General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

FAO Mike R or cossie handling/suspension guru's...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-11-2006, 05:09 PM
  #1  
bud-weis
Football Cwazy
Thread Starter
 
bud-weis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Redditch, Worcestershire
Posts: 9,553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default FAO Mike R or cossie handling/suspension guru's...

......

On the new cossie i have a bit of a problem which i'd like to solve......

basically when driving on any uneven road (which is about 90% of UK roads!) the car tramlines really badly and pulls you into the grooves/bumps in the road....it's very noticeable on the motorway in the left lane where lorries have left a groove.

Now i've tried different tyres and it's not that,my next port of call will be checking the wheel alignment/geometry i think,and possibly replace the lower arms,maybe with adjustable jobbies from Zoo,

what i want to know is what is the usual cause of this? i'd like to fix it asap,because frankly it's verging on dangerous if going at any speed....and i'm not sure if the quaiffe diff exaggerates it a bit too

LOVE cossies
Old 12-11-2006, 05:16 PM
  #2  
Rhys
15K+ Super Poster!!
 
Rhys's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: South Wales, GB
Posts: 18,745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default



I hate it when they tramline, i always thought its was down to low profile tyres but its not that as the BM doesnt do it.

Be interesting to see why, as my saff used to tramline but i wouldnt say its was Dangerous bad.


Hows it feel mate to be back in a cossie?
Old 12-11-2006, 05:44 PM
  #3  
simonc
Advanced PassionFord User
 
simonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: kent
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mine is exactly the same, seems worse since i fitted coilovers, trying to go point to point quickly on B roads can be hairy if the roads are poor /uneven but it now handles better than it ever did on trackdays but ruined for the road !

Whats the answer ? Apart from the obvious (change the car) My M3 was worlds apart in the B road handling & was sure footed whatever the road surface.

Simon.
Old 12-11-2006, 05:59 PM
  #4  
Andreas
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Andreas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If I remember it correctly a toe-in setup at the front will make it wander around more.
Old 12-11-2006, 06:10 PM
  #5  
bud-weis
Football Cwazy
Thread Starter
 
bud-weis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Redditch, Worcestershire
Posts: 9,553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rhys




Hows it feel mate to be back in a cossie?
It feels great,every time i start it up i know i'm in something much more special than the TT

thanks for the replies people.....i have a feeling it may be towing in too,it turns in very well and handles very very well too,but it's just tramlining like a bitch!!
Old 12-11-2006, 06:35 PM
  #6  
Andreas
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Andreas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bud-weis
Originally Posted by Rhys




Hows it feel mate to be back in a cossie?
It feels great,every time i start it up i know i'm in something much more special than the TT

thanks for the replies people.....i have a feeling it may be towing in too,it turns in very well and handles very very well too,but it's just tramlining like a bitch!!
Yes, toe-out will make it turn in better but it will also become a bit more nervous in a straight line.
Old 12-11-2006, 07:30 PM
  #7  
Mike1
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Mike1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Shrops
Posts: 3,322
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Is it Jim's old car? Didn't he have 3-dr hubs on it and adj TCAs already?

One of the downsides of the 3-dr hubs is that they will make the car feel more nervous isn't it? The upside is that this nervousness translates into quicker turn-in and desire to change direction quickly?

Also, what tyres are you running - some directional tyres exacerbate tramlining.
Not saying it's not worth checking your geo as a first port of call but additional points to bear in mind
Old 12-11-2006, 07:42 PM
  #8  
Rhys
15K+ Super Poster!!
 
Rhys's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: South Wales, GB
Posts: 18,745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nice one Martin, Cossies are cool!

Iw ill have another one day
Old 12-11-2006, 11:06 PM
  #9  
Jim Green
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Jim Green's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Hull
Posts: 2,819
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Hi Martin.....

This became exagerated when I had the 3 door hubs and arms fitted, but as I intended to do track days, I was looking towards the better turn in and it being very sensative to the steering.

I do still have the original hubs and bottom arms and if you want them, then just let me know. I was just about to put them on E-Bay, but I'll wait till you've spoken to Mike & Zoo. The wheels are ET40, which is the correct off-set, so it's not due to the wheels.

Give Mike a call though, and see what he says....he & zoo, are the experts on this, but if you want the original arms, they're here and yours if you want them.

Regards Jim
Old 12-11-2006, 11:52 PM
  #10  
CabbyRS
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
CabbyRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Redditch
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hey i was allowed a drive on Saturday nite!! (even on me own!!!), superb motor , bet ur gonna miss it Jim ?
Old 13-11-2006, 12:42 AM
  #11  
bud-weis
Football Cwazy
Thread Starter
 
bud-weis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Redditch, Worcestershire
Posts: 9,553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jim Green
Hi Martin.....

