Cossie Helen

iTrader: (1)

CossieRich

iTrader: (1)

Eagle

Why is it always you who gets arsey about Bruce's car being stolen. Do you feel somewhat responsible because you made the decision to stop for food? Lots of very serious accusations are thrown around on this board such as stalking but they all seem to be laughed off and told to fuck off. So why does a stolen car always result in you getting annoyed? Not a piss take, just wondering

Eagle

iTrader: (2)

i was there .. it pisses me off because i saw how gutted he was at that second he realised it was gone having spent ages getting it running how he wanted it too etc.. how would you feel if it was you ???? the bloke looked totally gutted....
i get defensive over it because he is a friend of mine ..
im sure IF you were ever in the same situation you might have an idea of why i do ... no i dont feel responsible ...

ok your probaly right i do overreact .. so i will just shut up then from now on ...

CossieRich

iTrader: (1)

That wasnt difficult to remain calm was it Pete I have been in the same situation so i know how you feel. Ok it wasnt as expensive as Bruce's 500 but I know how you feel, and it isnt a good feeling

Jay,

iTrader: (4)

Pete why bother mate just getting stressed over rumors . if the subject is brought up in ten years it'll still be unproven hearsay. and the fact if it was a setup job I don't think the person whose spose to of took it is spoutin off he nicked it would be that stupid probably wouldn't be able to drive the fuckin thing

Anonymous

Pete
Me thinks you doth protest too much !!

We live in a society where the guilty may not have enough evidence to convict them in Law.

You believe this was a random thief , where someone stumbled on it in a pub car-park, managed to disarm two alarms & a Tracker ( That was quoted at the time) & then make the car disappear from the face of the earth. That may well be how it was, but no proof in Law.

Others may think the thief knew exactly where to go, how to disarm & then dispense of the car. That may well be how it was, but no proof in Law.

Im sure this Socialist Government are working on it ,but at the mo we can all have opinions on things. 50% think Diana died in a tragic accident 50% that it was some sort of set-up. Again no proof in Law.

Im impressed at you defending your mate, but ive never seen anyone accuse Bruce of anything on this or any other Forum.

But please not tell me I cant have an opinion on this Forum, because it dosen’t agree with yours.
Rod

Eagle

iTrader: (2)

never said that rod and you should know it, thats one of the best thing about passionford.. but after our hour phone call one month i thought you understod as to why i act as i do .. but obviously thought incorrectly ..

as for my defence stance about providing proof i for one as a moderator find it increasingly annoying when people are all too happy to accuse others without any proof .. and will stop it happening to ANY user on here ..

Matt

sounds about right

great thread

big up yourself