General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

POWER LOSSES THRU 4WD TRANSMISSION

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-01-2007, 07:18 PM
  #81  
Martin-Hadland
1st to 200 without NOS
iTrader: (2)
 
Martin-Hadland's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 119 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by marco polo
hi shaun



all the vc's had 50Nm of torque when they left the factory
marco
Not true!
Old 08-01-2007, 07:18 PM
  #82  
rapidcossie
10K+ Poster!!
 
rapidcossie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: scotland
Posts: 14,907
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

thats just cheating martin
Old 09-01-2007, 11:06 AM
  #83  
xr2i-carl
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Thread Starter
 
xr2i-carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: ESSEX
Posts: 6,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so what did the m5 make then??? come on
Old 09-01-2007, 11:28 AM
  #84  
rand
Regular Contributor
 
rand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kent
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Marco, where can I get this done?

Cheers
Old 09-01-2007, 05:03 PM
  #85  
xr2i-carl
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Thread Starter
 
xr2i-carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: ESSEX
Posts: 6,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

????????????????? m5 ??????????????????
Old 09-01-2007, 05:07 PM
  #86  
Billabong
PassionFord Post Whore!!

 
Billabong's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Northants
Posts: 9,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by xr2i-carl
????????????????? m5 ??????????????????
Originally Posted by rapidcossie
made 360 and 444..

bear in mind the big BM's never make the full power quoted
I actually thought it might make a bit more than quoted, hence my guess. Not driven an M5, but I know which power delivery/unit I'd prefer to have, Euan
Old 09-01-2007, 05:18 PM
  #87  
marco polo
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (1)
 
marco polo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: birmingham
Posts: 10,644
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by martin-reyland
Originally Posted by marco polo
hi shaun



all the vc's had 50Nm of torque when they left the factory
marco
Not true!


yes they did Rear VC's had 50Nm 2wd/4wd

the 4wd saff center diff has 25Nm

and the escort 4wd center VC has 50Nm

marco
Old 09-01-2007, 05:19 PM
  #88  
marco polo
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (1)
 
marco polo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: birmingham
Posts: 10,644
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by martin-reyland
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
In answer to the original question, the 2wd car will MURDER the 4x4 one with equal flywheel power once rolling.
What about a 4x4 car that turns into a 2wd one once it's moving?

well thats a good idea

marco
Old 09-01-2007, 05:25 PM
  #89  
glancy2081
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
glancy2081's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: fife
Posts: 1,246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

a can only wish my 4wd could turn to 2wd once moving
Old 09-01-2007, 06:19 PM
  #90  
rapidcossie
10K+ Poster!!
 
rapidcossie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: scotland
Posts: 14,907
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Billabong
Originally Posted by xr2i-carl
????????????????? m5 ??????????????????
Originally Posted by rapidcossie
made 360 and 444..

bear in mind the big BM's never make the full power quoted
I actually thought it might make a bit more than quoted, hence my guess. Not driven an M5, but I know which power delivery/unit I'd prefer to have, Euan
A smoky old YB
Old 09-01-2007, 06:26 PM
  #91  
dovboy
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
dovboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: fife,scotland
Posts: 3,713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

a cos on track is a bit like a rainbow smoke machine
Old 09-01-2007, 06:41 PM
  #92  
BigErn
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
BigErn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunderland
Posts: 7,445
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

As far as Im aware you lose 40% power through 4x4 transmission from flywheel to road wheels. Not sure of 2wd losses.
Old 09-01-2007, 06:59 PM
  #93  
Fiecos Dan
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Fiecos Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: S/E Kent, Thanet
Posts: 4,775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by martin-reyland
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
In answer to the original question, the 2wd car will MURDER the 4x4 one with equal flywheel power once rolling.
What about a 4x4 car that turns into a 2wd one once it's moving?
still wont be as fast, as the rolling resistance of the unused drive chain once switched.
But i guess an extra 15bhp should even it up.
Old 09-01-2007, 07:00 PM
  #94  
xr2i-carl
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Thread Starter
 
xr2i-carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: ESSEX
Posts: 6,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so the new v10 m5 only made 444bhp as the flywheel?
Old 09-01-2007, 07:11 PM
  #95  
Martin-Hadland
1st to 200 without NOS
iTrader: (2)
 
