cvh block
#81
well no why would I want to buy a 1.9?? when my zvh with arrows rods and arias pistons has run over 300bhp and 398 lbft scince 2006 >>>>I have no need to touch one im very happy with my zetec block that has lasted as a daily driver and is still spot on now . that's why I wouldn't touch another 1.9 or a 1.6 either I have no need to . and it seams to me no matte how much power you push from the 1.6 they never produce they same torque figures as the zvh any way
You have built a ZVH with forged rods and forged pistons! Good job.
However that doesn't mean the 1.6 and 1.9 blocks are crap does it?
Personally I would rather have a high winding 1.6 with a little less torque to save gearboxes. Unless one has the $$$ for a mtx or 6 sped gearbox change.
In Canada on the 1.9 cvh we have a 5 speed that will handle a bit more torque than the IB5.
Last edited by Canada1; 22-10-2013 at 03:02 PM.
#82
well no why would I want to buy a 1.9?? when my zvh with arrows rods and arias pistons has run over 300bhp and 398 lbft scince 2006 >>>>I have no need to touch one im very happy with my zetec block that has lasted as a daily driver and is still spot on now . that's why I wouldn't touch another 1.9 or a 1.6 either I have no need to . and it seams to me no matte how much power you push from the 1.6 they never produce they same torque figures as the zvh any way
#83
Woohoo a 2000+cc engine that makes more torque than a 1600! Who would have guessed that would be the case? LOL
You have built a ZVH with forged rods and forged pistons! Good job.
However that doesn't mean the 1.6 and 1.9 blocks are crap does it?
Personally I would rather have a high winding 1.6 with a little less torque to save gearboxes. Unless one has the $$$ for a mtx or 6 sped gearbox change.
In Canada on the 1.9 cvh we have a 5 speed that will handle a bit more torque than the IB5.
You have built a ZVH with forged rods and forged pistons! Good job.
However that doesn't mean the 1.6 and 1.9 blocks are crap does it?
Personally I would rather have a high winding 1.6 with a little less torque to save gearboxes. Unless one has the $$$ for a mtx or 6 sped gearbox change.
In Canada on the 1.9 cvh we have a 5 speed that will handle a bit more torque than the IB5.
I said I have no need to buy one !!!!!I wouldn't buy another engine when my one produces the goods and works would I ??? as for gearboxes my original lasted 11 years so not realy bothered and I like the standard ratios so not intrested in gearboxes tbh and id personaly prefer low down torque rather than high reving as more usable on roads imo
Last edited by zvh; 24-10-2013 at 02:12 PM.
#84
#85
well done gus that's very very very good for a 1600
im still running a standard rst inlet and throttle body there in the process of being changed as we talk so il let u know the new figure
and I get that torque at 4200rpm
do you use yours as a daily runner gus just out of intrest ?? as me an my missus have seen it at tommys most times when weve been up there
I don't think its hard to get big power from any engine I think the harder part is making it every day useable and driveable for every day use lots of power is easily doable but useability and reliability are harder to get imo but iff its built for track days and santa pod then who cares I spose!!and without being rude gus !!!! do you think the 1600 will last over 7 years with everyday use at that power ??? honest question ?
im still running a standard rst inlet and throttle body there in the process of being changed as we talk so il let u know the new figure
and I get that torque at 4200rpm
do you use yours as a daily runner gus just out of intrest ?? as me an my missus have seen it at tommys most times when weve been up there
I don't think its hard to get big power from any engine I think the harder part is making it every day useable and driveable for every day use lots of power is easily doable but useability and reliability are harder to get imo but iff its built for track days and santa pod then who cares I spose!!and without being rude gus !!!! do you think the 1600 will last over 7 years with everyday use at that power ??? honest question ?
Last edited by zvh; 24-10-2013 at 07:59 AM.
#88
I never said they were crap !!!! u lot love a bitchy session on here don't u lol
I said I have no need to buy one !!!!!I wouldn't buy another engine when my one produces the goods and works would I ??? as for gearboxes my original lasted 11 years so not realy bothered and I like the standard ratios so not intrested in gearboxes tbh and id personaly prefer low down torque rather than high reving as more usable on roads imo
I said I have no need to buy one !!!!!I wouldn't buy another engine when my one produces the goods and works would I ??? as for gearboxes my original lasted 11 years so not realy bothered and I like the standard ratios so not intrested in gearboxes tbh and id personaly prefer low down torque rather than high reving as more usable on roads imo
Actually I don't like bitch sessions.
