fuel system designs
#1
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
as above can anyone help or have experience of building fuel systems for track day cars. as some people maybe aware iam building a mk6 4x4 fiesta with a zetec turbo which stands at 500+bhp but we are hoping for more (650bhp) and iam wanting to start buying componets that i can collect while the car is still at the fabricators. ive had a good read about and i think this is how i want my fuel system which is all aeromotive as its one of the best products ive seen and is all jic fitting etc so easy install. i just need to know if theres anything else that needs to be added or taken out of the system. any advice would be welcome as ive only ever fitted a fuel reg and a uprated pump so i aint no expert. i want the fuel system to be rated to aleast 1000bhp incase we decide to run nos aswell
the system will be also mounted in the boot.
heres a gay drawing (arrows show flow direction)
![](http://i457.photobucket.com/albums/qq300/ZETABOOSTBOY522BHP/fuelsystem3.jpg)
as said above any help would be great also any pics of layouts
cheers paul
the system will be also mounted in the boot.
heres a gay drawing (arrows show flow direction)
![](http://i457.photobucket.com/albums/qq300/ZETABOOSTBOY522BHP/fuelsystem3.jpg)
as said above any help would be great also any pics of layouts
cheers paul
![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
#3
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
cheers paul
![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
#4
PassionFord Post Whore!!
#5
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
would you not be better off using a holley high volume low pressure lift pump from tank to swirl pot & when i was doing my fuel system stu from msd advised me on doing the supply & return lines in dash 8 lines. your return line from your y section is a restriction as you have 2-6,s going into 1 the single section should be as big as or bigger than the 2 together hope this helps
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Fuel-Pump-Elec...5ad4444a9bthis would be a good pump cheap to
![Big Grin](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
Last edited by andy escos; 02-01-2010 at 09:52 AM.
#6
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I would only return to the swirl tank if your low pressure pump is totally inadequate. Best option is to size properly so you can return to the main tank.
Although I would also add a line from the top of the swirl tank to the main tank, purely as an air bleed.
As for using two A1000 pumps, IMO thats just mental and really not needed. There are dedicated low pressure pumps available that will do that job, at a fraction of the cost. Just check any of the Yank suppliers. You could buy the likes of a 100-140 gph pump for keen prices and it will be a proper lift pump that can suck fuel.
See here http://www.realsteel.co.uk/section6.pdf
Also, from the fuel pump to the Y block or dist block, -8 would be more than ample for your needs, and much easier routed.
You'll also need some dedicated wiring, as the A1000's can draw a lot of current, and maybe a trailer to carry them as they are massive lol.
Although I would also add a line from the top of the swirl tank to the main tank, purely as an air bleed.
As for using two A1000 pumps, IMO thats just mental and really not needed. There are dedicated low pressure pumps available that will do that job, at a fraction of the cost. Just check any of the Yank suppliers. You could buy the likes of a 100-140 gph pump for keen prices and it will be a proper lift pump that can suck fuel.
See here http://www.realsteel.co.uk/section6.pdf
Also, from the fuel pump to the Y block or dist block, -8 would be more than ample for your needs, and much easier routed.
You'll also need some dedicated wiring, as the A1000's can draw a lot of current, and maybe a trailer to carry them as they are massive lol.
#7
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
would you not be better off using a holley high volume low pressure lift pump from tank to swirl pot & when i was doing my fuel system stu from msd advised me on doing the supply & return lines in dash 8 lines. your return line from your y section is a restriction as you have 2-6,s going into 1 the single section should be as big as or bigger than the 2 together hope this helps
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Fuel-Pump-Elec...5ad4444a9bthis would be a good pump cheap to
![Big Grin](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
also i want to use as little different thread sizes as i can so its as simple as possible
cheers paul
Last edited by zetaboostboy522bhp; 02-01-2010 at 11:12 AM.
Trending Topics
#8
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Your fuel pressure regulator has nothing whatsoever to do with what the low pressure lift pump is doing.
a pair of -6 into a y block then a return -6 is irrelevant.
The single -6 line is more than adequate anyway, and the FPR will cause more of a restriction than any amount of -6 lines or Y blocks. Thats how it works after all !
I would stick with -10 from tank to lift pump though, if you insist on the A1000.
After that -8 would be ample for the swirl supply and supply to the other A1000, as it is no longer only gravity fed due to the lift pump.
Although if you have room, -10 would do no harm.
a pair of -6 into a y block then a return -6 is irrelevant.
The single -6 line is more than adequate anyway, and the FPR will cause more of a restriction than any amount of -6 lines or Y blocks. Thats how it works after all !
I would stick with -10 from tank to lift pump though, if you insist on the A1000.
After that -8 would be ample for the swirl supply and supply to the other A1000, as it is no longer only gravity fed due to the lift pump.
