General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

Solid lifters

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 10:06 PM
  #1  
RWD_cossie_wil's Avatar
RWD_cossie_wil
Thread Starter
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11,919
Likes: 11
From: birmingham west mids
Default Solid lifters

If fitted to a YB, with 500+ BHP spec cams, what could you safley rev the engine to with a decent bottom end, and what is the maintainance like, ie how often would they need checking/ shimming? Are they any noisier than hydraulic ones if correctly set?
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 10:13 PM
  #2  
Chip's Avatar
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Likes: 22
Default

9K+

But my idea of "decent spec bottom end" might be different to yours, as it involves things like a farndon crank a set of arrow rods, some forged pistons and a dry sump.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 10:14 PM
  #3  
Chip's Avatar
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Likes: 22
Default

PS

slight bit of noise if set correctly, but far less than the average set of 100K old hydraulics, and they dont need setting as often as people make out, you will be putting new rings in before you need to adjust them probably on that sort of spec engine!
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 10:15 PM
  #4  
abdr500's Avatar
abdr500
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,905
Likes: 0
From: enfield
Default

they wount need checking once the clearnce are done its like any other part in the engine like piston to bore clearnce ther is a certen gap that has to be met usally when the car gets noisey then check wear on the shim or cam lobe
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 10:18 PM
  #5  
Chip's Avatar
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Likes: 22
Default

If you are planning on trying out different cams, then make sure they are on EXACTLY the same base circle, then you can just swap them about without re-shimming
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 10:20 PM
  #6  
RWD_cossie_wil's Avatar
RWD_cossie_wil
Thread Starter
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11,919
Likes: 11
From: birmingham west mids
Default

Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
9K+

But my idea of "decent spec bottom end" might be different to yours, as it involves things like a farndon crank a set of arrow rods, some forged pistons and a dry sump.
Would prob be on a std bottom end thats been lightened and balanced with ARP rod bolts, low comp and freshly rebuilt.

Your "decent" bottom end is a bit more "Mega" bottom end I think . I have got a set of Arrow rods but didnt fit them to my latest build as it was never going to really be over 500BHP..
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 10:22 PM
  #7  
Chip's Avatar
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Likes: 22
Default

Originally Posted by RWD_cossie_wil
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
9K+

But my idea of "decent spec bottom end" might be different to yours, as it involves things like a farndon crank a set of arrow rods, some forged pistons and a dry sump.
Would prob be on a std bottom end thats been lightened and balanced with ARP rod bolts, low comp and freshly rebuilt.

Your "decent" bottom end is a bit more "Mega" bottom end I think . I have got a set of Arrow rods but didnt fit them to my latest build as it was never going to really be over 500BHP..
My nova is on arrow rods, and steel crank etc, to me thats just what you do when building a 500bhp high revving engine, although ive not got round to dry sumping it yet, will do once its run in probably though.

If you are on a standard bottom end, then hydraulics are probably fine for your requirements TBH, especially if you are on the standard oil pump which I wouldnt want to trust beyond the 8200 or so hydraulics will cope at.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jan 10, 2008 | 10:26 PM
  #8  
RWD_cossie_wil's Avatar
RWD_cossie_wil
Thread Starter
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11,919
Likes: 11
From: birmingham west mids
Default

Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Originally Posted by RWD_cossie_wil
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
9K+

But my idea of "decent spec bottom end" might be different to yours, as it involves things like a farndon crank a set of arrow rods, some forged pistons and a dry sump.
Would prob be on a std bottom end thats been lightened and balanced with ARP rod bolts, low comp and freshly rebuilt.

Your "decent" bottom end is a bit more "Mega" bottom end I think . I have got a set of Arrow rods but didnt fit them to my latest build as it was never going to really be over 500BHP..
My nova is on arrow rods, and steel crank etc, to me thats just what you do when building a 500bhp high revving engine, although ive not got round to dry sumping it yet, will do once its run in probably though.

If you are on a standard bottom end, then hydraulics are probably fine for your requirements TBH, especially if you are on the standard oil pump which I wouldnt want to trust beyond the 8200 or so hydraulics will cope at.
Std cossie crank is all steel as you prob know, good for 600+ as advised by a few very reputable tuners, and got a 5 bar oil pump. Was just wondering really as If I do go GT30 ext in the future it would make the powerband a bit bigger at the top I thought the weak link would be the std valves?
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 10:30 PM
  #9  
Chip's Avatar
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Likes: 22
Default

5 bar oil pump wont stop it cavitating at higher RPM.

Im sure you can manage with the standard crank, but given that you didnt mention being on a budget at all in your original post, I put what I would consider an ideal spec for a big RPM motor running 9K+, i dont think many decent tuners would advise you using a standard crank for that TBH
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 10:47 PM
  #10  
Karl's Avatar
Karl
Norris Motorsport
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,437
Likes: 3
From: Derbyshire
Default

GT30 power band does not require rpm limit above 8200rpm on a YB so you will be fine on hydraulics.

