General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

WRC/GRP-A YB Power/Torque figures

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-03-2008, 09:52 AM
  #1  
Rippers
Monte Geek
Thread Starter
 
Rippers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Cheshunt, Herts
Posts: 8,812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default WRC/GRP-A YB Power/Torque figures

I've alway wanted to know how WRC/GRP-A YB achieved 600nm of torque and only 300bhp.

I know they where high comp and they have 32/34mm turbo restrictors but can someone explain the science behind this, ie how a restrictor effects power and not torque etc What sort of boost did they run?
I've seen a IHI turbo and they are tiny! it just amazes me the torque they produce! Has anyone got a plotted power graph for a WRC engine? would love to see how the power and torque rise on these and where the peak power is etc

Is there anyway of appyling these methods to other YB's combinations so you could have for instance a 400bhp engine with 500lbs of torque??
Old 08-03-2008, 09:54 AM
  #2  
Ollie.
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Ollie.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Near Glasgow
Posts: 2,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Paul im pretty sure they run nearly 3 bar... but someone who knows for definite will reply i dare say!
Old 08-03-2008, 10:03 AM
  #3  
cossiemanden
DANISH cosworth abuser
 
cossiemanden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Holbćk, denmark
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOADS of midrange boost 3-4bar is what ive been told
Old 08-03-2008, 10:04 AM
  #4  
rsnissan
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (9)
 
rsnissan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Essex/Middlesex
Posts: 7,836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i think they were built for big power but the restrictors just limited the peak BHP because of air flow. however its not just a simple as removing the restrictor to just magically get big bhp due to the spec of the engine being based on running a restrictor.

Thats what I always understood it to be
Old 08-03-2008, 10:04 AM
  #5  
GARETH T
Professional Waffler
 
GARETH T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: barry-south wales
Posts: 30,980
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

its very simple!
the restrictor restricts ultimate air flow! so they HAVENT got the option of running big bhp at high engine revs as this would require alot of air!
so what they do instead is make the engine produce the power lower down in the rev range!
Old 08-03-2008, 10:05 AM
  #6  
Stu @ M Developments
PassionFords Creator



iTrader: (12)
 
Stu @ M Developments's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Blackpool, UK Destination: Rev limiter
Posts: 28,824
Received 95 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Its only about 440ftlb. Hardly an amazing achievement on a high compression turbocharged motor with a few bar of boost.
Old 08-03-2008, 10:07 AM
  #7  
GARETH T
Professional Waffler
 
GARETH T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: barry-south wales
Posts: 30,980
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stu @ M Developments
Its only about 440ftlb. Hardly an amazing achievement on a high compression turbocharged motor with a few bar of boost.
i disagree,, i think its a great achievement to have that torque of that level at them sorts of revs and still be within the rules!
Old 08-03-2008, 10:11 AM
  #8  
Stavros
DEYTUKURJERBS
 
Stavros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Korea
Posts: 29,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Power is made by torque and revs, torque isnt made by power, so its perfectly normal to have tons of torque without the power if your not revving and are running loadsa boost.

The way they made it is mostly down to big big boost pressure.
Though being able to "only" have 300bhp or so and not having to rev meant they could run mega high comp, very low duration cams, small ports, etc etc, which all help torque too, but in a much smaller way.

If a 400bhp "normal" spec mega boost and mild cams YB stopped revving at 4.5k or so itd also be pushing similar numbers, though obv not as good as they have been specced to breath well at higher rpm too, which obv reduces low down power and torque.

Last edited by Stavros; 08-03-2008 at 10:13 AM.
Old 08-03-2008, 12:50 PM
  #9  
Micky The Finn
Former Sponsor
 
Micky The Finn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: in the nite garden
Posts: 5,730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thats why foci world car engines are only 30k on an exchange basic!!
Old 08-03-2008, 12:51 PM
  #10  
Micky The Finn
Former Sponsor
 
Micky The Finn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: in the nite garden
Posts: 5,730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stu @ M Developments
Its only about 440ftlb. Hardly an amazing achievement on a high compression turbocharged motor with a few bar of boost.
440lb/ft?which engine wrc engines is that on then?with what size restrictor?
Old 08-03-2008, 01:22 PM
  #11  
Gatecrasher
Not welcome...

