My 2nd hand .48 did 12 months of 32psi before it let go, mine was a standard engine running 55 ib's, never has it RR'd but it was quick

 

Is this a t34 whit 360 bearing and cutback blade? I have that on mine whit 48 ex

 

No cut back grcossie

 

That's very good power for the .48 (as already said a few times in this thread)

What compression is the engine?

 

It's 7.8:1 cr

 

a .63 wil struggle to see 390+ ! thye last time i see a .48 produce near that was on real fuel back in the old days lol

 

Good figures, sounds like a similar spec to my mates SCS engine which has been bombproof for years.

 

I wounder how a AB07 would perform in this engine ?

Bit more lift than a BD10 but a bit less duration.

Steve

 

Bd10 has 1 degree less duration than a bd16 I was always told to favour duration over lift.
X-flow hot rod a8 cams still being used today have relative small lift but massive duration.

 

i own 3 scs engines - never had an issue

 

No it wouldn't, with a ported head, big pair of cams and 26/7 psi held it will make over 400bhp on the dyno, infact 412 bhp Duncan claires engine made

 

Wish I could have had mine on their dyno with their mapping because on a rolling road you don't get a true figure really, but they did a top job on mine in-car. Rolling road showed over 390bhp on .63

 

the only real downside @ SCS is their website that says nothing

but then again they put efforts in engines, not marketing and it seems to work out a treat, so fair play

 

sweet I loved my .48 setup on the road.......I think I like it more than my HG T38 440 engine

If i get another 2wd that's deffo the spec I am going for again!

 

With all the reviews on road cars over 400bhp, I'm so happy not to go that far with mine Plus anything over I'd be too paranoid to use on the road as a daily basis in the event it inevitably brakes

 

it is a ford, they have to break down at some point

 

Noooooo!!!! I refuse to believe that

 

I always thought a t34 0.63 running 32psi @ 400bhp is beyond it's compressor map - it will do it but not for long so I fail to see how a 0.48 can do it reliably

 

My t34.48 made 388hp with 376 lb ft on the scs dyno with 2bar peak and gets a hard time-that's been perfect for 3yrs......touch wood!

 

What are Pectel gunning air injectors?

 

REALLY OK then jim im too old to get into this

 

....hmmmmmmm, thats all from me,

Shakes head in disbelief!

 

says the guy who put 2.4 bars into an old 1700cc turbo volvo engine that as a result of it went up in smoke......

 

Yes but there was actually 2.4 bar and it did go up lol ! but there were no silly power figures for those 5 secs it lasted

 

Good, then you'll understand i, or scs, or the Ł50000 pound dyno that's kept to spec by superflo have no reason to lie.

 

i admit it went like a rocketship, just not for very long

i have rarely been as amused as that day though jay

 

I remember those, always made me chuckle!

 

price means fuckall and could be built by NASA wether your honest as blind man witnessing a armed robbery and saying hes seen fuck all I dont care a t34.48 doing this claimed bhp is bollocks !! but i do believe that you believe it did the horse power jim

anyway thats my last word on it cant be arsed to make 30 replies to something that i wont change my mind on jim

 

lol still one the best weekends of my life dude

 

In which case every figure that comes off this dyno is bollocks jay. Including the super 1600 ford puma engines for ford themselves and the ford racing puma engine again for ford themselves. And maybe you should tell mountune and Aston martin that they're dyno figs are bullshit too as all three dynos are identical.

Like yourself, theyre my last words, anyone can read this post and see for themselves who's speaking the utter shite

Night!

 

OOOOHHHH

 

Well we had our engine built by SCS 8 years ago D55 3dr cossie jimbo you might remember it & that was on a T34.48 & the turbo is still going strong & still kicking out 385 brake

 

Jim, glad u took the tennager shoes off, this is what is expected from the next generation SCS....not some political correctness but utter facts.

well done and jay, put a vest on and shut it

 

i had my no shit vest on u cunt

 

Mr Rainbird, you made a hint this compression was in the 8's but someone has said its the usual 7.8-1, plus you dissed the BD10 saying it was the worst camshaft made, now your hero has produced this dream figure i suppose you now want the BD10 as a butt plug along with Harveys other secret butt plugs?

I find it amazing that a well known figure in cosworth tuning can produce such silly power figures and not get mocked, whereas if you are a not so well known tuner they will get the PassionFord ride from HELL!!!!

...people say this place aint "clicky"....YEAH RIGHT

 

Phil going for a 10 pager

 

I don't understand why this has gone this way ?

Someone posted their results as they where another happy customer from a well known tuner and all you two can do is bitch ? Scs build good engines that last and produce the numbers, the mans a happy customer for fuck sake

 

Plus this bhp/torque figure is nothing new tho 380-400 has been around for years using 400s/403s.....

 

at the end of the day if it made 300 bhp or 600 bhp its all down to what the customer wants it to do on the road

bhp claims is better off left for friday nights down the local pub imo

 

Phil - 'BD10 buttplug' ROFL

Jay - Why would you diss the results? Is it because your ginger?