RE: CARWISE STATEMENT - WHY HAS THIS BEEN MOVED
#41
PassionFords Creator
iTrader: (12)
jaycos,
im saying stu that the cam thread should have gone before it went out of control it seemed to be ok to stay there as long as a person was gettin shafted
im saying stu that the cam thread should have gone before it went out of control it seemed to be ok to stay there as long as a person was gettin shafted
as soon as it was linked to another forum thats different bcause it ruins pf and ur stature
External links to popular topics gains us more members and bandwidth and thus all the advertisers also gain business. I fail to see how it can affect me or my stature personally in any way whatsoever. PassionFord is a website that allows an unusually high freedom of speech, nothing more nothing less.
but it aint finished so what did it achieve and what is it going to
#42
Do me a favour!
The guy posts saying how awful the website is, and you agree with him.
When I question the fact that he doesn't appear to be much of a contributor, he replies that he doesn't really care about posting on here - can you not see the irony?
Further to that, several people have claimed bias on behalf of the mods, I've asked for an example, and am still waiting.
The guy posts saying how awful the website is, and you agree with him.
When I question the fact that he doesn't appear to be much of a contributor, he replies that he doesn't really care about posting on here - can you not see the irony?
Further to that, several people have claimed bias on behalf of the mods, I've asked for an example, and am still waiting.
#45
Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
ok stu u didnt see it then thats fine ok mabey im still not typing this right freedom of speech is one thing but does this include eggin cam on to hit , beat up or cause damage to neil as i see this as stupidity not freedom of speech so my point was why let it carry on
rich ur reply to Y the fact that he has only 4 posts ect , i dont think the site is bad just the way the way that things like slatting disputes are handled as i just answered to stus question
cheers jay
rich ur reply to Y the fact that he has only 4 posts ect , i dont think the site is bad just the way the way that things like slatting disputes are handled as i just answered to stus question
cheers jay
#46
having a mid life crisis
Actually people say the webteam bias towards one tuner,correctr if I not wrong
Some of the web team cars are tuned by NMS
Couple by MSD
One by MAD
One BY AVA
A couple of their cars is not set up by any tuner
Some of the web team cars are tuned by NMS
Couple by MSD
One by MAD
One BY AVA
A couple of their cars is not set up by any tuner
#48
Okay Jay, but then explain this.
Mr Y says that this website's moderaters are ruled by bias, to which you replied:
Since you were so vocal on the subject, can we see an example of this bias, and moderators laughing at the situation?
If I was a mod, I'd find that quite insulting. Despite their tuner alleigances, nearly all the mods do an excellent job of remaining impartial.
Mr Y says that this website's moderaters are ruled by bias, to which you replied:
aint this the truth it didnt matter because it wasnt wreckin there favourite cossie shop and prob found it quite funny in a sick sort of way
If I was a mod, I'd find that quite insulting. Despite their tuner alleigances, nearly all the mods do an excellent job of remaining impartial.
#49
Advanced PassionFord User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: In my GTR Skyline as often as poss ; )
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Absolutely right, Stu ...
Although a delicate subject was aired in public .. It provided a space for everyone to have their say. Only threatening and suggestive remarks regarding retalliation would necessitate the thread's removal ... or removal of the offending items.
Whether any party was "getting shafted" or not .. Both of them actively involved themselves from the start. So I can't see a great deal unfair there.
Personally, I would look for a way to draw a line under all this, and ask the parties to keep us informed.
Jay, It's really up to Stu and his Administrators to run things as they see fit.
Regards .....
Al.
Although a delicate subject was aired in public .. It provided a space for everyone to have their say. Only threatening and suggestive remarks regarding retalliation would necessitate the thread's removal ... or removal of the offending items.
Whether any party was "getting shafted" or not .. Both of them actively involved themselves from the start. So I can't see a great deal unfair there.
Personally, I would look for a way to draw a line under all this, and ask the parties to keep us informed.
Jay, It's really up to Stu and his Administrators to run things as they see fit.
Regards .....
Al.
#51
PassionFords Creator
iTrader: (12)
jaycos,
freedom of speech is one thing but does this include eggin cam on to hit , beat up or cause damage to neil as i see this as stupidity not freedom of speech
freedom of speech is one thing but does this include eggin cam on to hit , beat up or cause damage to neil as i see this as stupidity not freedom of speech
Anyway.... enough. Lets just agree to disagree if thats what we need to do.
#54
Originally Posted by Diablo
IF you GENUINELY care enough about the forum to want to have an input into how its run then surely you must also care enough to contribute to how its funded, so how come you arent a gold member?
I took issue with the administration of the forum. How exactly will my Ł20 contribution impact that?
I took issue with the administration of the forum. How exactly will my Ł20 contribution impact that?
I personally feel that anyone piggybacking FOC on the forum should just be greatful the administration here are kind enough to let the leech off the rest of us in the first place
#56
Originally Posted by RichardPON
Chip - no need for that.
