Best road going spec based on a GT30
#1
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Essex/Middlesex
Posts: 7,836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Best road going spec based on a GT30
What is the best Spec to go for using a GT30 on a relatively standard engine, 205 block?
I love the power delivery of my 803's/0.48 set up at present but want more power.
Am I right in thinking that fitting lower comp 4x4 pistons and a bit of head work with some bigger injectors will do the trick? what sort of power can I expect on this setup and can you recommend doing anything else at the same time double valve springs etc etc
Cheers
I love the power delivery of my 803's/0.48 set up at present but want more power.
Am I right in thinking that fitting lower comp 4x4 pistons and a bit of head work with some bigger injectors will do the trick? what sort of power can I expect on this setup and can you recommend doing anything else at the same time double valve springs etc etc
Cheers
#3
DEYTUKURJERBS
Originally Posted by SapphyMike
T34.63.
And anyhow, he likes how the .48 is, the .63 isnt like that.
I love how .48 ones drive, not sure about GT30s, but bet they good.
What power you actually want mate?
#4
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 9,156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Stavros
Originally Posted by SapphyMike
T34.63.
And anyhow, he likes how the .48 is, the .63 isnt like that.
I love how .48 ones drive, not sure about GT30s, but bet they good.
What power you actually want mate?
but, why complicate things?
#5
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Essex/Middlesex
Posts: 7,836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Id rather bypass the whole T34 thing now and go to the "next level"
I would like as close to 400 ATW as possible really but after more input I may have to settle for less not sure really but thats why i posted this thread
anymore for anymore???
I would like as close to 400 ATW as possible really but after more input I may have to settle for less not sure really but thats why i posted this thread
anymore for anymore???
Trending Topics
#8
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 9,156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Originally Posted by SapphyMike
T34.63.
Hardly what he is asking for!
ok, how about a UT T38?
#9
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
Originally Posted by SapphyMike
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Originally Posted by SapphyMike
T34.63.
Hardly what he is asking for!
ok, how about a UT T38?
He wants a GT30 for fucks sake, let him have one
Its advice on everything EXCEPT the turbo that he wants, lol
#11
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
Originally Posted by Paul Ripley
Has anyone done a High Comp GT30? was considering that myself but means a complete rebuild with longer rods etc
Most people seem to go lowered comp.
Personally I would go standard comp and risk having to sacrafice a little midrange, but ive never actually tried it.
#14
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
I wouldn't run high compression on a car that is going to be regularly maxed out or see track days UNLESS you have the budget to run suitable fuel at these events.
Lee has just switched to a GT30 (this is the set up he ran at Coombe over the weekend), why not ask him how it drives .
Lee has just switched to a GT30 (this is the set up he ran at Coombe over the weekend), why not ask him how it drives .
#15
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by SapphyMike
ok, how about a UT T38?
That's the turbo i have and i'm changing to a GT30...
Not the most responsive turbo to be fair, makes decent power, mine made 442bhp/355 torque, but not much happens below 4k (ON MINE ANYWAY)
#16
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 9,156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by staffi
Originally Posted by SapphyMike
ok, how about a UT T38?
That's the turbo i have and i'm changing to a GT30...
Not the most responsive turbo to be fair, makes decent power, mine made 442bhp/355 torque, but not much happens below 4k (ON MINE ANYWAY)
tbh, if i could find one, a good old TO4B was a good turbo..
#17
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
[quote="SapphyMike"]
but then your engine spec is wrong for that turbo isnt it?
It did have a T4 originally but Jim swapped it fir the 38, as for wrong spec engine, the cams in the car are NMS ground from blanks and are tailored for quite high revs..
but then your engine spec is wrong for that turbo isnt it?
It did have a T4 originally but Jim swapped it fir the 38, as for wrong spec engine, the cams in the car are NMS ground from blanks and are tailored for quite high revs..
#18
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Essex... and Birmingham!
Posts: 21,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
Lee has just switched to a GT30 (this is the set up he ran at Coombe over the weekend), why not ask him how it drives .
Ask Doug Stirling... he is feeling his Reyland 2.0 GT30 as well
MENTAL MENTAL MENTAL powerband!!!!
Originally Posted by L8 ECU
Originally Posted by Porkie
Stav.... I now have the worlds first Sierra Automatic trackcar. You just select 3rd gear and drive it like a big go kart! 2 gearchanges the whole lap of Combe now!