This became exagerated when I had the 3 door hubs and arms fitted, but as I intended to do track days, I was looking towards the better turn in and it being very sensative to the steering.

I do still have the original hubs and bottom arms and if you want them, then just let me know. I was just about to put them on E-Bay, but I'll wait till you've spoken to Mike & Zoo. The wheels are ET40, which is the correct off-set, so it's not due to the wheels.

Give Mike a call though, and see what he says....he & zoo, are the experts on this, but if you want the original arms, they're here and yours if you want them.

Regards Jim
Thanks for the offer Jim i'll let you know asap

The turn in is definitely sharper with the set up how it is,but IMO the trade off for a smooth ride isn't worth it,so i'll try to get both at the same time rather than one or the other

i guess on a track it would be fine
Old 13-11-2006, 07:09 AM
  #12  
Mike1
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Mike1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Shrops
Posts: 3,322
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Yes, I thought Jim had gone for the 3-door hubs to give quicker/sharper turn-in


This is supposedly the changes from 3-door to Sapphire 2wd made by Ford.
Obviously the 4-dr shell was stiffer which has to be taken into account.
Spring rates went up from 106 to 118lb/in at the front and 263 to 286 lb/in at the back.
Damper rates were made softer in bump and stiffer in rebound.
ARB was increased to 16mm on back
Castor increased by over one degree
Camber made fractionally more negative
Kingpin inclination made slightly greater.
Front knuckles re-designed to lower the front roll centre from 144mm to 70mm

Work was also done to rid the tendency of the 3-door to "pitch" front to rear.

Much of the work above was done to create a less "nervous" car and for it to have better straight line stability

Hope that's interesting



Also I remember when they first brought the 3-door out it was supposed to be even sharper on the press release - some press journalists complained about the razor sharp turn in and nervous handling - Ford took the criticism on board and changed from rigid plastic joints in the front suspension to rubber and re-valved the power steering to make it slightly less responsive before it was put on general release apparently
Old 13-11-2006, 07:20 AM
  #13  
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
 
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norwich
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I would guess that the geometry has been set to Ford recommendations, which means that it is statically parrallel. Unfortunately on a shonky Ford, this is completely pointless, because as soon as the car is rolling, the bush deflection means that the car immediately toes out, giving the nervous state described. This is why I always recommend some static toe-IN, that way, with bush deflection the car runs almost parrallel in forward motion. It greatly improves stability. However, only a geometry check will reveal all. Obviously the problem is trying to convince any non-performance orientated laser alignment place NOT to use the factory settings .
Old 13-11-2006, 07:31 AM
  #14  
CossieRich
Did Someone Mention TUV
iTrader: (1)
 
CossieRich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Surrey
Posts: 17,169
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
I would guess that the geometry has been set to Ford recommendations, which means that it is statically parrallel. Unfortunately on a shonky Ford, this is completely pointless, because as soon as the car is rolling, the bush deflection means that the car immediately toes out, giving the nervous state described. This is why I always recommend some static toe-IN, that way, with bush deflection the car runs almost parrallel in forward motion. It greatly improves stability. However, only a geometry check will reveal all. Obviously the problem is trying to convince any non-performance orientated laser alignment place NOT to use the factory settings .
Interesting stuff this Mike. How much toe-in do you suggest?
Old 13-11-2006, 07:40 AM
  #15  
Mike1
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Mike1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Shrops
Posts: 3,322
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rhys


I hate it when they tramline, i always thought its was down to low profile tyres but its not that as the BM doesnt do it.
It's not necessarily low profile tyres but some directional tyres can make it worse
Old 13-11-2006, 08:10 AM
  #16  
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
 
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norwich
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

1-2mm on the front and 2-3mm on the rear.
Old 13-11-2006, 09:14 AM
  #17  
Mike1
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Mike1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Shrops
Posts: 3,322
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
1-2mm on the front and 2-3mm on the rear.
How much front camber did you run in conjunction with that out of interest Mike?
Old 13-11-2006, 09:17 AM
  #18  
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
 
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norwich
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Depends on what sort of use the car gets, 1.5-2.0° negative for a road car.

My Escort is set up as per Grp A cars, so runs 3° front* and 2° 45' rear.

*Please note this amount of camber on a 4x4 car requires longer front drive shafts .
Old 13-11-2006, 02:20 PM
  #19  
bud-weis
Football Cwazy
Thread Starter
 
bud-weis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Redditch, Worcestershire
Posts: 9,553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the reply Mike

i have it booked in for an alignment check,hopefully we can sort it

the guy who works there,Andy Fisher used to work on the RS500 touring cars for brooklyn and he knows his shit about everything cosworth so hopefully he'll have a good idea how to set it up
Old 13-11-2006, 03:52 PM
  #20  
Jim Green
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Jim Green's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Hull
Posts: 2,819
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Martin : I'm sure I gave you the Laser Alignment sheet that I got when I had all the geometry check done....... They stated that it was perfect ....... However, remember they would be checking it agains fords specifications....so it will be correct, but wrong for what you want and what mike suggests.....If you know what I mean.

