Solid lifters
Thread Starter
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (9)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11,919
Likes: 11
From: birmingham west mids
If fitted to a YB, with 500+ BHP spec cams, what could you safley rev the engine to with a decent bottom end, and what is the maintainance like, ie how often would they need checking/ shimming?
Are they any noisier than hydraulic ones if correctly set?
Are they any noisier than hydraulic ones if correctly set?
PS
slight bit of noise if set correctly, but far less than the average set of 100K old hydraulics, and they dont need setting as often as people make out, you will be putting new rings in before you need to adjust them probably on that sort of spec engine!
slight bit of noise if set correctly, but far less than the average set of 100K old hydraulics, and they dont need setting as often as people make out, you will be putting new rings in before you need to adjust them probably on that sort of spec engine!
they wount need checking once the clearnce are done its like any other part in the engine like piston to bore clearnce ther is a certen gap that has to be met usally when the car gets noisey then check wear on the shim or cam lobe
Thread Starter
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (9)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11,919
Likes: 11
From: birmingham west mids
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
9K+
But my idea of "decent spec bottom end" might be different to yours, as it involves things like a farndon crank a set of arrow rods, some forged pistons and a dry sump.
But my idea of "decent spec bottom end" might be different to yours, as it involves things like a farndon crank a set of arrow rods, some forged pistons and a dry sump.
Your "decent" bottom end is a bit more "Mega" bottom end I think
. I have got a set of Arrow rods but didnt fit them to my latest build as it was never going to really be over 500BHP..
Originally Posted by RWD_cossie_wil
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
9K+
But my idea of "decent spec bottom end" might be different to yours, as it involves things like a farndon crank a set of arrow rods, some forged pistons and a dry sump.
But my idea of "decent spec bottom end" might be different to yours, as it involves things like a farndon crank a set of arrow rods, some forged pistons and a dry sump.
Your "decent" bottom end is a bit more "Mega" bottom end I think
. I have got a set of Arrow rods but didnt fit them to my latest build as it was never going to really be over 500BHP..If you are on a standard bottom end, then hydraulics are probably fine for your requirements TBH, especially if you are on the standard oil pump which I wouldnt want to trust beyond the 8200 or so hydraulics will cope at.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (9)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11,919
Likes: 11
From: birmingham west mids
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Originally Posted by RWD_cossie_wil
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
9K+
But my idea of "decent spec bottom end" might be different to yours, as it involves things like a farndon crank a set of arrow rods, some forged pistons and a dry sump.
But my idea of "decent spec bottom end" might be different to yours, as it involves things like a farndon crank a set of arrow rods, some forged pistons and a dry sump.
Your "decent" bottom end is a bit more "Mega" bottom end I think
. I have got a set of Arrow rods but didnt fit them to my latest build as it was never going to really be over 500BHP..If you are on a standard bottom end, then hydraulics are probably fine for your requirements TBH, especially if you are on the standard oil pump which I wouldnt want to trust beyond the 8200 or so hydraulics will cope at.
I thought the weak link would be the std valves?
5 bar oil pump wont stop it cavitating at higher RPM.
Im sure you can manage with the standard crank, but given that you didnt mention being on a budget at all in your original post, I put what I would consider an ideal spec for a big RPM motor running 9K+, i dont think many decent tuners would advise you using a standard crank for that TBH
Im sure you can manage with the standard crank, but given that you didnt mention being on a budget at all in your original post, I put what I would consider an ideal spec for a big RPM motor running 9K+, i dont think many decent tuners would advise you using a standard crank for that TBH
GT30 power band does not require rpm limit above 8200rpm on a YB so you will be fine on hydraulics.
However I do run standard crank engines up to 8500rpm, but again on a GT30 engine you'll simply not be making power up to that rpm.
However I do run standard crank engines up to 8500rpm, but again on a GT30 engine you'll simply not be making power up to that rpm.
Thread Starter
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (9)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11,919
Likes: 11
From: birmingham west mids
Originally Posted by Karl
GT30 power band does not require rpm limit above 8200rpm on a YB so you will be fine on hydraulics.
However I do run standard crank engines up to 8500rpm, but again on a GT30 engine you'll simply not be making power up to that rpm.
However I do run standard crank engines up to 8500rpm, but again on a GT30 engine you'll simply not be making power up to that rpm.
On the subject, do you think a GT35 is too big for a road car? 2.0 engine.
Originally Posted by RWD_cossie_wil
Originally Posted by Karl
GT30 power band does not require rpm limit above 8200rpm on a YB so you will be fine on hydraulics.
However I do run standard crank engines up to 8500rpm, but again on a GT30 engine you'll simply not be making power up to that rpm.
However I do run standard crank engines up to 8500rpm, but again on a GT30 engine you'll simply not be making power up to that rpm.
On the subject, do you think a GT35 is too big for a road car? 2.0 engine.Depends on your own outlook on what makes a good car though at the end of the day!
