General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

1.7 Puma motor vs. 1.8 silvertop Zetec? VVT?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-05-2013, 01:34 PM
  #1  
Doodah
Wahay!! I've lost my Virginity!!
Thread Starter
 
Doodah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: somerset
Posts: 90
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default 1.7 Puma motor vs. 1.8 silvertop Zetec? VVT?

Hi all I'm getting all ready to do a 1.8 silvertop conversion on my Mk4 Escort & was just wondering about using the 1.7 engine from a Puma. I know it's a popular conversion on the Fiesta Zetec-S, is this because it has VVT? Actually, not knowing much about these things, I have to ask - does it even have VVT?!?

If so I'd be interested to know if anyone has put this engine into a Mk4. I know nothing about how VVT works, only what it does, and that it's nice

Is it an electrical/electronic or mechanical system, ie can it be as simple to fit this engine as the Zetec & run it on carbs? Is it worth paying the extra (I'm sure it'll be harder to get hold of one) and would it be that much, or any, quicker than a 1.8 Zetec running 2.0 cams?

Thanks
Old 08-05-2013, 02:05 PM
  #2  
Dal_
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (2)
 
Dal_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northants
Posts: 2,553
Received 65 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

Variable Cam Timing yes. Toyota's have VVT.

It runs of varying the oil pressure in a chamber to advance or retard the cam. It does this with a solenoid operated electronically so will need a VCT operational ECU to work correctly.

Doesn't do that much tbh..

Last edited by Dal_; 08-05-2013 at 02:06 PM.
Old 08-05-2013, 04:12 PM
  #3  
the_frozen_one
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
iTrader: (1)
 
the_frozen_one's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Crawley, West Sussex
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Doodah
can it be as simple to fit this engine as the Zetec & run it on carbs? Is it worth paying the extra (I'm sure it'll be harder to get hold of one) and would it be that much, or any, quicker than a 1.8 Zetec running 2.0 cams?
Nope pain in the arse. Nope not worth it. Nope it won't be quicker.
Old 08-05-2013, 05:43 PM
  #4  
BM08
Professional Waffler
 
BM08's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: west midlands
Posts: 27,883
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I know a work mate who's had 3 pumas, all had engine/running problems
Old 08-05-2013, 07:13 PM
  #5  
zetec-Sam
neeeeeeeeooowmmmm
iTrader: (2)
 
zetec-Sam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Laannndaaaannnn
Posts: 4,815
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by BM08
I know a work mate who's had 3 pumas, all had engine/running problems
Your 'mate' had shitters then, the Zetec SE's are very good if looked after.
Old 08-05-2013, 07:44 PM
  #6  
Straight_4_N/a
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Straight_4_N/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Caerphilly, Wales.
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zetec-Sam
Your 'mate' had shitters then, the Zetec SE's are very good if looked after.
zetec-se are weak and make poor torque compaired to zetec-es.
Old 08-05-2013, 07:51 PM
  #7  
the_frozen_one
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
iTrader: (1)
 
the_frozen_one's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Crawley, West Sussex
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Lets all refer to them by the proper names else this could get confusing the 'zetec e' is a zeta. The 'Zetec se' is a sigma. Other wise one 's' will be missed somewhere and all hell will break loose

Trending Topics

Old 08-05-2013, 07:51 PM
  #8  
Straight_4_N/a
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Straight_4_N/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Caerphilly, Wales.
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Two of my cars have VVT and VVT-I and its a load of shit!
its fitted so you get better emissions and more mpg at normal revs which it slows the car down unless you drive the car around at 5,000rpm+ all the time.
Old 08-05-2013, 07:56 PM
  #9  
Straight_4_N/a
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Straight_4_N/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Caerphilly, Wales.
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by the_frozen_one
Lets all refer to them by the proper names else this could get confusing the 'zetec e' is a zeta. The 'Zetec se' is a sigma. Other wise one 's' will be missed somewhere and all hell will break loose
Ok then but thats gonna cock alot up lol.
Zeta/Zetec-E
Zetec-E II
Zetec-R
Zetec-R ST/Duratec ST
Zetec-R RS/Duratec RS
Thats the zetecs names lol.
Old 08-05-2013, 07:58 PM
  #10  
the_frozen_one
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
iTrader: (1)
 
