PERFORMANCE FORD OR FAST FORD?????
#1
Regular Contributor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: oop north in yorkshire.
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PERFORMANCE FORD OR FAST FORD?????
Wud just like to no who likes which mag. I personally read PF and occasionally buy FF and constantly see little comments bout each other so want to settle it once and for all. Which is the most popular?????
Trending Topics
#9
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Gloucester
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Performance Ford is far more technical than Fast Ford. Fast Ford also ruin any car feature by using all the "arty" photo's that virtually disguise what the bloody car is!
PF writers also have a genuine interest in tuned Ford cars!!
PF writers also have a genuine interest in tuned Ford cars!!
#13
Regular Contributor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: oop north in yorkshire.
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the reason i read PF is because it seems 2 me as if Fast Ford is more interested in ICE and bodykits, whereas PF generally focuses on cars with as much power n pace as possible. Anyone agree?
#23
Originally Posted by andy_st200
TRC better than both (Track and Race Cars Magazine to you)
Still PF for me, although Fast Ford is getting a lot better. Shame about the sheds they've got as staff cars though
#30
I'm Finding My Feet Here Now
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: up north
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: PERFORMANCE FORD OR FAST FORD?????
Originally Posted by robrs
Wud just like to no who likes which mag. I personally read PF and occasionally buy FF and constantly see little comments bout each other so want to settle it once and for all. Which is the most popular?????
#31
PassionFord Post Whore!!
I will 99% of the time buy PF as i think they generally hit the nail on the head,
Over the last issues or so FF has gotten better but it does show for my liking to many bodykitted ice'd up cars, i want technical information with ground breaking cars, unique orignal ideas a good lay out, as Ian @ Racetek says no fancy camera angles or any of that rubbish just good revealing shots,
I like the vital stats in PF but liked the article on Reyland in FF last month.
I always look at FF before i buy it, PF i just tell the misses to pick me up a copy, infact i was even paying Ł7 for a copy in the states for a few years,
Mike
Would be interesting to see the grudge matchs against other brands of cars though with similar power etc etc
Over the last issues or so FF has gotten better but it does show for my liking to many bodykitted ice'd up cars, i want technical information with ground breaking cars, unique orignal ideas a good lay out, as Ian @ Racetek says no fancy camera angles or any of that rubbish just good revealing shots,
I like the vital stats in PF but liked the article on Reyland in FF last month.
I always look at FF before i buy it, PF i just tell the misses to pick me up a copy, infact i was even paying Ł7 for a copy in the states for a few years,
Mike
Would be interesting to see the grudge matchs against other brands of cars though with similar power etc etc
#40
Team HOTHOT!
I like them both as much as each other - each one has its good and bad points
altho i'm leaning slightly more to FF as they just did the photoshoot for my feature
altho i'm leaning slightly more to FF as they just did the photoshoot for my feature