12v v6 to 24v can it be done ?
#41
Resident Wrestling Legend
iTrader: (3)
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
300 brake on tb's will be fine and it'll make a cracking engine for a road car
there is someone who makes a girdle for the bottom end, but it's not that big a big of engineering as it's just a plate to tie the end caps together, and seeing as the sump tends to interfere with the installation of the girdle, it's a bit cut and shut to the sump to get it all to fit
for the amount of money i spent on the engine in my motor i could have had 400 brake worth of yb with better weight distribution for the car and better handling and better everything else
but it's nice to be different, even if it does cost you more and get you less
there is someone who makes a girdle for the bottom end, but it's not that big a big of engineering as it's just a plate to tie the end caps together, and seeing as the sump tends to interfere with the installation of the girdle, it's a bit cut and shut to the sump to get it all to fit
for the amount of money i spent on the engine in my motor i could have had 400 brake worth of yb with better weight distribution for the car and better handling and better everything else
but it's nice to be different, even if it does cost you more and get you less
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
#42
DEYTUKURJERBS
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
does a girdle REALLY make a difference tho?
on a lot of cars a girdle is a placebo, does fuck all in reality.
anyone tried doing a half fill yet? if run a big oil cooler its not a real issue even on a track/road car.
i still dont think the 12v is as bad as people think it is, even if its very ordinary in n/a form. hmm...
on a lot of cars a girdle is a placebo, does fuck all in reality.
anyone tried doing a half fill yet? if run a big oil cooler its not a real issue even on a track/road car.
i still dont think the 12v is as bad as people think it is, even if its very ordinary in n/a form. hmm...
#43
Wahay!! I've lost my Virginity!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
r500 i ran a 24v sierra for a few years and spent a bit of cash on that car, so i speak from experience.
i love the 24v, but i understand its limitations.
if you add up how much it will cost you for a well specced 24v then see what you can get from other engines for the same money (ie YBs, V8s etc.) it just doesnt make sense to go with the cologne
i love the 24v, but i understand its limitations.
if you add up how much it will cost you for a well specced 24v then see what you can get from other engines for the same money (ie YBs, V8s etc.) it just doesnt make sense to go with the cologne
im prepared to spend time and effrot on this engine but i do know its limitations , i may well stick to the 2.9 24v block with tbs for the moment
but the 3.7 litre 24v is my goal;
![Big Grin](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
#44
Wahay!! I've lost my Virginity!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![smiley_abuv.gif](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smiley_abuv.gif)
#45
PassionFord Post Troll
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 3,174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#46
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Join Date: May 2005
Location: motherwell
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#47
PassionFord Post Troll
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 3,174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#48
Resident Wrestling Legend
iTrader: (3)
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
does a girdle REALLY make a difference tho?
on a lot of cars a girdle is a placebo, does fuck all in reality.
anyone tried doing a half fill yet? if run a big oil cooler its not a real issue even on a track/road car.
i still dont think the 12v is as bad as people think it is, even if its very ordinary in n/a form. hmm...
on a lot of cars a girdle is a placebo, does fuck all in reality.
anyone tried doing a half fill yet? if run a big oil cooler its not a real issue even on a track/road car.
i still dont think the 12v is as bad as people think it is, even if its very ordinary in n/a form. hmm...
![Grin](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
it's not down to anything other than the block flexing when it's pushed beyond around the 6500 rpm limit on sustained periods that it tends to let go on frequent occasions
#49
PassionFord Post Whore!!
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ahhhh no the essex and the cologne were devolped at about the same time.
Ford(England) made there 2.0 V6 and Ford(Germany) Made theres over time they increased size
I think the essex was a better block though as GAA form it made 400 bhp.
I think a 24v with TBs will look from a distance like a GAA engine so will look cool
#50
PassionFord Post Whore!!
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
oooo one more thing, the standard valve springs are very soft so after 7000 rpm the thing valve bounces. Merlin perfomace used to do upraded ones, but I think its gone out of busness
#55
Resident Wrestling Legend
iTrader: (3)
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
there is also the oil issue to worry about, the heads froth up and not enough oil returns at those sorts of speeds to the sump so you can get starvation issues too
so it starts to get more and more difficult to make that sort of power higher up the rev range
added to the fact that there was a rumour doing the rounds that 280 bhp was the max available from the standard inlet and anyone who claimed more was ridiculed
until the fella from turbo techincs pulled up in a 500 bhp tt 24V with the standard inlet fitted and it was then acceptable to be able to make that power
so it starts to get more and more difficult to make that sort of power higher up the rev range
added to the fact that there was a rumour doing the rounds that 280 bhp was the max available from the standard inlet and anyone who claimed more was ridiculed
until the fella from turbo techincs pulled up in a 500 bhp tt 24V with the standard inlet fitted and it was then acceptable to be able to make that power
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
#56
PassionFord Post Whore!!
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The great thing about a 24v is give it some boost, it fucking loves it, the torque goes through the roof, cap you revs to 6k chuck 8 psi in there and you will have 330 odd foot ibs of torque at about 4k rpm
#58
DEYTUKURJERBS
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Head oil issue is common and simple. Head oil resitrictors. Happens on Skylines and tons of engines.
