General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

Why 2.1 and not 2.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-2008, 09:09 PM
  #1  
RS 5tu
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
RS 5tu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Blackpool
Posts: 2,365
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Question Why 2.1 and not 2.0

Why go 2.1 and not say at 2.0 is it just the fact that you can use calibre pistons? what power gain would you get say over a 2.1 instead of 1.8 (i have 1.8 btw) but never bother thinking about 2.1 how much could you do a 2.1 with calibra pistons and modded rods?

Also any one know all the bits you have to do and need to do a 2.1 and rough cost (parts only no labour)
Old 10-08-2008, 09:10 PM
  #2  
vroooom ptssssh
It Wasnt Me!
 
vroooom ptssssh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Scottyland
Posts: 22,752
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

its not even 2.1 im sure its something like 2048CC
Old 10-08-2008, 09:11 PM
  #3  
XRT_si
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (2)
 
XRT_si's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London
Posts: 6,861
Received 54 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

True, C20LET pistons dont ACTUALLY give 2.1. Just everyone says it.
Old 10-08-2008, 09:11 PM
  #4  
RS 5tu
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
RS 5tu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Blackpool
Posts: 2,365
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Yeh i know but is the piston not shorter giving little more stroke (if you know what i mean) making it 2.1? Thats the only thing i can think of
Old 10-08-2008, 09:12 PM
  #5  
Stavros
DEYTUKURJERBS
 
Stavros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Korea
Posts: 29,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Anything over 2050cc is classed at 2.1?

Isnt it over that?

If not, thats retarded.
Old 10-08-2008, 09:13 PM
  #6  
RS 5tu
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
RS 5tu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Blackpool
Posts: 2,365
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

as above its 2048cc but if the piston were shorter it could move further down the cylinder giving it 2.1

Last edited by RS 5tu; 10-08-2008 at 09:15 PM.
Old 10-08-2008, 09:14 PM
  #7  
bonus_boy
PassionFord Post Troll
 
bonus_boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: brierley hill
Posts: 2,865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

but its a 2048cc so its classed as a 2.0...
Old 10-08-2008, 09:18 PM
  #8  
RS 5tu
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
RS 5tu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Blackpool
Posts: 2,365
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

it must be 2.1, do you not have to bore it out?
Old 10-08-2008, 09:45 PM
  #9  
Red16
10K+ Poster!!
 
Red16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: South Shields
Posts: 10,788
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

the reason people dont stay at 2.0 is because the used Zetec engines need a rebore, hence the increase in capacity (whatever it may be)
Old 10-08-2008, 09:49 PM
  #10  
pa_sjo
Colossal Pervert
 
pa_sjo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 3,678
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by RS 5tu
as above its 2048cc but if the piston were shorter it could move further down the cylinder giving it 2.1
I think back to automotive school for you sonny
Old 10-08-2008, 09:57 PM
  #11  
Stavros
DEYTUKURJERBS
 
Stavros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Korea
Posts: 29,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by pa_sjo
I think back to automotive school for you sonny
I was gonna say that earlier, but resisted
Old 10-08-2008, 10:07 PM
  #12  
RS 5tu
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
RS 5tu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Blackpool
Posts: 2,365
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Whys that? there are more ways to increase cc than a rebore. Any way it was only a guess as i dont know,How els do they get 2.1? or is what you are saying there is NO 2.1s

Last edited by RS 5tu; 10-08-2008 at 10:08 PM.
Old 10-08-2008, 10:12 PM
  #13  
pa_sjo
Colossal Pervert
 
pa_sjo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 3,678
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'm sure someone out there has used 86.5mm pistons to obtain a real 2.1L zetec.. 86mm bore by 88mm stroke is 2.0L, not 2.1L.

And you're right, you can increase displacement by change stroke, as well as bore. Running a shorter compression height piston though is not changing your stroke!!
Old 10-08-2008, 10:13 PM
  #14  
RS 5tu
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
RS 5tu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Blackpool
Posts: 2,365
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

So my wording was crap but you get what i mean?
Old 10-08-2008, 10:16 PM
  #15  
pa_sjo
Colossal Pervert
 
pa_sjo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 3,678
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

No, it was just wrong. You said a shorter piston gives you more stroke, which it does not. The crank dictates the stroke, the piston has nothing to do it with it
Old 10-08-2008, 10:16 PM
  #16  
Stavros
DEYTUKURJERBS
 
Stavros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Korea
Posts: 29,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

a shorter piston gives you lower compression stu, nowt else
Old 10-08-2008, 10:21 PM
  #17  
RS 5tu
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
RS 5tu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Blackpool
Posts: 2,365
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Well like i said it was only a guess to how you got 2.1
So if i got a 2.0 with calibra piston it would still be 2.0 becouse its actually 2048cc So my question is would it be worth it changing my 1.8 for a 2.0 i would say no...?
Old 10-08-2008, 10:21 PM
  #18  
pa_sjo
Colossal Pervert
 
pa_sjo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 3,678
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