Narrinder is a top fella, and a real car enthusiast - I'm sure that wasn't his intention.
Narrinder is a top fella, and a real car enthusiast - I'm sure that wasn't his intention.
Apologies Narinder if that is the case.
But i do still feel that anyone who cares about the forum should help fund it.
After all if we didnt, it wouldnt be here to whinge about anyway!
#57
Originally Posted by RichardPON
Do me a favour!
The guy posts saying how awful the website is, and you agree with him.
When I question the fact that he doesn't appear to be much of a contributor, he replies that he doesn't really care about posting on here - can you not see the irony?
Further to that, several people have claimed bias on behalf of the mods, I've asked for an example, and am still waiting.
The guy posts saying how awful the website is, and you agree with him.
When I question the fact that he doesn't appear to be much of a contributor, he replies that he doesn't really care about posting on here - can you not see the irony?
Further to that, several people have claimed bias on behalf of the mods, I've asked for an example, and am still waiting.
As I have seen a lot of on PF you basically think my opinion is not important because I am more of a viewer than a poster.
There is bias on here, I have tried to search for some without success as the serach facility does not seem to go back very far.
#58
You're opinion is certainly considered less important than someone who financially contributes.
So back to this bias that you keep claiming to see - any chance of that example?
So back to this bias that you keep claiming to see - any chance of that example?
#59
Originally Posted by RichardPON
You're opinion is certainly considered less important than someone who financially contributes.
Originally Posted by RichardPON
So back to this bias that you keep claiming to see - any chance of that example?
#64
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
He must have forgotten his sign on then . As he has "Santa's Little Helper" assigned to that IP address as well...
#67
Originally Posted by Stu @ M Developments
chip-3door,
otherwise he would have to be a liar.
otherwise he would have to be a liar.
Im going to send you a bill for making me hungry.
#68
PassionFord Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: kent
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
here is an example of people who post a lot ruining a thread from someone who dont post much,
comments from tf ralleysport
and reaction from mod,
NOTE BOTH are mods
what would happen if i jumped on one of his threads and said that to him ,deleted or banned,and i sent a pm about it and got a reply back asking ME to drop the attitude when NONE was sent to the person i pm'd i just called a mod on here a twat a few times
heres the link,lets see how many turn this into a piss take
https://passionford.com/forum/viewto...ighlight=quest
cheeRS gary
AKA shrek
comments from tf ralleysport
and reaction from mod,
NOTE BOTH are mods
what would happen if i jumped on one of his threads and said that to him ,deleted or banned,and i sent a pm about it and got a reply back asking ME to drop the attitude when NONE was sent to the person i pm'd i just called a mod on here a twat a few times
heres the link,lets see how many turn this into a piss take
https://passionford.com/forum/viewto...ighlight=quest
cheeRS gary
AKA shrek
#69
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SE
Posts: 9,226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
See now if Tim had said that to me I wouldve just answered "I wish I could"..
WIth the greatest respect Gary, ALOT of dry pisstaking on this (ASmost) BB... GOT to be thick skinned and take stuff with a pinch of salt IMO
WIth the greatest respect Gary, ALOT of dry pisstaking on this (ASmost) BB... GOT to be thick skinned and take stuff with a pinch of salt IMO
#70
Super Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by jaycos
Originally Posted by y
Originally Posted by Stu @ M Developments
If YOU USERS could actually keep a thread ON TOPIC like adults and not let it degenerate into threats and arguments like whinging schoolkids, then THE WEBTEAM would have no bloody need to move it to a more suitable room in the first place would we?
jay
#71
Originally Posted by Eagle
[
erm .. sorry but i do not agree with that in any way shape or form im not biased towards anyone .. i will pm anyone who has a sig pic over the correct size (as some mods have found out )and not have a problem banning anyone for the correct reason...
erm .. sorry but i do not agree with that in any way shape or form im not biased towards anyone .. i will pm anyone who has a sig pic over the correct size (as some mods have found out )and not have a problem banning anyone for the correct reason...
#72
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Less
Actually people say the webteam bias towards one tuner,correctr if I not wrong
Some of the web team cars are tuned by NMS
Couple by MSD
One by MAD
One BY AVA
A couple of their cars is not set up by any tuner
Some of the web team cars are tuned by NMS
Couple by MSD
One by MAD
One BY AVA
A couple of their cars is not set up by any tuner
One by MAD who is that then???
#73
Super Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by YUM360
Originally Posted by Less
Actually people say the webteam bias towards one tuner,correctr if I not wrong
Some of the web team cars are tuned by NMS
Couple by MSD
One by MAD
One BY AVA
A couple of their cars is not set up by any tuner
Some of the web team cars are tuned by NMS
Couple by MSD
One by MAD
One BY AVA
A couple of their cars is not set up by any tuner
One by MAD who is that then???
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post