Kent cams???
22-09-2004, 04:48 PM
#1
15000
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Kent cams???
been looking through the Burton Catalogue at kent cams and where it says power band for the CVH34 it comes in at 1.5K to 7K but the 35 and 36 dont start till 2K and the 37 not till 2.5K
is the 34 the better cam for acceleration?
is the 34 the better cam for acceleration?
23-09-2004, 01:07 PM
#3
PassionFord Post Troll
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The CVH35 has a huge overlap and is not that good for low down power or low boost power. It definately needs high boost to produce results. If I'd buy a new cam, I wouldn't buy a cam as hot as the CVH35 anymore. Numbervise the 285T looks good to me.
23-09-2004, 01:58 PM
#4
15000
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thats what i thought Jesse and why i dont want to go for the 35 or above 
saying that acording to RPM the CVH36 "QUOTE" (it is designed to dramatically reduce turbo lag) http://www.racepowermotorsport.com/cams.htm so i would assume sounds like it might be worth ago for low down power and acceleration? 
anyone else have anything to add?
saying that acording to RPM the CVH36 "QUOTE" (it is designed to dramatically reduce turbo lag) http://www.racepowermotorsport.com/cams.htm so i would assume sounds like it might be worth ago for low down power and acceleration? anyone else have anything to add?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mc5506
Ford Escort RS Turbo
6
05-10-2015 09:57 PM