google image earth and NASA world wind
#1
PassionFord Post Troll
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Not sure if anyone has come accross these two before. I have been using them for a couple of weeks and they are awesome.
The google one is about 10MB and the NASA one about 180MB.
They are software that use satellites to zoom into a location of your choice anywhere in the world.
They are real time cameras and go down to street level. Could be useful for people showing each other best streets to go to in certain cities etc.
The main thing they require are the are reasonable spec modern PC and are designed for Broadband. They also need the latest Direct X update which is a Windows update anyway.
Enjoy
http://earth.google.com/
http://worldwind.arc.nasa.gov/download.html
The google one is about 10MB and the NASA one about 180MB.
They are software that use satellites to zoom into a location of your choice anywhere in the world.
They are real time cameras and go down to street level. Could be useful for people showing each other best streets to go to in certain cities etc.
The main thing they require are the are reasonable spec modern PC and are designed for Broadband. They also need the latest Direct X update which is a Windows update anyway.
Enjoy
![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
http://earth.google.com/
http://worldwind.arc.nasa.gov/download.html
#4
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Surrey
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Have used them both. Top programs!!
Can't seem to get as high detail on the Nasa one as I get on Google Earth. Zoom into London on Nasa and it looks shite. Or am I just not giving it enough time to load? Nasa seems to take ages to load the images.
steve
Can't seem to get as high detail on the Nasa one as I get on Google Earth. Zoom into London on Nasa and it looks shite. Or am I just not giving it enough time to load? Nasa seems to take ages to load the images.
steve
#7
PassionFord Post Troll
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
To be honest I do prefer the google one. I am still learning on the NASA one as I can only use it at home due to it not liking to be run through a proxy at work. At least the google one I can use at work and have learnt a fair bit more about.
Hadnt realised some of the images were that old Matt
Hadnt realised some of the images were that old Matt
Trending Topics
#16
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Doncaster
Posts: 5,143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by KSA-Cossie
Ive tried to do that too but the pic goes all blurry so i cant see clearly. ![Wall](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/wall.gif)
![Wall](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/wall.gif)
rick, how do you do that mate?
#20
Football Cwazy
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Redditch, Worcestershire
Posts: 9,553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
yeah the images on google are quite old, just check out wembley stadium, it's still there...oh the memories
cool for looking at paris, las vegas , new york , even had a looked at the pyramids in egypt and the launch pad at kennedy space centre
so much to look
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
cool for looking at paris, las vegas , new york , even had a looked at the pyramids in egypt and the launch pad at kennedy space centre
![Smokin](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_smokin.gif)
so much to look
![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
#22
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Doncaster
Posts: 5,143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by EIL132
Google one is a con, you can only zoom in on pre set areas that are old ordinance photographs with any degree of clarity. Rest is a waste of time.
#23
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 6,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Matt
Originally Posted by EIL132
Google one is a con, you can only zoom in on pre set areas that are old ordinance photographs with any degree of clarity. Rest is a waste of time.
![Pthbbbb](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile045.gif)
#24
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Not far from here
Posts: 3,992
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
my old rs turbo is parked outside my house on the google one too
over a year ago i sold it like but anyway its cool as fook
must be a manchester thing
if you actually look at manchester area, the map is MILES more detailed than lots of the surrounding areas
![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
![Banana](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/banana_dance.gif)
over a year ago i sold it like but anyway its cool as fook
![Banana](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/banana_dance.gif)
![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
must be a manchester thing
![Wink](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
if you actually look at manchester area, the map is MILES more detailed than lots of the surrounding areas
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DixieTheKid
Ford Sierra/Sapphire/RS500 Cosworth
11
06-06-2020 11:20 AM
PRO-LINE MOTORSPORT
General Car Related Discussion.
5
28-09-2015 09:54 PM