Daz's Dolomite 693bhp/500lbf ft torque RR
#321
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chesterfield
Posts: 4,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by martin-reyland
Originally Posted by Bosch-Man
Hadland step away from the Labatts
Like fuck you on the wagon
Like fuck you on the wagon
that's the difference between you and me... when i say i'm going to do something i stick to it
#328
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Reading
Posts: 956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the dolly is the nuts m8,cant believe the back stabbing bullshit some of you fuckers are talking about over afew hp and some fucking fuel.fuck um m8 nice motor
#329
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Originally Posted by pig
the dolly is the nuts m8,cant believe the back stabbing bullshit some of you fuckers are talking about over afew hp and some fucking fuel.fuck um m8 nice motor
mike
#332
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chesterfield
Posts: 4,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bosch-Man
...Martin imagine if i put my money into whooping your ass?....Youd look stupid being beaten by a chimp...thats why i dont do it...your God..ima Jesus
#333
1st to 200 without NOS
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by Bosch-Man
...Martin imagine if i put my money into whooping your ass?....Youd look stupid being beaten by a chimp...thats why i dont do it...your God..ima Jesus
#334
Originally Posted by martin-reyland
Originally Posted by Bosch-Man
...Martin imagine if i put my money into whooping your ass?....Youd look stupid being beaten by a chimp...thats why i dont do it...your God..ima Jesus
Well if youd let Mike see above your waist i'd get him to drive
#335
Originally Posted by Matt
Originally Posted by martin-reyland
Originally Posted by RANJ
Originally Posted by Matt
who exactly in your stupid dumb ass blinkered opinion am i arse licking then bubba?
hey im not ur missus
bbbbbzzzzzzttttt
youre outta here fat boy
MATT
I have nowt against Ranj as he was fine when I met him years ago at an rst thrash. BUT thats a funny as fuck post
RW
#336
1st to 200 without NOS
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by Bosch-Man
Originally Posted by martin-reyland
Originally Posted by Bosch-Man
...Martin imagine if i put my money into whooping your ass?....Youd look stupid being beaten by a chimp...thats why i dont do it...your God..ima Jesus
Well if youd let Mike see above your waist i'd get him to drive
#337
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chesterfield
Posts: 4,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by martin-reyland
Originally Posted by Bosch-Man
Originally Posted by martin-reyland
Originally Posted by Bosch-Man
...Martin imagine if i put my money into whooping your ass?....Youd look stupid being beaten by a chimp...thats why i dont do it...your God..ima Jesus
Well if youd let Mike see above your waist i'd get him to drive
http://www.bangedup.com/post.php?media=4086
#339
1st to 200 without NOS
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by Bosch-Man
Martin i am afraid you couldnt do my rules of super unleaded and full aero pack including wing mirrors
also have you spoke to rod about the fact he's breaking YOUR rules
#341
1st to 200 without NOS
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by Bosch-Man
Martin one final stipulation it has to be a full Cosworth...not one in Japanese drag!!!!!
ROFL
ROFL
#346
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Doncaster
Posts: 5,143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by cossierich330
Has taken me over 30 mins to read all this. Is there a point to it all
#348
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
I think you're being a little harsh on Rod, as all he was doing was bringing into question the dyno-plot . Okay, he could have done it a bit more diplomatically (like I did ), but not everyone is the same, and Rod "reacted" to it in the "what a load of bullshit" frame, instead of just questioning it's validity. We're all different!
However, I'm not sure if some of you are reacting aggressively to divert attention from the dyno-plot or what, but give Rod his dues - he posts what he thinks when he thinks it (rightly or wrongly) and this can get him into trouble.
Also, like it or not, Rod's car IS currently the fastest Cosworth on the planet (216mph on an 8 mile bowl doesn't cut it for me ), and if / when his speed is eventually beaten, you can bet that that tuner's "cronies" will be harping on about it until the cows come home .
Personally, if it was my car that had achieved what Rod's had, I too would be putting "pretenders to the crown" in their place too, right up until the point that my record was taken away from me . How would you NOT be justifiable proud of such an achievement? I hate the fact that in the UK it is a well known British attribute to diss success . Being the best at something should not IMO be mocked or rediculed. As far as I am concerned, Rod is making the most of his "fifteen minutes" of fame, and when it is beaten, no-one will remember (who the fuck was that Mike Rainbird chap with the 180+mph Sapphire way back when? ). So give credit where credit is due etc. I don't see anyone else willing to PROVE performance times like Rod has?
