General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

Question for the mappers - "Alpha-N chips"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-06-2008, 03:46 PM
  #1  
Jim Galbally
20K+ Super Poster.
Thread Starter
 
Jim Galbally's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ramsgate, Kent Drives: E39 530D Touring
Posts: 20,599
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Question for the mappers - "Alpha-N chips"

keep reading about a lot of people on the BMW websites going crazy for "Alpha-N" chips which do away with the MAF and run purely from throttle angle. aparently this gives them loads more power as they dont have the (aparently) restrictive MAF in the way.

as far as i can tell this is done by editing the LOS map to contain the map you're interested in, so that with the MAF disconnected, the ECU enters LOS, and reads this now edited MAp and the car drives as intended.

in theory this sounds sensible(ish) but i'm sure it's a stupid thing to do?

also what are the cons of going from a proper MAF based system down to a purely alpha-n system. surely if there was no need for a MAF manufacturers wouldn't be using them? now i'm pretty sure i know the answers to all of these questions, but would be nice to get input from those that do this for a living (ie tony/stu/karl etc.) also would you personally ever sell such a chip, and if not, why not

thanks guys
Old 11-06-2008, 03:48 PM
  #2  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Cant comment on the particular chips as I havent run one, but the theory is sound.

The reason for the AFM is economy and emisisons.

For out and out power, they offer no advantage over throttle angle mapping or MAP mapping
Old 11-06-2008, 03:52 PM
  #3  
Rick
15K+ Super Poster!!

 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Posts: 15,885
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Wouldn't
Old 11-06-2008, 03:54 PM
  #4  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Crikey Rick, can you hold back on the details, Jim is an inteligent guy and he wants to understand lots about it, but I dont think he can take in ALL that useful info you posted.....

Old 11-06-2008, 03:55 PM
  #5  
pa_sjo
Colossal Pervert
 
pa_sjo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 3,678
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The MAF is also beneficial as an engine wears and it's VE reduces over time.. But not exactly relevant I suppose in this scenario as tuning a fucked engine isn't worth it.

It's not a great idea running an ECU in a failed mode as other things may come into play that these internet tuner goons may not know about (it's highly unlikely they completely understand the strategies in the ECU)..
Old 11-06-2008, 03:57 PM
  #6  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Agree totally on the failed mode stuff, it might take timing out when it switches to that map etc, although arguabley that could be put back in again.

Its a bodge fundamentally but it can and does work.
Old 11-06-2008, 04:00 PM
  #7  
Rick
15K+ Super Poster!!

 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Posts: 15,885
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

meant to say, wouldn't on anything that does a lot of road miles, unless it's running huge TB's and lairy cams.

Trending Topics

Old 11-06-2008, 04:07 PM
  #8  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I agree, Id just look towards a less restrictive AFM, and a remap with that!
Old 11-06-2008, 04:10 PM
  #9  
foreigneRS
Testing the future
 
foreigneRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: W. Sussex
Posts: 17,597
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

i'd just leave it, it's probably powerful enough as it is without twatting about for a few extra bhp with the cost associated with it and any potential costs from engine damage. i think bmw m-division done a reasonable job on it overall, all things considered. fair enough on a track or race car of you've got money to burn, but not on a road car.
Old 11-06-2008, 06:40 PM
  #10  
Jim Galbally
20K+ Super Poster.
Thread Starter
 
Jim Galbally's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ramsgate, Kent Drives: E39 530D Touring
Posts: 20,599
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

no, im DEFINATELY not considering doing this myself, im just questioning the people that may be buying these blindly
Old 11-06-2008, 06:42 PM
  #11  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Stick their car on the rollers with one of those chips in mate and I bet it makes either less power than standard, or barely any more, and I bet the AFR at points on the map is a MILE out.
Old 11-06-2008, 06:56 PM
  #12  
DangerousBryan
Advanced PassionFord User
 
DangerousBryan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: sheffield,s.yorks
Posts: 2,201
Received 21 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

there's a couple on e36 that have tried them jim. usually along with a carbon fibre inlet manifold,which doesn't have the space for the maf sensor.
bryan
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
M7 COS
Wheels and Tyres
3
01-10-2015 04:46 PM
locum8
Technical help Q & A
5
01-10-2015 01:50 PM
Iain Mac
General Car Related Discussion.
7
30-09-2015 09:39 PM
stevecfrst1
Cars for Sale
1
30-09-2015 05:18 AM



Quick Reply: Question for the mappers - "Alpha-N chips"



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:59 AM.