Cossie Rich 379bhp run on the RR Video.
03-10-2008, 07:07 PM
#1
Happily retired
Thread Starter
Cossie Rich 379bhp run on the RR Video.
Hope this has not been shown already
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_HWE....com/index.cfm
Not sure what a rs500 Escort is
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCYQM...eature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_HWE....com/index.cfm
Not sure what a rs500 Escort is
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCYQM...eature=related
Last edited by Rod-Tarry; 03-10-2008 at 07:42 PM.
03-10-2008, 08:24 PM
#3
Almost there!
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Gatwick (ish)
Posts: 7,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
as said, no idea what an RS500 escos is, and a bit of on an odd clip aswell.
Looks good on the rollers Richy, no idea who composed the silly clip tho.
hope you achieve what you are after next time mate
Looks good on the rollers Richy, no idea who composed the silly clip tho.
hope you achieve what you are after next time mate
03-10-2008, 08:33 PM
#6
20K+ Super Poster.
horrid video far too cheese
byt the way can we have a normal T34 .63 graph to compare to rich's? as im sure the "area under the graph" would be muchos different?
ps dinguin, fuck off
far too cheese byt the way can we have a normal T34 .63 graph to compare to rich's? as im sure the "area under the graph" would be muchos different?
ps dinguin, fuck off
03-10-2008, 08:33 PM
#7
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Trending Topics
03-10-2008, 08:38 PM
#9
PassionFord Post Whore!!
03-10-2008, 08:42 PM
#12
PassionFord Post Whore!!
This was on a stock head and 2wd inlet so some tweaks to the inlet should see some power back
this should be done in a couple of weeks max.Mark
03-10-2008, 08:45 PM
#14
PassionFord Post Whore!!
It was upto Rich to post this and I did nothing to stop him, So next a small tweak and back to the dyno to sort the power.
Mark
03-10-2008, 08:47 PM
#15
20K+ Super Poster.
Rod posting vids can't help though!
03-10-2008, 09:08 PM
#17
Happily retired
Thread Starter
Martin
I posted his Graph as well, ive all day to sort these things out, Rich works for a living so nothing sinister there, Rich is a mate, I dont work for MAD never have.
The Video was done by a site called Motor Addicts who just happened to be at the RR nothing to do with Mark or Rich, it came from their site. No idea about the second video it came up on the Motor Addicts site the next video on in You Tube.
I posted his Graph as well, ive all day to sort these things out, Rich works for a living so nothing sinister there, Rich is a mate, I dont work for MAD never have.
The Video was done by a site called Motor Addicts who just happened to be at the RR nothing to do with Mark or Rich, it came from their site. No idea about the second video it came up on the Motor Addicts site the next video on in You Tube.
03-10-2008, 10:08 PM
#27
Almost there!
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Gatwick (ish)
Posts: 7,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Personally - i think Rich's car looks awesome, the colour of the car and the wheels compliment each other perfectly.
all the right bits to discreetly stand out enough from the mainstream
all the right bits to discreetly stand out enough from the mainstream
03-10-2008, 10:10 PM
#28
BANNED
BANNED
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 12,483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rod,
Nothing personal but thats not what you have said in the past as I and others have seen.
I am making an issue of this because you are in effect allowed a trade name yet I am not even though I no longer trade.
I have quoted your past "I am working for mad type posts" to admin and they just ignore it...LOL
Only as means to get my name changed if you are allowed yours.
Are you sure you are not passionfords "ferrari" and have bunged stu a wad of cash lol.
Again, nothing personal
03-10-2008, 10:12 PM
#29
Depends on if it's 2wd or 4x4, 330 6 pots will be fine on either but the 355 idea would only work on a 2wd. Btw .... Were you answering the phone @ SCS today? I called and the call was greated by an unknown voice.
Last edited by Martin-Hadland; 03-10-2008 at 10:15 PM.
04-10-2008, 08:28 AM
#35
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Doncaster
Posts: 5,143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
have to say when i saw the in car vid that i red about i thought it appeared no faster than mine on a t34 .55. thats because its the same power.
not to be sniffed at though im sure theres more in it. the evo boys are using the gt3071 and making more power.
what was the max torque figure and at what rpm?
not to be sniffed at though im sure theres more in it. the evo boys are using the gt3071 and making more power.
what was the max torque figure and at what rpm?
04-10-2008, 09:03 AM
#36
Happily retired
Thread Starter
Rod,
Nothing personal but thats not what you have said in the past as I and others have seen.