Martin-Hadland's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 119 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by marco polo
Originally Posted by martin-reyland
Originally Posted by marco polo
hi shaun



all the vc's had 50Nm of torque when they left the factory
marco
Not true!


yes they did Rear VC's had 50Nm 2wd/4wd

the 4wd saff center diff has 25Nm

and the escort 4wd center VC has 50Nm

marco
Exactly what I said! You stated all VC's were 50nm, I said untrue. Read you reply
Old 09-01-2007, 07:58 PM
  #96  
stevieturbo
C**t
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 7,952
Received 261 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BigErn
As far as Im aware you lose 40% power through 4x4 transmission from flywheel to road wheels. Not sure of 2wd losses.
There is no random number you can pluck from thin air, to guess what losses either might have.

And 40% would be HUGE !!!
Old 09-01-2007, 08:39 PM
  #97  
Fagin
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Fagin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by marco polo
Originally Posted by Fagin
Originally Posted by marco polo
hi shaun

the cossie 4wd tranny loss can be improved by removing all the pig iron

marco
Absolutely mate!!
yo cock

shaun

if you was to put a brand new cossy on the rollers 4x4 where nothing was worn out ie , gearbox/diff/front diff/prop front/rear/center vc/drive shafts/cv ect there wouldn't that much tranny loss compaired to a 10 yr old cossy thats what i'm saying

marco
I dont care what your saying!!
Old 09-01-2007, 08:49 PM
  #98  
rapidcossie
10K+ Poster!!
 
rapidcossie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: scotland
Posts: 14,907
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by xr2i-carl
so the new v10 m5 only made 444bhp as the flywheel?
wheels
Old 09-01-2007, 09:52 PM
  #99  
Lloyd
escort mk4 cossy 4x4
 
Lloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: coventry
Posts: 4,629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fiecos Dan
Originally Posted by martin-reyland
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
In answer to the original question, the 2wd car will MURDER the 4x4 one with equal flywheel power once rolling.
What about a 4x4 car that turns into a 2wd one once it's moving?
still wont be as fast, as the rolling resistance of the unused drive chain once switched.
But i guess an extra 15bhp should even it up.
i doubt it would be even 15 bhp,the trans losses will be the same,as the rwd.because they are the only wheels connected to the engine.the skyline transfer unit is fluid controlled,not chain like a cos,so the only losses are the diff and shafts that run on bearings,and once moving the resistance to acceleration is very small.
Old 10-01-2007, 12:06 AM
  #100  
marco polo
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (1)
 
marco polo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: birmingham
Posts: 10,644
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by martin-reyland
Originally Posted by marco polo
Originally Posted by martin-reyland
Originally Posted by marco polo
hi shaun



all the vc's had 50Nm of torque when they left the factory
marco
Not true!


yes they did Rear VC's had 50Nm 2wd/4wd

the 4wd saff center diff has 25Nm

and the escort 4wd center VC has 50Nm

marco
Exactly what I said! You stated all VC's were 50nm, I said untrue. Read you reply


i should have double checked what i wrote
Old 10-01-2007, 12:06 AM
  #101  
marco polo
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (1)
 
marco polo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: birmingham
Posts: 10,644
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fagin
Originally Posted by marco polo
Originally Posted by Fagin
Originally Posted by marco polo
hi shaun

the cossie 4wd tranny loss can be improved by removing all the pig iron

marco
Absolutely mate!!
yo cock

shaun

if you was to put a brand new cossy on the rollers 4x4 where nothing was worn out ie , gearbox/diff/front diff/prop front/rear/center vc/drive shafts/cv ect there wouldn't that much tranny loss compaired to a 10 yr old cossy thats what i'm saying

marco
I dont care what your saying!!