What is your 1800cc engine? Turbo? 8v? 16v?
Old 10-08-2008, 10:22 PM
  #19  
RS 5tu
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
RS 5tu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Blackpool
Posts: 2,365
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

1.8 Turbo 8v
Old 10-08-2008, 10:23 PM
  #20  
pa_sjo
Colossal Pervert
 
pa_sjo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 3,678
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

So are you asking about simply changing the bottom end to a 2L one, or going the full 16v?
Old 10-08-2008, 10:26 PM
  #21  
RS 5tu
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
RS 5tu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Blackpool
Posts: 2,365
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pa_sjo
So are you asking about simply changing the bottom end to a 2L one, or going the full 16v?
Well coz my car is off the road i am doing some changes efi conversion and restoring it and respray, I was after a bit more power but since i already have a 1.8 would i get a good increase and how much and how to get this "2.1" people always rave on about. Staying 8v btw i have got a good spec head.
Old 10-08-2008, 10:27 PM
  #22  
pa_sjo
Colossal Pervert
 
pa_sjo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 3,678
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Then you'd most likely not get any more power, just get a wider power band..
Old 10-08-2008, 10:32 PM
  #23  
RS 5tu
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
RS 5tu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Blackpool
Posts: 2,365
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

No point then for the price i could build a bottom end i could spend the money on something else. (like finishing it )
Old 10-08-2008, 10:40 PM
  #24  
xrsi
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
iTrader: (1)
 
xrsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: oswestry - shropshire
Posts: 1,187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pa_sjo
No, it was just wrong. You said a shorter piston gives you more stroke, which it does not. The crank dictates the stroke, the piston has nothing to do it with it
also rod length plays a part as well in the stroke

piston height can be a factor in the overall stroke that can be used within an engine as a shorter length between the rod pin and the crown will enable you to have a slightly larger throw or longer rod compaired to an identical engine with a larger pin to crown length as it would protrude out of the bore if it were the same length. But as said the height of the piston is mainly to do with the CR ratios.

the larger the capacity the more torque and power that can be obtained from the same mods as the increased capacity offers the chance for more air to enter the cylinders and in turn more fuel creating a lsrger bang within the cylinder (i said chance as at full throttle with the engbine approaching the red line the time the valve is open for gets les and less and there is a critical point where the cylinder can no longer obtain enough ai to be full in the time the valve is open, this is normally at the point of peak power)

if you were going to change to a 2ltr for the cost of the calibra pistons and also the work required to fit them to the rods then i would just get some propper pistons for zetec (likes of JE are cheap)
Old 10-08-2008, 10:42 PM
  #25  
pa_sjo
Colossal Pervert
 
pa_sjo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 3,678
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

What? I'll repeat what I said. The crank is the ONLY thing that dictates the STROKE of an engine. Rod length, piston height, completely irrelevant.
Old 10-08-2008, 10:57 PM
  #26  
SiZT
Advanced PassionFord User
 
SiZT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Staffordshire
Posts: 1,896
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pa_sjo
What? I'll repeat what I said. The crank is the ONLY thing that dictates the STROKE of an engine. Rod length, piston height, completely irrelevant.
Old 10-08-2008, 11:04 PM
  #27  
xrsi
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
iTrader: (1)
 
xrsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: oswestry - shropshire
Posts: 1,187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pa_sjo
What? I'll repeat what I said. The crank is the ONLY thing that dictates the STROKE of an engine. Rod length, piston height, completely irrelevant.
i said the piston height dictates the maximum stroke you can have. Yeah thinking back harder to my uni days im thinking of dispalacement where rod length is included not stroke, its late at night and im knackered!
Old 10-08-2008, 11:05 PM
  #28  
pa_sjo
Colossal Pervert
 
pa_sjo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 3,678
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The piston comrpession height AND rod length dictate the maximum stroke you can have (well, and the physical space you have inside the crank case )..

It doesn't hurt to stir up the ol' grey matter on this stuff
Old 10-08-2008, 11:25 PM
  #29  
xrsi
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
iTrader: (1)
 
xrsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: oswestry - shropshire
Posts: 1,187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

its really bad, i sat through 3 years of lectures and finished 2 years ago and havent had to use anythnig from my degree!

normally i can rememebr alot of the stuff without refering back to some old notes (as long as it wasnt engineering maths - hated that! lol)

yeah making sure you have enough room for the throw inside the crank case is always a good idea! wouldnt be supprised if people havent when designing an engine before now! lol
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mk3ste
Restorations, Rebuilds & Projects.
19
17-10-2021 10:09 AM
nico12
Restorations, Rebuilds & Projects.
6
31-12-2015 04:42 PM
Daniel Howard
Ford Classics & Vintage
2
03-10-2015 10:44 PM
The Enigma
General Car Related Discussion.
6
29-09-2015 10:31 AM
BENJAMIN_21
Ford Fiesta
0
17-09-2015 08:58 AM



Quick Reply: Why 2.1 and not 2.0



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:30 PM.