Most responsive small turbo on standard internal Cosworth ?
#1
Most responsive small turbo on standard internal Cosworth ?
My new years mission is to decide on what turbo to buy, been pondering for months : (
Standard cosworth engine with a T34.55 fitted in my Dax at present. I always loved how the power came in when I was running a standard T3 @ 200bhp, so would be nice if I could get back to this and gain another 100bhp ?
Trying to compare the following turbos, but I have not been able to find dyno graphs for a hybrid t3 or a gt28 mated up on a standard internal cosworth.
T34.48 vs hybrid T3 vs GT2871 ?
Really want some proven numbers if they can be offered up here.
Thanks and Happy New Year.
Standard cosworth engine with a T34.55 fitted in my Dax at present. I always loved how the power came in when I was running a standard T3 @ 200bhp, so would be nice if I could get back to this and gain another 100bhp ?
Trying to compare the following turbos, but I have not been able to find dyno graphs for a hybrid t3 or a gt28 mated up on a standard internal cosworth.
T34.48 vs hybrid T3 vs GT2871 ?
Really want some proven numbers if they can be offered up here.
Thanks and Happy New Year.
#2
Well imo the Stage 2 T3 i had from Turbo Technics was awesome, made 328bhp too @ 27psi peak and your thread asks for the most responsive so if it were me i'd be looking down that route again, especially if you've had one and loved it..
Another option, change your housing to a .48, that'll be like the T3 but pull harder...
Another option, change your housing to a .48, that'll be like the T3 but pull harder...
#6
Trending Topics
#8
Makes 5th gear very nice to drive compared to a more gutless, but powerful car.
I'm sure you could easily source a good solid 300bhp turbo with very fast spool.
A little TD04 off a Subaru has almost full boost by 2000rpm and can just about scrape 300bhp. And it's a basic oil journal.
So some of the GT range like maybe a GT28 would be a good option.
#9
Not sure about that. Even old Saab 900's used ancient T3's
Pretty sure the Rouse has a small frame turbo. ie T25 based. Cant easily get a look at his now though as it's stored away.
But it definately doesnt use a normal Cossie style T3 flange/turbine housing or downpipe.
Just a tiny turbo in general, but does work well.
Pretty sure the Rouse has a small frame turbo. ie T25 based. Cant easily get a look at his now though as it's stored away.
But it definately doesnt use a normal Cossie style T3 flange/turbine housing or downpipe.
Just a tiny turbo in general, but does work well.
#10
Rouse had T25 and 260bhp and 300Ib/ft and produced noticeable boost at 2k
http://www.rs-ford.co.uk/images/rous...rousesport.zip
http://www.rs-ford.co.uk/images/rous...rousesport.zip
#11
Rouse had T25 and 260bhp and 300Ib/ft and produced noticeable boost at 2k
http://www.rs-ford.co.uk/images/rous...rousesport.zip
http://www.rs-ford.co.uk/images/rous...rousesport.zip
It's been a few months since I drove it, but it really did feel nice to drive. Better than any other Sierra I'd driven.
#16
I'd think if someone developed a kit for twin scroll applications using small turbos, you could have say 350bhp with very good spool. Which would really transform the car.
Maybe it's just old age, but instant boost is great even if it doesnt scream at the top end. At least for a car that gets used on a regular basis
Maybe it's just old age, but instant boost is great even if it doesnt scream at the top end. At least for a car that gets used on a regular basis
#18
the small turbo escos turbo can be turned into a hybrid and is very responsive i think turbo technics do them ....
have you thought about some headwork as that seems the best mod on a yb and maybe a inlet cam change then you might not need a different turbo just add a .48 housing to you spec aswel
that should see 370/380bhp with a good mapp seems the best spec for power and response
have you thought about some headwork as that seems the best mod on a yb and maybe a inlet cam change then you might not need a different turbo just add a .48 housing to you spec aswel
that should see 370/380bhp with a good mapp seems the best spec for power and response
#19
On a light car like yours i really cant see why the t34.55 isnt working for you??
Whats the full spec and what map are you running etc as i cant see why what youve got cant be mapped and work how you want it??
I cant see why you need boost from 2k unless you want to drive around in 5th everywhere!!
What ratios you got as this will make massive difference on a car as small as yours..
cheers danny
Whats the full spec and what map are you running etc as i cant see why what youve got cant be mapped and work how you want it??
I cant see why you need boost from 2k unless you want to drive around in 5th everywhere!!
What ratios you got as this will make massive difference on a car as small as yours..
cheers danny
But a Cossie engine is totally gutless low down. The Rousesport outdrives any other Cossie Ive ever driven due to its responsiveness down low.