Old 10-01-2007, 07:33 AM
  #102  
Martin-Hadland
1st to 200 without NOS
iTrader: (2)
 
Martin-Hadland's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 119 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lloyd
Originally Posted by Fiecos Dan
Originally Posted by martin-reyland
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
In answer to the original question, the 2wd car will MURDER the 4x4 one with equal flywheel power once rolling.
What about a 4x4 car that turns into a 2wd one once it's moving?
still wont be as fast, as the rolling resistance of the unused drive chain once switched.
But i guess an extra 15bhp should even it up.
i doubt it would be even 15 bhp,the trans losses will be the same,as the rwd.because they are the only wheels connected to the engine.the skyline transfer unit is fluid controlled,not chain like a cos,so the only losses are the diff and shafts that run on bearings,and once moving the resistance to acceleration is very small.
Lloyd, you are both right and wrong! Indeed the drive to the front wheels IS fluid controlled but the system still has a chain exactly the same (but wider) as a 4x4 Cosworth. When no drive is being transmitted to the front the chain is freewheeling.
Old 10-01-2007, 08:14 AM
  #103  
foreigneRS
Testing the future
 
foreigneRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: W. Sussex
Posts: 17,597
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

finally there is a sensible and factual post about chassis dyno's from Gerry
Old 10-01-2007, 09:34 AM
  #104  
Lloyd
escort mk4 cossy 4x4
 
Lloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: coventry
Posts: 4,629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by martin-reyland
Originally Posted by lloyd
Originally Posted by Fiecos Dan
Originally Posted by martin-reyland
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
In answer to the original question, the 2wd car will MURDER the 4x4 one with equal flywheel power once rolling.
What about a 4x4 car that turns into a 2wd one once it's moving?
still wont be as fast, as the rolling resistance of the unused drive chain once switched.
But i guess an extra 15bhp should even it up.
i doubt it would be even 15 bhp,the trans losses will be the same,as the rwd.because they are the only wheels connected to the engine.the skyline transfer unit is fluid controlled,not chain like a cos,so the only losses are the diff and shafts that run on bearings,and once moving the resistance to acceleration is very small.
Lloyd, you are both right and wrong! Indeed the drive to the front wheels IS fluid controlled but the system still has a chain exactly the same (but wider) as a 4x4 Cosworth. When no drive is being transmitted to the front the chain is freewheeling.
i was nearly right then .lol
Old 10-01-2007, 09:56 AM
  #105  
Turbosystems
Super Moderator

iTrader: (5)
 
Turbosystems's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: home
Posts: 12,849
Received 50 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

if we took out your engine and harnessed 550 red rum horses to your car would it do 190mph at brunters
what would be the et and terminal at santapod lol

The horses would be shod with road legal yokohama horse shoes
Old 10-01-2007, 10:06 AM
  #106  
Lloyd
escort mk4 cossy 4x4
 
Lloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: coventry
Posts: 4,629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

that would depend on how much nos you can get the horses to breath in. ps the engine is out if you want to try it,
Old 10-01-2007, 02:50 PM
  #107  
Lloyd
escort mk4 cossy 4x4
 
Lloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: coventry
Posts: 4,629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Turbosystems
if we took out your engine and harnessed 550 red rum horses to your car would it do 190mph at brunters
what would be the et and terminal at santapod lol

The horses would be shod with road legal yokohama horse shoes
ive just re-read this? its a bit cryptic but are you trying to tell me something?
Old 10-01-2007, 04:31 PM
  #108  
svony
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
iTrader: (3)
 
svony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Big rotten Apple
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I can't imagine the driveline loss to be more than 25% on a 4wd cossie. Last summer I dynoed my car (4x4 3dr replica) and the numbers were 258hp/284tq at the wheels, 4th gear pulls. With the percentage added for driveline loss that would put me almost exactly at the figure Karl quoted me for my setup when I got my chip from him.

At the rolling roads/dynos there in the UK who decides what the percentage loss is when setting up the machines to measure BHP? Is it a standard industry figure/formula or is it a random number applied by the individual operator? Whar gear are the runs usually made in?
Old 10-01-2007, 04:33 PM
  #109  
Fiecos Dan
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Fiecos Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: S/E Kent, Thanet
Posts: 4,775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by martin-reyland
Originally Posted by lloyd
Originally Posted by Fiecos Dan
Originally Posted by martin-reyland
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
In answer to the original question, the 2wd car will MURDER the 4x4 one with equal flywheel power once rolling.
What about a 4x4 car that turns into a 2wd one once it's moving?
still wont be as fast, as the rolling resistance of the unused drive chain once switched.
But i guess an extra 15bhp should even it up.
i doubt it would be even 15 bhp,the trans losses will be the same,as the rwd.because they are the only wheels connected to the engine.the skyline transfer unit is fluid controlled,not chain like a cos,so the only losses are the diff and shafts that run on bearings,and once moving the resistance to acceleration is very small.
Lloyd, you are both right and wrong! Indeed the drive to the front wheels IS fluid controlled but the system still has a chain exactly the same (but wider) as a 4x4 Cosworth. When no drive is being transmitted to the front the chain is freewheeling.

