WongRS

iTrader: (11)

My 2nd hand .48 did 12 months of 32psi before it let go, mine was a standard engine running 55 ib's, never has it RR'd but it was quick

grcossie

Is this a t34 whit 360 bearing and cutback blade? I have that on mine whit 48 ex

J1mbo

iTrader: (1)

No cut back grcossie

Smit

iTrader: (5)

That's very good power for the .48 (as already said a few times in this thread)

What compression is the engine?

105epwr

It's 7.8:1 cr

Jay,

iTrader: (4)

a .63 wil struggle to see 390+ ! thye last time i see a .48 produce near that was on real fuel back in the old days lol

JonnyBravo

Good figures, sounds like a similar spec to my mates SCS engine which has been bombproof for years.

cossie4i+

iTrader: (15)

I wounder how a AB07 would perform in this engine ?

Bit more lift than a BD10 but a bit less duration.

Steve

105epwr

Bd10 has 1 degree less duration than a bd16 I was always told to favour duration over lift.
X-flow hot rod a8 cams still being used today have relative small lift but massive duration.

carcollector

i own 3 scs engines - never had an issue

J1mbo

iTrader: (1)

No it wouldn't, with a ported head, big pair of cams and 26/7 psi held it will make over 400bhp on the dyno, infact 412 bhp Duncan claires engine made

COCHYN

Wish I could have had mine on their dyno with their mapping because on a rolling road you don't get a true figure really, but they did a top job on mine in-car. Rolling road showed over 390bhp on .63

carcollector

the only real downside @ SCS is their website that says nothing

but then again they put efforts in engines, not marketing and it seems to work out a treat, so fair play

rsnissan

iTrader: (9)

sweet I loved my .48 setup on the road.......I think I like it more than my HG T38 440 engine

If i get another 2wd that's deffo the spec I am going for again!

COCHYN

With all the reviews on road cars over 400bhp, I'm so happy not to go that far with mine Plus anything over I'd be too paranoid to use on the road as a daily basis in the event it inevitably brakes

carcollector

it is a ford, they have to break down at some point

COCHYN

Noooooo!!!! I refuse to believe that

R4N SS

iTrader: (6)

I always thought a t34 0.63 running 32psi @ 400bhp is beyond it's compressor map - it will do it but not for long so I fail to see how a 0.48 can do it reliably

105epwr

My t34.48 made 388hp with 376 lb ft on the scs dyno with 2bar peak and gets a hard time-that's been perfect for 3yrs......touch wood!

polly_x

iTrader: (2)

What are Pectel gunning air injectors?

Jay,

iTrader: (4)

REALLY OK then jim im too old to get into this

Ima Racing

iTrader: (1)

....hmmmmmmm, thats all from me,

Shakes head in disbelief!

carcollector

says the guy who put 2.4 bars into an old 1700cc turbo volvo engine that as a result of it went up in smoke......

Jay,

iTrader: (4)

Yes but there was actually 2.4 bar and it did go up lol ! but there were no silly power figures for those 5 secs it lasted

J1mbo

iTrader: (1)

Good, then you'll understand i, or scs, or the Ł50000 pound dyno that's kept to spec by superflo have no reason to lie.

carcollector

i admit it went like a rocketship, just not for very long

i have rarely been as amused as that day though jay

CrOwSoN15

I remember those, always made me chuckle!

Jay,

iTrader: (4)

price means fuckall and could be built by NASA wether your honest as blind man witnessing a armed robbery and saying hes seen fuck all I dont care a t34.48 doing this claimed bhp is bollocks !! but i do believe that you believe it did the horse power jim

anyway thats my last word on it cant be arsed to make 30 replies to something that i wont change my mind on jim

Jay,

iTrader: (4)

lol still one the best weekends of my life dude

J1mbo

iTrader: (1)

In which case every figure that comes off this dyno is bollocks jay. Including the super 1600 ford puma engines for ford themselves and the ford racing puma engine again for ford themselves. And maybe you should tell mountune and Aston martin that they're dyno figs are bullshit too as all three dynos are identical.

Like yourself, theyre my last words, anyone can read this post and see for themselves who's speaking the utter shite

Night!

Jay,

iTrader: (4)

OOOOHHHH

shortie

Well we had our engine built by SCS 8 years ago D55 3dr cossie jimbo you might remember it & that was on a T34.48 & the turbo is still going strong & still kicking out 385 brake

carcollector

Jim, glad u took the tennager shoes off, this is what is expected from the next generation SCS....not some political correctness but utter facts.

well done and jay, put a vest on and shut it

Jay,

iTrader: (4)

i had my no shit vest on u cunt

Ima Racing

iTrader: (1)

Mr Rainbird, you made a hint this compression was in the 8's but someone has said its the usual 7.8-1, plus you dissed the BD10 saying it was the worst camshaft made, now your hero has produced this dream figure i suppose you now want the BD10 as a butt plug along with Harveys other secret butt plugs?

I find it amazing that a well known figure in cosworth tuning can produce such silly power figures and not get mocked, whereas if you are a not so well known tuner they will get the PassionFord ride from HELL!!!!

...people say this place aint "clicky"....YEAH RIGHT

Tarren

Phil going for a 10 pager

bad boy rs

iTrader: (7)

I don't understand why this has gone this way ?

Someone posted their results as they where another happy customer from a well known tuner and all you two can do is bitch ? Scs build good engines that last and produce the numbers, the mans a happy customer for fuck sake

105epwr

Plus this bhp/torque figure is nothing new tho 380-400 has been around for years using 400s/403s.....

v man

at the end of the day if it made 300 bhp or 600 bhp its all down to what the customer wants it to do on the road

bhp claims is better off left for friday nights down the local pub imo

Smit

iTrader: (5)

Phil - 'BD10 buttplug' ROFL

Jay - Why would you diss the results? Is it because your ginger?