Jim
Old 13-11-2006, 03:55 PM
  #21  
bud-weis
Football Cwazy
Thread Starter
 
bud-weis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Redditch, Worcestershire
Posts: 9,553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yep that makes perfect sense

just spoke to Karl too and he gave me a few things to check out

oh and i forgot to grab the tool to remove the centre caps from you
Old 13-11-2006, 05:15 PM
  #22  
Vic
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Vic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

mike, my 3 door is going for a wheel alignment tomorrow and would like to know what sort of specs i should ask for?

my car at the moment has 17 inch wheels, polybushed and lowered 1 inch. I'm getting a fair bit of tramlining as well!
Old 14-11-2006, 01:31 AM
  #23  
wildheart
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (4)
 
wildheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 6,108
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
1-2mm on the front and 2-3mm on the rear.
Can you change the toe on the rear beam? (3dr)
Old 14-11-2006, 06:50 AM
  #24  
Mike1
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Mike1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Shrops
Posts: 3,322
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wildheart
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
1-2mm on the front and 2-3mm on the rear.
Can you change the toe on the rear beam? (3dr)
I think Mike sells a shim kit to do this if you have a std beam.
Old 14-11-2006, 09:01 AM
  #25  
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
 
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norwich
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vic
mike, my 3 door is going for a wheel alignment tomorrow and would like to know what sort of specs i should ask for?

my car at the moment has 17 inch wheels, polybushed and lowered 1 inch. I'm getting a fair bit of tramlining as well!
Don't run the car with static parrallel then .
Old 14-11-2006, 10:04 AM
  #26  
foreigneRS
Testing the future
 
foreigneRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: W. Sussex
Posts: 17,597
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wildheart
Can you change the toe on the rear beam? (3dr)
you can make the hole in the beam larger and put big and thick washers on the bolt either side and then when you have the geometery that you want just tighten the bolt to fix the position. you might also like to weld the washers in place, but it isn't totally necessary and makes adjustment next time difficult without getting the grinder out.
Old 14-11-2006, 10:06 AM
  #27  
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
 
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norwich
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by foreigneRS
Originally Posted by wildheart
Can you change the toe on the rear beam? (3dr)
you can make the hole in the beam larger and put big and thick washers on the bolt either side and then when you have the geometery that you want just tighten the bolt to fix the position. you might also like to weld the washers in place, but it isn't totally necessary and makes adjustment next time difficult without getting the grinder out.
This is exactly how they adjusted the geometry on the Grp N cars .
Old 14-11-2006, 10:46 AM
  #28  
foreigneRS
Testing the future
 
foreigneRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: W. Sussex
Posts: 17,597
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

not rocket science is it?

you can also do the same on the front x-member to move the inner TCA pivot point for adjusting the camber

don't know why more people don't do it - suppose it's not as 'bling' as adjustable tca's etc
Old 14-11-2006, 10:50 AM
  #29  
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
 
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norwich
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by foreigneRS
not rocket science is it?

you can also do the same on the front x-member to move the inner TCA pivot point for adjusting the camber

don't know why more people don't do it - suppose it's not as 'bling' as adjustable tca's etc
You can't always get the full range of adjustment you require, that's all .
Old 14-11-2006, 11:16 AM
  #30  
Tony Ryan
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Tony Ryan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Between Mike & Nick You are describing a "package " of adjustments or parts that are required to assist , its the same on the adjustable beam thread above this one , for most of you who have road cars and do the occasional trackday all these expensive Motorsport parts aren't needed , and even if you did use them you'd skimp on the dampers and still wonder why it understeers or tramlines or whatvever . The 2 single best mods i ever made on my GpN Sapphire are already described in this thread .
Old 14-11-2006, 11:28 AM
  #31  
foreigneRS
Testing the future
 
foreigneRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: W. Sussex
Posts: 17,597
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

there's loads of things that people do to their cars tony that "aren't needed" - that doesn't stop people wanting to do them for whatever reason
Old 14-11-2006, 11:28 AM
  #32  
Mike1
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Mike1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Shrops
Posts: 3,322
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tony Ryan
The 2 single best mods i ever made on my GpN Sapphire are already described in this thread .
Slammed it in the weeds and stuck 19s on?

