General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

FAO Stu - Closed loop setup

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31-05-2006, 09:40 AM
  #1  
frog
0-60 in 17 seconds (eek)
Thread Starter
 
frog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 6,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default FAO Stu - Closed loop setup

Stu, had a thought over the week end.

As I understand it, your closed loop setup monitors fuelling off boost.

Would it be possible to monitor the output of the lambda sensor on boost and provide some kind of warning light output if the fuelling drops dangerously lean ?
I appreciate it might be pushing the limits of the ECU's capabilities, but would be a very useful form of basic lambda control without the expense of the full AFR meter, etc...

Old 31-05-2006, 09:46 AM
  #2  
Anonymous
Banned
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

the lambda sensor doesnt read anything that is useful on boost.

at 13:1 you would be lean enough to risk a meltdown and the lamda sensor would be saying "very rich"



Just buy a wideband that has an alarm (like the one stu uses himself in fact i believe!)
Old 31-05-2006, 09:50 AM
  #3  
frog
0-60 in 17 seconds (eek)
Thread Starter
 
frog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 6,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chip-3door
the lambda sensor doesnt read anything that is useful on boost.
at 13:1 you would be lean enough to risk a meltdown and the lamda sensor would be saying "very rich"
Just buy a wideband that has an alarm (like the one Stu uses himself in fact i believe!)
Does the conversion work with a narrowband sensor then I thought it required a wideband, hence my idea
Old 31-05-2006, 09:55 AM
  #4  
rsnissan
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (9)
 
rsnissan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Essex/Middlesex
Posts: 7,836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

no off boot fueling is controlled by a narrow band sensors. Thats why those silly autometer gauges that people hook up to the standard lambda sensors are usless in the real world
Old 31-05-2006, 10:02 AM
  #5  
Anonymous
Banned
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by frog
Originally Posted by chip-3door
the lambda sensor doesnt read anything that is useful on boost.
at 13:1 you would be lean enough to risk a meltdown and the lamda sensor would be saying "very rich"
Just buy a wideband that has an alarm (like the one Stu uses himself in fact i believe!)
Does the conversion work with a narrowband sensor then I thought it required a wideband, hence my idea
If it had a wideband, you could just fit a guage for pennies anyway, the gauge is the cheap bit of a wideband setup, its the sensor and the controller that cost the money
Old 31-05-2006, 11:06 AM
  #6  
frog
0-60 in 17 seconds (eek)
Thread Starter
 
frog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 6,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rsnissan
no off boot fueling is controlled by a narrow band sensors.
That confuses me

Originally Posted by rsnissan
Thats why those silly autometer gauges that people hook up to the standard lambda sensors are usless in the real world
I know , we've got one, and it's more use as a christmas decoration than anything else (came with the car btw).

chip
Surely, if you have stu's conversion fitted, you'd need another wideband sensor to hook up to the controller, or, can one sensor be used for both purposes ?
Old 31-05-2006, 11:11 AM
  #7  
rsnissan
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (9)
 
rsnissan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Essex/Middlesex
Posts: 7,836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by frog
Originally Posted by rsnissan
no off boot fueling is controlled by a narrow band sensors.
That confuses me
Sorry that was a reply to your original question and there should have been a comma after the No lol

As in "no" it would not be possible due to using a narrow band sensor.


And yes your correct the two sensors would be suited to the two seperate jobs. (hence some cars having two probes in the downpipe or one with a standard lamdba in the exhaust housing and then an EGT in the downpipe +a wideband)
Old 31-05-2006, 11:20 AM
  #8  
Anonymous
Banned
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by frog
Originally Posted by rsnissan
no off boot fueling is controlled by a narrow band sensors.
That confuses me

Originally Posted by rsnissan
Thats why those silly autometer gauges that people hook up to the standard lambda sensors are usless in the real world
I know , we've got one, and it's more use as a christmas decoration than anything else (came with the car btw).

chip
Surely, if you have Stu's conversion fitted, you'd need another wideband sensor to hook up to the controller, or, can one sensor be used for both purposes ?
I was working on your totally incorrect assumption that stu's conversion used a wideband, it doesnt.

What i was getting at, was if the ECU could see that, then so could a gauge, but obviously it CANT see that, which is what makes your post so pointless
Old 31-05-2006, 11:34 AM
  #9  
gingeRS
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
gingeRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: london baby!
Posts: 7,443
Received 26 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by frog
I know , we've got one, and it's more use as a christmas decoration than anything else (came with the car btw).
that was neils favourite purchase

keep trying to tell him that it didn't serve a purpose, but he was having none of it

i'm considering stu's closed loop conversion? have you got it, noticed any difference?

Old 31-05-2006, 11:42 AM
  #10  
frog
0-60 in 17 seconds (eek)
Thread Starter
 
frog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 6,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chip-3door
I was working on your totally incorrect assumption that Stu's conversion used a wideband, it doesnt.
What i was getting at, was if the ECU could see that, then so could a gauge, but obviously it CANT see that, which is what makes your post so pointless
My confusion deepens....