the_frozen_one's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Crawley, West Sussex
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Regardless of personal preference the facts are that the sigma is primarily emissions based, extremely oil critical, engineered to cost Ł2.50 rather than to last, it's disposable and there's no scope to rebuild it. You gotta throw it away and buy another 2nd hand unit which may or may not last longer the a businessman in Bangkok

Last edited by the_frozen_one; 08-05-2013 at 08:05 PM.
Old 08-05-2013, 08:00 PM
  #11  
the_frozen_one
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
iTrader: (1)
 
the_frozen_one's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Crawley, West Sussex
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Straight_4_N/a
Ok then but thats gonna cock alot up lol.
Zeta/Zetec-E
Zetec-E II
Zetec-R
Zetec-R ST/Duratec ST
Zetec-R RS/Duratec RS
Thats the zetecs names lol.
I said proper names, not marketing names

Still just zeta and sigma
Old 08-05-2013, 08:00 PM
  #12  
Doodah
Wahay!! I've lost my Virginity!!
Thread Starter
 
Doodah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: somerset
Posts: 90
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

my question answered think I'll stick with the 1.8 lol

Ta

Last edited by Doodah; 06-04-2014 at 07:17 PM.
Old 08-05-2013, 08:20 PM
  #13  
zetec-Sam
neeeeeeeeooowmmmm
iTrader: (2)
 
zetec-Sam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Laannndaaaannnn
Posts: 4,815
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Straight_4_N/a
zetec-se are weak and make poor torque compaired to zetec-es.
Quite a bit to do with capacity there...

The 1.7 is 157nm, and a 2.0 Zetec E is 183nm, not a massive difference, considering the smaller capacity, the 1.7 is also lighter and produces almost as much power. The Zetec se's, sorry, Sigmas, were also purposefully restricted by Ford, to keep insurance costs down, this is why on a 1.6 100bhp Sigma you can get around 150bhp with just an exhaust, cam and map. They're hardly 'weak' compared to other Ford engines. The only people I've ever heard slate them are those with no experience, and those who have only ever had poorly maintained shitters. Oh and those that were surprised they weren't as fast as their turbo'd cars.

I wouldn't fit one in a mk4 Escort due to the extra work, and the fact I'd turbo a 2.0 instead.

Last edited by zetec-Sam; 08-05-2013 at 08:23 PM.
Old 08-05-2013, 08:29 PM
  #14  
Straight_4_N/a
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Straight_4_N/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Caerphilly, Wales.
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

1.7 123bhp 157nm stock
1.7 150bhp 158nm racing puma (not 100% on the numbers but you get the idea)

even you must admit that for cams inlet exhaust and a remap making no change to the torque is pritty shity lol
and didnt both performance and fast ford both call them GUTLESS engines lol.
Old 08-05-2013, 08:44 PM
  #15  
zetec-Sam
neeeeeeeeooowmmmm
iTrader: (2)
 
zetec-Sam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Laannndaaaannnn
Posts: 4,815
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The FRP is actually 162nm. They were designed to be revvy little n/a's fitted into hatchbacks, not for towing horse boxes. Put a standard 1.7 lump in a mk5 Fiesta, and a standard 2.0 into another mk5, they'll be almost identical in terms of acceleration, if not the 1.7 a bit quicker.
Firstly Fast Ford have praised the Sigma engines, and even did loads of features on their 1.7 engined Fiesta, including a 'how to' of fitting one, secondly what bearing does it have if a magazine called something gutless? I could call an ls1 gutless, doesn't mean it's true.

Edit-could we have derailed this topic any more?