Dynos (as has been proven on this thread) can be made to lie. However, the black stuff can't lie .
However, I'm not sure if some of you are reacting aggressively to divert attention from the dyno-plot or what, but give Rod his dues - he posts what he thinks when he thinks it (rightly or wrongly) and this can get him into trouble.
Also, like it or not, Rod's car IS currently the fastest Cosworth on the planet (216mph on an 8 mile bowl doesn't cut it for me ), and if / when his speed is eventually beaten, you can bet that that tuner's "cronies" will be harping on about it until the cows come home .
Personally, if it was my car that had achieved what Rod's had, I too would be putting "pretenders to the crown" in their place too, right up until the point that my record was taken away from me . How would you NOT be justifiable proud of such an achievement? I hate the fact that in the UK it is a well known British attribute to diss success . Being the best at something should not IMO be mocked or rediculed. As far as I am concerned, Rod is making the most of his "fifteen minutes" of fame, and when it is beaten, no-one will remember (who the fuck was that Mike Rainbird chap with the 180+mph Sapphire way back when? ). So give credit where credit is due etc. I don't see anyone else willing to PROVE performance times like Rod has?
Dynos (as has been proven on this thread) can be made to lie. However, the black stuff can't lie .
#349
Mike, I'm disappointed.
I've never seen you type so much bollox in one post before
When you and Bruce were attacking top speeds, before Martin came along and obliterated you both , you were very modest about your achievements (which back then were something special). The only one who was acting the fool back then was Car Crusher , as well you remember - whilst it was light hearted banter, it always had a little edge to it, just because of Bruce's then "MAD or nothing attitude".
Anyway, I don't think it's about achievements or knocking someone who succeeds at all - Rod should be justifiably proud of his car/achievements as it is an absolute beast of a car - it's about being gracious with it as well.
There's also a difference between being proud and being arrogant, which since Rod likes to remind everybody that he's old enough to be most of our grandfathers (and may well be! ), he really ought to recognise.
I've never seen you type so much bollox in one post before
When you and Bruce were attacking top speeds, before Martin came along and obliterated you both , you were very modest about your achievements (which back then were something special). The only one who was acting the fool back then was Car Crusher , as well you remember - whilst it was light hearted banter, it always had a little edge to it, just because of Bruce's then "MAD or nothing attitude".
Anyway, I don't think it's about achievements or knocking someone who succeeds at all - Rod should be justifiably proud of his car/achievements as it is an absolute beast of a car - it's about being gracious with it as well.
There's also a difference between being proud and being arrogant, which since Rod likes to remind everybody that he's old enough to be most of our grandfathers (and may well be! ), he really ought to recognise.
#350
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
Yes, but there were MANY cars that came along that were "claiming" to be MUCH more powerful, yet couldn't exceed 180mph, which I found hilarious and would publically villify as not having the claimed pwer out-put.
Back then, most of these people weren't altogether in one place to take the piss out of directly, but now with the advent of Pf, there are "lots" of 500+bhp cars and still many of them haven't exceeded 180mph, let alone 190 or even 200mph .
Also, the thing you have to remember with the banter between Bruce and I, is that we had BOTH attempted the top speed thing, so both knew how difficult it was and so there was a degree of total and utter respect for each other's achievements. I certainly would not have taken the banter from someone that hadn't been there, seen it and got the T-shirt .
How could I respect someone dissing me (playfully or otherwise), if they didn't actually literally understand what was involved in such an endeavour (risking life and limb + a Ł10k of engine each time)?
Back then, most of these people weren't altogether in one place to take the piss out of directly, but now with the advent of Pf, there are "lots" of 500+bhp cars and still many of them haven't exceeded 180mph, let alone 190 or even 200mph .
Also, the thing you have to remember with the banter between Bruce and I, is that we had BOTH attempted the top speed thing, so both knew how difficult it was and so there was a degree of total and utter respect for each other's achievements. I certainly would not have taken the banter from someone that hadn't been there, seen it and got the T-shirt .
How could I respect someone dissing me (playfully or otherwise), if they didn't actually literally understand what was involved in such an endeavour (risking life and limb + a Ł10k of engine each time)?
#351
Hmm..
my shed beat other rsts that I KNEW to have 40+ more at the wheels.
That doesn't prove they dont have the power.
I also didnt think Rod had proven a horsepower figure for a very long time. They were based on estimates of added power from Nos.
Until they decide what the playing field is.. be that Brunters or the same rolling road, no one can win or lose. Thus Daz's car, until it goes down brunters has nothing to claim against rods "crown".
