How are the MSD stage 3 chip torque wise ?
15-02-2005, 09:34 AM
#3
Regular Contributor
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Denmark
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know 
But I'm sure he prefer his own product.... I'm trying to say, I think he's bias on this one
But i'm proberly gonna contact him for a power grapg on a stage 2 chip
Cheers Kennert
But I'm sure he prefer his own product.... I'm trying to say, I think he's bias on this one
But i'm proberly gonna contact him for a power grapg on a stage 2 chip
Cheers Kennert
15-02-2005, 09:51 AM
#5
Regular Contributor
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Denmark
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
slowpoke, I guess your not so slow anymore
Tell me about that set-up ?
are you running L6 or L8, was a pectel board necessary ?
What hp and torque are you running?
Cheers Kennert
Tell me about that set-up ?
are you running L6 or L8, was a pectel board necessary ?
What hp and torque are you running?
Cheers Kennert
15-02-2005, 10:08 AM
#6
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: huddersfield
Posts: 5,807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
im running l8 with it bein 4x4 no pectel board full closep loop fueling
dont know exact hp and torque as it was live mapped
peaks and holds 27 psi now and im really happy with it
matt
dont know exact hp and torque as it was live mapped
peaks and holds 27 psi now and im really happy with it
matt
Trending Topics
15-02-2005, 07:57 PM
#14
just finding my feet
well i must admit there is one complaint, since ive had a stage 3 chip in me car the car keeps loosing traction on full throttle in the wet 
never done it before,,but then i wasnt running 25psi before either
so in a nut shell his chips ar fooking spot on, im soon gonna get a live map on greys off him soon too
never done it before,,but then i wasnt running 25psi before either
so in a nut shell his chips ar fooking spot on, im soon gonna get a live map on greys off him soon too
15-02-2005, 08:25 PM
#15
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wiltshire UK
Posts: 3,795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by kennert
I know
But I'm sure he prefer his own product.... I'm trying to say, I think he's bias on this one
But i'm proberly gonna contact him for a power grapg on a stage 2 chip
Cheers Kennert
But I'm sure he prefer his own product.... I'm trying to say, I think he's bias on this one
But i'm proberly gonna contact him for a power grapg on a stage 2 chip
Cheers Kennert
15-02-2005, 08:29 PM
#16
just finding my feet
Originally Posted by richm
Originally Posted by kennert
I know
But I'm sure he prefer his own product.... I'm trying to say, I think he's bias on this one
But i'm proberly gonna contact him for a power grapg on a stage 2 chip
Cheers Kennert
But I'm sure he prefer his own product.... I'm trying to say, I think he's bias on this one
But i'm proberly gonna contact him for a power grapg on a stage 2 chip
Cheers Kennert
15-02-2005, 08:52 PM
#17
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
b19bal,
is it me or what 
by the way his chips are superb.
he sugested i change to a smaller turbo and standard cams ect as greys ect aint the style of driving i do, ya cant faukt him
im soon gonna get a live map on greys off him soon too
_________________
_________________
by the way his chips are superb.
15-02-2005, 09:11 PM
#18
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im very happy with my chip running closed loop lambda control.
It does not feel as punchy as an Ahmed chip when the boost kicks in. However it picks up better, feels more driveable and smooth so I would not be surprised if its actually faster and its just the refined curve that makes it feel less fast.
Better fuel economy too, ive tested it back to back with my Ahmed chip.
It does not feel as punchy as an Ahmed chip when the boost kicks in. However it picks up better, feels more driveable and smooth so I would not be surprised if its actually faster and its just the refined curve that makes it feel less fast.
Better fuel economy too, ive tested it back to back with my Ahmed chip.
26-02-2005, 05:42 PM
#19
Regular Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Kennert, you will know after 20 March, when my MSD stage 2 chip (330kit) is fitted by Jan Motor 
Just ordered one closed loop chip from stu yesterday!
Just ordered one closed loop chip from stu yesterday!
26-02-2005, 08:25 PM
#24
Regular Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rs Gus
my MSD stage 2 showed 352bhp and 340lb/ft at well lane turbo centre it ran numerous 12.7 quaters at york dragway have a graph i think if i didnt give it the lad who bought the car
have a graph i think if i didnt give it the lad who bought the car
26-02-2005, 08:29 PM
#26
Regular Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rs Gus
standard with a .63 t34 so a .48 would have given more tourque lower
so a .48 would have given more tourque lower I believe I have the same setup on my Cossie as you had on yours What about the boost level - 26peak and 23 hold??
