about cosworth ex manifold ...from other topic
#321
Originally Posted by cossiedave
do you really think you can here det at these sort of speed,s
#326
Originally Posted by cossiedave
so would you run a 600 bhp car on one pump and std fuel lines i think not it,s MAD MAD
There was no dett and fueling where I wanted it to be which is the same as Rods even with 200hp of Nos on it,
Dett you can hear it and react quickly enough but look at the piston it melted not detted,
High back pressure caused a heat biuld up whch over heated the piston which caused it to fail.
Mark
#328
Originally Posted by madevelopments
Originally Posted by rapidcossie
are all these people who are saying" they think" etc etc actually testing their theorys?
Mark
Oh, we can all have 3 grand inlet manifolds etc., so the car looks like it could go out and win Pikes Peak, but it's having the balls to have a go at proving and not being affraid to fail, unlike some.
#329
Originally Posted by MAD Ade
Originally Posted by madevelopments
Originally Posted by rapidcossie
are all these people who are saying" they think" etc etc actually testing their theorys?
Mark
Oh, we can all have 3 grand inlet manifolds etc., so the car looks like it could go out and win Pikes Peak, but it's having the balls to have a go at proving and not being affraid to fail, unlike some.
#330
Originally Posted by madevelopments
High back pressure caused a heat biuld up whch over heated the piston which caused it to fail.
Mark
Mark
Can you disclose what measures will now be taken so save Ade going through the same trauma again?
I would be going external wastegate turbo (I know they're a pain to package the wastegate pipework), I would look at crown thickness but if they are 6mm or there about (in the middle) then I would be ok with that and for now I would retain the 2wd manifold.
Not having a go, just genuinely interested!
#331
Originally Posted by MAD Ade
Originally Posted by madevelopments
Originally Posted by rapidcossie
are all these people who are saying" they think" etc etc actually testing their theorys?
Mark
Oh, we can all have 3 grand inlet manifolds etc., so the car looks like it could go out and win Pikes Peak, but it's having the balls to have a go at proving and not being affraid to fail, unlike some.
#332
Originally Posted by MAD Ade
Originally Posted by madevelopments
Originally Posted by rapidcossie
are all these people who are saying" they think" etc etc actually testing their theorys?
Mark
Oh, we can all have 3 grand inlet manifolds etc., so the car looks like it could go out and win Pikes Peak, but it's having the balls to have a go at proving and not being affraid to fail, unlike some.
Have a merry Christmas one & all
Rod
#333
Originally Posted by martin-reyland
Originally Posted by MAD Ade
Originally Posted by madevelopments
Originally Posted by rapidcossie
are all these people who are saying" they think" etc etc actually testing their theorys?
Mark
Oh, we can all have 3 grand inlet manifolds etc., so the car looks like it could go out and win Pikes Peak, but it's having the balls to have a go at proving and not being affraid to fail, unlike some.
#334
Originally Posted by ThePH
Originally Posted by MAD Ade
Originally Posted by madevelopments
Originally Posted by rapidcossie
are all these people who are saying" they think" etc etc actually testing their theorys?
Mark
Oh, we can all have 3 grand inlet manifolds etc., so the car looks like it could go out and win Pikes Peak, but it's having the balls to have a go at proving and not being affraid to fail, unlike some.
Have a merry Christmas one & all
Rod
#335
Martin i assume the wanker comment was aimed at me? ...and please dont pm me saying i have ripped you off for 30 quid plus postage i have had no invoice just one phonecall whilst placing an order to tell me the cost of the parts which i dont know wether i am using yet..i am sorry its inconvienced you and i hope the money that i owe hasnt meant you go without this christmas.
Bit surprised to hear ade is only running a std fuel line as i thought it was important to go up a size over 500bhp..i have ...but if you have tested it then i guess its ok...the cosworth amazes me on many occasions on how much overkill was used on a 204bhp road car!
Bit surprised to hear ade is only running a std fuel line as i thought it was important to go up a size over 500bhp..i have ...but if you have tested it then i guess its ok...the cosworth amazes me on many occasions on how much overkill was used on a 204bhp road car!
