BBC2 9pm after Top Gear....
#1
Thread Starter
PassionFord Post Troll
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,898
Likes: 1
From: Cornwall... Aarrhh me hearties!
BBC2 9pm after Top Gear....
you'll all be switching over.
Well, someone had to post about it, it might as well be me . Don't worry, your BBC will tell you everythings fine, don't worry, just carry on as normal.
Well, someone had to post about it, it might as well be me . Don't worry, your BBC will tell you everythings fine, don't worry, just carry on as normal.
#5
Come on Graham!
You going to tell us that there's something shady about Avery and his cronies getting a healthy dose of reality?
Try this - helps explain away that dross video you've been distributing:
http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html
You going to tell us that there's something shady about Avery and his cronies getting a healthy dose of reality?
Try this - helps explain away that dross video you've been distributing:
http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html
#6
Originally Posted by Oranoco
I'll be watching it, find these really intresting. Not saying I buy into a lot of these theories but they certainly raise eyebrows and make you think
Trending Topics
#8
Thread Starter
PassionFord Post Troll
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,898
Likes: 1
From: Cornwall... Aarrhh me hearties!
Originally Posted by Less
and theres little green men on mars
Originally Posted by RichardPON
Come on Graham!
You going to tell us that there's something shady about Avery and his cronies getting a healthy dose of reality?
Try this - helps explain away that dross video you've been distributing:
http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html
You going to tell us that there's something shady about Avery and his cronies getting a healthy dose of reality?
Try this - helps explain away that dross video you've been distributing:
http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html
But unfortunately better docs have come out since.
Of course, it could always turn out to be a fair and balanced program.
Lets see if they mention.
Northwoods.
Norman Mineta's testimony.
The Jersey Girls.
Able Danger.
Molten rivers of metal underneath the towers.
The thousands of police, medical staff, firemen, and everyday people who are due to die in the next 10 years, because they breathed air they were told was "safe", during the clear up.
#10
Originally Posted by Graham S1
Originally Posted by Less
and theres little green men on mars
Originally Posted by RichardPON
Come on Graham!
You going to tell us that there's something shady about Avery and his cronies getting a healthy dose of reality?
Try this - helps explain away that dross video you've been distributing:
http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html
You going to tell us that there's something shady about Avery and his cronies getting a healthy dose of reality?
Try this - helps explain away that dross video you've been distributing:
http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html
But unfortunately better docs have come out since.
Of course, it could always turn out to be a fair and balanced program.
Lets see if they mention.
Northwoods.
Norman Mineta's testimony.
The Jersey Girls.
Able Danger.
Molten rivers of metal underneath the towers.
The thousands of police, medical staff, firemen, and everyday people who are due to die in the next 10 years, because they breathed air they were told was "safe", during the clear up.
Let's hope they tear that Loose Change drivel to pieces.
Honestly - how can you still believe in all that drivel, especially when all the "experts" involved in Loosee Change are CTs themselves?
#11
Thread Starter
PassionFord Post Troll
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,898
Likes: 1
From: Cornwall... Aarrhh me hearties!
Originally Posted by RichardPON
Honestly - how can you still believe in all that drivel, especially when all the "experts" involved in Loosee Change are CTs themselves?
I found out myself about this before even the 1st Loose Change came out.
What about those who have never backed Loose Change?
Like I said, there are other better put together one's out there. "911 Mysteries" for a start. And "Press for Truth".
What about NOW, when you have plenty of experts out there disputing the "Official Conspiracy Theory"?
#13
Well?
How do you refute things like saying 93 footage was found 6.9 miles away from the crash site, when they showed that the 6.9 miles is the measurement given when taking the most passable road between both sites, rather than the distance as the crow flies?
It's that kind of diabolical research that explains why you lot have no credibility!
How do you refute things like saying 93 footage was found 6.9 miles away from the crash site, when they showed that the 6.9 miles is the measurement given when taking the most passable road between both sites, rather than the distance as the crow flies?
It's that kind of diabolical research that explains why you lot have no credibility!
#14
Originally Posted by RichardPON
Well?
How do you refute things like saying 93 footage was found 6.9 miles away from the crash site, when they showed that the 6.9 miles is the measurement given when taking the most passable road between both sites, rather than the distance as the crow flies?
It's that kind of diabolical research that explains why you lot have no credibility!
How do you refute things like saying 93 footage was found 6.9 miles away from the crash site, when they showed that the 6.9 miles is the measurement given when taking the most passable road between both sites, rather than the distance as the crow flies?
