The rules are here:
https://passionford.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=310819


Which one dont you think has been applied to Simon out of interest?

 

Jay.......i have had many when banned but this is about his admission to harrassing me over the years...using the usernames that were banned for a reason.

..i have always wondered how it would feel to be bullet proof..best ask simon.

 

Multiple user ban...IIRC historically it's a lifetime ban for multiple accounts

I didnt bother clicking that link as it doesnt mean shit anyway....waste of bandwidth having rules on this forum tbh

 

rule 13 looks like it might be used today

 

...so why also can chip constantly use mental jibes against me when it was agreed that if he did its ban time,i have refrained from the peodo remarks..again why one rule for one?

 

If you had access to the mods section, you would know that the multiple accounts have been dealt with.

 

how many user names did u say u have had phil

chip calls me a inbreed dosent mean hes nasty or believes it

 

If you REALLY want to keep making an issue of multiple accounts I am more than happy to ban Phil too

 

Simon SECS...rules broken

Please Read These Rules As They Set Out How We Want To Keep The Board.
By Posting On This Board You Are Accepting The Rules Set Out Below. We Reserve The Right To Adjust The Rules As We See Appropriate.

General Board Rules...


2/ No Victimisation And Or Racial Incitement Including Threatening Behaviour Of Any Kind Will Be Tolerated.
3/ No Posts Shall Discredit, Disrepute Or Insult Any Member Of This Community. Any Posts Found To Do So Will Be Edited Or Removed.

6/ No User Has The Rights To Any Information Contained Within The Board. All Information Including Contact Information However Added Shall Not Be Kept or Published By Any Other User EXCEPT The Admin Staff.

10/ No Invasion Of Privacy, Including The Posting Or Directing To Images Or Information About Any Individual With The Sole Intention Of Victimisation.

14/ All User Information Shall Be Personally Correct At Any Given Time Of Asking. This Includes All Contact Details Of Which Email Addresses Shall Be Only Acessable By The Person Registered User.



Choice Of Username..

.
2/ Offensive Words Will Not Be Tolerated.

4/ One Username Per Registered User. We Reserve The Right To Remove Any Account That Fails To Adhere To This.
5/ No Username Shall Be Used To Falsely Represent Another User, Company Or Other Representative.

 

Thats ok...i'll just re-register and abuse a load of threads, cause havoc for a while and then be welcomed back with open arms thats the norm on pf

 

phil u are quoting the rules when u are probably responsible for most of them being written and you deffinatly broke the other ones so whats ur point ?

 

..are you for real? you banned him and me for those words...so you think chip is being friendly to me?

 

please (JOKE)

 

Phil, lets not beat around the fucking bush here, YOU YOURSELF have broken alot of the rules yourself, and got away with it time and time again.
Sadly, you act like a 10 year old when banned and unfairly start hassling Stu on the phone when he is trying to run his business.

If you want to keep going on and on I am going to ban you simply for victimising Simon.

Whether you agree or not, that is what is going to happen, you choose.

 

..not broken any rules unless i was started on first.

..cant beleive that a person can stalk another user behind a hidden name,text obscenities,use usernames to cause disruption....so if a user came on with your old nickname friom school or your mum's not known name due to using her second name posting address details using kaneisdead user after my dog died...wouldnt make you think that somehow this is pretty bad?..i seem to remember when hacked and user names were changed you was very pissed off

 

..and i payed for it,why bring stu into this what has he got to do with it,whats he been saying? Why are you ok with the harrasment notion what has simon given you?

 

If you genuinely believe you are being stalked, then see the police, it is NOT the responsibility of passionford admin to attempt to punnish people from criminal offences such as stalking by text message, its NOTHING to do with them.

You need to be talking to the authorities (or a shinrk ) about your concerns IMHO

 

Just remember, if you keep going on and on about the rules being upheld more strictly, that also applies to you too.
Keep going as you are like a stuck record and you will get banned simple as that.
You are victimising him constantly, whether you seem to think so or not.

Seriously, its YOUR choice, either get over it or dont come back, cause thats how its going to be

 

fuckin right i was pissed off we have 35000 members on here phil and theres a hand full of users that wank this board up as much as the hacker imo which pisses me off just as much


if you have stalker issuse then phone the police

 

Ban both of them, uphold the rules like they should be......

If there is a history of people getting away with breaking the rules its not going to change unless forced.

 

YOU are the one that brings Stu into it, by hassling him on the phone when you get banned!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Regarding the harrasment, Im am seeing it on here constantly from yourself!
You really need to take a step back and look at yourself, my 13 year old daughter acts more adult like than you do.
You may claim its "just the net" and you are not like this in real life, but you obviously ARE like that, cause you just cant move on and leave things alone!

If I banned you now, you would be pissed off and maybe ring Stu again, or possibly come on with a duplicate account, simply because you cannot stay away, and you obviously DO see it more than "just the internet"

YOU ARE OBSESSED, SEEK HELP OFF LINE FOR YOUR OWN GOOD!

 

https://passionford.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=316094



PMSL, yes Martyn has been bought off as well, its all a big conspiracy

 

Let Dave Escos back then. He has caused FAR FAR FAR less hassle than SECS ever has.

 

..Seriously jay before your mate goes gung ho,how can you go to the police when the moderating team of a bb where it is mainly happening will deny upholding rules and protecting the guilty?

 

Dave got his lifetime ban due to totting up the previous bans.
If Phil continues on as he is, he is going to be going down the same slippery slope too.

 

The text messages you keep referring to are NOTHING to do with this forum, the police will be interested in them, the mods of this forum (rightly so as its NOTHING to do with them) are not.

So either go to the police over these text messages you claim to have receieved, or just shut the fuck up about them

 

You have the "proof", print off your pm's take you mobile and show them the texts, play them your answerphone messages, show them whatever else you have that makes you beleive it to be true.

If you seriously beleive you have a stalker than go to the police with the evidence.
Whether or not you feel the rules are upheld on here is irrelivant to the matter.

 

...you are correct martyn/chip i do need medical help its the ultimate scapegoat thing to say.

..i will leave it here knowing crime does pay,people aint like sheep when one of those sheep protests he becomes the black one.

 

 

this is my point things have been to laxed and phils shouting about multipul usernames is a life ban when he has been guilty of it , but like martyn says he cry'd to stu when the man is trying to earn a living so to give stu a easier life and try to deal with it a little nicer but obviously u cant treat people decently


lets not forget that stu had to have time from here at one point because people who broke the rule wouldnt leave him alone

 

..just a final word..WHY THE FUCK is chip involved in this thread?

 

If you do not go to the police with your proof, no one will EVER take it seriously.
And as far as I am concerned, if you dont, then YOU obviously dont take it that seriously either!

 

..why would i phone stu..and why would he waste his time talking to me,infact it was stu that phoned me whilst i was in my shop shouting obsenitys down the phone,so i think you have it the wrong way round!

 

You mean Phil harrassed Stu like he reckons Simon is doing to him....who'd have thought it LOL

Either way...not upholding the rules from day 1 has got it like this.....and Simon being let back isnt exactly a step in the right direction is it?

 

and what brought stu to that point phil as i have myself had heated discussions with stu a never yet has he been rude to me ? no