#336
Am glad Mark posted. Cleared up 9 pages in 2 posts. I see the experts who quote theorys have disappeared under the rock they came from. Mark and Martin are the only true experts on this thread. along with maybe mpsort but not heard of him. Mike knows his stuff, but not on the same level as the 2 M's
Phil, you aint a wanker mate, you just have a habit of winding people up
Ade,
Although im not as experienced in this high speed cossie game as yourself and Rodney, if i can be of any help AT ALL, let me know.
Phil, you aint a wanker mate, you just have a habit of winding people up
Ade,
Although im not as experienced in this high speed cossie game as yourself and Rodney, if i can be of any help AT ALL, let me know.
#338
Rich,
As you very well know, I don't post at weekends, but I was interested enough in Mark's response to log on .
In response to your comments, I full admit to NOT being as knowledgeable as Mark and Martin, but I would point out that from the picture posted, both Martin and myself reached the same conclusion as each other without ANY consultation . What does that say?
Also Mark is saying EXACTLY the same thing as us about back-pressure being the issue, the only difference being, he attributes it to the 2wd manifold, whereas I believe it to be the internally gated turbo that is at fault. So same difference again .
After the exchange of comments, I pointed Harvey to the thread as well, and as soon as he saw the piston, he said the same thing - heat build up due to back-pressure. He also added a bit of useful information, which lead ME to continue with my hypothesis about the turbo - and that was that he was sent a GT35 with an internal wastegate (he mentioned something about it being an Owen Developments turbo?), but on assesment of the turbine, he sent it straight back, as was of the opinion, that it would cause too much back pressure and would not be suitable for running 600bhp through it.
Obviously any tuner worth his salt will be measuring the back-pressure on a new turbo, so hopefully Mark can post this measurement up, it will confirm or deny my hypothesis .
As to Mark thinking that it is to promote me or my business in anyway , it was only to help Ade as much as possible and nothing more, as IMO, he is the best MAD person within the gang, hence why both Martin and myself are keen to see any possible problems ironed out before the next build, as it would be soul destroying to have a third engine expire through NO FAULT OF HIS OWN .
If anything we have said helps in any way, then I will be VERY happy. Unfortunately, any help or advice is seen as scoring points and not taken in the way intended. Next time I will keep any information I have that may be of assistance contained to either a PM to the person concerned or not at all, and people can continue to find out for themselves the EXPENSIVE way .
Ade,
It looks as Mark has it all under control now, and switching to a proper externally gated turbo with a decent size turbine housing will IMO resolve all your back-pressure issues anyway, without resorting to the expense of a tubular manifold. However, if you would prefer to do a belt and braces job, this won't hurt anything other than your wallet . 200mph, here you come .
As you very well know, I don't post at weekends, but I was interested enough in Mark's response to log on .
In response to your comments, I full admit to NOT being as knowledgeable as Mark and Martin, but I would point out that from the picture posted, both Martin and myself reached the same conclusion as each other without ANY consultation . What does that say?
Also Mark is saying EXACTLY the same thing as us about back-pressure being the issue, the only difference being, he attributes it to the 2wd manifold, whereas I believe it to be the internally gated turbo that is at fault. So same difference again .
After the exchange of comments, I pointed Harvey to the thread as well, and as soon as he saw the piston, he said the same thing - heat build up due to back-pressure. He also added a bit of useful information, which lead ME to continue with my hypothesis about the turbo - and that was that he was sent a GT35 with an internal wastegate (he mentioned something about it being an Owen Developments turbo?), but on assesment of the turbine, he sent it straight back, as was of the opinion, that it would cause too much back pressure and would not be suitable for running 600bhp through it.
Obviously any tuner worth his salt will be measuring the back-pressure on a new turbo, so hopefully Mark can post this measurement up, it will confirm or deny my hypothesis .
As to Mark thinking that it is to promote me or my business in anyway , it was only to help Ade as much as possible and nothing more, as IMO, he is the best MAD person within the gang, hence why both Martin and myself are keen to see any possible problems ironed out before the next build, as it would be soul destroying to have a third engine expire through NO FAULT OF HIS OWN .
If anything we have said helps in any way, then I will be VERY happy. Unfortunately, any help or advice is seen as scoring points and not taken in the way intended. Next time I will keep any information I have that may be of assistance contained to either a PM to the person concerned or not at all, and people can continue to find out for themselves the EXPENSIVE way .