 
Gatecrasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: South east...
Posts: 3,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Paul you know your going to break things with 500lb's Mark Shead makes 500hp/500lb with 2.6 bar on a GT30 on a DD rolling road, the print out is on here some where...
Old 08-03-2008, 01:43 PM
  #12  
Stavros
DEYTUKURJERBS
 
Stavros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Korea
Posts: 29,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Cosworth Rallyesport
440lb/ft?which engine wrc engines is that on then?with what size restrictor?
He was just quoting Pauls 600nm
Old 08-03-2008, 02:19 PM
  #13  
Rippers
Monte Geek
Thread Starter
 
Rippers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Cheshunt, Herts
Posts: 8,812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Tim whats the average life of a WRC engine and turbo?
Old 08-03-2008, 02:51 PM
  #14  
markk
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (2)
 
markk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lancs
Posts: 10,638
Received 104 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

it all in the build really, we dont spec for high revs just loads of torque with boost as early as possible in massive amounts as for the IHI beinga small turbo, its not as small as you may think, the compressor volume is huge, the exhaus housing looks small, i cant remember its ratio, im sure Ian will remind me

ive often though that the MD240RS thingy turbo 'may' make a good rally turbo due to its ratios of hot/cold side - any thoughts on that ? (sorry to distract the post)


also the 300hp thingy - is quite a lot on gravel i can tell thee !
Old 08-03-2008, 02:51 PM
  #15  
fordrallycar
Advanced PassionFord User
iTrader: (4)
 
fordrallycar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: wiltshire
Posts: 1,557
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

the engine & turbo have to do 2 rallys the they get a full rebuild
Old 08-03-2008, 02:54 PM
  #16  
markk
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (2)
 
markk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lancs
Posts: 10,638
Received 104 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fordrallycar
the engine & turbo have to do 2 rallys the they get a full rebuild

no they dont, depends on th e'linked' rules as to how long the engine must last, but clubman group a cars and clubman use WRC car will easily do a full season if nothing mechanical breaks.
Old 08-03-2008, 02:59 PM
  #17  
ian sibbert
Advanced PassionFord User
 
ian sibbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lancaster, Lancs
Posts: 1,859
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I'll think you'll find the figure's a little higher, an N12 subaru, thats a group 'n' car will make 560 nm on a 32mm restrictor.....

Part of the new rule changes for 2008 mean teams are only allowed a maximum of 5 engines per car and they have to then use one engine for 3 'linked' rallies (to increase reliability) if they defy this rule the FIA impose a penalty, they have just done Citreon on rally mexico, for breaking this rule, although the FIA recinded the penalty when Citreon put the old engine back in the car....

Average engine i'd guess now they'd be looking at 3000km as on average your looking 1000km per rally incl the shakedown (not all competetive)....
Old 08-03-2008, 03:00 PM
  #18  
ian sibbert
Advanced PassionFord User
 
ian sibbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lancaster, Lancs
Posts: 1,859
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

beat me too it mark....lol...took me 10 mins to write that.....lol
Old 08-03-2008, 03:41 PM
  #19  
Micky The Finn
Former Sponsor
 
Micky The Finn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: in the nite garden
Posts: 5,730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ive just re read the thread title,it says wrc yb engines,not the current crop of wrc engines.
Old 08-03-2008, 06:49 PM
  #20  
Mad Matt
Rally nut
iTrader: (2)
 
Mad Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am not that experimented as Ian or mr.Finch but what I have seen over the years is that a WRC YB engine produced around 350bhp, but for torque I have never seen really any real figure. Between 650 and 750Nm depending of age and tuner.

Recent WRC cars are around the 1000Nm barrier. Spoken to a Bozian engineer 2 years ago (307 WRC) he told me the 307 had more than 1000Nm of torque. Basically I have never seen the real figures, but I assume the modern WRC cars are quite near the 1000 barrier.

The old Octavia was doing between 600 and 750Nm between versions, and this was an old car...