I am making an issue of this because you are in effect allowed a trade name yet I am not even though I no longer trade.
I have quoted your past "I am working for mad type posts" to admin and they just ignore it...LOL
Only as means to get my name changed if you are allowed yours.
Are you sure you are not passionfords "ferrari" and have bunged stu a wad of cash lol.
Again, nothing personal
Nothing personal but thats not what you have said in the past as I and others have seen.
I am making an issue of this because you are in effect allowed a trade name yet I am not even though I no longer trade.
I have quoted your past "I am working for mad type posts" to admin and they just ignore it...LOL
Only as means to get my name changed if you are allowed yours.
Are you sure you are not passionfords "ferrari" and have bunged stu a wad of cash lol.
Again, nothing personal
I have never repeat never been an employee of MAD, or ever claimed I was, I do some work at MAD but i dont get payed. I build his looms & sometimes fit them. He does not pay me to do this, but I do have a 'tab' with Mark. My rebuilds over the past 18 months have been against the hours ive put in. The confusion came about when I was there on a mag article & they said I was an employee. It makes no economic sense whatsoever for Mark to employee me, he doesnt have the electrical work to keep me fully employed & I would require far more than he could afford to pay, to make it worth my while getting out of bed on a regular basis.
Im 63 & dont need to work.
The arrangement I have suits me fine.
I trust this clears it up once & for all.
ps. By the way I had to change from MADRod to Madrod or perhaps you wanted insanerod or even sillyrod both suitable I feel, please dont be so petty Simon please.
04-10-2008, 09:13 AM
#37
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Doncaster
Posts: 5,143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have never repeat never been an employee of MAD, or ever claimed I was, I do some work at MAD but i dont get payed. I build his looms & sometimes fit them. He does not pay me to do this, but I do have a 'tab' with Mark. My rebuilds over the past 18 months have been against the hours ive put in. The confusion came about when I was there on a mag article & they said I was an employee. It makes no economic sense whatsoever for Mark to employee me, he doesnt have the electrical work to keep me fully employed & I would require far more than he could afford to pay, to make it worth my while getting out of bed on a regular basis.
Im 63 & dont need to work.
The arrangement I have suits me fine.
I trust this clears it up once & for all.
ps. By the way I had to change from MADRod to Madrod or perhaps you wanted insanerod or even sillyrod both suitable I feel, please dont be so petty Simon please.
Im 63 & dont need to work.
The arrangement I have suits me fine.
I trust this clears it up once & for all.
ps. By the way I had to change from MADRod to Madrod or perhaps you wanted insanerod or even sillyrod both suitable I feel, please dont be so petty Simon please.
if you didnt spend with him then you either wouldnt do it or would want paying for it.
at least "getting paid" how you do wont have the tax man sniffing.
are you really insinuating that the mad in your username now doesnt refer to m a developments, and that its really a mark of your crazyness?
04-10-2008, 10:57 AM
#40
BANNED
BANNED
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 12,483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have never repeat never been an employee of MAD, or ever claimed I was, I do some work at MAD but i dont get payed. I build his looms & sometimes fit them. He does not pay me to do this, but I do have a 'tab' with Mark. My rebuilds over the past 18 months have been against the hours ive put in. The confusion came about when I was there on a mag article & they said I was an employee. It makes no economic sense whatsoever for Mark to employee me, he doesnt have the electrical work to keep me fully employed & I would require far more than he could afford to pay, to make it worth my while getting out of bed on a regular basis.
Im 63 & dont need to work.
The arrangement I have suits me fine.
I trust this clears it up once & for all.
ps. By the way I had to change from MADRod to Madrod or perhaps you wanted insanerod or even sillyrod both suitable I feel, please dont be so petty Simon please.
Im 63 & dont need to work.
The arrangement I have suits me fine.
I trust this clears it up once & for all.
ps. By the way I had to change from MADRod to Madrod or perhaps you wanted insanerod or even sillyrod both suitable I feel, please dont be so petty Simon please.
I was right then LOL.
Irrespective if you get paid or not, you have done/still do promote/benefit Marks business whilst having the use of a trade name reference.
Admin know all this yet allow it..... !
I personally dont care what anyone calls themself but when the same rules are applied to me are not applied to others then thats unfair.
As much as I respect you and Mark, I dont understand why he doesnt just get a trade membership as he clearly does gain benefit from this site (not just from you) which isnt fair on the other tuner/traders who do contribute.
Its not as if its a lot of money !!!!!!