It's that kind of diabolical research that explains why you lot have no credibility!
I await Graham's reply
#15
Originally Posted by RichardPON
How do you refute things like saying 93 footage was found 6.9 miles away from the crash site, when they showed that the 6.9 miles is the measurement given when taking the most passable road between both sites, rather than the distance as the crow flies?
#16
Thread Starter
PassionFord Post Troll
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,898
Likes: 1
From: Cornwall... Aarrhh me hearties!
Originally Posted by RichardPON
Well?
How do you refute things like saying 93 footage was found 6.9 miles away from the crash site, when they showed that the 6.9 miles is the measurement given when taking the most passable road between both sites, rather than the distance as the crow flies?
It's that kind of diabolical research that explains why you lot have no credibility!
How do you refute things like saying 93 footage was found 6.9 miles away from the crash site, when they showed that the 6.9 miles is the measurement given when taking the most passable road between both sites, rather than the distance as the crow flies?
It's that kind of diabolical research that explains why you lot have no credibility!
Talk about a strawman argument.
If stuff was found a mile away, where was it? They couldn't find it. Did something fall off while it was diving? Or was it shot down? Nothing was answered. How much do you actually know about the Flight 93 crash sight, witnesses interviewed etc.
PON, show me some tail sections, wing bits, engines.... or do you agree that planes can simply be "absorbed" into the ground? If you throw a person into the ground at 500 mph, do they simply get absorbed in?
Gets confusing when you listen to eyewitnesses. This guy was at the lake.
"Jim Stop of Somerset was fishing at the Indian Lake marina, about three miles from the crash site, when he looked up and saw the plane overhead.
I heard the engine whine and scream, Stop said.
He then heard an explosion and saw a fireball."
I heard the engine whine and scream, Stop said.
He then heard an explosion and saw a fireball."
#18
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
From: Chippenham, Wiltshire
Originally Posted by Graham S1
"Jim Stop of Somerset was fishing at the Indian Lake marina, about three miles from the crash site, when he looked up and saw the plane overhead.
I heard the engine whine and scream, Stop said.
He then heard an explosion and saw a fireball."
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pitt...b/s_12942.html
I heard the engine whine and scream, Stop said.
He then heard an explosion and saw a fireball."
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pitt...b/s_12942.html
It doesn't say the plane was on fire in the air
#19
Thread Starter
PassionFord Post Troll
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,898
Likes: 1
From: Cornwall... Aarrhh me hearties!
This whole 6.9 miles thing is news to me anyway. Haven't heard much about it, and it's not a prevalent "theory". Which is why I'm having to research it while I type.
What had been said was that an engine had been found about 8 miles away, but I don't think they mentioned that at all last night.
What had been said was that an engine had been found about 8 miles away, but I don't think they mentioned that at all last night.
#20
Originally Posted by Graham S1
Originally Posted by RichardPON
Well?
How do you refute things like saying 93 footage was found 6.9 miles away from the crash site, when they showed that the 6.9 miles is the measurement given when taking the most passable road between both sites, rather than the distance as the crow flies?
It's that kind of diabolical research that explains why you lot have no credibility!
How do you refute things like saying 93 footage was found 6.9 miles away from the crash site, when they showed that the 6.9 miles is the measurement given when taking the most passable road between both sites, rather than the distance as the crow flies?
It's that kind of diabolical research that explains why you lot have no credibility!
Talk about a strawman argument.
If stuff was found a mile away, where was it? They couldn't find it. Did something fall off while it was diving? Or was it shot down? Nothing was answered. How much do you actually know about the Flight 93 crash sight, witnesses interviewed etc.
PON, show me some tail sections, wing bits, engines.... or do you agree that planes can simply be "absorbed" into the ground? If you throw a person into the ground at 500 mph, do they simply get absorbed in?
Gets confusing when you listen to eyewitnesses. This guy was at the lake.
"Jim Stop of Somerset was fishing at the Indian Lake marina, about three miles from the crash site, when he looked up and saw the plane overhead.
I heard the engine whine and scream, Stop said.
He then heard an explosion and saw a fireball."
I heard the engine whine and scream, Stop said.
He then heard an explosion and saw a fireball."
Did the coroner, who was misquoted in that Loose Change drivel YOU distributed, not simply say that there were no bodies......... as in they'd all been destroyed in the accident, yet they found enough human remains to identify the passengers?