Although if you have room, -10 would do no harm.
#9
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Your fuel pressure regulator has nothing whatsoever to do with what the low pressure lift pump is doing.
a pair of -6 into a y block then a return -6 is irrelevant.
The single -6 line is more than adequate anyway, and the FPR will cause more of a restriction than any amount of -6 lines or Y blocks. Thats how it works after all !
I would stick with -10 from tank to lift pump though, if you insist on the A1000.
After that -8 would be ample for the swirl supply and supply to the other A1000, as it is no longer only gravity fed due to the lift pump.
Although if you have room, -10 would do no harm.
a pair of -6 into a y block then a return -6 is irrelevant.
The single -6 line is more than adequate anyway, and the FPR will cause more of a restriction than any amount of -6 lines or Y blocks. Thats how it works after all !
I would stick with -10 from tank to lift pump though, if you insist on the A1000.
After that -8 would be ample for the swirl supply and supply to the other A1000, as it is no longer only gravity fed due to the lift pump.
Although if you have room, -10 would do no harm.
cheers paul
#10
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
No, the lift pump has no pressure built in whatsoever the same as every fuel pump.. Any restriction placed in front of the pump largely dictates any pressure...ie a FPR, or in your case a swirl tank+hoses+A1000+everything after the A1000.
If the lift pump flows more than everything after it, the swirl tank could end up under some pressure. If it doesnt flow enough, it could run empty at virtually zero pressure.
Although the lift pump may have a safety overpressure cutout should a blockage occur ( or the restriction in front is too great, ie it simply flows too much ).
Its a bit like a hose pipe. Your water mains might have 15 psi pressure available. But when you run a hose does it feel like it ? No...stick your finger over the end and suddenly there may be 15psi in it though.
Size of swirl pot depends entirely on your usage and space available. How big do YOU need it to be ?? How much room do YOU have ? How much fuel will your engine consume ? How long will you be WOT for etc ??
2 litres would be more than enough for even the most powerful cars though.
Although, unless you are doing some serious track usage, you have little need for a swirl tank. As you appear to be opting for a custom tank anyway, it would make more sense just to design a fuel system around a good single tank and single pump setup. It would save a fortune too.
If the lift pump flows more than everything after it, the swirl tank could end up under some pressure. If it doesnt flow enough, it could run empty at virtually zero pressure.
Although the lift pump may have a safety overpressure cutout should a blockage occur ( or the restriction in front is too great, ie it simply flows too much ).
Its a bit like a hose pipe. Your water mains might have 15 psi pressure available. But when you run a hose does it feel like it ? No...stick your finger over the end and suddenly there may be 15psi in it though.
Size of swirl pot depends entirely on your usage and space available. How big do YOU need it to be ?? How much room do YOU have ? How much fuel will your engine consume ? How long will you be WOT for etc ??
2 litres would be more than enough for even the most powerful cars though.
Although, unless you are doing some serious track usage, you have little need for a swirl tank. As you appear to be opting for a custom tank anyway, it would make more sense just to design a fuel system around a good single tank and single pump setup. It would save a fortune too.
Last edited by stevieturbo; 02-01-2010 at 11:59 AM.
#11
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
the final return in my thaught any way is its to small as when your off boost you have a -10 supplying 2x-6 then to the reg if it cannot return all that unused fuel because of the single -6 hose it will raise your fuel pressure & cause higher fuel emissions & worse fuel economy
#12
Advanced PassionFord User
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
IMO that looks massive overkill... you'd get away with -8 pipes feed/tank then split off to -6 to the fuel rails. -8 will supply 1000hp my -6 feed supplys me wih plenty for the 500+hp i am going... you design is right tho and what people have said to change like return to swirl imo is worth while also... the pumps also a massive overkill and very costly, i originally was going to use aeromotive pump also but they require a controller to work correctly.
so i changed over to the bosche pumps and 1 044 will feed 500-550hp so just run 2 pumps and saves you money on buying a aeromotive... the filters are very good tho...
so i changed over to the bosche pumps and 1 044 will feed 500-550hp so just run 2 pumps and saves you money on buying a aeromotive... the filters are very good tho...
#13
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
IMO that looks massive overkill... you'd get away with -8 pipes feed/tank then split off to -6 to the fuel rails. -8 will supply 1000hp my -6 feed supplys me wih plenty for the 500+hp i am going... you design is right tho and what people have said to change like return to swirl imo is worth while also... the pumps also a massive overkill and very costly, i originally was going to use aeromotive pump also but they require a controller to work correctly.
so i changed over to the bosche pumps and 1 044 will feed 500-550hp so just run 2 pumps and saves you money on buying a aeromotive... the filters are very good tho...
so i changed over to the bosche pumps and 1 044 will feed 500-550hp so just run 2 pumps and saves you money on buying a aeromotive... the filters are very good tho...
cheers paul
#16
Professional Waffler
#17
10K+ Poster!!