Just to clarify then
-The conversion uses a narrowband sensor.
-Which is unsuitable for on-boost measurements.
So, no, the conversion cannot be extended to warn of lean conditions on boost.

chip When you say "the ECU can't see that", do you mean the ECU couldn't read off a wide-band sensor at all without complex circuitry (e.g. controller) ?

gingeRS
I don't have the conversion no, but was wondering if it could serve a dual benefit
Everyone who's had it fitted swears by it though
Old 31-05-2006, 11:45 AM
  #11  
Anonymous
Banned
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by frog
Just to clarify then
-The conversion uses a narrowband sensor.
-Which is unsuitable for on-boost measurements.
So, no, the conversion cannot be extended to warn of lean conditions on boost.
CORRECT

Originally Posted by frog
chip When you say "the ECU can't see that", do you mean the ECU couldn't read off a wide-band sensor at all without complex circuitry (e.g. controller) ?
CORRECT

Originally Posted by frog
Everyone who's had it fitted swears by it though
CORRECT
Old 31-05-2006, 11:51 AM
  #12  
silky16v
Get on That!
iTrader: (1)
 
silky16v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lake District
Posts: 2,701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

both the saph & escort had stu's closed chip fitted both have seen instant off boost MPG increase
Old 31-05-2006, 11:54 AM
  #13  
gingeRS
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
gingeRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: london baby!
Posts: 7,443
Received 26 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

so even though my car HAS the standard ford lambda?

the stage 3 conversion, doesnt use this? so i get overfuelling off boost, and when cruising?

my car just did 205 miles on 49 quids worth of super, and that includes a trip to santa pod and back (motorway cruising)

may invest soon.
Old 31-05-2006, 12:02 PM
  #14  
Andreas
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Andreas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Aint some wideband setups able to provide a low band signal so that you only have to run the wideband sensor and the relay the lowband signal on to the ECU?
Old 31-05-2006, 12:07 PM
  #15  
foreigneRS
Testing the future
 
foreigneRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: W. Sussex
Posts: 17,597
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

frog the conversion can use a wideband sensor as long as the controller gives a simulated narrowband output (0 - 1V) which most of them do.

the ecu could also use a wideband sensor with wideband output (0 - 5V) if you added another small piece of hardware (called a hybrid unit) to the board and could use target wideband values if programmed cleverly.
Old 31-05-2006, 12:07 PM
  #16  
Anonymous
Banned
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Andreas
Aint some wideband setups able to provide a low band signal so that you only have to run the wideband sensor and the relay the lowband signal on to the ECU?
Yes, but as you are only talking about 20 quid for a narrowband sensor i personally would always use a seperate one.

As that way you can "sanity check" your wideband as it should be on 14.7 on cruise, if its not, you know that its going out of calibration as the narrow bands do what they do far longer and far more reliabley than a wideband does.

If you link it how you said, and then the wideband is out of calibration, it will drag your engine out of stoich inline with it and will still read normally.
Old 31-05-2006, 12:09 PM
  #17  
Anonymous
Banned
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by foreigneRS
frog the conversion can use a wideband sensor as long as the controller gives a simulated narrowband output (0 - 1V) which most of them do.
Thus though, its NOT what frog was asking originally you still have an expensive wideband and the ECU is still effectively narrowband


Originally Posted by foreigneRS
the ecu could also use a wideband sensor with wideband output (0 - 5V) if you added another small piece of hardware (called a hybrid unit) to the board and could use target wideband values if programmed cleverly.
I dont believe that many tuners would agree with using target wideband values on boost, i personally wouldnt want to trust it.
Old 31-05-2006, 12:53 PM
  #18  
frog
0-60 in 17 seconds (eek)
Thread Starter
 
frog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 6,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks guys
Old 31-05-2006, 01:11 PM
  #19  
foreigneRS
Testing the future
 
foreigneRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: W. Sussex
Posts: 17,597
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chip-3door
I dont believe that many tuners would agree with using target wideband values on boost, i personally wouldnt want to trust it.
who said anything about on boost?
Old 31-05-2006, 01:13 PM
  #20  
Anonymous
Banned
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by foreigneRS
Originally Posted by chip-3door
I dont believe that many tuners would agree with using target wideband values on boost, i personally wouldnt want to trust it.
who said anything about on boost?
Fair one, was meaning for the purposes of this thread.

Target of 15.2:1 on very steady cruise sounds good to me though mate!
Old 31-05-2006, 07:23 PM
  #21  
cossie4i+
TT T38 Power
iTrader: (15)
 
cossie4i+'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Somerset
Posts: 22,368
Received 32 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gingeRS

my car just did 205 miles on 49 quids worth of super, and that includes a trip to santa pod and back (motorway cruising)

may invest soon.
Bloody hell

You want to get that sorted, thats less than 20mpg on a run

I get about 27mpg on a run and thats without closed loop.