However I do run standard crank engines up to 8500rpm, but again on a GT30 engine you'll simply not be making power up to that rpm.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 10:55 PM
  #11  
RWD_cossie_wil's Avatar
RWD_cossie_wil
Thread Starter
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11,919
Likes: 11
From: birmingham west mids
Default

Originally Posted by Karl
GT30 power band does not require rpm limit above 8200rpm on a YB so you will be fine on hydraulics.

However I do run standard crank engines up to 8500rpm, but again on a GT30 engine you'll simply not be making power up to that rpm.
On the subject, do you think a GT35 is too big for a road car? 2.0 engine.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 10:56 PM
  #12  
Chip's Avatar
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Likes: 22
Default

Originally Posted by RWD_cossie_wil
Originally Posted by Karl
GT30 power band does not require rpm limit above 8200rpm on a YB so you will be fine on hydraulics.

However I do run standard crank engines up to 8500rpm, but again on a GT30 engine you'll simply not be making power up to that rpm.
On the subject, do you think a GT35 is too big for a road car? 2.0 engine.
Yes, nasty laggy things compared to a GT30, and 500bhp+ is plenty for a road car IMHO

Depends on your own outlook on what makes a good car though at the end of the day!
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 10:59 PM
  #13  
Karl's Avatar
Karl
Norris Motorsport
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,437
Likes: 3
From: Derbyshire
Default

I do not recommend GT35's on a 2.0YB engine when using the 2wd exhaust manifold as the turbo has a late boost threshold (usually 4500rpm) and a tendancy to surge in the 4500rpm to 6500rpm range.

However with a suitably specced tubular manifold the GT35 can work well on a 2.0YB, but certainly not what I would recommend as a road going engine.

For nice engine manners, keep with a GT30 on 2.0YB's or go for 2.2/2.3 if using a GT35.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 11:02 PM
  #14  
RWD_cossie_wil's Avatar
RWD_cossie_wil
Thread Starter
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11,919
Likes: 11
From: birmingham west mids
Default

Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Originally Posted by RWD_cossie_wil
Originally Posted by Karl
GT30 power band does not require rpm limit above 8200rpm on a YB so you will be fine on hydraulics.

However I do run standard crank engines up to 8500rpm, but again on a GT30 engine you'll simply not be making power up to that rpm.
On the subject, do you think a GT35 is too big for a road car? 2.0 engine.
Yes, nasty laggy things compared to a GT30, and 500bhp+ is plenty for a road car IMHO

Depends on your own outlook on what makes a good car though at the end of the day!
Power everywhere, not at 78,000 RPM ...

I ask as I have a brand new GT35 sat under my desk looking bored ... YB's don't take stroking/boreing to 2.2/2.3 very well so I have heard? , apparently the old 2.4 conversions were quite slow revving?

Just wondering about the big capacity route as well as apparently the Evo engines (6/7/8) , and I know they are a completely different beast , go to 2.3 easy and a GT35 on those is phenominal?
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 11:07 PM
  #15  
Karl's Avatar
Karl
Norris Motorsport
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,437
Likes: 3
From: Derbyshire
Default

Going to a 84mm crank and 92.5mm bore is possible on the std block and with the correct piston/rod design acceptable rod/stroke ratio can be maintained to allow a sensible 8000rpm limit. Add a GT35 to the right engine with this crank/bore size and you have 600bhp+ potential with great road car manners.

Obviously not a cheap route however!
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 11:13 PM
  #16  
Chip's Avatar
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Likes: 22
Default

Swap the GT35 for a GT30!
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 11:13 PM
  #17  
RWD_cossie_wil's Avatar
RWD_cossie_wil
Thread Starter
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11,919
Likes: 11
From: birmingham west mids
Default

Originally Posted by Karl
Going to a 84mm crank and 92.5mm bore is possible on the std block and with the correct piston/rod design acceptable rod/stroke ratio can be maintained to allow a sensible 8000rpm limit. Add a GT35 to the right engine with this crank/bore size and you have 600bhp+ potential with great road car manners.

Obviously not a cheap route however!
Ok, I have a 200 block ona 0.5 fresh overbore, with 6 centre long studs, GT 35, std/std crank, set of std length arrow H section rods, 8.5:1 forged pistons (J.E) sat in a box ( all bought a few years ago when I knew a lot less than I know now )...

What would be the most cost effective way of doing this 2.3 engine? I assume I would sell everything bar the GT35 and 200 block and go from there? what would the head spec / cams have to be like, as I already have a 25/26mm ported 2wd head and a new BD16 and BD 14 exhaust?

Rough costs please?
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 11:14 PM
  #18  
Chip's Avatar
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Likes: 22
Default

Swap the GT35 for a GT30, keep everything else you have, problem solved.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 11:14 PM
  #19  
RWD_cossie_wil's Avatar
RWD_cossie_wil
Thread Starter
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11,919
Likes: 11
From: birmingham west mids
Default

Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Swap the GT35 for a GT30!
I was considering this
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 11:17 PM
  #20  
Karl's Avatar
Karl
Norris Motorsport
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,437
Likes: 3
From: Derbyshire
Default

None of what you list is suitable for going to 2.3.