Old 08-03-2008, 09:09 PM
  #21  
RST-AndyP
Banned
 
RST-AndyP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Yeovil
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

why the fuck do folk quote NM figures just quote ft/lb we dont like fooling stupid people in thinking its ft/lb
Old 08-03-2008, 09:27 PM
  #22  
Micky The Finn
Former Sponsor
 
Micky The Finn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: in the nite garden
Posts: 5,730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RST-AndyP
why the fuck do folk quote NM figures just quote ft/lb we dont like fooling stupid people in thinking its ft/lb
ft/lb is an old english measurement,NM is an international measurement.
Old 08-03-2008, 09:28 PM
  #23  
Micky The Finn
Former Sponsor
 
Micky The Finn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: in the nite garden
Posts: 5,730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

do you really think citreon,subaru,mitsubishi,suzuki etc etc would use feet and pounds to measure anything?
Old 08-03-2008, 10:18 PM
  #24  
Gatecrasher
Not welcome...

 
Gatecrasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: South east...
Posts: 3,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what an easy conversion from ftlb to NM?
Old 08-03-2008, 10:26 PM
  #25  
Fiecos Dan
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Fiecos Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: S/E Kent, Thanet
Posts: 4,775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gatecrasher
what an easy conversion from ftlb to NM?


NM x 0.73756 = lb/ft
Old 08-03-2008, 10:31 PM
  #26  
Gatecrasher
Not welcome...

 
Gatecrasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: South east...
Posts: 3,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Evening Dan

and what about then other way round?
Old 08-03-2008, 10:36 PM
  #27  
Fiecos Dan
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Fiecos Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: S/E Kent, Thanet
Posts: 4,775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yo,

lb/ft x 1.35556 = NM

Last edited by Fiecos Dan; 08-03-2008 at 10:40 PM.
Old 08-03-2008, 10:43 PM
  #28  
Gatecrasher
Not welcome...

 
Gatecrasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: South east...
Posts: 3,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old 09-03-2008, 09:10 AM
  #29  
GARETH T
Professional Waffler
 
GARETH T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: barry-south wales
Posts: 30,980
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gatecrasher
Evening Dan

and what about then other way round?
just to help you out, if you ever want to know "the other way around" for a conversion formula you can do in inverse of the original conversion!

so just 1/original conversion number

so 1/0.73756=1.3558218992353164488312815228592

Last edited by GARETH T; 09-03-2008 at 10:45 AM.
Old 09-03-2008, 10:41 AM
  #30  
kennyA
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
kennyA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Dresden
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

One 1994 GpA car here in Germany was rebuilt (YB engine, originally mountune) at a well known tuner in Kent last year.

On the dyno it produced max 414lbft and 312bhp. (3000 - 6500rpm)



kenny.
Old 09-03-2008, 11:03 AM
  #31  
Mad Matt
Rally nut
iTrader: (2)
 
Mad Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I bought a group A turbo of a guy who had a group A Escort, he was running 280bhp with 2.5bars of boost, and 300bhp with 2.8bars if it can help.
Old 09-03-2008, 11:42 AM
  #32  
J1mbo
B1mbo
iTrader: (1)
 
J1mbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 14,986
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by kennyA
One 1994 GpA car here in Germany was rebuilt (YB engine, originally mountune) at a well known tuner in Kent last year.

On the dyno it produced max 414lbft and 312bhp. (3000 - 6500rpm)



kenny.

that sounds about right kenny for a group a engine. the wrc engines make about 500 lbs ft of torque and about 315-320 bhp
wrc engines dont have to run loads of boost to make the figures.
you run as much boost as you can but you have to measure the depression ( i think its that ) so when the depression gets too high you back the boost off and have to come to a compromise between the 2
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RB26DETT
General Car Related Discussion.
17
27-05-2016 11:26 AM
Eigdoog
General Car Related Discussion.
48
19-09-2015 11:03 AM
NoLeafClover
General Car Related Discussion.
0
19-08-2015 09:50 PM
no1trancefan
Ford Focus ST
1
06-08-2015 05:09 PM



Quick Reply: WRC/GRP-A YB Power/Torque figures



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:47 PM.