Ford Escort RS Turbo This forum is for discussion of all things pertaining to the Ford Escort Rs Turbo Series 1 and 2.

Need Some Advice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14-07-2007, 10:08 PM
  #1  
BlueFiesta85
PassionFord Regular
Thread Starter
 
BlueFiesta85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Heathrow
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Need Some Advice

i currently have a erst s2 setup which is running 180+ at the wheels with a pace chargecooler setup.
as i now want more power, would i benefit any extra power by installing a intercooler system and a uprated turbo?

my setup is as follows:
standard bottom end with new mahle pistons and arp bolts
stage 3 head (ported, polished etc)
standard factory t3 turbo with a new -31 actuator
original ford head gasket
kent cvh 34 cam setup with KA pulley
k&n airfilter
everything else is standard i.e metering head, no fifth injector.

is it anyhow possible to achieve more power or torque with the current setup as i dont want to spend alot of money in doing so.

Old 15-07-2007, 01:47 PM
  #2  
105epwr
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
105epwr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: peterborough
Posts: 664
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

hi,found charge coolers abit restrictive so i then put a front mount cooler on (radtec)t3 with .48a/r housing 55trim comp wheel,standard head,cam and rods machined mahle pistons.peaks @26psi and holds22psi unlimited boost chip pressurised the fuel press reg..still on mfi rolling roaded at SCS with print out 206bhp at wheels and 274lbft!!! altough only done 2.5k like this but NO probs yet!!!the only big issue is the g/box it chews them!
Old 15-07-2007, 08:53 PM
  #3  
BlueFiesta85
PassionFord Regular
Thread Starter
 
BlueFiesta85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Heathrow
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so it would be worth investing into a larger intercooler, but im sure ill need to uprate the turbo aswell?
Old 15-07-2007, 09:19 PM
  #4  
s2 ben
Regular Contributor
 
s2 ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: derby/notts
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yes you would benefit from a front mount loads better than a chargecooler dont need a new turbo stick with the one you have till you have funds for a bigger one then do that aswell
Old 15-07-2007, 09:31 PM
  #5  
BlueFiesta85
PassionFord Regular
Thread Starter
 
BlueFiesta85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Heathrow
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what would be the best turbo upgrade to look into mate, if i were to get a large i/c and turbo together?
also dnt forget that i dont intend to change the fueling system so would i be ok installing a larger i/c and turbo with the standard mfi fuel system?
Old 16-07-2007, 11:42 AM
  #6  
Christian and Beccy
#1 in Spelling Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Christian and Beccy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 23,329
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Sorry guys, but 180@ the wheels on a Standard T3 and with a standard Pace Chargecooler??

I'd be very surprised if that car makes 180 at the flywheel, let alone the wheels.

Also, 105epwr, a few years ago, my RST made 220@ wheels on SCS Dyno, but was only actually 180 at the flywheel (proved this on more than one other dyno).

180@the wheels is a much harder figure to reach than I think people realise.

In answer to your question though, a uprated Intercooler is a must. Those Chargecoolers are no good for beyond 18psi IMO, even that far is a push.
Old 16-07-2007, 12:13 PM
  #7  
T28 RST
Ok then
 
T28 RST's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: GLASGOW
Posts: 4,300
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Christian and Beccy
Sorry guys, but 180@ the wheels on a Standard T3 and with a standard Pace Chargecooler??

I'd be very surprised if that car makes 180 at the flywheel, let alone the wheels.

Also, 105epwr, a few years ago, my RST made 220@ wheels on SCS Dyno, but was only actually 180 at the flywheel (proved this on more than one other dyno).

180@the wheels is a much harder figure to reach than I think people realise.

In answer to your question though, a uprated Intercooler is a must. Those Chargecoolers are no good for beyond 18psi IMO, even that far is a push.
Agree 100% with what Christian has just said

Your mods are

Chargecooler
stage 3 head (ported, polished etc)
kent cvh 34 cam setup
Obviously a chip and exhaust of some sort.

BTW how much boost were you using to get 180 ATW
Old 16-07-2007, 06:55 PM
  #8  
BlueFiesta85
PassionFord Regular
Thread Starter
 
BlueFiesta85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Heathrow
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dyno printout @ Torque of Devil



boost was measured 18psi max with a new -31 actuator, so wat i/c is best for the escort as i have a pro alloy one on my fiesta turbo and find it suitable for the that setup
Old 16-07-2007, 08:43 PM
  #9  
s2 ben
Regular Contributor
 
s2 ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: derby/notts
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

grs is the one to go for but still nothing wrong with pro alloy radtec etc
Old 16-07-2007, 09:28 PM
  #10  
105epwr
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
105epwr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: peterborough
Posts: 664
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