If they really thought 280bhp was maximum the inlet could do with forced induction the owners are even more complete mongaloids than I already imagined.
And any turbo car with any boost will give a bit over its cc in torque, 24V Cossie or any bloody engine really, thats no big deal. A 2.9 running 8psi giving 330lbft isnt exactly unexpected.
If they really thought 280bhp was maximum the inlet could do with forced induction the owners are even more complete mongaloids than I already imagined.
And any turbo car with any boost will give a bit over its cc in torque, 24V Cossie or any bloody engine really, thats no big deal. A 2.9 running 8psi giving 330lbft isnt exactly unexpected.
#59
PassionFord Post Whore!!
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
yeah steve, but if you take 2.9 12v to get over 300 bhp takes a lote of money, but 24v heads flow very very good and the pistons are better conrods are better. 8 psi will make over 300 bhp on a 24v it will need a lot more boost to do the same on a 12v
#61
Resident Wrestling Legend
iTrader: (3)
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
on the 12V it makes shit loads of torque right from the get go
i had my peak of 390+ lb/ft at 1900 rpm and could pootle around in 5th at 10 pmh
the power needs a bit more work to get out as it's limited in essence to around the 6k mark really as this is where the boost would tail off and there was no point reving beyond that mark
plus the limiter would kick in at 6300 rpm so you couldn't hit 60 in second, no matter how hard i treid i could only get 58.5 mph
i had my peak of 390+ lb/ft at 1900 rpm and could pootle around in 5th at 10 pmh
the power needs a bit more work to get out as it's limited in essence to around the 6k mark really as this is where the boost would tail off and there was no point reving beyond that mark
plus the limiter would kick in at 6300 rpm so you couldn't hit 60 in second, no matter how hard i treid i could only get 58.5 mph
![Sad](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
#62
Wahay!! I've lost my Virginity!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#63
Wahay!! I've lost my Virginity!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ahhhh no the essex and the cologne were devolped at about the same time.
Ford(England) made there 2.0 V6 and Ford(Germany) Made theres over time they increased size
I think the essex was a better block though as GAA form it made 400 bhp.
I think a 24v with TBs will look from a distance like a GAA engine so will look cool
Ford(England) made there 2.0 V6 and Ford(Germany) Made theres over time they increased size
I think the essex was a better block though as GAA form it made 400 bhp.
I think a 24v with TBs will look from a distance like a GAA engine so will look cool
![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
#64
PassionFord Post Whore!!
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
r500 as I said before the essex started as a 2.0 in the corsair, the rs2600 was a devlopment of the cologne 2.0 which was in some german ford which escaps me at the mo
The cologne in its 2.8 form was regarded as a boat ancher by cosworth.
shit ports, shit block, shit every thing lol
sorry for being a nerd lol
The cologne in its 2.8 form was regarded as a boat ancher by cosworth.
shit ports, shit block, shit every thing lol
sorry for being a nerd lol
#65
Wahay!! I've lost my Virginity!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
r500 as I said before the essex started as a 2.0 in the corsair, the rs2600 was a devlopment of the cologne 2.0 which was in some german ford which escaps me at the mo
The cologne in its 2.8 form was regarded as a boat ancher by cosworth.
shit ports, shit block, shit every thing lol
sorry for being a nerd lol
The cologne in its 2.8 form was regarded as a boat ancher by cosworth.
shit ports, shit block, shit every thing lol
sorry for being a nerd lol
im happy with it anyways and wont look out of place
![Big Grin](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
#66
PassionFord Post Whore!!
#69
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Join Date: May 2005
Location: motherwell
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#74
Wahay!! I've lost my Virginity!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Quote:
Originally Posted by escort700bhp
dont think it came in v6 2.0 ??,trick question .v6 2.3 yes
year oct 69 ??
howd i do ? many points?
0 points![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mark_24v_wiring
2.0 v6 was a cologne engine first used in 1969 i think
5 points
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyB
The 2.0 v6 was a MK1, but I am sure the Capri was a 1970's car?
2 points
![Content](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/content.gif)
![Content](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/content.gif)
Originally Posted by escort700bhp
![](https://passionford.com/forum/images/buttons/viewpost.gif)
dont think it came in v6 2.0 ??,trick question .v6 2.3 yes
year oct 69 ??
howd i do ? many points?
0 points
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mark_24v_wiring
![](https://passionford.com/forum/images/buttons/viewpost.gif)
2.0 v6 was a cologne engine first used in 1969 i think
5 points
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyB
![](https://passionford.com/forum/images/buttons/viewpost.gif)
The 2.0 v6 was a MK1, but I am sure the Capri was a 1970's car?
