FAO Stu - Closed loop setup
#1
0-60 in 17 seconds (eek)
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 6,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FAO Stu - Closed loop setup
Stu, had a thought over the week end.
As I understand it, your closed loop setup monitors fuelling off boost.
Would it be possible to monitor the output of the lambda sensor on boost and provide some kind of warning light output if the fuelling drops dangerously lean ?
I appreciate it might be pushing the limits of the ECU's capabilities, but would be a very useful form of basic lambda control without the expense of the full AFR meter, etc...
As I understand it, your closed loop setup monitors fuelling off boost.
Would it be possible to monitor the output of the lambda sensor on boost and provide some kind of warning light output if the fuelling drops dangerously lean ?
I appreciate it might be pushing the limits of the ECU's capabilities, but would be a very useful form of basic lambda control without the expense of the full AFR meter, etc...
#2
the lambda sensor doesnt read anything that is useful on boost.
at 13:1 you would be lean enough to risk a meltdown and the lamda sensor would be saying "very rich"
Just buy a wideband that has an alarm (like the one stu uses himself in fact i believe!)
at 13:1 you would be lean enough to risk a meltdown and the lamda sensor would be saying "very rich"
Just buy a wideband that has an alarm (like the one stu uses himself in fact i believe!)
#3
0-60 in 17 seconds (eek)
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 6,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by chip-3door
the lambda sensor doesnt read anything that is useful on boost.
at 13:1 you would be lean enough to risk a meltdown and the lamda sensor would be saying "very rich"
Just buy a wideband that has an alarm (like the one Stu uses himself in fact i believe!)
at 13:1 you would be lean enough to risk a meltdown and the lamda sensor would be saying "very rich"
Just buy a wideband that has an alarm (like the one Stu uses himself in fact i believe!)
#4
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Essex/Middlesex
Posts: 7,836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no off boot fueling is controlled by a narrow band sensors. Thats why those silly autometer gauges that people hook up to the standard lambda sensors are usless in the real world
#5
Originally Posted by frog
Originally Posted by chip-3door
the lambda sensor doesnt read anything that is useful on boost.
at 13:1 you would be lean enough to risk a meltdown and the lamda sensor would be saying "very rich"
Just buy a wideband that has an alarm (like the one Stu uses himself in fact i believe!)
at 13:1 you would be lean enough to risk a meltdown and the lamda sensor would be saying "very rich"
Just buy a wideband that has an alarm (like the one Stu uses himself in fact i believe!)
#6
0-60 in 17 seconds (eek)
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 6,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rsnissan
no off boot fueling is controlled by a narrow band sensors.
Originally Posted by rsnissan
Thats why those silly autometer gauges that people hook up to the standard lambda sensors are usless in the real world
chip
Surely, if you have stu's conversion fitted, you'd need another wideband sensor to hook up to the controller, or, can one sensor be used for both purposes ?
#7
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Essex/Middlesex
Posts: 7,836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by frog
Originally Posted by rsnissan
no off boot fueling is controlled by a narrow band sensors.
As in "no" it would not be possible due to using a narrow band sensor.
And yes your correct the two sensors would be suited to the two seperate jobs. (hence some cars having two probes in the downpipe or one with a standard lamdba in the exhaust housing and then an EGT in the downpipe +a wideband)
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by frog
Originally Posted by rsnissan
no off boot fueling is controlled by a narrow band sensors.
Originally Posted by rsnissan
Thats why those silly autometer gauges that people hook up to the standard lambda sensors are usless in the real world
chip
Surely, if you have Stu's conversion fitted, you'd need another wideband sensor to hook up to the controller, or, can one sensor be used for both purposes ?
What i was getting at, was if the ECU could see that, then so could a gauge, but obviously it CANT see that, which is what makes your post so pointless
#9
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Originally Posted by frog
I know , we've got one, and it's more use as a christmas decoration than anything else (came with the car btw).
keep trying to tell him that it didn't serve a purpose, but he was having none of it
i'm considering stu's closed loop conversion? have you got it, noticed any difference?
#10
0-60 in 17 seconds (eek)
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 6,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by chip-3door
I was working on your totally incorrect assumption that Stu's conversion used a wideband, it doesnt.
What i was getting at, was if the ECU could see that, then so could a gauge, but obviously it CANT see that, which is what makes your post so pointless
What i was getting at, was if the ECU could see that, then so could a gauge, but obviously it CANT see that, which is what makes your post so pointless
Just to clarify then
-The conversion uses a narrowband sensor.
-Which is unsuitable for on-boost measurements.
So, no, the conversion cannot be extended to warn of lean conditions on boost.
chip When you say "the ECU can't see that", do you mean the ECU couldn't read off a wide-band sensor at all without complex circuitry (e.g. controller) ?
gingeRS
I don't have the conversion no, but was wondering if it could serve a dual benefit
Everyone who's had it fitted swears by it though
#11
Originally Posted by frog
Just to clarify then
-The conversion uses a narrowband sensor.
-Which is unsuitable for on-boost measurements.
So, no, the conversion cannot be extended to warn of lean conditions on boost.
-The conversion uses a narrowband sensor.
-Which is unsuitable for on-boost measurements.
So, no, the conversion cannot be extended to warn of lean conditions on boost.