Last edited by zetec-Sam; 08-05-2013 at 08:50 PM.
Old 29-07-2013, 01:53 PM
  #16  
derwynr
Virgin
 
derwynr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Wales
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've got a mk3 with a sigma in there and its an absolute gem. defo the way to go. forget about the old zetec is my recommendation!
not so hard to do.
A few things I had to do was to mate the bellhousing from the sigma to your mk4 box and that side of the mountings are then sorted. you then need to weld a support for the driver side engine mount and that's about it! My engine is standard running on emerald ECU and better exhaust manifold and
Old 29-07-2013, 02:03 PM
  #17  
lacey
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
lacey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,271
Received 35 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

My 1.7 puma engine in my Zetec s has just done 170k and still pulls well , people are forgetting you don't need as much torque when your not as heavy , and the puma lump is so light and small compared to the old Zetec e cast iron engines
Old 29-07-2013, 03:43 PM
  #18  
the_frozen_one
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
iTrader: (1)
 
the_frozen_one's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Crawley, West Sussex
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by derwynr
I've got a mk3 with a sigma in there and its an absolute gem. defo the way to go. forget about the old zetec is my recommendation!
not so hard to do.
A few things I had to do was to mate the bellhousing from the sigma to your mk4 box and that side of the mountings are then sorted. you then need to weld a support for the driver side engine mount and that's about it! My engine is standard running on emerald ECU and better exhaust manifold and
Mk3 fiesta or escort?
Old 29-07-2013, 05:21 PM
  #19  
derwynr
Virgin
 
derwynr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Wales
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

sorry, that's an escort
Old 29-07-2013, 06:34 PM
  #20  
the_frozen_one
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
iTrader: (1)
 
the_frozen_one's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Crawley, West Sussex
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by derwynr
sorry, that's an escort
Impressive, always wondered if it could be done. Any pics?
Old 29-07-2013, 08:42 PM
  #21  
It's Czech Mate
............

 
It's Czech Mate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West Mids
Posts: 12,970
Received 102 Likes on 88 Posts
Default

Sigma is fantastic, there's a reason Caterham and westys come with them, light, torquey and easy to sell in various states of tune

I'd like to see a boat anchor 1.8 or 2.0 zetec-e do 150 bhp with cams and a map. Zetec-e are great for turboing don't get me wrong, but take a lot more tuning to get the numbers out of, been there and done it.

The st170 isn't a bad shout as a stock though
Old 29-07-2013, 08:45 PM
  #22  
It's Czech Mate
............

 
It's Czech Mate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West Mids
Posts: 12,970
Received 102 Likes on 88 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Straight_4_N/a
zetec-se are weak and make poor torque compaired to zetec-es.
The 1.8/2.0 make more torque purely due to capacity

1.6 sigma vs 1.6 zetec e will show you which is the best engine

The 1.6 zetec-e is fucking shit
Old 29-07-2013, 08:47 PM
  #23  
Paul_RS
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (4)
 
Paul_RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bangor, Northern Ireland
Posts: 7,886
Received 35 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

RS2000 I4 - 150bhp/150odd lb/ft - winning
Old 29-07-2013, 09:01 PM
  #24  
the_frozen_one
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
iTrader: (1)
 
the_frozen_one's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Crawley, West Sussex
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul_RS
RS2000 I4 - 150bhp/150odd lb/ft - winning
2.0 duratec ain't much better

Everyone knows it's cvh or go home
Old 29-07-2013, 09:38 PM
  #25  
derwynr
Virgin
 
derwynr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Wales
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by the_frozen_one
Impressive, always wondered if it could be done. Any pics?
here's a pic of the se dummy engine.

Last edited by derwynr; 24-05-2014 at 04:03 AM.
Old 29-07-2013, 09:41 PM
  #26  
derwynr
Virgin
 
derwynr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Wales
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

anyone else done this conversion yet?
Old 30-07-2013, 12:39 PM
  #27  
Zetec_mk4_XR3i
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Zetec_mk4_XR3i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sunny Dunfermline, Fife
Posts: 2,947
Received 27 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Nice to see something different!

