cam cover
14-07-2006, 01:00 PM
#81
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
Originally Posted by BROM@ZOO
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
Originally Posted by gingeRS
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
Bailey do their own fitting kit (£41), but I wouldn't use this set-up on anything other than a road car, as it breaths from flame trap and cam cover and then drains to the point that is heat-wrapped on my car. This is flawed for the reasons I have described above.
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
The Bailey breather in my picture has four outlets (two breathers (ports), one return and one drain).
so you breath from the flame trap and under the exhaust, and return to sump, what does the other port do? can see it in the pics
is it the atmospheric port?
.
Originally Posted by DaveEscos
still HIGHLY gypo Mike!!
but to be fair, if you can't afford proper aeroquip fittings then what can you do.
God forbid though for your dizzyless conv.. you must surely have a proper blank in place... not just the std dizzy...
now THAT would be REALLY gypstonian!
but to be fair, if you can't afford proper aeroquip fittings then what can you do.
God forbid though for your dizzyless conv.. you must surely have a proper blank in place... not just the std dizzy...
now THAT would be REALLY gypstonian!
.cap in ya ass mike to you
i have done 4 teardrops cam triggers
into a ecc4 cam cover
. Because this is what he told me when I asked about the one you did for him . Anyway, Harvey is half way through one for mine (he didn't like doing it either) .
14-07-2006, 01:36 PM
#82
PassionFord Post Whore!!
have put the drilling off, for the minute.
after reading dave henshalls comments very carefully, i have decided that if i can remove the flame trap with the minimum of fuss, then i will
then i will breathe from either side and return oil to sump via the old return when the flame trap is removed.
how much effort to remove the inlet manifold? if needed.
might as well do this properly.
after reading dave henshalls comments very carefully, i have decided that if i can remove the flame trap with the minimum of fuss, then i will
then i will breathe from either side and return oil to sump via the old return when the flame trap is removed.
how much effort to remove the inlet manifold? if needed.
might as well do this properly.
14-07-2006, 01:39 PM
#83
Originally Posted by gingeRS
have put the drilling off, for the minute.
after reading dave henshalls comments very carefully, i have decided that if i can remove the flame trap with the minimum of fuss, then i will
then i will breathe from either side and return oil to sump via the old return when the flame trap is removed.
how much effort to remove the inlet manifold? if needed.
might as well do this properly.
after reading dave henshalls comments very carefully, i have decided that if i can remove the flame trap with the minimum of fuss, then i will
then i will breathe from either side and return oil to sump via the old return when the flame trap is removed.
how much effort to remove the inlet manifold? if needed.
might as well do this properly.
. It's a bitch by the way .
14-07-2006, 02:23 PM
#86
Monte Geek
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Cheshunt, Herts
Posts: 8,812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Franco
Originally Posted by gingeRS
how much effort to remove the inlet manifold? if needed.
If your names Jeremy Beadle!!
Thats a good one for you
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post