Pulls HARD to 8300rpm no worries PROPER Turbo
Even you will be SHOCKED at just how different the engine is now!
Pulls HARD to 8300rpm no worries PROPER Turbo
Even you will be SHOCKED at just how different the engine is now!
Seriously, with solid lifters and 8,200 rev limit I amazed at the flexibility of my car in 4th gear.....I'm on 3.62 diffs (it was on 3.9 riff /step-off but I did not get on with the gearing - see below)......
Cruising on motorways/dual carriageways in 4th gear (with 3.62 diffs) the car is instantly on full boost at 75 / 80 MPH and goes all the way through to 155 / 160 MPH without even hitting the rev limiter ......on a road car like mine it makes it a KILLER ONE GEAR CAR on motorways - bonus being that it's the strongest gear - so less likely to break.
Surprised many a M5 / M3 / Porsche driver with this party trick:
If I'm waiting for a slower car to move out of the outside lane, I then sneak it in to 4th.....by this time the M3/M5/Porche is very close to my bumper.......then as soon as the slower car has cleared the lane, I apply full throtle..............can pull 1/2 mile to 1 mile on them EASY before they even realised whats happening
With 3.9 final drive the gearing was "awkward" IMO - 4th being too low and 5th too high....you always wanted to be in between the gears.
Regards,
Doug.
#21
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Essex... and Birmingham!
Posts: 21,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by kjc300
I really can't wait to get mine mapped properly!! Got a few bits and bobs to finish on it shouldn't be long now!!
#24
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
Originally Posted by Porkie
Originally Posted by kjc300
I really can't wait to get mine mapped properly!! Got a few bits and bobs to finish on it shouldn't be long now!!
#25
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 3,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Porkie
Originally Posted by kjc300
I really can't wait to get mine mapped properly!! Got a few bits and bobs to finish on it shouldn't be long now!!
Pm me a price Lee!!
P.s. whats a "solider" ?
#26
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (1)
hi mate
i have the a gt30 with a .63 internal wastegate and im well happy with it
it makes postive boost from 2k but doesn't start to kick in properly untill 3.3k
when i say postive that means 0.1+ 1.1+ 1.3 ect at 2k then rises
for road i love it too bits because i have the low down responce for normal driving
i think my engine compression is either 7:2:1 or 7:5:1 im not really sure as Steve Scott built it , all i said was copy the Harvy engine so i haven't got a clue im not sure if the head is ported or not
i know the Harvy head and inlet was ported i know this isn't the same head as the harvy head was fooked , so i dont know but anyway im well happy the way this gt30 pulls
My internal wastegate will not make as much power as an external wastegate GT30 version who cares about an extra 50bhp i dont.
All i wanted was a "plug and play" turbo that made a bit more power than the t34 without much lag and this was the best option for me
i couldn't be botherd with the screamer pipe and modding the exhaust housing to make fit the external version no only noise is a big issue on tracks no so it wasn't the best option
i haven't got a clue what version my GT30 so dont ask i told Martin to order me one so he knows what version i have
this turbo still will not come in any quicker than your turbo on .48 housing no way not even a t34 .63 will either
it does come on boost hard about 3.2k all i am saying it makes somekind of postive boost at 2.k because of the roller bearing
thats all i can say
i am still on the t34 chip injectors 3bar ect untill the car comes out of the ford shop then its going to karls to map/fit 1000cc injectors /5bar map/ eccv plelume with spacer /air to air with 12 postion boost controller
Im not chasing figures so i dont really cars what power it makes but if it makes a genuine 420+bhp it will be half a quick car !!!
marco
i have the a gt30 with a .63 internal wastegate and im well happy with it
it makes postive boost from 2k but doesn't start to kick in properly untill 3.3k
when i say postive that means 0.1+ 1.1+ 1.3 ect at 2k then rises
for road i love it too bits because i have the low down responce for normal driving
i think my engine compression is either 7:2:1 or 7:5:1 im not really sure as Steve Scott built it , all i said was copy the Harvy engine so i haven't got a clue im not sure if the head is ported or not
i know the Harvy head and inlet was ported i know this isn't the same head as the harvy head was fooked , so i dont know but anyway im well happy the way this gt30 pulls
My internal wastegate will not make as much power as an external wastegate GT30 version who cares about an extra 50bhp i dont.