26-02-2005, 09:48 PM
#30
Originally Posted by tkrath
Originally Posted by Rs Gus
28peak 23held 
It must be the limit for the T34 turbo??p.s THAT WAS AT THAT LEVEL BECAUSE IT WAS DONE AT MSD YOU SHOULD SET IT TO THE 26PSI YOU WAS ADVISED AND NOT ANYMORE mine was also at a freind style
a bit more for the hell roflol
27-02-2005, 11:03 AM
#32
Regular Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rs Gus
p.s THAT WAS AT THAT LEVEL BECAUSE IT WAS DONE AT MSD YOU SHOULD SET IT TO THE 26PSI YOU WAS ADVISED AND NOT ANYMORE mine was also at a freind style a bit more for the hell roflol
a bit more for the hell roflolMy will only go 23peak and 20hold - going for 310-320bhp
27-02-2005, 05:45 PM
#34
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kent
Posts: 4,364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The chip should be unlimited for off the shelf!!!...ie the more boost the more fuel and appropiate ignition curve....your injectors should lean out before a professional map does!
27-02-2005, 05:55 PM
#35
Regular Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rs Gus
set the boost to what it should be m8 as it may possibly be on a lower load site in the map and may melt
27-02-2005, 06:07 PM
#36
Originally Posted by tkrath
Originally Posted by Rs Gus
set the boost to what it should be m8 as it may possibly be on a lower load site in the map and may melt
DO AS HE SAYS NOT AS YOU WISH!!!!!!!
27-02-2005, 09:05 PM
#38
Evening Thomas,
Thought id best pop on and elaborate slightly on what Gus is trying to say
The way a chip works, is that at a certain boost pressure the information will start to be read from the line in the fuel and spark maps that are intended to be used "Flat out" so to speak.
Commonly, people think;
" i will run less boost for safety"
or
"I will fit a 2 stage boost control"
And this can lead to problems rather than make it safer, as the information being acessed at the boost pressure is often not what the chip was designed for and can cause under or over fueling.
The bottom line, as Gus rather elequently put it Is just follow your tuners recomendations and all should be fine for you. We dont recomend you push things too hard as we are, in mail order cases, working in the dark and thus have to leave a strong margin of safety in the software and instructions that we are sending out to you.
In your particular case, 23psi peak with 20psi held will be ok if a little over rich, but ideally i would still like her to "hold" just a little more boost if possible to keep the mixture within my ideal expected window as the instructions do of course state.
Hopefully this will clear up any confusion, but if not please feel free to contact me at your convenience as i dont want you to have any doubts after a purchase from me.
Thought id best pop on and elaborate slightly on what Gus is trying to say
The way a chip works, is that at a certain boost pressure the information will start to be read from the line in the fuel and spark maps that are intended to be used "Flat out" so to speak.
Commonly, people think;
" i will run less boost for safety"
or
"I will fit a 2 stage boost control"
And this can lead to problems rather than make it safer, as the information being acessed at the boost pressure is often not what the chip was designed for and can cause under or over fueling.
The bottom line, as Gus rather elequently put it
Is just follow your tuners recomendations and all should be fine for you. We dont recomend you push things too hard as we are, in mail order cases, working in the dark and thus have to leave a strong margin of safety in the software and instructions that we are sending out to you.In your particular case, 23psi peak with 20psi held will be ok if a little over rich, but ideally i would still like her to "hold" just a little more boost if possible to keep the mixture within my ideal expected window as the instructions do of course state.
Hopefully this will clear up any confusion, but if not please feel free to contact me at your convenience as i dont want you to have any doubts after a purchase from me.
24-03-2005, 02:10 PM
#40
PassionFord Post Troll
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 2,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rs Gus
my MSD stage 2 showed 352bhp and 340lb/ft at well lane turbo centre have a graph i think if i didnt give it the lad who bought the car
have a graph i think if i didnt give it the lad who bought the carYou already answered my question about the boost
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DavidK
Ford Sierra/Sapphire/RS500 Cosworth
1
27-09-2015 02:55 PM
