FAO EAGLE
#1
FAO EAGLE
Lambchop would like to know why he is banned and asks what proof are you basing your assumption on, that he is allegedly circulating pictures on the FHM thread.
He denies vehemently passing on anything, so obviously he want's to know where are you getting your misinformation from that he has?
Copy of email sent to Chop....
REFERENCE THE FHM PICTURE CIRCULATING ON PASSIONFORD.
>
> You have been banned from Passionford forums due to your involvment of the
> circulation of underage pornographic material.
> any user found either asking for or sending this picture will also be
> banned from this forum and any details held will be passed to the local
> authorities.
>
> the willing and knowing distribution of underage pornographic images is
> AGAINST THE LAW, and thus passionford will help the authorities in any
> legal persuit of offenders.
> PASSIONFORD will not tollerate this kind of user behaviour on its forums.
>
> many thanks.
He denies vehemently passing on anything, so obviously he want's to know where are you getting your misinformation from that he has?
Copy of email sent to Chop....
REFERENCE THE FHM PICTURE CIRCULATING ON PASSIONFORD.
>
> You have been banned from Passionford forums due to your involvment of the
> circulation of underage pornographic material.
> any user found either asking for or sending this picture will also be
> banned from this forum and any details held will be passed to the local
> authorities.
>
> the willing and knowing distribution of underage pornographic images is
> AGAINST THE LAW, and thus passionford will help the authorities in any
> legal persuit of offenders.
> PASSIONFORD will not tollerate this kind of user behaviour on its forums.
>
> many thanks.
#2
Daft question, but even if the picture is of a 14 year old, is it even illegal if its just topless and not specifally pornographic?
The sun have birds of 16 in there on page 3 (thats how old sam fox was when she started) so its obvioulsy NOT classed the same as "porn" which is 18+ I believe.
The sun have birds of 16 in there on page 3 (thats how old sam fox was when she started) so its obvioulsy NOT classed the same as "porn" which is 18+ I believe.
#3
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Daft question, but even if the picture is of a 14 year old, is it even illegal if its just topless and not specifally pornographic?
The sun have birds of 16 in there on page 3 (thats how old sam fox was when she started) so its obvioulsy NOT classed the same as "porn" which is 18+ I believe.
The sun have birds of 16 in there on page 3 (thats how old sam fox was when she started) so its obvioulsy NOT classed the same as "porn" which is 18+ I believe.
The main question here to be answered is... WHAT PROOF does Eagle have that Chop has circulated pictures.
#4
Originally Posted by Redkop
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Daft question, but even if the picture is of a 14 year old, is it even illegal if its just topless and not specifally pornographic?
The sun have birds of 16 in there on page 3 (thats how old sam fox was when she started) so its obvioulsy NOT classed the same as "porn" which is 18+ I believe.
The sun have birds of 16 in there on page 3 (thats how old sam fox was when she started) so its obvioulsy NOT classed the same as "porn" which is 18+ I believe.
The main question here to be answered is... WHAT PROOF does Eagle have that Chop has circulated pictures.
#5
Originally Posted by DanCossie
Originally Posted by Redkop
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Daft question, but even if the picture is of a 14 year old, is it even illegal if its just topless and not specifally pornographic?
The sun have birds of 16 in there on page 3 (thats how old sam fox was when she started) so its obvioulsy NOT classed the same as "porn" which is 18+ I believe.
The sun have birds of 16 in there on page 3 (thats how old sam fox was when she started) so its obvioulsy NOT classed the same as "porn" which is 18+ I believe.
The main question here to be answered is... WHAT PROOF does Eagle have that Chop has circulated pictures.
From what I can gather from the new Sticky by Eagle at the top of GD that people are going to be banned for just asking about it.
You can't go banning people who have previously asked for it before he put the sticky up FFS
Originally Posted by Eagle
REFERENCE THE FHM PICTURE CIRCULATING ON PASSIONFORD.
any user found circulating the picture or asking for it will be removed from Passionford.
any user found circulating the picture or asking for it will be removed from Passionford.
Trending Topics
#10
Hello, Stavros here.
WHY pray tell, have i been banned?
Am I right in saying you will be banned for ASKING or DISTRIBUTING that pic?
So where have I done that then?
Fookin tons of people have, but I HAVENT.
Ive seen the pics, like meeelions of FHM readers etc have, but never seen it on the internet once, and not asked for it here once.
So can certain mods get their facts right and un-ban me please.
And aplogise if, as it seems, ive done FOOK ALL wrong.
And yeah, ive broke a rule by now having 2 usernames, but if nobody explains WHY im banned, have no email address to contact them away from here, and unable to even READ the board when your banned, what you expect. Cant ban someone when they shouldnt have been banned in the 1st place...
WHY pray tell, have i been banned?
Am I right in saying you will be banned for ASKING or DISTRIBUTING that pic?
So where have I done that then?
Fookin tons of people have, but I HAVENT.
Ive seen the pics, like meeelions of FHM readers etc have, but never seen it on the internet once, and not asked for it here once.
So can certain mods get their facts right and un-ban me please.
And aplogise if, as it seems, ive done FOOK ALL wrong.