Please don't tell me you believe that whole switched flights, Cleveland rubbish that Avery pushes..? What an insult to the passengers' memories to suggest that they are all being held in captivity somewhere because they couldn't possibly have crashed!
Come on Graham, you're mildy educated - tell me, after official reports found human remains, an engine, plane debris, and a hole in the ground, how it couldn't have been?
Also, please answer the 6.9 mile thing, for the purpose of credibility.
#21
Thread Starter
PassionFord Post Troll
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,898
Likes: 1
From: Cornwall... Aarrhh me hearties!
Originally Posted by Ratty
Originally Posted by Graham S1
"Jim Stop of Somerset was fishing at the Indian Lake marina, about three miles from the crash site, when he looked up and saw the plane overhead.
I heard the engine whine and scream, Stop said.
He then heard an explosion and saw a fireball."
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pitt...b/s_12942.html
I heard the engine whine and scream, Stop said.
He then heard an explosion and saw a fireball."
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pitt...b/s_12942.html
It doesn't say the plane was on fire in the air
The reports of wreckage at Indian Lake were accurate in so far as small, light fragments of insulation material and paper from United 93 were found by residents at the lake, having blown there from the crash site on the prevailing wind.
#22
Think about it Graham.
Plane hits ground, mass of energy released,the lighter loose bits of fragement get instantly thrown outwards, then the wind carries them.
I'm sure its a basic rule of physics, things don't get incinerated the millisecond the explosion happens?
It seems the CT's like to look hard for the most realistic alternative truth there is. Just to be different. Its a state of mind.
Plane hits ground, mass of energy released,the lighter loose bits of fragement get instantly thrown outwards, then the wind carries them.
I'm sure its a basic rule of physics, things don't get incinerated the millisecond the explosion happens?
It seems the CT's like to look hard for the most realistic alternative truth there is. Just to be different. Its a state of mind.
#23
Thread Starter
PassionFord Post Troll
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,898
Likes: 1
From: Cornwall... Aarrhh me hearties!
Originally Posted by timrud
Think about it Graham.
Plane hits ground, mass of energy released,the lighter loose bits of fragement get instantly thrown outwards, then the wind carries them.
I'm sure its a basic rule of physics, things don't get incinerated the millisecond the explosion happens?
Plane hits ground, mass of energy released,the lighter loose bits of fragement get instantly thrown outwards, then the wind carries them.
I'm sure its a basic rule of physics, things don't get incinerated the millisecond the explosion happens?
And the wind... yes. Do you know the conditions of that day? Light breeze, 5-10mph winds. Hmmm....
You have a while to answer now. I'm off to work. Back lunchtime.
#24
PMSL you know my view on this....
But i sooooooooooooooo knew you was going to post about the programe Graham Also as pridectable as the programs
Also they was on about this on Radio two in the week if you want to listen to it.
But i sooooooooooooooo knew you was going to post about the programe Graham Also as pridectable as the programs
Also they was on about this on Radio two in the week if you want to listen to it.
#26
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
From: Chippenham, Wiltshire
Originally Posted by Graham S1
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/conspiracy_files/6341851.stm
So light bits of insulation, and paper, survived the crash, but not multi ton, metal sections of plane.
The reports of wreckage at Indian Lake were accurate in so far as small, light fragments of insulation material and paper from United 93 were found by residents at the lake, having blown there from the crash site on the prevailing wind.
The plane was traveling at more than 500mph. It crashed upside-down at a forty-five degree angle. The 128,730+ pound Boeing 757 gouged a 50-foot-deep pit. The force of this impact disintegrated metal, bone and flesh. It took investigators more than three months to identify the remains of the 40 passengers and crew, and, by process of elimination, the four hijackers. The black box containing the flight data and cockpit voice recorders was recovered by investigators two days after the crash
Engine below
#29
Those pictures could be from anywhere!
What your saying is its IMPOSSIBLE for ANYTHING to have got this debated distance from the crash. If that is right then your right.
However I'm saying it IS possible, enspecially for light bits to travel that far.
Yes the wind might of been 5-10mph at ground level. But didn't the bits get thrown upwards? And isn't the wind a bit stronger up there?
I'm sorry, but your grasping at straws. Straws that contain a bit of information that can be misinterprited in an imaginative way.
Please don't give up your day job and join the police, the ones I have to work with already are bad enough
What your saying is its IMPOSSIBLE for ANYTHING to have got this debated distance from the crash. If that is right then your right.
However I'm saying it IS possible, enspecially for light bits to travel that far.