Ade,
It looks as Mark has it all under control now, and switching to a proper externally gated turbo with a decent size turbine housing will IMO resolve all your back-pressure issues anyway, without resorting to the expense of a tubular manifold. However, if you would prefer to do a belt and braces job, this won't hurt anything other than your wallet . 200mph, here you come .
#339
Originally Posted by CossieRich
Phil, you aint a wanker mate, you just have a habit of winding people up
noun Chiefly British and Australian Slang: Vulgar.
1. a contemptible person; jerk.
2. a male masturbator.
3. a person who winds others up for personal pleasure
[Origin: 194550]
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, Š Random House, Inc. 2006.
I'd say by definition Phil's a wanker....have a good one Phil
#340
I did read this LONG thread after a time away.. gee..
Only thing i think is weird is that if it was turbo BP causing this det. that holed/melted the piston, its weird that the other(bad picture) seems unharmed! Usually all pistons get abused when temperature rises and engine starts pinging, there are clear evidence on the holed piston of pinging(see the pinholes around outer piston crown) so i am starting to think individual cylinder problems, like wrong air distribution, broken injector, loose injectorcable, clogged injector etc.. As i wrote before, id like to know how the backpressure in the manifold was measured..
Only thing i think is weird is that if it was turbo BP causing this det. that holed/melted the piston, its weird that the other(bad picture) seems unharmed! Usually all pistons get abused when temperature rises and engine starts pinging, there are clear evidence on the holed piston of pinging(see the pinholes around outer piston crown) so i am starting to think individual cylinder problems, like wrong air distribution, broken injector, loose injectorcable, clogged injector etc.. As i wrote before, id like to know how the backpressure in the manifold was measured..
#342
Originally Posted by Bosch-Man
msport Mark would have been monitering it at all times so if it was an injector issue it would have shown up on the AFR meter surely?
#344
I believe the "pinging" that you are referring to is actually nothing more than the aftermath of the material that escaped from the hole you can see.... .
I do not believe that this is anything to do with det. Mark monitors this too well.
I do not believe that this is anything to do with det. Mark monitors this too well.
#345
Mike,
Dont be weak. Make sure you post on every technical thing you see fit and dont resort to PM'ing the individual. This has been a great thread, so dont throw toys out of pram
You got pm
Dont be weak. Make sure you post on every technical thing you see fit and dont resort to PM'ing the individual. This has been a great thread, so dont throw toys out of pram
You got pm
#346
Originally Posted by CossieRich
Mike,
Dont be weak. Make sure you post on every technical thing you see fit and dont resort to PM'ing the individual. This has been a great thread, so dont throw toys out of pram
You got pm
Dont be weak. Make sure you post on every technical thing you see fit and dont resort to PM'ing the individual. This has been a great thread, so dont throw toys out of pram
You got pm
#347
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
Originally Posted by CossieRich
Mike,
Dont be weak. Make sure you post on every technical thing you see fit and dont resort to PM'ing the individual. This has been a great thread, so dont throw toys out of pram
You got pm
Dont be weak. Make sure you post on every technical thing you see fit and dont resort to PM'ing the individual. This has been a great thread, so dont throw toys out of pram
You got pm
#348
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
I believe the "pinging" that you are referring to is actually nothing more than the aftermath of the material that escaped from the hole you can see.... .
I do not believe that this is anything to do with det. Mark monitors this too well.
I do not believe that this is anything to do with det. Mark monitors this too well.
Yes, very much possible, I really cant say because I have too little to go on. But since we are guessing.. But i still think its odd that the other piston looks that good(hard to see though)if it were a Bp issue.
Individual EGTs would have said a lot..
Its broken anyhow, end of story.
#351
Originally Posted by madevelopments
So you have tested a 044 on stock lines No I thought not a 044 will out flow 4 1000cc injectors by over 10% so you you have 10% safety in fuel supply,
Mark
Mark
#353
Originally Posted by madevelopments
Martin
My test showed 4.5l@6bar did you check your fuel filter .
Mark
My test showed 4.5l@6bar did you check your fuel filter .
Mark
#355
Originally Posted by rapidcossie
what is the set up on yours martin?
#360
Originally Posted by MAD YUM
Originally Posted by martin-reyland
Originally Posted by MAD YUM
Nice set up there martin
Oooopsss didnt mean to do that