And yeah, ive broke a rule by now having 2 usernames, but if nobody explains WHY im banned, have no email address to contact them away from here, and unable to even READ the board when your banned, what you expect. Cant ban someone when they shouldnt have been banned in the 1st place...
#13
Originally Posted by Redkop
Originally Posted by DanCossie
Originally Posted by Redkop
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Daft question, but even if the picture is of a 14 year old, is it even illegal if its just topless and not specifally pornographic?
The sun have birds of 16 in there on page 3 (thats how old sam fox was when she started) so its obvioulsy NOT classed the same as "porn" which is 18+ I believe.
The sun have birds of 16 in there on page 3 (thats how old sam fox was when she started) so its obvioulsy NOT classed the same as "porn" which is 18+ I believe.
The main question here to be answered is... WHAT PROOF does Eagle have that Chop has circulated pictures.
From what I can gather from the new Sticky by Eagle at the top of GD that people are going to be banned for just asking about it.
You can't go banning people who have previously asked for it before he put the sticky up FFS
Originally Posted by Eagle
REFERENCE THE FHM PICTURE CIRCULATING ON PASSIONFORD.
any user found circulating the picture or asking for it will be removed from Passionford.
any user found circulating the picture or asking for it will be removed from Passionford.
because there wasnt a sticky before the crime was commitied you cant get done for it you are saying??everyone knows its wrong surely
#14
Originally Posted by DanCossie
Originally Posted by Redkop
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Daft question, but even if the picture is of a 14 year old, is it even illegal if its just topless and not specifally pornographic?
The sun have birds of 16 in there on page 3 (thats how old sam fox was when she started) so its obvioulsy NOT classed the same as "porn" which is 18+ I believe.
The sun have birds of 16 in there on page 3 (thats how old sam fox was when she started) so its obvioulsy NOT classed the same as "porn" which is 18+ I believe.
The main question here to be answered is... WHAT PROOF does Eagle have that Chop has circulated pictures.
#18
Originally Posted by Lambchop
Originally Posted by DanCossie
Originally Posted by Redkop
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Daft question, but even if the picture is of a 14 year old, is it even illegal if its just topless and not specifally pornographic?
The sun have birds of 16 in there on page 3 (thats how old sam fox was when she started) so its obvioulsy NOT classed the same as "porn" which is 18+ I believe.
The sun have birds of 16 in there on page 3 (thats how old sam fox was when she started) so its obvioulsy NOT classed the same as "porn" which is 18+ I believe.
The main question here to be answered is... WHAT PROOF does Eagle have that Chop has circulated pictures.
#22
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Mod can change passwords cant they?
If so, they have PM access if they want it effectively.
If so, they have PM access if they want it effectively.
thats right chip but every password request the user is normally on msn asking for it there told the new password and asked to change it straight away on that screen u only have there profile
#23
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Mod can change passwords cant they?
If so, they have PM access if they want it effectively.
If so, they have PM access if they want it effectively.
#25
Originally Posted by Daviet
Originally Posted by Redkop
Originally Posted by DanCossie
Originally Posted by Redkop
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Daft question, but even if the picture is of a 14 year old, is it even illegal if its just topless and not specifally pornographic?
The sun have birds of 16 in there on page 3 (thats how old sam fox was when she started) so its obvioulsy NOT classed the same as "porn" which is 18+ I believe.
The sun have birds of 16 in there on page 3 (thats how old sam fox was when she started) so its obvioulsy NOT classed the same as "porn" which is 18+ I believe.
The main question here to be answered is... WHAT PROOF does Eagle have that Chop has circulated pictures.
From what I can gather from the new Sticky by Eagle at the top of GD that people are going to be banned for just asking about it.
You can't go banning people who have previously asked for it before he put the sticky up FFS
Originally Posted by Eagle
REFERENCE THE FHM PICTURE CIRCULATING ON PASSIONFORD.
any user found circulating the picture or asking for it will be removed from Passionford.
any user found circulating the picture or asking for it will be removed from Passionford.
because there wasnt a sticky before the crime was commitied you cant get done for it you are saying??everyone knows its wrong surely
#27
Originally Posted by Eagle
Originally Posted by snedboy26
i got banned aswell for askin but never passed on pic atall
can i get un-banned??
can i get un-banned??
have you replied to the email ???
will i just reply to the e-mail then?
#29
Originally Posted by The Diva
Originally Posted by Cossie Helen
I gather Mod's can get into PM's on here then?
Thank fook for that Rob, you'd hate what Sticky told me about you.
#30
Originally Posted by snedboy26
Originally Posted by Eagle
Originally Posted by snedboy26
i got banned aswell for askin but never passed on pic atall
can i get un-banned??
can i get un-banned??
have you replied to the email ???
will i just reply to the e-mail then?
#33
Originally Posted by staffi
Originally Posted by The Diva
Originally Posted by Cossie Helen
I gather Mod's can get into PM's on here then?
Thank fook for that Rob, you'd hate what Sticky told me about you.
I can imagine.....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Disabled Account
General Car Related Discussion.
4
14-06-2005 07:17 PM
cabrio zo
General Car Related Discussion.
11
23-02-2005 10:42 AM