Islam4UK banned
#81
The irony of their leader saying on the news a minute ago that the uk,s turning into a dictatorship when his supporters yesterday carrying banners saying islams going to take over the uk
#82
i would like to have seen the grand plan seen out. i dont mean i would of wanted the Nazi's to have won i mean if you could play out what would of happened if they did take over ( i know you and me wouldnt be here etc). you know the whole finished Germania type thing with all the architecture done the underground roads, and what would be next etc. and the scientist put to full use and plans put into realisty stealth planes they trying to do, ufo thing lol etc
The us nuclear weapons were very very crude. the german designs were far more advanced and capable its just lucky they didnt get the resources or time to finish them!
Jet and rocket technology of the 50's and 60's is massively influenced by german work!
#83
Chip i dont meanso much the ones that used the camps for there science more the others for the Supersonic things and rockets,, jet aircraft, guided missiles, stealth, armour, etc.
The USA took a lot of them at the ending and after the war. Most went to NASA that they did take. V1 rocket etc. i think the space race wouldnt of happened as it did with out them.
Also it is rumoured the Nazi's were the first to find a link about lung cancer and cigarette smoking. though dont take much to think it aint good for ya lol
i need to quote more often too many people post inbetween
The USA took a lot of them at the ending and after the war. Most went to NASA that they did take. V1 rocket etc. i think the space race wouldnt of happened as it did with out them.
Also it is rumoured the Nazi's were the first to find a link about lung cancer and cigarette smoking. though dont take much to think it aint good for ya lol
i need to quote more often too many people post inbetween
like this?
only kidding
lots of views, and lots opinions
#85
thier advances in technology wer due to a highly effective war machine. something hitler only had limited control over.
but as chip says theres a massive difference between the effect of an arms race on rapidly advancing technology and having a credible society and economy fueling the same advances albeit at a slower rate.
#86
#90
Agreed mate i aint saying he was right just pointing out the similarities,and how we could go the same way, just listen to how strong people feel, if you regard them as thick or not its a scary thought and its up to the people in charge to sort it out but they dont seem to have a clue how strong the feeling is out there
#91
never has worked and never will, different cultures dont mix, in a perfect world yes but it aint, someone name me a country where it works?
#92
He did it by lieing to people and make them believe something that wasnt true.
They all lived under a ruthless and mentally unstable dictator and were told to be happy and things were going well so they beleived it.
Again, VERY easy to achieve for a short period of time when blessed with absolute power!
#93
#95
1000 years from now, people will find it very strange that racism in the context of how it is today, ever existed IMHO
Last edited by Chip; 12-01-2010 at 12:53 PM.
#96
i would bet there is still tension there but to be honest i dont know so thats blown my comment out of the water but on the whole imo it aint working anywhere, and threads like this just prove it, its human nature and you cant change that
#98
#100
Agreed mate i aint saying he was right just pointing out the similarities,and how we could go the same way, just listen to how strong people feel, if you regard them as thick or not its a scary thought and its up to the people in charge to sort it out but they dont seem to have a clue how strong the feeling is out there
Looking at china theyve sacrificed the concept of individual for the concept of society as a whole and its pretty obvious as its a fundamental concept of communism!
Not saying we need to go red
But we do need to redress the balance. whats the point of individual rights if society as a whole collapses?? Is it not a good society that was able to give us those individual rights.
I like the military concept of simple leadership:
Team
Task
Individual
you have to balance all 3 to win the battle.
Even a very simple model like that and you can apply it to politics and see the balance is fucked!
Also in the military it is a core value that it is sometimes necessary to sacrifice the needs/lives of individuals to save the many.
Not saying we need to be sacrificing lives in uk society but the concept of needing to serve the bigger picture is still valid.
But in a society where individual is king, society as a whole suffers because the individual rights are sacrascant.
#101
thats the thing, intelligent people will sit down and try an resolve the issue, perhaps the thought of thier own mortality is an issue here?
but, and its big but, alot of people haven't got the intelligence to even begin to work it out, and jump on the first band wagon that rolls in, and join a tribe
but, and its big but, alot of people haven't got the intelligence to even begin to work it out, and jump on the first band wagon that rolls in, and join a tribe
#102
yes but the people are thinking out as individuals not as a society. thats the fundamental flaw with our politics. a lot of our current policys are based around individual rights with little consideration for society as a whole. the 'individual' was something pushed by thatcher lots.
Looking at china theyve sacrificed the concept of individual for the concept of society as a whole and its pretty obvious as its a fundamental concept of communism!
Not saying we need to go red
But we do need to redress the balance. whats the point of individual rights if society as a whole collapses?? Is it not a good society that was able to give us those individual rights.