Yes the wind might of been 5-10mph at ground level. But didn't the bits get thrown upwards? And isn't the wind a bit stronger up there?
I'm sorry, but your grasping at straws. Straws that contain a bit of information that can be misinterprited in an imaginative way.
Please don't give up your day job and join the police, the ones I have to work with already are bad enough
#30
I am pretty sure that Disney were behind the whole thing.
Tourism figures have been poor in the US for a while now, and it stands to reason that by bringing them to the top of the news page, it would enhance Mickey and Minnies fortune.
Rumour has it that Pluto was one of the Suicide bombers, but it hasnt been corroborated.
On a serious, note, the wonderful thing about conspiracy theories is that they can be made with very little basis in fact, and nobody needs to sensibly corroborate their 'facts'. Moreover, they can simply retaliate to any evidence put forward by the officials as propaganda!
There is little point in engaging people like this in debate. It is like trying to tell your five year old that they dont want sweets. An utter waste of effort!
Not to mention the fact that many people died in these attacks, and this is not a particularly honerable way to remember them IMHO
JJ
Tourism figures have been poor in the US for a while now, and it stands to reason that by bringing them to the top of the news page, it would enhance Mickey and Minnies fortune.
Rumour has it that Pluto was one of the Suicide bombers, but it hasnt been corroborated.
On a serious, note, the wonderful thing about conspiracy theories is that they can be made with very little basis in fact, and nobody needs to sensibly corroborate their 'facts'. Moreover, they can simply retaliate to any evidence put forward by the officials as propaganda!
There is little point in engaging people like this in debate. It is like trying to tell your five year old that they dont want sweets. An utter waste of effort!
Not to mention the fact that many people died in these attacks, and this is not a particularly honerable way to remember them IMHO
JJ
#31
i watched the first half hour and then had to other stuff, but the pentagon one was the biggest surprise
the show you a plane
then the hole
and there is no way it could have been a plane hitting it
100 tones doing 500 mph is going to do a bit more damage than knock a 20 foot hole in the wall ain't it
the whole twin towers being a crontolled explosion i couldn't buy, but it's not been prooven either way
intersting viewing but thats about it we all know bush is a bit of a clown but he's got to be doing something right, or else his oil puppeteers are pulling the right strings
the show you a plane
then the hole
and there is no way it could have been a plane hitting it
100 tones doing 500 mph is going to do a bit more damage than knock a 20 foot hole in the wall ain't it
the whole twin towers being a crontolled explosion i couldn't buy, but it's not been prooven either way
intersting viewing but thats about it we all know bush is a bit of a clown but he's got to be doing something right, or else his oil puppeteers are pulling the right strings
#32
Originally Posted by dojj
i watched the first half hour and then had to other stuff, but the pentagon one was the biggest surprise
the show you a plane
then the hole
and there is no way it could have been a plane hitting it
100 tones doing 500 mph is going to do a bit more damage than knock a 20 foot hole in the wall ain't it
the whole twin towers being a crontolled explosion i couldn't buy, but it's not been prooven either way
intersting viewing but thats about it we all know bush is a bit of a clown but he's got to be doing something right, or else his oil puppeteers are pulling the right strings
the show you a plane
then the hole
and there is no way it could have been a plane hitting it
100 tones doing 500 mph is going to do a bit more damage than knock a 20 foot hole in the wall ain't it
the whole twin towers being a crontolled explosion i couldn't buy, but it's not been prooven either way
intersting viewing but thats about it we all know bush is a bit of a clown but he's got to be doing something right, or else his oil puppeteers are pulling the right strings
JJ
#33
Graham,
Go take all this absolute drivel for the criminally stupid and gullible back to turbosport where there are a few like minded dimwits who will listen to this sh!te
Oh, did Graham tell you that the planes that hit the towers were remote controlled bombs and they kidnapped 400 passengers and killed them, and they secretly wired WTC1 & 2 (112 floors each )and building 7 with explosives and brought them down in a controlled explosion................ FFS grow up
It is just disrespectful to the poor bastards who died that day and the fact that some Yanks will make money and notoriety from that is no great surprise
Go take all this absolute drivel for the criminally stupid and gullible back to turbosport where there are a few like minded dimwits who will listen to this sh!te
Oh, did Graham tell you that the planes that hit the towers were remote controlled bombs and they kidnapped 400 passengers and killed them, and they secretly wired WTC1 & 2 (112 floors each )and building 7 with explosives and brought them down in a controlled explosion................ FFS grow up
It is just disrespectful to the poor bastards who died that day and the fact that some Yanks will make money and notoriety from that is no great surprise
#34
Originally Posted by dojj
i watched the first half hour and then had to other stuff, but the pentagon one was the biggest surprise
the show you a plane
then the hole
and there is no way it could have been a plane hitting it
100 tones doing 500 mph is going to do a bit more damage than knock a 20 foot hole in the wall ain't it
the show you a plane
then the hole
and there is no way it could have been a plane hitting it
100 tones doing 500 mph is going to do a bit more damage than knock a 20 foot hole in the wall ain't it
Did you not see the independant computer modelling they did..... and then the CTs refuting it, claiming that the computer animation company must have been bought off by the goverment!
