General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

Supercharger conversion dual TB's... Why?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-02-2011, 09:55 AM
  #1  
Karlos G
Balls Deep!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Karlos G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 9,185
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
Default Supercharger conversion dual TB's... Why?

I was looking at supercharger conversions for a friends MX5 and they all run a dual TB setup, one before the SC and then the stock TB.
Why is this? Whats wrong with just using the stock TB like if you were fitting a turbo?

Thanks!
Old 10-02-2011, 10:16 AM
  #2  
chaffe
Turbocharging Technician
 
chaffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Top secret. Mission:Imposible.
Posts: 3,557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

because the supercharger will be more efficoent when its pumping less (in a vacuum) on light throttle. IE when you are cruising it will make little boost as it is operating in a vacuum.
Old 10-02-2011, 10:38 AM
  #3  
Karlos G
Balls Deep!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Karlos G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 9,185
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Ah yes of course because it will make max boost all the time otherwise being belt driven.
Old 10-02-2011, 10:39 AM
  #4  
chaffe
Turbocharging Technician
 
chaffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Top secret. Mission:Imposible.
Posts: 3,557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Karlos G
Ah yes of course because it will make boost all the time otherwise being belt driven.
ya man
Old 10-02-2011, 10:40 AM
  #5  
Karlos G
Balls Deep!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Karlos G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 9,185
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Car would be very responsive though!
Old 10-02-2011, 10:41 AM
  #6  
chaffe
Turbocharging Technician
 
chaffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Top secret. Mission:Imposible.
Posts: 3,557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Karlos G
Car would be very responsive though!
ugh, the devils work, turbochargers are the future
Old 10-02-2011, 10:49 AM
  #7  
ajamesc
cossie fan (unluckerly)
 
ajamesc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: hampshire
Posts: 9,795
Received 435 Likes on 393 Posts
Default

mate of mine has just turbo,ed his one why bother with a supercharger lol
Old 10-02-2011, 11:06 AM
  #8  
Karlos G
Balls Deep!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Karlos G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 9,185
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

If it were mine then of course I would go the turbo route!
Old 10-02-2011, 11:09 AM
  #9  
chaffe
Turbocharging Technician
 
chaffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Top secret. Mission:Imposible.
Posts: 3,557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

nothing "super" about superchargers lol
Old 10-02-2011, 11:34 AM
  #10  
robrs2
Advanced PassionFord User
 
robrs2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Teesside
Posts: 1,648
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

It may be a by pass valve not throttle body.
The normal way is a throttle before the supercharger with a by pass valve around the supercharger. The bypass valve is vac operated. So on closed or light throttle the supercharger uses less power. Then under load the bypass is closed and the supercharger gives full output.
But there are lots of ways to set them up. Depends if you want instant power or efficient running.
Old 10-02-2011, 12:42 PM
  #11  
bj928
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
bj928's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: whitstable, kent
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chaffe
nothing "super" about superchargers lol
depends on application, i'm going supercharger because i want big power and no lag, modern supercharging is quite good though compared to yesteryear, they are getting very efficient, problem is most people are brain washed into turbos being better and won't look past them
Old 10-02-2011, 12:47 PM
  #12  
Karlos G
Balls Deep!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Karlos G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 9,185
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by robrs2
It may be a by pass valve not throttle body.
The normal way is a throttle before the supercharger with a by pass valve around the supercharger. The bypass valve is vac operated. So on closed or light throttle the supercharger uses less power. Then under load the bypass is closed and the supercharger gives full output.
But there are lots of ways to set them up. Depends if you want instant power or efficient running.
No it's two TB's, there is a bypass valve too mate.
Old 10-02-2011, 12:50 PM
  #13  
chaffe
Turbocharging Technician
 
chaffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Top secret. Mission:Imposible.
Posts: 3,557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bj928
depends on application, i'm going supercharger because i want big power and no lag, modern supercharging is quite good though compared to yesteryear, they are getting very efficient, problem is most people are brain washed into turbos being better and won't look past them
Of course the application is of importance, but on a road car (this is what most of us are talking about) with rising fuel costs, a turbo offers better efficiency over a supercharger. And with regard to modern and old, the very same can be said with turbos. Turbos work very well in almost all applications and offer a simplisic way of achieving more horespower, thats why most forced induction road cars use turbos in either petrol or diesel application.
Old 10-02-2011, 01:00 PM
  #14  
ajamesc
cossie fan (unluckerly)
 
ajamesc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: hampshire
Posts: 9,795
Received 435 Likes on 393 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bj928
depends on application, i'm going supercharger because i want big power and no lag, modern supercharging is quite good though compared to yesteryear, they are getting very efficient, problem is most people are brain washed into turbos being better and won't look past them
then turbo is the way then lol u never herd of twin scroll turbos and manifolds
Old 10-02-2011, 01:35 PM
  #15  
SiZT
Advanced PassionFord User
 
SiZT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Staffordshire
Posts: 1,896
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Karlos G
Car would be very responsive though!
If you didn't run 2 tb's you'd need to run either a dump valve (which would really get on your tits) or face bad idling and your aux belt stretching all the time.