When i said drive chain, i meant transfere box, prop, diff, drive shafts.

Would be good to test the resistance, But that would mean modifie'n a RR so both roller are chain connected, so even when in 2wd mode, the fronts are being turn'd at same speed as the driven rear wheels, which this should show the rolling resistance drain on the power output.
Old 10-01-2007, 04:43 PM
  #110  
pete mcrash
saff is working!!!...atm
iTrader: (1)
 
pete mcrash's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: fishburn sex shop...co.durham
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by svony
I can't imagine the driveline loss to be more than 25% on a 4wd cossie. Last summer I dynoed my car (4x4 3dr replica) and the numbers were 258hp/284tq at the wheels, 4th gear pulls. With the percentage added for driveline loss that would put me almost exactly at the figure Karl quoted me for my setup when I got my chip from him.

At the rolling roads/dynos there in the UK who decides what the percentage loss is when setting up the machines to measure BHP? Is it a standard industry figure/formula or is it a random number applied by the individual operator? Whar gear are the runs usually made in?
.....mine has always been done in 4th
Old 10-01-2007, 05:56 PM
  #111  
stevieturbo
C**t
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 7,952
Received 261 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by svony
or is it a random number applied by the individual operator? Whar gear are the runs usually made in?
From reading various forums, this can be a hot topic.... I think most do seem to use a random number.

We need to be using wheel figures here, same as the rest of the world. Thats what dynos measure in the first place.

As for the Skyline boxes....only the R32 box has true 2wd mode. The R33 and R34 always have some degree of drive to the front wheels, even when zero pressure is applied to the diff.
Old 11-01-2007, 05:33 AM
  #112  
Lloyd
escort mk4 cossy 4x4
 
Lloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: coventry
Posts: 4,629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
Originally Posted by svony
or is it a random number applied by the individual operator? Whar gear are the runs usually made in?
From reading various forums, this can be a hot topic.... I think most do seem to use a random number.

We need to be using wheel figures here, same as the rest of the world. Thats what dynos measure in the first place.

As for the Skyline boxes....only the R32 box has true 2wd mode. The R33 and R34 always have some degree of drive to the front wheels, even when zero pressure is applied to the diff.
thats not true in my skyline box,its been on a 4wd dyno pack.and with the pressure turned off the front wheels have no drive.
Old 11-01-2007, 07:13 AM
  #113  
Martin-Hadland
1st to 200 without NOS
iTrader: (2)
 
Martin-Hadland's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 119 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
As for the Skyline boxes....only the R32 box has true 2wd mode. The R33 and R34 always have some degree of drive to the front wheels, even when zero pressure is applied to the diff.
Interesting statement can you explain further? Do you know R32 and 33 transfer boxes are the same?
Old 11-01-2007, 04:49 PM
  #114  
stevieturbo
C**t
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 7,952
Received 261 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by martin-reyland
Originally Posted by stevieturbo
As for the Skyline boxes....only the R32 box has true 2wd mode. The R33 and R34 always have some degree of drive to the front wheels, even when zero pressure is applied to the diff.
Interesting statement can you explain further? Do you know R32 and 33 transfer boxes are the same?
I was informed by a guy who works at RB abut the differences. He says the R33/34 centre diff can be modifed to give zero drive to the front wheels, same as R32.
But normally, R33 and R34 do still put some drive to the fronts at all times. I dont know how much though. He says its still ok for burnouts etc with a line lock though.

Initially I was searching for an R32 box, but ended up with an R33 as they are supposedly stronger, and generally better.