Seriously though Tony, just looked through this and the adj beam thread - what, in summary, were the 2 best mods you did on your Group N?
Old 14-11-2006, 01:29 PM
  #33  
Mike1
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Mike1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Shrops
Posts: 3,322
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tony Ryan
Between Mike & Nick You are describing a "package " of adjustments or parts that are required to assist , its the same on the adjustable beam thread above this one , for most of you who have road cars and do the occasional trackday all these expensive Motorsport parts aren't needed , and even if you did use them you'd skimp on the dampers and still wonder why it understeers or tramlines or whatvever . The 2 single best mods i ever made on my GpN Sapphire are already described in this thread .
Was it the shims on the back and front then Tony? What settings did you go for or are there limits on Group N?
Old 14-11-2006, 05:50 PM
  #34  
Tony Ryan
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Tony Ryan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike1
Originally Posted by Tony Ryan
Between Mike & Nick You are describing a "package " of adjustments or parts that are required to assist , its the same on the adjustable beam thread above this one , for most of you who have road cars and do the occasional trackday all these expensive Motorsport parts aren't needed , and even if you did use them you'd skimp on the dampers and still wonder why it understeers or tramlines or whatvever . The 2 single best mods i ever made on my GpN Sapphire are already described in this thread .
Was it the shims on the back and front then Tony? What settings did you go for or are there limits on Group N?
Got it in one , i shimmed the back by machining Exactly the right angled plates , and sorted the front geometry - although i go back to what i said , if you dont spend the right money on dampers & tyres all this is worthless.
Old 14-11-2006, 05:53 PM
  #35  
Mike1
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Mike1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Shrops
Posts: 3,322
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tony Ryan
Originally Posted by Mike1
Originally Posted by Tony Ryan
Between Mike & Nick You are describing a "package " of adjustments or parts that are required to assist , its the same on the adjustable beam thread above this one , for most of you who have road cars and do the occasional trackday all these expensive Motorsport parts aren't needed , and even if you did use them you'd skimp on the dampers and still wonder why it understeers or tramlines or whatvever . The 2 single best mods i ever made on my GpN Sapphire are already described in this thread .
Was it the shims on the back and front then Tony? What settings did you go for or are there limits on Group N?
Got it in one , i shimmed the back by machining Exactly the right angled plates , and sorted the front geometry - although i go back to what i said , if you dont spend the right money on dampers & tyres all this is worthless.
What dampers and tyres did you use on yours Tony?
Old 14-11-2006, 07:42 PM
  #36  
Tony Ryan
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Tony Ryan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike1
Originally Posted by Tony Ryan
Originally Posted by Mike1
Originally Posted by Tony Ryan
Between Mike & Nick You are describing a "package " of adjustments or parts that are required to assist , its the same on the adjustable beam thread above this one , for most of you who have road cars and do the occasional trackday all these expensive Motorsport parts aren't needed , and even if you did use them you'd skimp on the dampers and still wonder why it understeers or tramlines or whatvever . The 2 single best mods i ever made on my GpN Sapphire are already described in this thread .
Was it the shims on the back and front then Tony? What settings did you go for or are there limits on Group N?
Got it in one , i shimmed the back by machining Exactly the right angled plates , and sorted the front geometry - although i go back to what i said , if you dont spend the right money on dampers & tyres all this is worthless.
What dampers and tyres did you use on yours Tony?

Koni & BF Goodrich but later change to Dunlop slicks
Old 14-11-2006, 08:17 PM
  #37  
Fiecos Dan
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Fiecos Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: S/E Kent, Thanet
Posts: 4,775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

As mentioned above.


i used Mike R's shim kit to set both the toe and camber on the rear of mine.


But dont wide tyres on the front also cause Tramlineing?
Old 14-11-2006, 08:23 PM
  #38  
Mike1
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Mike1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Shrops
Posts: 3,322
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tony Ryan
Koni & BF Goodrich but later change to Dunlop slicks
Were they a track-day orientated BF Goodrich? What size were they? As it was GpN was it standard springs?
Old 14-11-2006, 09:09 PM
  #39  
bud-weis
Football Cwazy
Thread Starter
 
bud-weis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Redditch, Worcestershire
Posts: 9,553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fiesta cossie
As mentioned above.


i used Mike R's shim kit to set both the toe and camber on the rear of mine.


But dont wide tyres on the front also cause Tramlineing?
can this be done to a 2wd rear beam though? i was under the impression that the camber can't be adjusted properly without a proper adjustable beam like the Zoo one?

even slotting the mounting holes won't do it properly will it? (thinking in my head about the shape of the beam and the mounting points of the trailing arms )
Old 15-11-2006, 07:46 AM
  #40  
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
 
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norwich
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Martin,
You are correct. You NEED a 6° rear beam, otherwise the camber will be randomly adjustable (bump steer) with suspension travel.

The shims just doe the toe, and are just a cheap small improvement. The beam is the cure, the shims are a "plaster" .


Quick Reply: FAO Mike R or cossie handling/suspension guru's...



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:23 PM.