Originally Posted by ajamesc
then turbo is the way then lol u never herd of twin scroll turbos and manifolds
Still won't be as responsive as a s/c
Old 10-02-2011, 01:42 PM
  #16  
ajamesc
cossie fan (unluckerly)
 
ajamesc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: hampshire
Posts: 9,795
Received 435 Likes on 393 Posts
Default

Still won't be as responsive as a s/c[/quote] still as responsive as u will ever need on the road if u have the right set up and its mapped by someone who knows what there doing theres cars about now with twin scroll set ups that make 2.6 bar of boost in 5th by 46oorpm that is responsive
Old 10-02-2011, 01:53 PM
  #17  
bj928
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
bj928's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: whitstable, kent
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ajamesc
Still won't be as responsive as a s/c
still as responsive as u will ever need on the road if u have the right set up and its mapped by someone who knows what there doing theres cars about now with twin scroll set ups that make 2.6 bar of boost in 5th by 46oorpm that is responsive [/QUOTE]

a supercharger is at about 90% torque by 1500rpm, thats responce, well at least thats what they say about the XJR Jags, and thats running a crap supercharger
Old 10-02-2011, 02:15 PM
  #18  
ajamesc
cossie fan (unluckerly)
 
ajamesc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: hampshire
Posts: 9,795
Received 435 Likes on 393 Posts
Default

i should hope it is a crap one as xjrs and xkrs arnt that fast lol
Old 10-02-2011, 03:08 PM
  #19  
SiZT
Advanced PassionFord User
 
SiZT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Staffordshire
Posts: 1,896
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ajamesc
still as responsive as u will ever need on the road if u have the right set up and its mapped by someone who knows what there doing theres cars about now with twin scroll set ups that make 2.6 bar of boost in 5th by 46oorpm that is responsive


Look at the torque curve, how many turbo cars have them as flat?
Old 10-02-2011, 03:22 PM
  #20  
ajamesc
cossie fan (unluckerly)
 
ajamesc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: hampshire
Posts: 9,795
Received 435 Likes on 393 Posts
Default

lol your kidding right theres no torque or bhp there look up rod tarrys grapth or mad ades looking at your grapth u have around 130 ft lb at 3500 rpm but someone like rod has about 300lb ft by then and he says his turbo is laggy as its for top speed yet by 5000rpm he has 600lb ft

Last edited by ajamesc; 10-02-2011 at 03:48 PM.
Old 10-02-2011, 04:30 PM
  #21  
Karlos G
Balls Deep!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Karlos G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 9,185
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ajamesc
still as responsive as u will ever need on the road if u have the right set up and its mapped by someone who knows what there doing theres cars about now with twin scroll set ups that make 2.6 bar of boost in 5th by 46oorpm that is responsive
What?! lol
That is terrible response, 2.6bar in 5th at 4600rpm!!!
Old 10-02-2011, 04:45 PM
  #22  
ajamesc
cossie fan (unluckerly)
 
ajamesc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: hampshire
Posts: 9,795
Received 435 Likes on 393 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Karlos G
What?! lol
That is terrible response, 2.6bar in 5th at 4600rpm!!!
u think? some cases they are even makeing it by 4200 in 4th
Old 10-02-2011, 05:11 PM
  #23  
Karlos G
Balls Deep!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Karlos G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 9,185
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

It hard to comment really without knowing the full spec of the engine and turbo but to be making peek boost by 4600rpm in 5th is pretty late even though it is 2.6bar (37.7psi).
Old 10-02-2011, 05:17 PM
  #24  
vroooom ptssssh
It Wasnt Me!
 
vroooom ptssssh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Scottyland
Posts: 22,752
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I've saw a compound charged CA18 nissan engine, it had throtle before suprecharger, then supercharger into turbo then turbo into inlet, b ut between supercharger and turbo, it had a throtle, which was for the changeover from s/c to turbo at the correct RPM when the turbo spooled the S/C became a restriction so it bypased with the extra throtle. worked V.well too.

I suppose if your S.C is small enough there is an arguement for a 2nd throtle as it could become a restriction at high rpm, maybe? I dunno.

Last edited by vroooom ptssssh; 10-02-2011 at 05:19 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mk3ste
Restorations, Rebuilds & Projects.
19
17-10-2021 10:09 AM
abz474
Cars for Sale
9
01-11-2015 06:53 PM
stevecfrst1
Cars for Sale
1
30-09-2015 05:18 AM
SMILER258
Restorations, Rebuilds & Projects.
36
28-09-2015 09:04 AM
mpilk
Ford Sierra/Sapphire/RS500 Cosworth
3
27-09-2015 09:21 AM



Quick Reply: Supercharger conversion dual TB's... Why?



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:17 PM.