So unless you're aiming for say 350+, I can see little reason to put up with a laggy setup ?
#21
Thanks for the responses so far.
I use the car alot on airfield trackdays and I am losing some time out of the corners.
This run was completed at the end of October last year on the T34.55 on an MSD L8 chip.
Car has a Quaife 3.62 LSD and standard T5 gearbox.
I use the car alot on airfield trackdays and I am losing some time out of the corners.
This run was completed at the end of October last year on the T34.55 on an MSD L8 chip.
Car has a Quaife 3.62 LSD and standard T5 gearbox.
#23
Well using that above graph as an example....it seems totally and utterly gutless below 4500rpm !!!
I think room for improvement is an understatement. If that's flywheel power, there is no reason a good turbo choice shouldnt be seeing full boost by near 3000rpm.
On that graph virtually nothing is happening until 5000rpm !
I think room for improvement is an understatement. If that's flywheel power, there is no reason a good turbo choice shouldnt be seeing full boost by near 3000rpm.
On that graph virtually nothing is happening until 5000rpm !
#24
There are many modern turbo options available that have much better response than the old T3 turbine - and any T4 compressor.
Here in Canada many are using the Holset HX35 with great success. Fantastic spooling for a 46 lb/minute turbo.
The Holset HX35 also bolts up to a standard T3 exhaust manifold.
http://www.turbotekniikka.fi/images/...uperhx35_2.jpg
Here in Canada many are using the Holset HX35 with great success. Fantastic spooling for a 46 lb/minute turbo.
The Holset HX35 also bolts up to a standard T3 exhaust manifold.
http://www.turbotekniikka.fi/images/...uperhx35_2.jpg
#25
Ive got a .48 exhaust housing sat in the garage and had considered this.
Does the graph below account for the different map, .48 exhaust housing or both.
If I want to improve on this, I guess I will need to consider a smaller turbo ?
Friends Dax running similar set-up to me (Custom intercooler/rad, 4wd head and .48 exhaust housing)
Does the graph below account for the different map, .48 exhaust housing or both.
If I want to improve on this, I guess I will need to consider a smaller turbo ?
Friends Dax running similar set-up to me (Custom intercooler/rad, 4wd head and .48 exhaust housing)
Last edited by Daxcossie; 01-01-2011 at 04:24 PM.
#26
Yeah there's alot more boost available there, i'd just see how a .48 houisng with fresh map suits tbh, i don't think you'll have the pull on a T3 tbh, where-as it'll pull that bit harder out of the corners for you on the T34...
#29
#30
Danny will cure it but then it will be more responsive earlier on the revs,so might have to lower the boost abit,so it doesnt spin as you getting out of the apex,cause iam pretty sure it will make some good numbers i can post if you want my dyno print out the 2876 you can see its climbing at 1.25 bar and made 385 with very mild timming,you need to map it any way,and if you dont like it,fit the 0.48
#31
#34
Why not look into the possibility of using a modern turbo design?
I know more people (in the UK) have more experience using the T3/T4 turbos.
Why use such a laggy old turbo design?
I know more people (in the UK) have more experience using the T3/T4 turbos.
Why use such a laggy old turbo design?
#35
Happy to look at all options.
IMO however, most cosworths these days either go down the tried and tested T34 route or opt for the bigger GT30 ball bearing range.
Difficult speccing a new turbo if knowbody is running the same spec.
The only Cosworth GT28 users that I have found, had modded engines aswell.
IMO however, most cosworths these days either go down the tried and tested T34 route or opt for the bigger GT30 ball bearing range.
Difficult speccing a new turbo if knowbody is running the same spec.
The only Cosworth GT28 users that I have found, had modded engines aswell.
#37
Fair enough Dax.
I understand what you are saying. The ball bearing GT30 is a good turbo, but quite expensive as well.
Many of the DSM (Mitsubishi) turbo guys are now using Holset turbos with great success.
As are the Ford 2.3 turbo guys here.
400 hp range and fantastic spooling.
Take a look on the web, and do some research - I think you may be pleasantly surprised.
Cheers
I understand what you are saying. The ball bearing GT30 is a good turbo, but quite expensive as well.
Many of the DSM (Mitsubishi) turbo guys are now using Holset turbos with great success.
As are the Ford 2.3 turbo guys here.
400 hp range and fantastic spooling.
Take a look on the web, and do some research - I think you may be pleasantly surprised.
Cheers
#38
the t25 in my rouse is awesome, its so responsive throughout the rev range, more naturally aspirated than turbo. id love a bit more top end pull though as it seems to run out of puff at higher rpms