RW
my shed beat other rsts that I KNEW to have 40+ more at the wheels.
That doesn't prove they dont have the power.
I also didnt think Rod had proven a horsepower figure for a very long time. They were based on estimates of added power from Nos.
Until they decide what the playing field is.. be that Brunters or the same rolling road, no one can win or lose. Thus Daz's car, until it goes down brunters has nothing to claim against rods "crown".
RW
#354
Originally Posted by Cliff S1
I have to say I'm with Mike on this.
You can all slag Rod off but I know I'd be shouting about my achievement if I was him
What's the closest someone has come to beating Rods speed within Brunters?
You can all slag Rod off but I know I'd be shouting about my achievement if I was him
What's the closest someone has come to beating Rods speed within Brunters?
#355
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
Originally Posted by Steven_RW
Hmm..
my shed beat other rsts that I KNEW to have 40+ more at the wheels.
That doesn't prove they dont have the power.
I also didnt think Rod had proven a horsepower figure for a very long time. They were based on estimates of added power from Nos.
Until they decide what the playing field is.. be that Brunters or the same rolling road, no one can win or lose. Thus Daz's car, until it goes down brunters has nothing to claim against rods "crown".
RW
my shed beat other rsts that I KNEW to have 40+ more at the wheels.
That doesn't prove they dont have the power.
I also didnt think Rod had proven a horsepower figure for a very long time. They were based on estimates of added power from Nos.
Until they decide what the playing field is.. be that Brunters or the same rolling road, no one can win or lose. Thus Daz's car, until it goes down brunters has nothing to claim against rods "crown".
RW
I'm surprised that you don't understand why these cars failed . There is no point them making a peak of 40bhp more than yours at 5500rpm, if by 6500 they are making 10bhp less . Where the power is, is just as important as how much the power is for doing top speed runs (unless the car is re-geared accordingly ).
#357
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: In my garage, coventry
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
I will be happy to run my car at brunters
Its not the same shape as a cosworth
But i will give it my all
It aint going to beat rods top speed as my gbox only gives it 190 mph
If it does 190 and has the aerodynamics of a box it shows it has some power but has it less than the claim
I suppose i could say my car is the fasted top speed old car at brunters(32 years old ) with cos engine in
Unless u know different
Im still up for going to the rollers though
now where did i put that new Turbo
oh here it is
may throw it on Just for the rollers
Its not the same shape as a cosworth
But i will give it my all
It aint going to beat rods top speed as my gbox only gives it 190 mph
If it does 190 and has the aerodynamics of a box it shows it has some power but has it less than the claim
I suppose i could say my car is the fasted top speed old car at brunters(32 years old ) with cos engine in
Unless u know different
Im still up for going to the rollers though
now where did i put that new Turbo
oh here it is
may throw it on Just for the rollers
#359
Originally Posted by Alg1k
I will be happy to run my car at brunters
Its not the same shape as a cosworth
But i will give it my all
It aint going to beat rods top speed as my gbox only gives it 190 mph
If it does 190 and has the aerodynamics of a box it shows it has some power but has it less than the claim
I suppose i could say my car is the fasted top speed old car at brunters(32 years old ) with cos engine in
Unless u know different
Im still up for going to the rollers though
Its not the same shape as a cosworth
But i will give it my all
It aint going to beat rods top speed as my gbox only gives it 190 mph
If it does 190 and has the aerodynamics of a box it shows it has some power but has it less than the claim
I suppose i could say my car is the fasted top speed old car at brunters(32 years old ) with cos engine in
Unless u know different
Im still up for going to the rollers though
#360
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Building a gearbox in Markyate
Posts: 1,314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Alg1k
I will be happy to run my car at brunters
Its not the same shape as a cosworth
But i will give it my all
It aint going to beat rods top speed as my gbox only gives it 190 mph
If it does 190 and has the aerodynamics of a box it shows it has some power but has it less than the claim
I suppose i could say my car is the fasted top speed old car at brunters(32 years old ) with cos engine in
Unless u know different
Im still up for going to the rollers though
now where did i put that new Turbo
oh here it is
may throw it on Just for the rollers
Its not the same shape as a cosworth
But i will give it my all
It aint going to beat rods top speed as my gbox only gives it 190 mph
If it does 190 and has the aerodynamics of a box it shows it has some power but has it less than the claim
I suppose i could say my car is the fasted top speed old car at brunters(32 years old ) with cos engine in
Unless u know different
Im still up for going to the rollers though
now where did i put that new Turbo
oh here it is
may throw it on Just for the rollers