Performance/ quarter mile times of cossies with efr turbos...
A few posts have gone up about efr turbo equipped cars over the past few years now on here as well as on the escort Cosworth forum.
Just wondering apart from the obvious low lag and better drivability of cars with efr turbos are there performance any better since changing from T34's of gt series turbos etc??
You see a lot of good power graphs and reviews on them but how do they equate in actual performance?
I'm still yet to see any big power efr turbo cossies run up Santapod or do any topspeed style runs etc??
Anyone know of any?
Be interesting to see how they are performance wise to the usual tried and tested stuff...
Cheers Paul
Just wondering apart from the obvious low lag and better drivability of cars with efr turbos are there performance any better since changing from T34's of gt series turbos etc??
You see a lot of good power graphs and reviews on them but how do they equate in actual performance?
I'm still yet to see any big power efr turbo cossies run up Santapod or do any topspeed style runs etc??
Anyone know of any?
Be interesting to see how they are performance wise to the usual tried and tested stuff...
Cheers Paul
I wonder if quarter mile times would be very different as surely a laggy turbo would be revved before pull away / launch so well and truly spinning and as you change up close to red line it would be in its best spot, it is on the road in normal driving that you would see the biggest impact. I have got one on my Cossied pug running 470bhp...it is awesome, I upgraded from a T34 which was laggy.
No, I went from 330/350 bhp straight to 470 and the efr makes more power at 2500/3000 revs that the t34 did at any point in the Rev range according to the dyno print plus it spools so much faster. I did swap from l8 to a vipec and a new loom too plus I think MAD mapping helps even though I did have an Ahmed bayjoo chip in the l8.
The drag strip is maybe one of the worst places to try and shout any praises about a particular turbo setup vs another, especially if top end power abilities are the same.
If it's making the power, unless it's terrible low down, it should run similar trap speeds and times ( although times are very launch and driver dependent )
It would take a terrible driver to affect trap speeds much though.
But road, transients, on/off boost, lower rpms, mid range etc are all where the EFR's should really shine.
If it's making the power, unless it's terrible low down, it should run similar trap speeds and times ( although times are very launch and driver dependent )
It would take a terrible driver to affect trap speeds much though.
But road, transients, on/off boost, lower rpms, mid range etc are all where the EFR's should really shine.
The drag strip is maybe one of the worst places to try and shout any praises about a particular turbo setup vs another, especially if top end power abilities are the same.
If it's making the power, unless it's terrible low down, it should run similar trap speeds and times ( although times are very launch and driver dependent )
It would take a terrible driver to affect trap speeds much though.
But road, transients, on/off boost, lower rpms, mid range etc are all where the EFR's should really shine.
If it's making the power, unless it's terrible low down, it should run similar trap speeds and times ( although times are very launch and driver dependent )
It would take a terrible driver to affect trap speeds much though.
But road, transients, on/off boost, lower rpms, mid range etc are all where the EFR's should really shine.
Mark
Trending Topics
A few posts have gone up about efr turbo equipped cars over the past few years now on here as well as on the escort Cosworth forum.
Just wondering apart from the obvious low lag and better drivability of cars with efr turbos are there performance any better since changing from T34's of gt series turbos etc??
You see a lot of good power graphs and reviews on them but how do they equate in actual performance?
I'm still yet to see any big power efr turbo cossies run up Santapod or do any topspeed style runs etc??
Anyone know of any?
Be interesting to see how they are performance wise to the usual tried and tested stuff...
Cheers Paul
Just wondering apart from the obvious low lag and better drivability of cars with efr turbos are there performance any better since changing from T34's of gt series turbos etc??
You see a lot of good power graphs and reviews on them but how do they equate in actual performance?
I'm still yet to see any big power efr turbo cossies run up Santapod or do any topspeed style runs etc??
Anyone know of any?
Be interesting to see how they are performance wise to the usual tried and tested stuff...
Cheers Paul
Power is easy responce and power is not you really need to drive a correctly set up car with a EFR and you Will get it
Mark
I'm totally getting that it's the response, low lag, quick spool up etc that these turbo packages deliver, and I know everyone who now has one or switched to one from other turbos praises them as well.
But has anyone noticed a difference performance wise?
Any of your customers ran quicker or slower times on the quarter Mark after switching turbos to an efr?
As Mark said that's all he's sold these past 5 years and I know cossies are not as common anymore it's just I'm yet to see any deliver good performance or stats compared to the 'old' technology....
Anyone out there know/experienced different??
Anyone using an efr on level 8 or P8??
Cheers Paul
But has anyone noticed a difference performance wise?
Any of your customers ran quicker or slower times on the quarter Mark after switching turbos to an efr?
As Mark said that's all he's sold these past 5 years and I know cossies are not as common anymore it's just I'm yet to see any deliver good performance or stats compared to the 'old' technology....
Anyone out there know/experienced different??
Anyone using an efr on level 8 or P8??
Cheers Paul
There was a 700+hp 3 door at Central day yesterday running a efr, I seen it run 13.7 but not sure if it went faster later. There's also a 4wd that's running a efr around 500hp and that runs high 11's. Iv got a sx200 on mine and will be trying it over the 1/4 soon.
The 3dr is running 654hp on his own spec engine and is CossieKing on the Escort forum, I heard it run a 11.2 but I dont know anymore.
Mark
You see a lot of good power graphs and reviews on them but how do they equate in actual performance?
I'm still yet to see any big power efr turbo cossies run up Santapod or do any topspeed style runs etc??
Anyone know of any?
Be interesting to see how they are performance wise to the usual tried and tested stuff...
Cheers Paul
I'm still yet to see any big power efr turbo cossies run up Santapod or do any topspeed style runs etc??
Anyone know of any?