Go with Chips advice.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 11:19 PM
  #21  
RWD_cossie_wil's Avatar
RWD_cossie_wil
Thread Starter
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11,919
Likes: 11
From: birmingham west mids
Default

Originally Posted by Karl
None of what you list is suitable for going to 2.3.

Go with Chips advice.
What would be the rough cost for a 2.3?
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 11:21 PM
  #22  
Karl's Avatar
Karl
Norris Motorsport
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,437
Likes: 3
From: Derbyshire
Default

Thats a VERY vague question.

Anything from Ł10K to Ł20K, depends on spec.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 11:24 PM
  #23  
RWD_cossie_wil's Avatar
RWD_cossie_wil
Thread Starter
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11,919
Likes: 11
From: birmingham west mids
Default

Originally Posted by Karl
Thats a VERY vague question.

Anything from Ł10K to Ł20K, depends on spec.
What are the variables?
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 11:28 PM
  #24  
Karl's Avatar
Karl
Norris Motorsport
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,437
Likes: 3
From: Derbyshire
Default

Too many to discuss on here. Sorry would take far too long to type.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 11:31 PM
  #25  
Chip's Avatar
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Likes: 22
Default

Originally Posted by RWD_cossie_wil
Originally Posted by Karl
Thats a VERY vague question.

Anything from Ł10K to Ł20K, depends on spec.
What are the variables?
Without being funny mate, I think you need to first come up with a budget, and then with that in mind, start discussing things with a tuner (Karl being a good choice of course) as its a big drain on time for them to discuss eleventy seven possible different specs for 500bhp only to find out you have a 400bhp budget.

No offence intended there, just being honest!
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 11:38 PM
  #26  
Altratz's Avatar
Altratz
PassionFord Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Karl
None of what you list is suitable for going to 2.3.

Go with Chips advice.
Oi stupid listen to someone for once just put the car back together and on the bloody road!
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 11:46 PM
  #27  
RWD_cossie_wil's Avatar
RWD_cossie_wil
Thread Starter
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11,919
Likes: 11
From: birmingham west mids
Default

Originally Posted by Altratz
Originally Posted by Karl
None of what you list is suitable for going to 2.3.

Go with Chips advice.
Oi stupid listen to someone for once just put the car back together and on the bloody road!
Different engine bone-head
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 08:50 AM
  #28  
Martin-Hadland's Avatar
Martin-Hadland
1st to 200 without NOS
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 121
From: Birmingham
Default

I have built several GT30 engines on solid lifters, you may not be making decent power at 8k+ but on track when you want to hold a gear rather than changing up they serve a purpose. The engine feels a lot nicer at high revs too.. When building a new engine the cost is not that much higher to go solid (I can supply lifters and shims at decent prices) so well worth considering..
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 08:56 AM
  #29  
Chip's Avatar
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Likes: 22
Default

Martin (and getting back to original post) I agree, solids are a worthy addition to a track car just becuase of the increased control they offer and nothing at all to do with the extra RPM.

When you hear cars come in at the end of a track session and they are down on power and clattering away cause of the hot oil not working the hydraulics as well, its easy to see why people want shot of them, its that reason that I converted my car to solids more than anything else.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 12:06 PM
  #30  
WD Pro's Avatar
WD Pro
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 0
From: Northwest
Default

So what would the fresh, standard, arp'd bottom end safely rev to with hyd followers and a dry sump (so no oil pump worries) ?

Cheers,

WD
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 12:13 PM
  #31  
Chip's Avatar
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Likes: 22
Default

If you shotpeen the rods and take any stress raisers off them, about 9K if you feel like taking chances.

But you have to ask yourself WHY are you revving an asmathic shitty old YB to that in the first place?
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 12:26 PM
  #32  
WD Pro's Avatar
WD Pro
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 0
From: Northwest
Default

Thanks

I have a pair of 14’s and a mildly ported head but I had in mind a limit of 7.5K, seems that could be stretched a little if it holds onto its power
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 12:33 PM
  #33  
Chip's Avatar
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Likes: 22
Default

Ive seen people running a totally standard engine to a 8200rpm limit without problems.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 03:01 AM
  #34  
coachworz's Avatar
coachworz
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: Singapore
Default

Originally Posted by Karl
I do not recommend GT35's on a 2.0YB engine when using the 2wd exhaust manifold as the turbo has a late boost threshold (usually 4500rpm) and a tendancy to surge in the 4500rpm to 6500rpm range.

However with a suitably specced tubular manifold the GT35 can work well on a 2.0YB, but certainly not what I would recommend as a road going engine.

For nice engine manners, keep with a GT30 on 2.0YB's or go for 2.2/2.3 if using a GT35.
what cams to go with gt30?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Prickly_buzz
Technical help Q & A
4
Dec 7, 2017 09:52 PM
arkeye
Ford Focus ST
1
Feb 20, 2016 01:22 PM
gambo08
Cars for Sale
17
Feb 4, 2016 10:49 PM
mk1turboestate
Cars for Sale
12
Dec 2, 2015 08:31 PM
SMILER258
Restorations, Rebuilds & Projects.
36
Sep 28, 2015 09:04 AM




All times are GMT. The time now is 02:46 AM.