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I've always used Facets in the past on NA fuel systems and seen Holleys used on bigger turbo stuff.
I've seem some Sierra race cars running 2 facets though as lift pumps and they flow a LOT.
Aeromotive stuff is total overkill regardless of cost for what you need
I've seem some Sierra race cars running 2 facets though as lift pumps and they flow a LOT.
Aeromotive stuff is total overkill regardless of cost for what you need
#18
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
the final return in my thaught any way is its to small as when your off boost you have a -10 supplying 2x-6 then to the reg if it cannot return all that unused fuel because of the single -6 hose it will raise your fuel pressure & cause higher fuel emissions & worse fuel economy
I still see it as daft using two of those A1000's. Yes they look nice...but they are huge, noisy, and not as reliable as some other setups. And as a lift pump...they must still be fully gravity fed, as they are still a typical efi pump.
#19
Professional Waffler
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
this 45psi (static pressure) will be manifold referenced so when your running 30psi of boost, your line pressure will be
static pressure +boost pressure, so 45+30, so 75psi line pressure
#21
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
right so what lift pump can you buy that has -10 fittings as the aeromotive pumps come with -10 as standard and i dont make sense to use -8 to the lift pump , swirl pot etc then -10 to the aeromotive then to the input on the y block etc.
i would like it as simple as possible as for -jic sizes as i really cant be arsed using loads of different thread sizes etc.
i also know that using 2 a1000 pumps is over kill as 1 a1000 pump can do 1000bhp turbod but its just how cheap they are and that all the lines would be the same for pumps and filters etc, but keep it coming as iam always willing to listen to others views and opinions
lets have some pictures of boot installs aswell if anyone is willing to post with what parts where used and what power your running
cheers paul
i would like it as simple as possible as for -jic sizes as i really cant be arsed using loads of different thread sizes etc.
i also know that using 2 a1000 pumps is over kill as 1 a1000 pump can do 1000bhp turbod but its just how cheap they are and that all the lines would be the same for pumps and filters etc, but keep it coming as iam always willing to listen to others views and opinions
lets have some pictures of boot installs aswell if anyone is willing to post with what parts where used and what power your running
cheers paul
#23
10K+ Poster!!
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
RCM Gobstopper Fuel System
FIA spec 26 litre rubber/kevlar bag tank in aluminium cover
Twin Bosch fuel pumps (200 litre per pump)
-8 Goodrich fuel feed pipe
-6 Goodrich fuel return pipe
-6 fuel cooler with cooling fan on return
RCMS 8 injector distribution block
2x SX fuel regulators running at 4 bar static pressure
FIA spec 26 litre rubber/kevlar bag tank in aluminium cover
Twin Bosch fuel pumps (200 litre per pump)
-8 Goodrich fuel feed pipe
-6 Goodrich fuel return pipe
-6 fuel cooler with cooling fan on return
RCMS 8 injector distribution block
2x SX fuel regulators running at 4 bar static pressure
#24
PassionFord Post Troll
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i have two bosch motorsport pumps fed from fuel tank with a sump feeding a rail each then into areomotive reg and back into the sump area with the return a good tank design and pick up is the cheapest, most simple, lot neater, lighter and has no down side i get no surge till its pretty much empty
#28
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i have two bosch motorsport pumps fed from fuel tank with a sump feeding a rail each then into areomotive reg and back into the sump area with the return a good tank design and pick up is the cheapest, most simple, lot neater, lighter and has no down side i get no surge till its pretty much empty
cheers paul
![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
#29
10K+ Poster!!
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Just a quick thought as well, as great as that aeromotive stuff looks I have heard a few stories about poor machining on some of it and my mates regulator did have a **** load of swarf inside it.
Looks pretty enough but it wouldn't appear to be best, the 044 pumps would appear to be the motorsport standard
Looks pretty enough but it wouldn't appear to be best, the 044 pumps would appear to be the motorsport standard
#31
PassionFord Post Troll
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
they are about level with the bottom of the tank,,you could have them above but wouldn't say you want to go much higher and best kept close as poss
#32
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
right so what lift pump can you buy that has -10 fittings as the aeromotive pumps come with -10 as standard and i dont make sense to use -8 to the lift pump , swirl pot etc then -10 to the aeromotive then to the input on the y block etc.
i would like it as simple as possible as for -jic sizes as i really cant be arsed using loads of different thread sizes etc.
i also know that using 2 a1000 pumps is over kill as 1 a1000 pump can do 1000bhp turbod but its just how cheap they are and that all the lines would be the same for pumps and filters etc, but keep it coming as iam always willing to listen to others views and opinions
lets have some pictures of boot installs aswell if anyone is willing to post with what parts where used and what power your running
cheers paul
i would like it as simple as possible as for -jic sizes as i really cant be arsed using loads of different thread sizes etc.
i also know that using 2 a1000 pumps is over kill as 1 a1000 pump can do 1000bhp turbod but its just how cheap they are and that all the lines would be the same for pumps and filters etc, but keep it coming as iam always willing to listen to others views and opinions
lets have some pictures of boot installs aswell if anyone is willing to post with what parts where used and what power your running
cheers paul
But as Andy has shown, a properly designed fuel tank with no external swirl pot is by far the most common sense approach, and certainly the cheapest.