All i wanted was a "plug and play" turbo that made a bit more power than the t34 without much lag and this was the best option for me
i couldn't be botherd with the screamer pipe and modding the exhaust housing to make fit the external version no only noise is a big issue on tracks no so it wasn't the best option
i haven't got a clue what version my GT30 so dont ask i told Martin to order me one so he knows what version i have
this turbo still will not come in any quicker than your turbo on .48 housing no way not even a t34 .63 will either
it does come on boost hard about 3.2k all i am saying it makes somekind of postive boost at 2.k because of the roller bearing
thats all i can say
i am still on the t34 chip injectors 3bar ect untill the car comes out of the ford shop then its going to karls to map/fit 1000cc injectors /5bar map/ eccv plelume with spacer /air to air with 12 postion boost controller
Im not chasing figures so i dont really cars what power it makes but if it makes a genuine 420+bhp it will be half a quick car !!!
marco
#27
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 3,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by staffi
Originally Posted by kjc300
I really can't wait to get mine mapped properly!! Got a few bits and bobs to finish on it shouldn't be long now!!
Who's mapping yours??
Karl hopefully, need to speak to him about it soon!!
#28
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Originally Posted by Paul Ripley
Has anyone done a High Comp GT30? was considering that myself but means a complete rebuild with longer rods etc
Mark
#29
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
Originally Posted by Mark Shead
Originally Posted by Paul Ripley
Has anyone done a High Comp GT30? was considering that myself but means a complete rebuild with longer rods etc
Mark
Would I be right in thinking that with something like SM4, you could still get away with lots of boost in the midrange, then link EGT's to extra fuelling so that if it was held open for ages like Mike is talking about it simply got richer and a little less powerful to stay safe but was full power in short bursts when EGT's dont get out of hand?
#30
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Originally Posted by Mark Shead
Originally Posted by Paul Ripley
Has anyone done a High Comp GT30? was considering that myself but means a complete rebuild with longer rods etc
Mark
Would I be right in thinking that with something like SM4, you could still get away with lots of boost in the midrange, then link EGT's to extra fuelling so that if it was held open for ages like Mike is talking about it simply got richer and a little less powerful to stay safe but was full power in short bursts when EGT's dont get out of hand?
Biuld a Cossie right map it right and then fit it correctly and there is no problems.
Mark
#31
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
Mark, you misunderstood me, apologies.
At high rpm you wont get EGT problems from lots of boost, so its not a problem to run loads of boost up there, so I was taking for granted that would be no problem, so it was only the midrange that I was referring to as somewhere that would have dangerously high EGT's if the car is held there due to the amount of retard needed.
At high rpm you wont get EGT problems from lots of boost, so its not a problem to run loads of boost up there, so I was taking for granted that would be no problem, so it was only the midrange that I was referring to as somewhere that would have dangerously high EGT's if the car is held there due to the amount of retard needed.
#32
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Mark, you misunderstood me, apologies.
At high rpm you wont get EGT problems from lots of boost, so its not a problem to run loads of boost up there, so I was taking for granted that would be no problem, so it was only the midrange that I was referring to as somewhere that would have dangerously high EGT's if the car is held there due to the amount of retard needed.
At high rpm you wont get EGT problems from lots of boost, so its not a problem to run loads of boost up there, so I was taking for granted that would be no problem, so it was only the midrange that I was referring to as somewhere that would have dangerously high EGT's if the car is held there due to the amount of retard needed.
Mark
#33
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
Originally Posted by Mark Shead
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Mark, you misunderstood me, apologies.
At high rpm you wont get EGT problems from lots of boost, so its not a problem to run loads of boost up there, so I was taking for granted that would be no problem, so it was only the midrange that I was referring to as somewhere that would have dangerously high EGT's if the car is held there due to the amount of retard needed.
At high rpm you wont get EGT problems from lots of boost, so its not a problem to run loads of boost up there, so I was taking for granted that would be no problem, so it was only the midrange that I was referring to as somewhere that would have dangerously high EGT's if the car is held there due to the amount of retard needed.
Mark
If you up the CR far enough there will be, at that point could you use the SM4 to dial extra fuel in based on EGT's to control it?
#34
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Originally Posted by Mark Shead
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Mark, you misunderstood me, apologies.
At high rpm you wont get EGT problems from lots of boost, so its not a problem to run loads of boost up there, so I was taking for granted that would be no problem, so it was only the midrange that I was referring to as somewhere that would have dangerously high EGT's if the car is held there due to the amount of retard needed.
