Ford Escort MKII 450hp N/A
#43
Originally Posted by ian sibbert
Gareth,
Cos a turb car don't sound like one of these....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxPGFs7Ml34
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XC9sCw6hY4w
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdYwclByOVo
And the 2 red escorts are a little less BHP than the Greek ones...both on slide injection though..
Cos a turb car don't sound like one of these....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxPGFs7Ml34
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XC9sCw6hY4w
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdYwclByOVo
And the 2 red escorts are a little less BHP than the Greek ones...both on slide injection though..
Heres another:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j55RjT2KsIU
ANY turbo car will never beat that noise
#48
#50
While searching about the red Escort i found this also!
One of our best hillclimbers EVER and definitely one of our most impressive!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OajlZ...elated&search=
One of our best hillclimbers EVER and definitely one of our most impressive!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OajlZ...elated&search=
#51
Very nice,i think on most race tracks an aspirated car will always win on the twisty bits,just look at my mates orange mk2 escort rs2000 with 2.2 HT racing pinto that does national day every year,very few people get past him with big power cossies,only a few pass on the long straights but then the bends come up again and they cant get past
Some people should recognize the car in the pic next to mine
Some people should recognize the car in the pic next to mine
#54
Originally Posted by Rallyesport
When he's got 200 hp he's still got 6000 RPM still to rev with rising power. Gareth, does your engine do that?
#55
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 0
From: Classic Ford
Originally Posted by kouzman
While searching about the red Escort i found this also!
One of our best hillclimbers EVER and definitely one of our most impressive!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OajlZ...elated&search=
One of our best hillclimbers EVER and definitely one of our most impressive!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OajlZ...elated&search=
#57
Going to shorter stroke reduces the reciprocating mass (the weight the engine has to spin around) combined with an increase in bore diameter which in conjunction with a decent head gives better breathing, more revs and lots more power.....
If you hear people talking about 'over square' engines this is what they mean....
If you hear people talking about 'over square' engines this is what they mean....
#59
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by turbo terry
ace machine! sounds the bollocks
can someone explain why you de stroke an engine? rod ratio? does it make for a revvy fucker?
can someone explain why you de stroke an engine? rod ratio? does it make for a revvy fucker?
That goes a bit
#61
I stand to be corrected but Ducati GP use
Shell Racing V-Power (Not the standard 97 stuff you buy in your local) Super Premium as Shell call it
Which is 5% ethanol and 100 Octane. Its like in F1. The fuels arent massively different to regular super unleaded. Well not in comparison to the stuff Dragsters and the like run.
Im dubious, but thats because a lot of Greek modified cars seem to have a different understanding as to how much 1HP actualy is... Theres a "Turbo 1000BHP E36 M3" there. But having seen a vid of it racing a Ferrari 360. Its probably less than 600BHP.
Shell Racing V-Power (Not the standard 97 stuff you buy in your local) Super Premium as Shell call it
Which is 5% ethanol and 100 Octane. Its like in F1. The fuels arent massively different to regular super unleaded. Well not in comparison to the stuff Dragsters and the like run.
Im dubious, but thats because a lot of Greek modified cars seem to have a different understanding as to how much 1HP actualy is... Theres a "Turbo 1000BHP E36 M3" there. But having seen a vid of it racing a Ferrari 360. Its probably less than 600BHP.
#62
Originally Posted by Markb_s1
Awesome car, but 211lb/ft of torque is a HELL of a lot for a 1.9 litre N/A engine.... is that even feasible?
I'm not questioning that there's clearly loads of development work gone into it, and it's a very impressive lump, but I've always been under the impression that even on a normally aspriated full race engine with ŁŁŁŁŁŁŁŁŁŁŁs of development work, over 100lb/ft per litre is simply not going to happen.
I'm not questioning that there's clearly loads of development work gone into it, and it's a very impressive lump, but I've always been under the impression that even on a normally aspriated full race engine with ŁŁŁŁŁŁŁŁŁŁŁs of development work, over 100lb/ft per litre is simply not going to happen.
#63
"your dads" car only has 199 lb foot out of a 2.5* so when you learn to read the quote Marks made. Maybe you'll understand.
*Presumably thats not when he fills it up with Diesel by mistake!
*Presumably thats not when he fills it up with Diesel by mistake!
#64
Originally Posted by kouzman
While searching about the red Escort i found this also!
One of our best hillclimbers EVER and definitely one of our most impressive!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OajlZ...elated&search=
One of our best hillclimbers EVER and definitely one of our most impressive!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OajlZ...elated&search=
http://www.raceinfo.no/tempftp/Ford_...llclimbing.mpg
Superb car control and super sexy car
Mark
#65
Originally Posted by Markb_s1
Awesome car, but 211lb/ft of torque is a HELL of a lot for a 1.9 litre N/A engine.... is that even feasible?
I'm not questioning that there's clearly loads of development work gone into it, and it's a very impressive lump, but I've always been under the impression that even on a normally aspriated full race engine with ŁŁŁŁŁŁŁŁŁŁŁs of development work, over 100lb/ft per litre is simply not going to happen.
I'm not questioning that there's clearly loads of development work gone into it, and it's a very impressive lump, but I've always been under the impression that even on a normally aspriated full race engine with ŁŁŁŁŁŁŁŁŁŁŁs of development work, over 100lb/ft per litre is simply not going to happen.
#69
Originally Posted by turbo terry
cheers
does over-square relate to the bore/stroke ratio?
awseome machine!
does over-square relate to the bore/stroke ratio?
awseome machine!
The engine going in my EsCos is oversquare having a 4 inch bore and 3 inch stroke.
It is not all about weight, a short stroke 2 litre will have a lower piston speed than a long stroke 2 litre so you can rev higher without excessive piston speeds. You also get a bigger combustion chamber relative to capacity meaning that there is more room for big valves.
Mark
#70
Originally Posted by Rallyesport
When he's got 200 hp he's still got 6000 RPM still to rev with rising power. Gareth, does your engine do that?
So when he makes 200hp he can just about still double the revs in the same gear. Almost any well specced turbo car can do that.
#71
Originally Posted by RS2300 4x4
Originally Posted by turbo terry
cheers
does over-square relate to the bore/stroke ratio?
awseome machine!
does over-square relate to the bore/stroke ratio?
awseome machine!
The engine going in my EsCos is oversquare having a 4 inch bore and 3 inch stroke.
It is not all about weight, a short stroke 2 litre will have a lower piston speed than a long stroke 2 litre so you can rev higher without excessive piston speeds. You also get a bigger combustion chamber relative to capacity meaning that there is more room for big valves.
Mark
#74
It's a 5 litre Ford V8 or 302 cubic inches
Even the 351 Cubic inch version (5.75 litres) is oversquare with a 4 inch bore and 3.5 inch stroke. Too heavy for me because of taller block and much more likely to grenade my MT75
Mark
Even the 351 Cubic inch version (5.75 litres) is oversquare with a 4 inch bore and 3.5 inch stroke. Too heavy for me because of taller block and much more likely to grenade my MT75
Mark
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
matman
Ford Rs Parts For Sale (Not cosworth, or Cvh Turbo)
1
09-09-2015 05:45 PM