fao morph
05-02-2010, 09:47 PM
#82
10K+ Poster!!
That said they were some ballistic times for the first run but it did end up being a pricey day out and if you run a powerful engine and the same happens it can be a very expensive day out.
Fair play to having a go though Morph, I don't know you or the car but I do know that RS's are bad enough in the dry let alone what it sounds like it was today !
05-02-2010, 11:19 PM
#87
need to know basis and you dont need to know.
and i dont think im clever !!!!! i am clever clever .
and after all the shit that you have posted in the past few months about your 300hp car i thought it was great that you managed a 92mph trap on your 1/4 .... really shows your power.
nice 16 sec' 1/4s and a great 17sec dash to 0-100 and a very good 0-60 aswell lol .
p-s will be good to see what d4rst manages when his 300hp gets on the black stuf.
and i dont think im clever !!!!! i am clever clever .
and after all the shit that you have posted in the past few months about your 300hp car i thought it was great that you managed a 92mph trap on your 1/4 .... really shows your power.
nice 16 sec' 1/4s and a great 17sec dash to 0-100 and a very good 0-60 aswell lol .
p-s will be good to see what d4rst manages when his 300hp gets on the black stuf.
Who actually gives a fuck? I don't. I'm quite sure the quoted 2.7 second 0-60 time in an atom weren't in the wet?!?! and if they were im sure you could add a few seconds. Obviously if the car performed WORSE than a standard rs turbo (and its clearly not regardless of maximum power) there were very obvious traction issues.
Congratulations for giving it ago mate! better luck next time
Rob,
06-02-2010, 07:44 AM
#88
PassionFord Post Whore!!
06-02-2010, 08:26 AM
#90
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Thread Starter
06-02-2010, 08:29 AM
#91
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Thread Starter
Mate don't take this the wrong way, i agree with a lot of the tech stuff you post etc and think your car is ace, but that post just makes you look a bit of a twat, which i shouldn't think you are........
Who actually gives a fuck? I don't. I'm quite sure the quoted 2.7 second 0-60 time in an atom weren't in the wet?!?! and if they were im sure you could add a few seconds. Obviously if the car performed WORSE than a standard rs turbo (and its clearly not regardless of maximum power) there were very obvious traction issues.
Congratulations for giving it ago mate! better luck next time
Rob,
Who actually gives a fuck? I don't. I'm quite sure the quoted 2.7 second 0-60 time in an atom weren't in the wet?!?! and if they were im sure you could add a few seconds. Obviously if the car performed WORSE than a standard rs turbo (and its clearly not regardless of maximum power) there were very obvious traction issues.
Congratulations for giving it ago mate! better luck next time
Rob,
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Chris S
General Car Related Discussion.
4
04-01-2007 07:11 PM
Disabled Account
General Car Related Discussion.
14
25-10-2005 06:55 AM
Disabled Account
General Car Related Discussion.
4
14-06-2005 06:17 PM
