Turbo Dynamics
Trending Topics
#9
The following users liked this post:
lee2cossies (03-04-2018)
#13
It is a shame that the swap is so expensive as I did not like the yb on a t34, trouble is the Cossies are now so expensive to tune, even a decent rebuild with a bit of porting and some long studs gets expensive.
#15
Anything to tune properly is expensive and even more so the higher power you go.
Nowt wrong with a t34 on a well set up car.
I’d say 80-90% of people would disagree with you but if that’s your opinion that’s also fine.
Your answer to anyone’s turbo/tuning questions seems to be “put an efr, manifold and management on it and take it to mad”
I’m not saying that’s wrong at all but come on now, stop beating the drum.
And if you don’t even really like turbo cars why have 5 and spend so much time, effort and money on them, and we’ll as keep talking about it??
That makes no sense at all!
Cheers Paul
Nowt wrong with a t34 on a well set up car.
I’d say 80-90% of people would disagree with you but if that’s your opinion that’s also fine.
Your answer to anyone’s turbo/tuning questions seems to be “put an efr, manifold and management on it and take it to mad”
I’m not saying that’s wrong at all but come on now, stop beating the drum.
And if you don’t even really like turbo cars why have 5 and spend so much time, effort and money on them, and we’ll as keep talking about it??
That makes no sense at all!
Cheers Paul
#17
Paul, You go against my posts about efr’s so you bang your drum and I bang mine.
My answer will be consistent as it is my belief until something better comes along. I am a big fan of the improvements that an efr and decent management makes, same with close ratio box and 6 degree beam or cradle
The cars that I wanted to do the jobs I wanted them to do just happened to be specified by the manufacturers as turbos.
This is a forum where we share ideas and opinions.
My answer will be consistent as it is my belief until something better comes along. I am a big fan of the improvements that an efr and decent management makes, same with close ratio box and 6 degree beam or cradle
The cars that I wanted to do the jobs I wanted them to do just happened to be specified by the manufacturers as turbos.
This is a forum where we share ideas and opinions.
Last edited by Caddyshack; 02-04-2018 at 12:46 PM.
#18
My t34 was mapped by Ahmed bajoo back in the day, I found it to be laggy and dropped off boost too easily, the efr on low boost was similar power just behaved much more like a modern turbo car.
#19
My car went well on its t34 it was a simple conversation I had done not long after getting the car. It was estimated at about 350bhp plenty quick enough for the majority of things I met on the road with 4 wheels lol. I also really rated my gt3076 set up with about 500bhp pulled really well was a proper fast car certainly fast enough that the majority of my non car loving mates wouldn’t get back in it lol. Can’t wait to try a 9180 I’m keen on taking the new route many are not be we are all different
At no point at all was the t34 anywear near on par with the gt30 in the real would and certainly won’t be with the new set up but there totally different ends of what you can archive now
At no point at all was the t34 anywear near on par with the gt30 in the real would and certainly won’t be with the new set up but there totally different ends of what you can archive now
Last edited by ajamesc; 02-04-2018 at 12:49 PM.
The following users liked this post:
turbotrev (02-04-2018)
#20
My car went well on its t34 it was a simple conversation I had done not long after getting the car. It was estimated at about 350bhp plenty quick enough for the majority of things I met on the road with 4 wheels lol. I also really rated my gt3076 set up with about 500bhp pulled really well was a proper fast car certainly fast enough that the majority of my non car loving mates wouldn’t get back in it lol. Can’t wait to try a 9180 I’m keen on taking the new route many are not be we are all different
#22
I'll be looking for a turbo upgrade,as my next job ,once ive altered the plenum,alternator,water hoses,air filter/intake,side scoops,breather system
Last edited by mattman1234; 02-04-2018 at 04:35 PM.
#23
#25
#26
#27
I know what you mean but it will do 630bhp on 7160 using my current manifold and no mods, it will be close to 900kg by the time I am finished and 630bhp with the kind of torque the 2.2 will make is, quite frankly, very scary.
#28
If your 34 car drove that bad then it either was oddly specced or it wasn’t set up very well.
Cheers Paul
The following users liked this post:
Rsmat (02-04-2018)
#29
In fact he downsized from it to gain response so I was told
(Yes I know he’s back on a 9180 now)
Cheers Paul
#30
#31
I have no problem with mark or him mapping a car of mine, it’s just the setups he’s prefers are not my choice so it’s pointless.
If staying 500 and under I’d consider it but above that imo there are different ways I personally prefer things hence no efr for me
Cheers Paul
If staying 500 and under I’d consider it but above that imo there are different ways I personally prefer things hence no efr for me
Cheers Paul
#32
Cheers Paul
#34
#36
Guy's c'mon it's called banter 😁
Toby you like the drive of a more modern car.
Paul you are like me and like the drive of a cosworth how it's always been brash and loads of booost....
If Toby had a old skool T4 8 greens set up in his lightweight pug it would have spat him out years ago. So the ideal solution was to have a linear boost car so it's easier to control.
If we was all the same life would be boring.
Paul
Toby you like the drive of a more modern car.
Paul you are like me and like the drive of a cosworth how it's always been brash and loads of booost....
If Toby had a old skool T4 8 greens set up in his lightweight pug it would have spat him out years ago. So the ideal solution was to have a linear boost car so it's easier to control.
If we was all the same life would be boring.
Paul
The following 4 users liked this post by costina:
The following users liked this post:
Caddyshack (02-04-2018)
#38
#40