At high rpm you wont get EGT problems from lots of boost, so its not a problem to run loads of boost up there, so I was taking for granted that would be no problem, so it was only the midrange that I was referring to as somewhere that would have dangerously high EGT's if the car is held there due to the amount of retard needed.
Mark
If you up the CR far enough there will be, at that point could you use the SM4 to dial extra fuel in based on EGT's to control it?
Mark
#35
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
This is like pulling fucking teeth
Im saying if you do get to the situation with "an engine" and "a turbo" and "some boost" that mike describes where you end up with EGT's going up, is that something the SM4 could take care of via introducing more fuel based on a response to EGT (or for that matter can it do it by some other method) in real time so that as the temps rise it simply safens up the map to make sure they dont get dangerously high at any point?
Im saying if you do get to the situation with "an engine" and "a turbo" and "some boost" that mike describes where you end up with EGT's going up, is that something the SM4 could take care of via introducing more fuel based on a response to EGT (or for that matter can it do it by some other method) in real time so that as the temps rise it simply safens up the map to make sure they dont get dangerously high at any point?
#37
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
Mark,
Obviously it depends on what you are calling high compression....
Obviously it depends on what you are calling high compression....
Mark
#38
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 11,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Porkie
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
Lee has just switched to a GT30 (this is the set up he ran at Coombe over the weekend), why not ask him how it drives .
Ask Doug Stirling... he is feeling his Reyland 2.0 GT30 as well
MENTAL MENTAL MENTAL powerband!!!!
Originally Posted by L8 ECU
Originally Posted by Porkie
Stav.... I now have the worlds first Sierra Automatic trackcar. You just select 3rd gear and drive it like a big go kart! 2 gearchanges the whole lap of Combe now!
Pulls HARD to 8300rpm no worries PROPER Turbo
Even you will be SHOCKED at just how different the engine is now!
Pulls HARD to 8300rpm no worries PROPER Turbo
Even you will be SHOCKED at just how different the engine is now!
Seriously, with solid lifters and 8,200 rev limit I amazed at the flexibility of my car in 4th gear.....I'm on 3.62 diffs (it was on 3.9 riff /step-off but I did not get on with the gearing - see below)......
Cruising on motorways/dual carriageways in 4th gear (with 3.62 diffs) the car is instantly on full boost at 75 / 80 MPH and goes all the way through to 155 / 160 MPH without even hitting the rev limiter ......on a road car like mine it makes it a KILLER ONE GEAR CAR on motorways - bonus being that it's the strongest gear - so less likely to break.
Surprised many a M5 / M3 / Porsche driver with this party trick:
If I'm waiting for a slower car to move out of the outside lane, I then sneak it in to 4th.....by this time the M3/M5/Porche is very close to my bumper.......then as soon as the slower car has cleared the lane, I apply full throtle..............can pull 1/2 mile to 1 mile on them EASY before they even realised whats happening
With 3.9 final drive the gearing was "awkward" IMO - 4th being too low and 5th too high....you always wanted to be in between the gears.
Regards,
Doug.
Thinking now though that I should of plumped for solid lifters..........
Franco
#39
10K+ Poster!!
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
I wouldn't run high compression on a car that is going to be regularly maxed out or see track days UNLESS you have the budget to run suitable fuel at these events.
everytime i see a cossie spec its always got low comp, between 6.8 and 7.*:1 whereas the jap lads all seem to run around 8.5:1 generally.
What difference does it make if theyre both ran on say Shell V-Power? How come it works on Evo's etc but not on cossies, even though they both run decent boost levels?
I understand the theory behind detonation but the 8.5:1 compression doesnt seem to cause any problems over on the darkside, but scares the shit out of the ford boys
#40
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Originally Posted by Red16
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
I wouldn't run high compression on a car that is going to be regularly maxed out or see track days UNLESS you have the budget to run suitable fuel at these events.
everytime i see a cossie spec its always got low comp, between 6.8 and 7.*:1 whereas the jap lads all seem to run around 8.5:1 generally.
What difference does it make if theyre both ran on say Shell V-Power? How come it works on Evo's etc but not on cossies, even though they both run decent boost levels?
I understand the theory behind detonation but the 8.5:1 compression doesnt seem to cause any problems over on the darkside, but scares the shit out of the ford boys
Mark