Originally Posted by frog
chip When you say "the ECU can't see that", do you mean the ECU couldn't read off a wide-band sensor at all without complex circuitry (e.g. controller) ?
Originally Posted by frog
Everyone who's had it fitted swears by it though
#13
PassionFord Post Whore!!
so even though my car HAS the standard ford lambda?
the stage 3 conversion, doesnt use this? so i get overfuelling off boost, and when cruising?
my car just did 205 miles on 49 quids worth of super, and that includes a trip to santa pod and back (motorway cruising)
may invest soon.
the stage 3 conversion, doesnt use this? so i get overfuelling off boost, and when cruising?
my car just did 205 miles on 49 quids worth of super, and that includes a trip to santa pod and back (motorway cruising)
may invest soon.
#15
Testing the future
frog the conversion can use a wideband sensor as long as the controller gives a simulated narrowband output (0 - 1V) which most of them do.
the ecu could also use a wideband sensor with wideband output (0 - 5V) if you added another small piece of hardware (called a hybrid unit) to the board and could use target wideband values if programmed cleverly.
the ecu could also use a wideband sensor with wideband output (0 - 5V) if you added another small piece of hardware (called a hybrid unit) to the board and could use target wideband values if programmed cleverly.
#16
Originally Posted by Andreas
Aint some wideband setups able to provide a low band signal so that you only have to run the wideband sensor and the relay the lowband signal on to the ECU?
As that way you can "sanity check" your wideband as it should be on 14.7 on cruise, if its not, you know that its going out of calibration as the narrow bands do what they do far longer and far more reliabley than a wideband does.
If you link it how you said, and then the wideband is out of calibration, it will drag your engine out of stoich inline with it and will still read normally.
#17
Originally Posted by foreigneRS
frog the conversion can use a wideband sensor as long as the controller gives a simulated narrowband output (0 - 1V) which most of them do.
Originally Posted by foreigneRS
the ecu could also use a wideband sensor with wideband output (0 - 5V) if you added another small piece of hardware (called a hybrid unit) to the board and could use target wideband values if programmed cleverly.
#19
Testing the future
Originally Posted by chip-3door
I dont believe that many tuners would agree with using target wideband values on boost, i personally wouldnt want to trust it.
#20
Originally Posted by foreigneRS
Originally Posted by chip-3door
I dont believe that many tuners would agree with using target wideband values on boost, i personally wouldnt want to trust it.
Target of 15.2:1 on very steady cruise sounds good to me though mate!
#21
TT T38 Power
iTrader: (15)
Originally Posted by gingeRS
my car just did 205 miles on 49 quids worth of super, and that includes a trip to santa pod and back (motorway cruising)
may invest soon.
You want to get that sorted, thats less than 20mpg on a run
I get about 27mpg on a run and thats without closed loop.
Steve.
#24
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Originally Posted by cossie4i
Originally Posted by gingeRS
my car just did 205 miles on 49 quids worth of super, and that includes a trip to santa pod and back (motorway cruising)
may invest soon.
You want to get that sorted, thats less than 20mpg on a run
I get about 27mpg on a run and thats without closed loop.
Steve.
pretty crappy eh?
#25
TT T38 Power
iTrader: (15)
Originally Posted by gingeRS
Originally Posted by cossie4i
Originally Posted by gingeRS
my car just did 205 miles on 49 quids worth of super, and that includes a trip to santa pod and back (motorway cruising)
may invest soon.
You want to get that sorted, thats less than 20mpg on a run
I get about 27mpg on a run and thats without closed loop.
Steve.
pretty crappy eh?
Steve.
#26
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Originally Posted by cossie4i
I still get 27mpg driving to the Pod and doing as many runs as i can, and a bit of a play going to and from
Steve.
#28
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Originally Posted by cossie4i
Originally Posted by gingeRS
Originally Posted by cossie4i
I still get 27mpg driving to the Pod and doing as many runs as i can, and a bit of a play going to and from
Steve.
Steve
i know mine runs really rich cos i have seen the vids of my runs from the pod, and theres a big puff of soot as i pull off each time
also mines 4x4 which also drains the fuel economy
#29
How rich it is on boost isnt always an indication of how rich it is off boost, there are LOTS of cossies out there running too rich at one point and too lean at another.
Running too rich is quite expensive, running too lean is potentially VERY expensive
Running too rich is quite expensive, running too lean is potentially VERY expensive
#30
TT T38 Power
iTrader: (15)
Originally Posted by gingeRS
better get who ever set yours up to do mine
i know mine runs really rich cos i have seen the vids of my runs from the pod, and theres a big puff of soot as i pull off each time
also mines 4x4 which also drains the fuel economy
i know mine runs really rich cos i have seen the vids of my runs from the pod, and theres a big puff of soot as i pull off each time
also mines 4x4 which also drains the fuel economy
Steve.
#31
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kettering
Posts: 2,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ive just had a closed loop system and a mapping session over the last few days at stus and the car is now flying also on the way home i was cruising down the motorway at speeds between 70-90 mph and by the time i got home i had done 200 miles and only used just under half a tank of fuel
would recommend to have fitted well worth the money
would recommend to have fitted well worth the money
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SMILER258
Restorations, Rebuilds & Projects.
36
28-09-2015 09:04 AM