Steve.
Old 01-06-2006, 09:58 AM
  #22  
Stu @ M Developments
PassionFords Creator
PassionFord Gold Member (Male)
Official PassionFord Trader
Administrator
iTrader: (12)
 
Stu @ M Developments's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Blackpool, UK Destination: Rev limiter
Posts: 28,824
Received 95 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Hi Greg, i believe all your questions have now been answered, but feel free to ask for clarification if required pal.
Old 01-06-2006, 10:07 AM
  #23  
frog
0-60 in 17 seconds (eek)
Thread Starter
 
frog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 6,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks Stu, they have, just need to ask my bank manager a few questions now for some toys
Old 01-06-2006, 10:16 AM
  #24  
gingeRS
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
gingeRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: london baby!
Posts: 7,443
Received 26 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cossie4i
Originally Posted by gingeRS

my car just did 205 miles on 49 quids worth of super, and that includes a trip to santa pod and back (motorway cruising)

may invest soon.
Bloody hell

You want to get that sorted, thats less than 20mpg on a run

I get about 27mpg on a run and thats without closed loop.

Steve.
thats about 120 miles crusing, 3 runs at the pod and maybe 70 miles, round town, high consumption, short journeys

pretty crappy eh?

Old 01-06-2006, 05:04 PM
  #25  
cossie4i+
TT T38 Power
iTrader: (15)
 
cossie4i+'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Somerset
Posts: 22,368
Received 32 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gingeRS
Originally Posted by cossie4i
Originally Posted by gingeRS

my car just did 205 miles on 49 quids worth of super, and that includes a trip to santa pod and back (motorway cruising)

may invest soon.
Bloody hell

You want to get that sorted, thats less than 20mpg on a run

I get about 27mpg on a run and thats without closed loop.

Steve.
thats about 120 miles crusing, 3 runs at the pod and maybe 70 miles, round town, high consumption, short journeys

pretty crappy eh?

I still get 27mpg driving to the Pod and doing as many runs as i can, and a bit of a play going to and from

Steve.
Old 01-06-2006, 09:37 PM
  #26  
gingeRS
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
gingeRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: london baby!
Posts: 7,443
Received 26 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cossie4i

I still get 27mpg driving to the Pod and doing as many runs as i can, and a bit of a play going to and from

Steve.
is that with closed loop? if so, i gotta get me some of that

Old 02-06-2006, 03:27 AM
  #27  
cossie4i+
TT T38 Power
iTrader: (15)
 
cossie4i+'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Somerset
Posts: 22,368
Received 32 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gingeRS
Originally Posted by cossie4i

I still get 27mpg driving to the Pod and doing as many runs as i can, and a bit of a play going to and from

Steve.
is that with closed loop? if so, i gotta get me some of that

No

Steve
Old 02-06-2006, 07:41 AM
  #28  
gingeRS
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
gingeRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: london baby!
Posts: 7,443
Received 26 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cossie4i
Originally Posted by gingeRS
Originally Posted by cossie4i

I still get 27mpg driving to the Pod and doing as many runs as i can, and a bit of a play going to and from

Steve.
is that with closed loop? if so, i gotta get me some of that

No

Steve
better get who ever set yours up to do mine

i know mine runs really rich cos i have seen the vids of my runs from the pod, and theres a big puff of soot as i pull off each time

also mines 4x4 which also drains the fuel economy

Old 02-06-2006, 07:58 AM
  #29  
Anonymous
Banned
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

How rich it is on boost isnt always an indication of how rich it is off boost, there are LOTS of cossies out there running too rich at one point and too lean at another.

Running too rich is quite expensive, running too lean is potentially VERY expensive
Old 02-06-2006, 01:19 PM
  #30  
cossie4i+
TT T38 Power
iTrader: (15)
 
cossie4i+'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Somerset
Posts: 22,368
Received 32 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gingeRS
better get who ever set yours up to do mine

i know mine runs really rich cos i have seen the vids of my runs from the pod, and theres a big puff of soot as i pull off each time

also mines 4x4 which also drains the fuel economy

Mine is a A1 chip, then set up by EA.

Steve.
Old 02-06-2006, 01:55 PM
  #31  
Butch.
PassionFord Post Troll

iTrader: (1)
 
Butch.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kettering
Posts: 2,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ive just had a closed loop system and a mapping session over the last few days at stus and the car is now flying also on the way home i was cruising down the motorway at speeds between 70-90 mph and by the time i got home i had done 200 miles and only used just under half a tank of fuel

would recommend to have fitted well worth the money
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
timsrs
Ford Sierra/Sapphire/RS500 Cosworth
5
13-11-2018 11:48 AM
Fezman1
Ford Sierra/Sapphire/RS500 Cosworth
1
02-10-2015 01:22 PM
XR4
Ford XR Range
0
01-10-2015 12:46 PM
SMILER258
Restorations, Rebuilds & Projects.
36
28-09-2015 09:04 AM
Marv888
Restorations, Rebuilds & Projects.
1
26-09-2015 03:44 PM



Quick Reply: FAO Stu - Closed loop setup



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:02 PM.