A recent RR set up @SCS i saw 241.7 bhp@4949 rpm @flywheel and 274.1 lbft @4439 so wot u saying?i should maybe try another rolling road?? it has a 5 or so second spike of 26PSI to be honest sounds good to me plus thats why SCS are one of the best known tuners.
Old 16-07-2007, 09:47 PM
  #11  
105epwr
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
105epwr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: peterborough
Posts: 664
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

another thing my brother had a nitrous burning rst (performance ford feature nov o3)that i saw 192@the wheels @17psi with a charge cooler!
Old 16-07-2007, 10:02 PM
  #12  
105epwr
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
105epwr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: peterborough
Posts: 664
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

without nos aswell!
Old 16-07-2007, 10:21 PM
  #13  
rstdave
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (3)
 
rstdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bristol/Bath
Posts: 2,568
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Blimey...274 foot pounds of torque is a hell of alot, big boost spike but even so, wouldn't have thought it would make those figures with that spec, which is basically a standard engine runnin alot of boost!! As c+b said above don't know if u'd achieve those figures at every rolling road! Not tryin to be negative, i just know how much needs to go into makin a genuine 250 ish bhp cvh running a T3, if i could have got those figures on a standard engine i wouldn't have bothered!
Old 17-07-2007, 08:19 AM
  #14  
Christian and Beccy
#1 in Spelling Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Christian and Beccy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 23,329
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Assuming that Harvery's dyno is still the same one as he had when I used to go there (5+ years ago), he used to tell me to take the figures with a pinch of salt back then.

As I said earlier, my car made 220@Wheels there and went on to make 180odd at the Flywheel on a newer Dyno.
Old 17-07-2007, 08:20 AM
  #15  
Christian and Beccy
#1 in Spelling Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Christian and Beccy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 23,329
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Also, 274lb/ft to me suggests wheelspin on the rollers, which is what you would expect with a big boost spike, which would then make the figures innaccurate.
Old 17-07-2007, 05:25 PM
  #16  
gambit
PassionFord Regular
 
gambit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: heathrow
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default rollers

i do tend to agree
Old 17-07-2007, 07:21 PM
  #17  
105epwr
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
105epwr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: peterborough
Posts: 664
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i see wot u all are saying,its a stge 3 hybrid with 55trim comp wheel,cossie 2wd ex housinge ect, c/r of 7.6:1...steel rods,crank etc etc wont give me more power i no.thats why i didnt opp for these
the rollers harvey has now are different to that analoge one u prob are talking about its a later one plugged up to a lap top etc with a printer which i have!
how do u post pics?so i can show u?i emit the torque curve peaks very quick @4000rpm(wen 26psi comes through)274lbft then by 5200rpm its tails off then 6300rpm its like 220lbft
harvey did drive it and sed its fucking lethal!!which it is the g/box will agree.ring harvey (01733576614)he no's the car (black mk3cab)ask him how and why
APT (c+b )is that your tuning shop?do u have a rr as your not far from me
and will have ago on it if so!!!cheers
Old 17-07-2007, 07:34 PM
  #18  
scortgti
Regular Contributor
 
scortgti's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

trust me your figures from harvey are too high for the spec. i used to use harvey and my car was making something stupid like 240bhp at fly with minimal mods!! i couldnt see how it could make that power so went somewhere else. on APT's rollers it made a much more believeble 186bhp at fly.
Old 17-07-2007, 07:53 PM
  #19  
105epwr
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
105epwr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: peterborough
Posts: 664
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

well,as i said will try another RR wheres APT?
Old 17-07-2007, 08:07 PM
  #20  
105epwr
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
105epwr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: peterborough
Posts: 664
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

well,as i said will try another RR wheres APT?
how do u no 186bhp or so is right or not this could apply to any R/R in the contry?std rst is 132 @like 6psi or so
my broter has a skoda vrs the ONLY mods are air filter,sports cat and remap(progressive boost)243bhp@ fly R/R@ jabba sport.(or not)
my cab sat with my dads 312bhp skyline so sumthings working sumwere.fuck it i love, the car and will do most things on the road!
Old 17-07-2007, 08:26 PM
  #21  
105epwr
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
105epwr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: peterborough
Posts: 664
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

ps its on oddkids web site on cars for sale,have a look at the advert near the bottom and the pics sum1 took @ c/f show its stunning!
Old 18-07-2007, 03:17 PM
  #22  
Danielbetty
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
iTrader: (3)
 
Danielbetty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 1,231
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

if c+b are saying that 105epwrs cab running 274lbft cant be proper figures as it would wheel spin on the rollers then if yours is more touque than his then surely yours would wheelspin and your figures are wrong aswell??
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mk3ste
Restorations, Rebuilds & Projects.
19
17-10-2021 10:09 AM
gcfcos
General Car Related Discussion.
59
06-10-2015 05:04 PM
Mc5506
Ford Escort RS Turbo
6
05-10-2015 09:57 PM
rsguy
General Car Related Discussion.
44
29-09-2015 03:29 PM
Marv888
Restorations, Rebuilds & Projects.
1
26-09-2015 03:44 PM



Quick Reply: Need Some Advice



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:40 PM.