I also noticed on another forum, where the skyline guys actuallly have a manual pump, to ensure 4wd is engaged on the launch. The normal controller must be a little slow on the take up to engage 4wd. They have a additional hydraulic system via a handbrake style laver to pump the diff up.
Old 11-01-2007, 07:22 PM
  #115  
Martin-Hadland
1st to 200 without NOS
iTrader: (2)
 
Martin-Hadland's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 119 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
Originally Posted by martin-reyland
Originally Posted by stevieturbo
As for the Skyline boxes....only the R32 box has true 2wd mode. The R33 and R34 always have some degree of drive to the front wheels, even when zero pressure is applied to the diff.
Interesting statement can you explain further? Do you know R32 and 33 transfer boxes are the same?
I was informed by a guy who works at RB abut the differences. He says the R33/34 centre diff can be modifed to give zero drive to the front wheels, same as R32.
But normally, R33 and R34 do still put some drive to the fronts at all times. I dont know how much though. .
He is wrong!
Old 11-01-2007, 07:41 PM
  #116  
stevieturbo
C**t
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 7,952
Received 261 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

He isnt the only person to have said similar.....

As I have no direct experience using one yet, I cant say. But I'd think someone that works on them for a living, might have an idea about them ??

Are you saying all of them are fully open then ?
Old 12-01-2007, 06:03 AM
  #117  
Lloyd
escort mk4 cossy 4x4
 
Lloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: coventry
Posts: 4,629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

your informant is wrong mate,the skyline 2wd to 4wd works via gyroscopes and accelerometers/decelerometers. ie it sets off in 2wd,the sensors signal the car is moving and then engages 4wd.you would be surprised how many skyline tuners i have spoken to who dont know how the system works.
Old 12-01-2007, 07:04 AM
  #118  
Martin-Hadland
1st to 200 without NOS
iTrader: (2)
 
Martin-Hadland's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 119 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
He isnt the only person to have said similar.....

As I have no direct experience using one yet, I cant say. But I'd think someone that works on them for a living, might have an idea about them ??

Are you saying all of them are fully open then ?
I have stripped these centre diffs and know exactly how they work and with zero line pressure there is no drive to the front wheels. Maybe when fitted to the original vehicle there is some hyd pressure applied at all times but without that there is no drive.

As Lloyd mentioned above there are a great deal of people in the Skyline business that don’t completely understand how the system works .. Particularly the hyd valves etc, I know this because at the start of the project we were given some very bad advice by more than one tuner which resulted in damaged pump/valves.
Old 12-01-2007, 11:23 AM
  #119  
xr2i-carl
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Thread Starter
 
xr2i-carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: ESSEX
Posts: 6,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

sorted now tho martin?
Old 12-01-2007, 02:39 PM
  #120  
stevieturbo
C**t
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 7,952
Received 261 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lloyd
your informant is wrong mate,the skyline 2wd to 4wd works via gyroscopes and accelerometers/decelerometers. ie it sets off in 2wd,the sensors signal the car is moving and then engages 4wd.you would be surprised how many skyline tuners i have spoken to who dont know how the system works.
None of the above matters to me, as its not for a skyline.

The reasons you mention above, are why some of the skyline drag racers, have a manual pump, to engage 4wd before setting off on the 1/4, as the system can be lazy to engage 4wd, and hence lose traction off the line.

I simply asked how hydraulic pressure affected the diff and what was required to make full 4wd as per skyline car, and was it fully open when zero pressure was applied. I was told that only the R32 was fully 2wd.

And to fully engage 4wd requires circa 180-200psi.

I would be surprised if he is wrong, as he is one of the people who built Kieths car.
Perhaps there is a mis-communication somewhere...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mark94
Ford Mondeo Including ST
5
10-10-2023 06:52 PM
phil51
Ford Focus Diesel
1
02-10-2015 01:00 PM
Iain Mac
General Car Related Discussion.
7
30-09-2015 09:39 PM
Fudgey
General Car Related Discussion.
21
30-09-2015 06:19 PM
dojj
General Car Related Discussion.
2
29-09-2015 10:32 PM



Quick Reply: POWER LOSSES THRU 4WD TRANSMISSION



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12 AM.