chargecooler vs intercooler
i run a focus rs engine in a mk6 fez and run the standard chargecooler and custom rads
problem i have is once its sat in traffic around town the chargecooler gets warm very quickly and soaks the heat up from the tubular manifold
would a intercooler set up be better for me
what are the pros and cons of both systems??????performance etc???
obvisually water injection would be used on a intercooled set up
problem i have is once its sat in traffic around town the chargecooler gets warm very quickly and soaks the heat up from the tubular manifold
would a intercooler set up be better for me
what are the pros and cons of both systems??????performance etc???
obvisually water injection would be used on a intercooled set up
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by DUDE_SWEET_FRST
Originally Posted by gus
would of thought a charge cooler would be better whilst in traffic
intercooler needs airflow
intercooler needs airflow
only reason i ask this is engine advantages have released a intercooler kit for the frs
if you had a choice of either of the above what would you choose and the reasons why????
frs are common as shi7e now
the diff gives you a false sense of security then it bites..........theres a good few bean up for breaking
pics of the car have been hosted in the builds section
the diff gives you a false sense of security then it bites..........theres a good few bean up for breaking
pics of the car have been hosted in the builds section
Don't ask - I don't know
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 19,033
Likes: 40
From: Avoiding idiots - or trying to....
Originally Posted by simhopper
frs are common as shi7e now
the diff gives you a false sense of security then it bites..........theres a good few bean up for breaking
pics of the car have been hosted in the builds section
the diff gives you a false sense of security then it bites..........theres a good few bean up for breaking
pics of the car have been hosted in the builds section
can't say I've seen any more than 2 or 3 but if you managed to get one mate fair play......................
Originally Posted by Mr S1
Originally Posted by simhopper
i run a focus rs engine in a mk6 fez
sim - get a piccy up
Don't ask - I don't know
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 19,033
Likes: 40
From: Avoiding idiots - or trying to....
Originally Posted by DUDE_SWEET_FRST
Originally Posted by Mr S1
Originally Posted by simhopper
i run a focus rs engine in a mk6 fez
sim - get a piccy up
Don't ask - I don't know
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 19,033
Likes: 40
From: Avoiding idiots - or trying to....
Originally Posted by simhopper

believe me now

Originally Posted by Mr S1
Originally Posted by DUDE_SWEET_FRST
Originally Posted by Mr S1
Originally Posted by simhopper
i run a focus rs engine in a mk6 fez
sim - get a piccy up
chargecoolers vs intercoolers
Unless you're going for over 300bhp, I would stick with the charge-cooler with an enlarged radiator.
The thing with fitting an intercooler, is that it isn't any good unless you can get plenty of airflow without restricting the radiator too much. Obviously, you also have fitment / packaging issues with an air to air one, as you don't want to ruin the look of the car by cutting bits of bumper away....
The thing with fitting an intercooler, is that it isn't any good unless you can get plenty of airflow without restricting the radiator too much. Obviously, you also have fitment / packaging issues with an air to air one, as you don't want to ruin the look of the car by cutting bits of bumper away....
If your charge cooler pump is running all the time then fit a fan to the charge rad this will help, if you cannot contain the heat under boost then change to a Intercooler.
Mark
Mark
Originally Posted by b19bal
sim cut out were that grill is and allow some sort of venting in the bonnet
at the moment all the air is going under the car from what i can see
at the moment all the air is going under the car from what i can see
As you already have the charge-cooler bits, the sensible thing to do would be to get it all running and then just measure the ACTs to see if the chargecooler is coping or not. Why waste money un-necessarily? TEST don't GUESS
.
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
As you already have the charge-cooler bits, the sensible thing to do would be to get it all running and then just measure the ACTs to see if the chargecooler is coping or not. Why waste money un-necessarily? TEST don't GUESS
.
# note, you will need 2 gauges to measure in and out temps
(i deserve commison
)
I run both Intercooler & Charge Cooler.
The Boost goes into the Charge cooler that feeds the intercooler.
I am going to remove the Charge cooler and go for the simpler design of a large front mount intercooler. there is less to go wrong with an air to air intercooler, charge coolers need water pumps, water ect...
sat in traffic It makes no difference what charge temps go to, your not going anyware. The other way would be to remove the RS Fan assembly, which is a set of small "Suckers" and replace with some slimline 12" kenlower "blowers" on the back of the air con rad. Place them low down just behind the intercooler or charge cooler rad and it should help air flow - Oh and wire them to an overide swith on the dash so they can be permantly on in traffic..
Thats my set-up and is 110% Tops!!
The Boost goes into the Charge cooler that feeds the intercooler.
I am going to remove the Charge cooler and go for the simpler design of a large front mount intercooler. there is less to go wrong with an air to air intercooler, charge coolers need water pumps, water ect...
sat in traffic It makes no difference what charge temps go to, your not going anyware. The other way would be to remove the RS Fan assembly, which is a set of small "Suckers" and replace with some slimline 12" kenlower "blowers" on the back of the air con rad. Place them low down just behind the intercooler or charge cooler rad and it should help air flow - Oh and wire them to an overide swith on the dash so they can be permantly on in traffic..
Thats my set-up and is 110% Tops!!
Had this problem with my FRS through summer. Now run an intercooler which is better then the chargecooler but doesn't help those temps whilst idling or in slow traffic. So cut a hole in the bonnet and have a manual switch for fans. Problem sorted.
Nim
Nim
There are pros and cons to both,
I mean getting very technical then you can look at the Specific heat capacity(SHC) of air against water, for instance SHC of air is 1005-1030 J/kgK but water is 4187J/kgK this means that it takes about 4 times as much energy to change the temperature of water than it does air, so when the chargecooler gets hot it stays hot longer, but it also takes longer to get hot than an intercooler would, theoretcally anyway.
the other pros and cons would be the packaging issues like Mr. Rainbird suggested, in all fairness I would be inclined to follow suggestion and see if what you already have is coping.
I mean getting very technical then you can look at the Specific heat capacity(SHC) of air against water, for instance SHC of air is 1005-1030 J/kgK but water is 4187J/kgK this means that it takes about 4 times as much energy to change the temperature of water than it does air, so when the chargecooler gets hot it stays hot longer, but it also takes longer to get hot than an intercooler would, theoretcally anyway.
the other pros and cons would be the packaging issues like Mr. Rainbird suggested, in all fairness I would be inclined to follow suggestion and see if what you already have is coping.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




?