I've had a couple of cheap 1700 Puma's and think they are great engines, I'd imagine a decent exhaust, filter and chip would make them even better!
Old 02-08-2013, 07:28 PM
  #28  
st220kyle
Advanced PassionFord User
 
st220kyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: somerset
Posts: 1,817
Received 61 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

How does the st170 engine compare against the two engines mentioned by the OP?
Old 02-08-2013, 07:43 PM
  #29  
lacey
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
lacey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,271
Received 35 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

It's a black top Zetec so its like if not the same as one ( Zetec e)
Old 02-08-2013, 07:57 PM
  #30  
st220kyle
Advanced PassionFord User
 
st220kyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: somerset
Posts: 1,817
Received 61 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Then surely that's the one to have?? With the 40 odd BHP, or is there a downside?
Old 02-08-2013, 08:23 PM
  #31  
lacey
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
lacey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,271
Received 35 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Still heavy in comparison to the se ( puma )
Old 04-08-2013, 07:47 AM
  #32  
disco-stu
Regular Contributor
 
disco-stu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 327
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I had three mk5 fiestas which all had the zetec se engine with no more than an exhaust and a filter. Now I have a mk6 escort 1.8 zetec e so much slower than my old zs
Old 04-08-2013, 08:04 AM
  #33  
xr2wishy
Bodger of Blackburn
iTrader: (2)
 
xr2wishy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: blackburn
Posts: 4,409
Received 23 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

i'd just go with a blacktop 2.0 zetec, slap some cams and boddies on there, bit of head work won't go a miss and you'll start heading towards 180-190bhp.
Old 04-08-2013, 08:38 AM
  #34  
liam-rst
shit happens
iTrader: (1)
 
liam-rst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: essex
Posts: 2,985
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Imo as xr2wishy says, 2.0 blacktop, the sigma ain't a bad engine but as previously mentioned they are a disposable engine so when it inevitably breaks its an engine out and replacement jobbie
Old 04-08-2013, 09:29 AM
  #35  
lacey
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
lacey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,271
Received 35 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

My friend had a Anglia with a Zetec se 1.6 in it , it didn't have a massive amount done but it was still ment to be around the 180hp mark ,
I have a 1.7 in a Zetec s that have just done 170k and still pulls well , and I will be removing this engine soon and rebuilding it and putting a turbo on it and then put it in a light weight 3dr sierra
Old 04-08-2013, 10:04 AM
  #36  
preedyfella
Virgin
 
preedyfella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Hereford
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 1.7 puma engine conversion on 1.4 focus

Will keep you posted as Im starting my 1.7 puma engine conversion on 1.4 focus.

Now I know I know your all going to say a 2ltr or ST/RS would be easier but as anyone done this conversion before?

Also the puma came to me for free

And the focus was something i started about 12 mouths ago but put on hold to finish my mk1 escort anyway the spec's of the puma aren't bad

LMS180 spec inlet
Inlet fitting kit
LMS stage two fully ported head
LM3 cams
Compression ratio raised to 10.9.1
Modified pocket Standard Pistons
LMS spec up-rated valve springs
Heavy Duty Rod Bolts
Panel filter
Power boost valve
Modified Induction System
Silicon Induction pipe
330cc Injectors
Vernier exhaust pulley
58mm knife edged throttle body

Again it down to the wiring but I was told the puma loom should plug it to the focus fusebox but i'll most likely end up re-wiring the whole car
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mark94
Ford Mondeo Including ST
5
10-10-2023 06:52 PM
mk3ste
Restorations, Rebuilds & Projects.
19
17-10-2021 10:09 AM
arkeye
Ford Focus ST
1
20-02-2016 01:22 PM
Daniel Howard
Ford Classics & Vintage
2
03-10-2015 10:44 PM
youngben
Cars & Parts Wanted.
0
27-09-2015 09:37 PM



Quick Reply: 1.7 Puma motor vs. 1.8 silvertop Zetec? VVT?



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:33 AM.