2 points
![Content](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/content.gif)
![Content](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/content.gif)
![Content](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/content.gif)
#76
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
r500 my retarded son ran a 24v sierra for a few years and spent a bit of cash on that car, so i speak from experience.
i love Jim, but i understand his limitations.
if you add up how much it will cost you for a well specced 24v and that's what you want, it just doesnt make sense to listen to Jim
i love Jim, but i understand his limitations.
if you add up how much it will cost you for a well specced 24v and that's what you want, it just doesnt make sense to listen to Jim
#78
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kent
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I beg to differ i deserve all 7 points
The first Ford Capri to bear that precise name was introduced in January 1969 at the Brussels Motor Show, with sales starting the following month. The intention was to reproduce in Europe the success Ford had had with the North American Ford Mustang; to produce a European pony car. It was mechanically based on the Cortina and built in Europe at the Dagenham and Halewood plants in the United Kingdom, the Genk plant in Belgium, and the Saarlouis and Cologne plants in Germany. The car was named Colt during development stage, but Ford were unable to use the name, as it was trademarked by Mitsubishi.
Although a fastback coupé, Ford wanted the Capri Mark 1 to be affordable for a broad spectrum of potential buyers. To help achieve that, it was available with a variety of engines. The British and German factories produced different line-ups. The continental model used the Ford Taunus V4 engine in 1.3, 1.5 and 1.7 L displacement, while the British versions were powered by the Ford Kent straight-4 in 1.3 and 1.6 L form. The Cologne V6 2.0 L served as initial range-topper. Until the end of the year, new sports versions were added: the 2300 GT in Germany, using a double-barrel carburettor with 125 PS (92 kW), and the 3000 GT in the UK, with the Essex V6, capable of 138 hp (103 kW).
The first Ford Capri to bear that precise name was introduced in January 1969 at the Brussels Motor Show, with sales starting the following month. The intention was to reproduce in Europe the success Ford had had with the North American Ford Mustang; to produce a European pony car. It was mechanically based on the Cortina and built in Europe at the Dagenham and Halewood plants in the United Kingdom, the Genk plant in Belgium, and the Saarlouis and Cologne plants in Germany. The car was named Colt during development stage, but Ford were unable to use the name, as it was trademarked by Mitsubishi.
Although a fastback coupé, Ford wanted the Capri Mark 1 to be affordable for a broad spectrum of potential buyers. To help achieve that, it was available with a variety of engines. The British and German factories produced different line-ups. The continental model used the Ford Taunus V4 engine in 1.3, 1.5 and 1.7 L displacement, while the British versions were powered by the Ford Kent straight-4 in 1.3 and 1.6 L form. The Cologne V6 2.0 L served as initial range-topper. Until the end of the year, new sports versions were added: the 2300 GT in Germany, using a double-barrel carburettor with 125 PS (92 kW), and the 3000 GT in the UK, with the Essex V6, capable of 138 hp (103 kW).
#80
Wahay!! I've lost my Virginity!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I beg to differ i deserve all 7 points
The first Ford Capri to bear that precise name was introduced in January 1969 at the Brussels Motor Show, with sales starting the following month. The intention was to reproduce in Europe the success Ford had had with the North American Ford Mustang; to produce a European pony car. It was mechanically based on the Cortina and built in Europe at the Dagenham and Halewood plants in the United Kingdom, the Genk plant in Belgium, and the Saarlouis and Cologne plants in Germany. The car was named Colt during development stage, but Ford were unable to use the name, as it was trademarked by Mitsubishi.
Although a fastback coupé, Ford wanted the Capri Mark 1 to be affordable for a broad spectrum of potential buyers. To help achieve that, it was available with a variety of engines. The British and German factories produced different line-ups. The continental model used the Ford Taunus V4 engine in 1.3, 1.5 and 1.7 L displacement, while the British versions were powered by the Ford Kent straight-4 in 1.3 and 1.6 L form. The Cologne V6 2.0 L served as initial range-topper. Until the end of the year, new sports versions were added: the 2300 GT in Germany, using a double-barrel carburettor with 125 PS (92 kW), and the 3000 GT in the UK, with the Essex V6, capable of 138 hp (103 kW).
The first Ford Capri to bear that precise name was introduced in January 1969 at the Brussels Motor Show, with sales starting the following month. The intention was to reproduce in Europe the success Ford had had with the North American Ford Mustang; to produce a European pony car. It was mechanically based on the Cortina and built in Europe at the Dagenham and Halewood plants in the United Kingdom, the Genk plant in Belgium, and the Saarlouis and Cologne plants in Germany. The car was named Colt during development stage, but Ford were unable to use the name, as it was trademarked by Mitsubishi.
Although a fastback coupé, Ford wanted the Capri Mark 1 to be affordable for a broad spectrum of potential buyers. To help achieve that, it was available with a variety of engines. The British and German factories produced different line-ups. The continental model used the Ford Taunus V4 engine in 1.3, 1.5 and 1.7 L displacement, while the British versions were powered by the Ford Kent straight-4 in 1.3 and 1.6 L form. The Cologne V6 2.0 L served as initial range-topper. Until the end of the year, new sports versions were added: the 2300 GT in Germany, using a double-barrel carburettor with 125 PS (92 kW), and the 3000 GT in the UK, with the Essex V6, capable of 138 hp (103 kW).
![](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/roi.gif)
![](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/roi.gif)