I do not recommend GT35's on a 2.0YB engine when using the 2wd exhaust manifold as the turbo has a late boost threshold (usually 4500rpm) and a tendancy to surge in the 4500rpm to 6500rpm range.
However with a suitably specced tubular manifold the GT35 can work well on a 2.0YB, but certainly not what I would recommend as a road going engine.
For nice engine manners, keep with a GT30 on 2.0YB's or go for 2.2/2.3 if using a GT35.
However with a suitably specced tubular manifold the GT35 can work well on a 2.0YB, but certainly not what I would recommend as a road going engine.
For nice engine manners, keep with a GT30 on 2.0YB's or go for 2.2/2.3 if using a GT35.
Thread Starter
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (9)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11,919
Likes: 11
From: birmingham west mids
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Originally Posted by RWD_cossie_wil
Originally Posted by Karl
GT30 power band does not require rpm limit above 8200rpm on a YB so you will be fine on hydraulics.
However I do run standard crank engines up to 8500rpm, but again on a GT30 engine you'll simply not be making power up to that rpm.
However I do run standard crank engines up to 8500rpm, but again on a GT30 engine you'll simply not be making power up to that rpm.
On the subject, do you think a GT35 is too big for a road car? 2.0 engine.Depends on your own outlook on what makes a good car though at the end of the day!
...I ask as I have a brand new GT35 sat under my desk looking bored
Just wondering about the big capacity route as well as apparently the Evo engines (6/7/8) , and I know they are a completely different beast , go to 2.3 easy and a GT35 on those is phenominal?
Going to a 84mm crank and 92.5mm bore is possible on the std block and with the correct piston/rod design acceptable rod/stroke ratio can be maintained to allow a sensible 8000rpm limit. Add a GT35 to the right engine with this crank/bore size and you have 600bhp+ potential with great road car manners.
Obviously not a cheap route however!
Obviously not a cheap route however!
Thread Starter
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (9)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11,919
Likes: 11
From: birmingham west mids
Originally Posted by Karl
Going to a 84mm crank and 92.5mm bore is possible on the std block and with the correct piston/rod design acceptable rod/stroke ratio can be maintained to allow a sensible 8000rpm limit. Add a GT35 to the right engine with this crank/bore size and you have 600bhp+ potential with great road car manners.
Obviously not a cheap route however!
Obviously not a cheap route however!
)...What would be the most cost effective way of doing this 2.3 engine? I assume I would sell everything bar the GT35 and 200 block and go from there? what would the head spec / cams have to be like, as I already have a 25/26mm ported 2wd head and a new BD16 and BD 14 exhaust?
Rough costs please?
Originally Posted by RWD_cossie_wil
Originally Posted by Karl
Thats a VERY vague question.
Anything from Ł10K to Ł20K, depends on spec.
Anything from Ł10K to Ł20K, depends on spec.
No offence intended there, just being honest!
Thread Starter
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (9)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11,919
Likes: 11
From: birmingham west mids
Originally Posted by Altratz
Originally Posted by Karl
None of what you list is suitable for going to 2.3.
Go with Chips advice.
Go with Chips advice.

I have built several GT30 engines on solid lifters, you may not be making decent power at 8k+ but on track when you want to hold a gear rather than changing up they serve a purpose. The engine feels a lot nicer at high revs too.. When building a new engine the cost is not that much higher to go solid (I can supply lifters and shims at decent prices) so well worth considering..
Martin (and getting back to original post) I agree, solids are a worthy addition to a track car just becuase of the increased control they offer and nothing at all to do with the extra RPM.
When you hear cars come in at the end of a track session and they are down on power and clattering away cause of the hot oil not working the hydraulics as well, its easy to see why people want shot of them, its that reason that I converted my car to solids more than anything else.
When you hear cars come in at the end of a track session and they are down on power and clattering away cause of the hot oil not working the hydraulics as well, its easy to see why people want shot of them, its that reason that I converted my car to solids more than anything else.
If you shotpeen the rods and take any stress raisers off them, about 9K if you feel like taking chances.
But you have to ask yourself WHY are you revving an asmathic shitty old YB to that in the first place?
But you have to ask yourself WHY are you revving an asmathic shitty old YB to that in the first place?
I do not recommend GT35's on a 2.0YB engine when using the 2wd exhaust manifold as the turbo has a late boost threshold (usually 4500rpm) and a tendancy to surge in the 4500rpm to 6500rpm range.
However with a suitably specced tubular manifold the GT35 can work well on a 2.0YB, but certainly not what I would recommend as a road going engine.
For nice engine manners, keep with a GT30 on 2.0YB's or go for 2.2/2.3 if using a GT35.
However with a suitably specced tubular manifold the GT35 can work well on a 2.0YB, but certainly not what I would recommend as a road going engine.
For nice engine manners, keep with a GT30 on 2.0YB's or go for 2.2/2.3 if using a GT35.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SMILER258
Restorations, Rebuilds & Projects.
36
Sep 28, 2015 09:04 AM