If it wasn't so serious, it would be laughable.....
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by RichardPON
Originally Posted by dojj
i watched the first half hour and then had to other stuff, but the pentagon one was the biggest surprise
the show you a plane
then the hole
and there is no way it could have been a plane hitting it
100 tones doing 500 mph is going to do a bit more damage than knock a 20 foot hole in the wall ain't it
the show you a plane
then the hole
and there is no way it could have been a plane hitting it
100 tones doing 500 mph is going to do a bit more damage than knock a 20 foot hole in the wall ain't it
Did you not see the independant computer modelling they did..... and then the CTs refuting it, claiming that the computer animation company must have been bought off by the goverment!
If it wasn't so serious, it would be laughable.....
How much of the defence budget is spent on national security/inteligence? and they had NO idea any of what happened was coming? I wont ever believe that.
Yes all the blowing up buildings talk and laughing at the preaching Alex Jones was verging on light entertainment, but I think they knew full well what was going to happen that day and knew it would set the ball rolling for the whole middle east senario we have now, all be it they must of envisaged it working in their favour more than it has with public support etc.
At the end of the day all the people I talked to at work today were laughing at all the ranting nut jobs going on about blowing up the twin towers, and not why the CIA/FBI didnt do anything about it, seems like they dont want people questioning that. The lame attempt at passing it off as a break down in communication was too daft to even consider as a genuine excuse.
It seems that while theres people willing to argue over hole sizes and amount of debris left over then they will be happy, I'd rather see these people focus their energy on asking questions about inteligence/national security.
#36
I don't hold any belief in the conspiracy theories surrounding the 9/11 attacks.
One thing that is sad is that the US government get hundreds of terrorist alerts every day and you can't chase after all of them without creating mass-hysteria among the general public.
I remember the day of the attacks and before 5pm GMT (12pm EST) the hit list of potential suspects had Osama Bin Laden at the top of the list. For whatever reason this information was not prioritised and the rest is history.
People always question governments (as they should), but somebody has to make these decisions. It's just unfortunate they can't always be right!
Andy
One thing that is sad is that the US government get hundreds of terrorist alerts every day and you can't chase after all of them without creating mass-hysteria among the general public.
I remember the day of the attacks and before 5pm GMT (12pm EST) the hit list of potential suspects had Osama Bin Laden at the top of the list. For whatever reason this information was not prioritised and the rest is history.
People always question governments (as they should), but somebody has to make these decisions. It's just unfortunate they can't always be right!
Andy
#37
Originally Posted by RichardPON
Originally Posted by dojj
i watched the first half hour and then had to other stuff, but the pentagon one was the biggest surprise
the show you a plane
then the hole
and there is no way it could have been a plane hitting it
100 tones doing 500 mph is going to do a bit more damage than knock a 20 foot hole in the wall ain't it
the show you a plane
then the hole
and there is no way it could have been a plane hitting it
100 tones doing 500 mph is going to do a bit more damage than knock a 20 foot hole in the wall ain't it
Did you not see the independant computer modelling they did..... and then the CTs refuting it, claiming that the computer animation company must have been bought off by the goverment!
If it wasn't so serious, it would be laughable.....
a 124 foot wide plane doesn't make a 20 foothole in the side of a building, no matter how hevily fortified it is
#38
Irritating c........
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 21,265
Likes: 147
From: The Dark Side of the Moon...