You could get away with a single A1000 that way.
if it was me....I'd still use a pair of 044's though. I'd rather a functional,. reliable fuel system, than one that looks nice with lots of red everywhere...
Which oddly enough....I dumped my A1000 in favour of a pair of 044's a few years ago !
#33
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
thanks guys , iam not defo going to use aeromotive but for example,
taking andrews picture , using the same tank could you use 1 aeromotive pre filter , 1 a1000 pump , 1 aeromotive filter , then a y block all -10 , then split to 2 -6 fuel lines to the rails and a -6 return ????
as andy says his design looks so much simpler than mine and would save quite abit of money.
what size inlets / outlets on the bosch pumps ,are they 044 ??
i have used a aeromotive reg with no probs but i surpose everyone has bad experiences with all sorts of components.
many thanks everyone for the help as this is a major learning curve!
taking andrews picture , using the same tank could you use 1 aeromotive pre filter , 1 a1000 pump , 1 aeromotive filter , then a y block all -10 , then split to 2 -6 fuel lines to the rails and a -6 return ????
as andy says his design looks so much simpler than mine and would save quite abit of money.
what size inlets / outlets on the bosch pumps ,are they 044 ??
i have used a aeromotive reg with no probs but i surpose everyone has bad experiences with all sorts of components.
many thanks everyone for the help as this is a major learning curve!
#34
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
-10 to the filter and pump is fine.
Using it on a high pressure side is a waste of time, stupid and pointless, and also harder to route due to the physical size of the hose.
-8 is more than enough. In fact a single -6 line would do you.
044's have an M18x1.5 intake, and M12x1.5 outlet.
Using it on a high pressure side is a waste of time, stupid and pointless, and also harder to route due to the physical size of the hose.
-8 is more than enough. In fact a single -6 line would do you.
044's have an M18x1.5 intake, and M12x1.5 outlet.
#36
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The pumps already mentioned could be adapted to whatever fittings you want.
But as Andy has shown, a properly designed fuel tank with no external swirl pot is by far the most common sense approach, and certainly the cheapest.
You could get away with a single A1000 that way.
if it was me....I'd still use a pair of 044's though. I'd rather a functional,. reliable fuel system, than one that looks nice with lots of red everywhere...
Which oddly enough....I dumped my A1000 in favour of a pair of 044's a few years ago !
But as Andy has shown, a properly designed fuel tank with no external swirl pot is by far the most common sense approach, and certainly the cheapest.
You could get away with a single A1000 that way.
if it was me....I'd still use a pair of 044's though. I'd rather a functional,. reliable fuel system, than one that looks nice with lots of red everywhere...
Which oddly enough....I dumped my A1000 in favour of a pair of 044's a few years ago !
cheers paul
#37
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
As already mentioned. They do not perform as well as an 044 at higher fuel pressures.
And their flow data for the pump wasnt overly impressive.....although the same does apply to an 044. I suspect the flaw data they provide is quite conservative.
I flow tested my system pretty much as installed and it certainly flows a lot more than what Bosch claim for an 044 based setup.
The A1000 was also big and bulky, and I wasnt happy with where it was installed, as it took up sapce in my boot. The 044's however were able to fit neatly underneath my tank, which left room for carrying racing tyres in the boot as well as luggage etc.
And their flow data for the pump wasnt overly impressive.....although the same does apply to an 044. I suspect the flaw data they provide is quite conservative.
I flow tested my system pretty much as installed and it certainly flows a lot more than what Bosch claim for an 044 based setup.
The A1000 was also big and bulky, and I wasnt happy with where it was installed, as it took up sapce in my boot. The 044's however were able to fit neatly underneath my tank, which left room for carrying racing tyres in the boot as well as luggage etc.
#40
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
People just go daft and think they need massive pumps, massive lines, massive everything when it comes to a fuel system.
They just need to build it sensibly. Despite their size...an 044 is a bloody fantastic pump.
The little Walbro's used more so in the JDM world are cheap and cheerful too, and flow very well. They do not perform well at high pressures though.
They just need to build it sensibly. Despite their size...an 044 is a bloody fantastic pump.
The little Walbro's used more so in the JDM world are cheap and cheerful too, and flow very well. They do not perform well at high pressures though.