WRC / Swedish plenum needed?? 400 bhp
12-04-2005, 11:51 AM
#1
BANNED
BANNED
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Mongsville, wiping Jimbo.'s spastic arse.
Posts: 23,032
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
WRC / Swedish plenum needed?? 400 bhp
as per title, need to finalise things before engine is built and dyno'd
is it worth using this inlet at this power level?
If so.. mike.. get one to you know where!
cheers
Dave
is it worth using this inlet at this power level?
If so.. mike.. get one to you know where!
cheers
Dave
12-04-2005, 12:00 PM
#5
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Dunstable (Junction 9 or 11 of the M1)
Posts: 3,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've got the WRC 8 inj rail for my new engine 
the inlet tracts on a WRC rail are a lot wider than a standard PORTED tracts inlet.
the inlet tracts on a WRC rail are a lot wider than a standard PORTED tracts inlet.
12-04-2005, 12:04 PM
#7
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
Personally, I would chop your standard turbo in for one of Harvey's hybrid T34s and then you can get 440ish bhp rather than just about 400bhp with the standard one.
Trending Topics
12-04-2005, 12:11 PM
#9
T38 aint a t34 tho is it.......t38 holds more boost for longer up the rev range....
T38 is closer to a t04b (which harvey and ahmed had no idea what it was LOL
)
Whats the spec of his Magical T34 then ?
T38 is closer to a t04b (which harvey and ahmed had no idea what it was LOL
)Whats the spec of his Magical T34 then ?
12-04-2005, 12:18 PM
#17
Was just a genunine question as t34 cars never make anymore than 380 on a set of decent rollers thats all.....massive jump to 440....
No stiring just interested, as the turbo could come in useful 
No stiring just interested, as the turbo could come in useful
12-04-2005, 12:26 PM
#22
Originally Posted by Doug Stirling
No need for Hob Nobs really as Mike knows what he is on about
But especially for Dingy:
But especially for Dingy:
My car is 370bhp, going on the maths, wastegate is shut @ all times LOL......t34
12-04-2005, 12:26 PM
#23
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,078
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by * Rudey *
doug i bet thats framed in your house somewhere that pic u love it 
It will be soon LOL Thing is, in the same way that Turbo Technics mixed and matched T34 and T4 parts to create the "in between" T38 ......Someone with an engine Dyno (Harvey) can work closely with a another Garret supplier to get similar results - if not better, as they would optimise the "new hybrid" for using on a YB engine.....IDEAL
12-04-2005, 12:31 PM
#25
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,078
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dingy
Its not a t34 tho doug, which mike claims it to be....LOL....
Turbotechnics rate the t34 at what bhp
Turbotechnics rate the t34 at what bhp
Well, IIRC a properly speced T34 can produce 400 - 410 absolute max........well it did on my Paul Bailey built engine.....That was chassis dyno power (Interpro)
12-04-2005, 12:32 PM
#26
Steve,
This is the magical T34 that Ima had on his engine and if you want the full spec, I suggest you phone Harvey. However, only the casing is a T3/4 (and is heavily machined), the core is totally different .
But given you're so knowledgable, you knew that already .
Dave,
If you want to go for the 440bhp turbo, then I'm sure Harvey could sort you out a deal. Take both your turbos on Sat and discuss with him....
This is the magical T34 that Ima had on his engine and if you want the full spec, I suggest you phone Harvey
. However, only the casing is a T3/4 (and is heavily machined), the core is totally different .But given you're so knowledgable, you knew that already
.Dave,
If you want to go for the 440bhp turbo, then I'm sure Harvey could sort you out a deal. Take both your turbos on Sat and discuss with him....
12-04-2005, 12:33 PM
#27
10K+ Poster!!
I guy round here and a PF user has a harvey gibbs engine in his 3 door,
I'm not getting too involved in this argument as I'm not a guru, but I know that it made 400bhp using one of Harveys T34's at 2 bar on his dyno, so really Mike does have a point, in fact I believe you even know the fella Mike
right, back to my cup of T
I'm not getting too involved in this argument as I'm not a guru, but I know that it made 400bhp using one of Harveys T34's at 2 bar on his dyno, so really Mike does have a point, in fact I believe you even know the fella Mike
right, back to my cup of T
12-04-2005, 12:35 PM
#28
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,078
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
Dave,
If you want to go for the 440bhp turbo, then I'm sure Harvey could sort you out a deal. Take both your turbos on Sat and discuss with him....
If you want to go for the 440bhp turbo, then I'm sure Harvey could sort you out a deal. Take both your turbos on Sat and discuss with him....
Dave you having a twin turbo set up????
. Now fuck off
12-04-2005, 12:37 PM
#30
Originally Posted by JonnyBravo
I guy round here and a PF user has a harvey gibbs engine in his 3 door,
I'm not getting too involved in this argument as I'm not a guru, but I know that it made 400bhp using one of Harveys T34's at 2 bar on his dyno, so really Mike does have a point, in fact I believe you even know the fella Mike
right, back to my cup of T
I'm not getting too involved in this argument as I'm not a guru, but I know that it made 400bhp using one of Harveys T34's at 2 bar on his dyno, so really Mike does have a point, in fact I believe you even know the fella Mike
right, back to my cup of T
PMSL - as if
Mike, i don't know anything about the blower, hence the question...
IT aint a T34 is it, plain and simple.
12-04-2005, 12:43 PM
#33
Jeebus
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Staffordshire, UK
Posts: 8,663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Remember JB fletch's Harbey Gibbs engined T34 car was dynoed at 418bhp, and made even more on the rollers at one point!
Awaiting Dingys reason why this doesn't count...
Awaiting Dingys reason why this doesn't count...
12-04-2005, 12:49 PM
#36
Phil, no answer, must have been a good blower
But for an engine to make more incar than on the dyno.
A. its impossible. (if this is not the case please explain)
B. Rollers incorrect. (see A.)
But for an engine to make more incar than on the dyno.
A. its impossible. (if this is not the case please explain)
B. Rollers incorrect. (see A.)
12-04-2005, 12:54 PM
#39
10K+ Poster!!
Originally Posted by dingy
Originally Posted by JonnyBravo
I guy round here and a PF user has a harvey gibbs engine in his 3 door,
I'm not getting too involved in this argument as I'm not a guru, but I know that it made 400bhp using one of Harveys T34's at 2 bar on his dyno, so really Mike does have a point, in fact I believe you even know the fella Mike
right, back to my cup of T
I'm not getting too involved in this argument as I'm not a guru, but I know that it made 400bhp using one of Harveys T34's at 2 bar on his dyno, so really Mike does have a point, in fact I believe you even know the fella Mike
right, back to my cup of T
PMSL - as if
Mike, i don't know anything about the blower, hence the question...
IT aint a T34 is it, plain and simple.
12-04-2005, 12:56 PM
#40
I know nothing about tuning.
i know how my car feels and it feels faster with 32psi then with 26psi and it makes less power than it did on the dyno with more boost.....more boost = more power usually
i know how my car feels and it feels faster with 32psi then with 26psi and it makes less power than it did on the dyno with more boost.....more boost = more power usually