The original post was about cvh block strength.
1.6 is quite a stout block (standard 80mm bore)
1.9 tall (standard 82mm bore) is probably a little weaker than a standard 1.6
The 2.0 zetec block could possibly be the strongest?
It is always easier to get larger torque and HP levels from larger displacement.
One needs less revs and less boost on a 2000cc vs. 1600cc to get 300 hp.
I think we agree on this.
Once again I applaud your build!! not bitching
Some here have made very high power with the old 1.6 block too!
I think they are all reasonably strong blocks within limits.
I offered my thoughts on the 1.9 tall block because they are plentiful here, and I have
sonic mapped the cylinder bores to see just how thick or thin they are. No intention to get into any pissing match. - or racing match (unless you want a go against my galaxie)
Cheers
#89
#90
#91
don't know luke tbh but its due a freshen up realy its covered allot of miles scince it was built but im very happy with how its lasted and still sounds spot on .
I have new set of rings and shells at home etc etc as I like preventive maintenance
and it will be intresting to see if this cts stage 2 plus box lasts as long as my standard one did !!!!!!!! its now had a few anti lag full throttle launches and ok so far
I have new set of rings and shells at home etc etc as I like preventive maintenance
and it will be intresting to see if this cts stage 2 plus box lasts as long as my standard one did !!!!!!!! its now had a few anti lag full throttle launches and ok so far
Last edited by zvh; 25-10-2013 at 02:36 PM.
#92
LOL,
Actually I don't like bitch sessions.
The original post was about cvh block strength.
1.6 is quite a stout block (standard 80mm bore)
1.9 tall (standard 82mm bore) is probably a little weaker than a standard 1.6
The 2.0 zetec block could possibly be the strongest?
It is always easier to get larger torque and HP levels from larger displacement.
One needs less revs and less boost on a 2000cc vs. 1600cc to get 300 hp.
I think we agree on this.
Once again I applaud your build!! not bitching
Some here have made very high power with the old 1.6 block too!
I think they are all reasonably strong blocks within limits.
I offered my thoughts on the 1.9 tall block because they are plentiful here, and I have
sonic mapped the cylinder bores to see just how thick or thin they are. No intention to get into any pissing match. - or racing match (unless you want a go against my galaxie)
Cheers
Actually I don't like bitch sessions.
The original post was about cvh block strength.
1.6 is quite a stout block (standard 80mm bore)
1.9 tall (standard 82mm bore) is probably a little weaker than a standard 1.6
The 2.0 zetec block could possibly be the strongest?
It is always easier to get larger torque and HP levels from larger displacement.
One needs less revs and less boost on a 2000cc vs. 1600cc to get 300 hp.
I think we agree on this.
Once again I applaud your build!! not bitching
Some here have made very high power with the old 1.6 block too!
I think they are all reasonably strong blocks within limits.
I offered my thoughts on the 1.9 tall block because they are plentiful here, and I have
sonic mapped the cylinder bores to see just how thick or thin they are. No intention to get into any pissing match. - or racing match (unless you want a go against my galaxie)
Cheers
and my 335bhp s2 now bores me hence why ive had a new inlet and bigger throttle body made up see how much more I can squeeze from it!! I never built it . it was built by coltec racing engines in Suffolk use to be called holbay racing engines
Last edited by zvh; 25-10-2013 at 02:30 PM.
#93
and ive got no room on the box to do a hydraulic conversion as my turbo sits directly over it .. my missus finds it hard work to drive now as little legs :O
#95
yup my new clutch we fitted with gearbox has made mine hard work in traffic !! which is annoying as the old alcon clutch was lovley .
and ive got no room on the box to do a hydraulic conversion as my turbo sits directly over it .. my missus finds it hard work to drive now as little legs :O
and ive got no room on the box to do a hydraulic conversion as my turbo sits directly over it .. my missus finds it hard work to drive now as little legs :O
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mk3ste
Restorations, Rebuilds & Projects.
19
17-10-2021 10:09 AM
nicodinho
Ford Non RS / XR / ST parts for sale.
6
07-10-2015 12:56 PM