Originally Posted by dojj
i watched the first half hour and then had to other stuff, but the pentagon one was the biggest surprise
the show you a plane
then the hole
and there is no way it could have been a plane hitting it
100 tones doing 500 mph is going to do a bit more damage than knock a 20 foot hole in the wall ain't it
the whole twin towers being a crontolled explosion i couldn't buy, but it's not been prooven either way
intersting viewing but thats about it we all know bush is a bit of a clown but he's got to be doing something right, or else his oil puppeteers are pulling the right strings
the show you a plane
then the hole
and there is no way it could have been a plane hitting it
100 tones doing 500 mph is going to do a bit more damage than knock a 20 foot hole in the wall ain't it
the whole twin towers being a crontolled explosion i couldn't buy, but it's not been prooven either way
intersting viewing but thats about it we all know bush is a bit of a clown but he's got to be doing something right, or else his oil puppeteers are pulling the right strings
1) Do you know how long it takes to set up a controlled explosion on a building the size of the WTC? Not to mention there were TWO towers?!?! A long fucking time, thats how long...
2) Do you know how much of an expert you have to be to bring down a single tower of that size? Not to mention BOTH towers? You would have to be a fucking good expert, and have a crew of fucking good experts aswell...
3) DO you really think that if a crew of experts had been setting up in preperation of a controlled explosion on both towers, that NO ONE in the ENTIRE world would have noticed? Or that there wasn't a single leak about it? Fuck me, you can't release a new album of your band without being leaked on the net in advance, and Britney Spears can't go to a nightclub without it being posted on the net - do you really think that an operation on this scale, which would mean that the US Government is deliberately intending to kill it's own civilians, that NO MENTION of it AT ALL, not even one raised "hmm, wonder what those people carriny thousands of metres of cable and tonnes of explosives are doing drilling holes in the walls of my office building?" eyebrow?????/
I think not
#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Thrush
3) DO you really think that if a crew of experts had been setting up in preperation of a controlled explosion on both towers, that NO ONE in the ENTIRE world would have noticed? Or that there wasn't a single leak about it? Fuck me, you can't release a new album of your band without being leaked on the net in advance, and Britney Spears can't go to a nightclub without it being posted on the net - do you really think that an operation on this scale, which would mean that the US Government is deliberately intending to kill it's own civilians, that NO MENTION of it AT ALL, not even one raised "hmm, wonder what those people carriny thousands of metres of cable and tonnes of explosives are doing drilling holes in the walls of my office building?" eyebrow?????/
I think not
#40
Thread Starter
PassionFord Post Troll
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,898
Likes: 1
From: Cornwall... Aarrhh me hearties!
Originally Posted by RichardPON
You lot. As in closed minded conspiract theorists.
http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/
Originally Posted by RichardPON
Please don't tell me you believe that whole switched flights, Cleveland rubbish that Avery pushes..?
Originally Posted by RichardPON
What an insult to the passengers' memories to suggest that they are all being held in captivity somewhere because they couldn't possibly have crashed!
Originally Posted by RichardPON
Come on Graham, you're mildy educated
Originally Posted by RichardPON
Also, please answer the 6.9 mile thing, for the purpose of credibility.
Rhys.. yes... I said that in the first post.
Originally Posted by milkman
Warning secret agents from amersham have discovered the true
Bush run for the hills
Bush run for the hills
Originally Posted by JjCoDeX75
Not to mention the fact that many people died in these attacks, and this is not a particularly honerable way to remember them IMHO
Originally Posted by Billy Sasterd
Go take all this absolute drivel for the criminally stupid and gullible back to turbosport where there are a few like minded dimwits who will listen to this sh!te
Originally Posted by RichardPON
That's a myth. All official reports on the scene place the hole at 75' in diameter.
Originally Posted by RichardPON
Did you not see the independant computer modelling they did..... and then the CTs refuting it, claiming that the computer animation company must have been bought off by the goverment!
Originally Posted by andyhardy
One thing that is sad is that the US government get hundreds of terrorist alerts every day and you can't chase after all of them without creating mass-hysteria among the general public.
Originally Posted by Thrush
1) Do you know how long it takes to set up a controlled explosion on a building the size of the WTC? Not to mention there were TWO towers?!?! A long fucking time, thats how long...
Originally Posted by Thrush
2) Do you know how much of an expert you have to be to bring down a single tower of that size? Not to mention BOTH towers? You would have to be a fucking good expert, and have a crew of fucking good experts aswell...
Originally Posted by Thrush
do you really think that an operation on this scale, which would mean that the US Government is deliberately intending to kill it's own civilians, that NO MENTION of it AT ALL, not even one raised "hmm, wonder what those people carriny thousands of metres of cable and tonnes of explosives are doing drilling holes in the walls of my office building?" eyebrow?????/