I like the military concept of simple leadership:
Team
Task
Individual
you have to balance all 3 to win the battle.
Even a very simple model like that and you can apply it to politics and see the balance is fucked!
Also in the military it is a core value that it is sometimes necessary to sacrifice the needs/lives of individuals to save the many.
Not saying we need to be sacrificing lives in uk society but the concept of needing to serve the bigger picture is still valid.
But in a society where individual is king, society as a whole suffers because the individual rights are sacrascant.
Looking at china theyve sacrificed the concept of individual for the concept of society as a whole and its pretty obvious as its a fundamental concept of communism!
Not saying we need to go red
But we do need to redress the balance. whats the point of individual rights if society as a whole collapses?? Is it not a good society that was able to give us those individual rights.
I like the military concept of simple leadership:
Team
Task
Individual
you have to balance all 3 to win the battle.
Even a very simple model like that and you can apply it to politics and see the balance is fucked!
Also in the military it is a core value that it is sometimes necessary to sacrifice the needs/lives of individuals to save the many.
Not saying we need to be sacrificing lives in uk society but the concept of needing to serve the bigger picture is still valid.
But in a society where individual is king, society as a whole suffers because the individual rights are sacrascant.
#104
listening to BBC 5 live earlier and even muslim groups in the UK are glad they are banned. Muslim 4 UK did not represent true Islam, the group represented extream views which praised terror.
lets not confuse Islam 4 UK with genuine pro Islamic groups, they were far from it
lets not confuse Islam 4 UK with genuine pro Islamic groups, they were far from it
#105
listening to BBC 5 live earlier and even muslim groups in the UK are glad they are banned. Muslim 4 UK did not represent true Islam, the group represented extream views which praised terror.
lets not confuse Islam 4 UK with genuine pro Islamic groups, they were far from it
lets not confuse Islam 4 UK with genuine pro Islamic groups, they were far from it
Same principle on here that if you vote bnp you are a jackboot wearing thick skinhead who has had no education
Last edited by gaz s1; 12-01-2010 at 01:13 PM.
#106
thats the thing, intelligent people will sit down and try an resolve the issue, perhaps the thought of thier own mortality is an issue here?
but, and its big but, alot of people haven't got the intelligence to even begin to work it out, and jump on the first band wagon that rolls in, and join a tribe
but, and its big but, alot of people haven't got the intelligence to even begin to work it out, and jump on the first band wagon that rolls in, and join a tribe
But some people would rather call that the middle/upper classes picking on the poor calling them thick and make it out to be a classist thing than actually look at the bigger picture!
#109
#115
#118
i agree, but thats a choice in going to someone elses country
if you choose not to go to a country then its not affecting your human rights surely?
ie, if you go to saudi arabia, you have chosen not to drink alcohol, if you should then be caught drinking you have to face the consequences.
its not affecting your human rights because it stipulates in thier law, that you are not permitted to consume alcohol?
if there was a deterent in actually doing something, you have been warned, and its on your own head the outcome
Last edited by RS1HEN; 12-01-2010 at 02:10 PM.
#119
I think immigration how it's progressing is just another fuel point for the ID chip...
If when it's ready they can throw in: only citizens will be chipped, no more immigrants etc. there is a massive sweetner and will get approval. Then they'll step it up to you're only a citizen if chipped, and they have elemental as well as physical control and we're well and truly fucked.
Throw in the fact that most people getting the chip initially will be the homeless or crims, who will probably have no input on the info distributed and so won't carry over ANY warnings to the masses. People really really need to wake up or the future is pretty shite.
If when it's ready they can throw in: only citizens will be chipped, no more immigrants etc. there is a massive sweetner and will get approval. Then they'll step it up to you're only a citizen if chipped, and they have elemental as well as physical control and we're well and truly fucked.
Throw in the fact that most people getting the chip initially will be the homeless or crims, who will probably have no input on the info distributed and so won't carry over ANY warnings to the masses. People really really need to wake up or the future is pretty shite.
#120
Agree with that, definately the level of civil liberty we currently enjoy is a short term thing.
The main tools that will be used to get the public to agree to proper tagging will include:
Fear (of the bnp if you are brown, and of the islam4uk if you are white)
Hate (of immigrants)
Hope (that it will increase job prospects)
Stupidity (I think they are already home and dry with most PF users)
The main tools that will be used to get the public to agree to proper tagging will include:
Fear (of the bnp if you are brown, and of the islam4uk if you are white)
Hate (of immigrants)
Hope (that it will increase job prospects)
Stupidity (I think they are already home and dry with most PF users)