Be interesting to see how they are performance wise to the usual tried and tested stuff...
Cheers Paul
I will be doing an EFR Topspeed run but you cant tell anything from that, any Turbo making the same Power will run the same Topspeed. Mark is developing the 9180 on an EVO & then mine. The EVO is spooling at least 1000rpm before my GT42 & better than a GT35 & close to a GT30. Mark Hudd has a 9180 on his 3dr maybe PM him & ask how it goes.
I'm totally getting that it's the response, low lag, quick spool up etc that these turbo packages deliver, and I know everyone who now has one or switched to one from other turbos praises them as well.
But has anyone noticed a difference performance wise?
Any of your customers ran quicker or slower times on the quarter Mark after switching turbos to an efr?
As Mark said that's all he's sold these past 5 years and I know cossies are not as common anymore it's just I'm yet to see any deliver good performance or stats compared to the 'old' technology....
Anyone out there know/experienced different??
Anyone using an efr on level 8 or P8??
Cheers Paul
But has anyone noticed a difference performance wise?
Any of your customers ran quicker or slower times on the quarter Mark after switching turbos to an efr?
As Mark said that's all he's sold these past 5 years and I know cossies are not as common anymore it's just I'm yet to see any deliver good performance or stats compared to the 'old' technology....
Anyone out there know/experienced different??
Anyone using an efr on level 8 or P8??
Cheers Paul
And as I said, given the 1/4 mile is probably the worst "performance" test ever for an EFR, why would you think a result would change because of one ? Given it's virtually full throttle the entire way. There is almost no reason for a similar powered car to go faster because of an EFR vs a different turbo.
Now if you're simply comparing an EFR turbo car that makes more power, to a car with an alternative turbo that made less power...well that again isnt even a comparable test. They're just different so results will be different.
A car with 700+ should be trapping in the 140+ range. Whilst ET's arent always a great indicator, 13.7 is poor for that sort of power.
Erm, it doesn't sound like you are hearing us, the performance is easily shown, my car made much more power. We have said that the drag strip will not make much difference against another car with similar headline power. My car would be much faster up,the strip now as 330 bhp vs 470 would make the difference but if you have a t4 at 400 bhp and efr at 400 bhp I doubt there would be much in it on a draga strip, on the road thent4 would be left behind on give and take roads with lots of speed changes such as roundabouts.
Most people will go to efr to add power though I.e. They are at 300 and want 500 bhp
So, drag strip, doubt much difference, road lots of extra performance.
Most people will go to efr to add power though I.e. They are at 300 and want 500 bhp
So, drag strip, doubt much difference, road lots of extra performance.
Very impressive time from the saff then it looked to be getting off the line good! Only seen the 3 door run once so must have gone faster later.
I will be doing an EFR Topspeed run but you cant tell anything from that, any Turbo making the same Power will run the same Topspeed. Mark is developing the 9180 on an EVO & then mine. The EVO is spooling at least 1000rpm before my GT42 & better than a GT35 & close to a GT30. Mark Hudd has a 9180 on his 3dr maybe PM him & ask how it goes.
So with it spooling up 1000 revs earlier will it hold power the same as before on the gt42/35 or will it run out of steam earlier?
Cheers Paul
Surely the fact they are praising them tells you their performance is better ?
And as I said, given the 1/4 mile is probably the worst "performance" test ever for an EFR, why would you think a result would change because of one ? Given it's virtually full throttle the entire way. There is almost no reason for a similar powered car to go faster because of an EFR vs a different turbo.
Now if you're simply comparing an EFR turbo car that makes more power, to a car with an alternative turbo that made less power...well that again isnt even a comparable test. They're just different so results will be different.
A car with 700+ should be trapping in the 140+ range. Whilst ET's arent always a great indicator, 13.7 is poor for that sort of power.
And as I said, given the 1/4 mile is probably the worst "performance" test ever for an EFR, why would you think a result would change because of one ? Given it's virtually full throttle the entire way. There is almost no reason for a similar powered car to go faster because of an EFR vs a different turbo.
Now if you're simply comparing an EFR turbo car that makes more power, to a car with an alternative turbo that made less power...well that again isnt even a comparable test. They're just different so results will be different.
A car with 700+ should be trapping in the 140+ range. Whilst ET's arent always a great indicator, 13.7 is poor for that sort of power.
Cheers Paul
Surely the fact they are praising them tells you their performance is better ?
And as I said, given the 1/4 mile is probably the worst "performance" test ever for an EFR, why would you think a result would change because of one ? Given it's virtually full throttle the entire way. There is almost no reason for a similar powered car to go faster because of an EFR vs a different turbo.
Now if you're simply comparing an EFR turbo car that makes more power, to a car with an alternative turbo that made less power...well that again isnt even a comparable test. They're just different so results will be different.
A car with 700+ should be trapping in the 140+ range. Whilst ET's arent always a great indicator, 13.7 is poor for that sort of power.
And as I said, given the 1/4 mile is probably the worst "performance" test ever for an EFR, why would you think a result would change because of one ? Given it's virtually full throttle the entire way. There is almost no reason for a similar powered car to go faster because of an EFR vs a different turbo.
Now if you're simply comparing an EFR turbo car that makes more power, to a car with an alternative turbo that made less power...well that again isnt even a comparable test. They're just different so results will be different.
A car with 700+ should be trapping in the 140+ range. Whilst ET's arent always a great indicator, 13.7 is poor for that sort of power.
Erm, it doesn't sound like you are hearing us, the performance is easily shown, my car made much more power. We have said that the drag strip will not make much difference against another car with similar headline power. My car would be much faster up,the strip now as 330 bhp vs 470 would make the difference but if you have a t4 at 400 bhp and efr at 400 bhp I doubt there would be much in it on a draga strip, on the road thent4 would be left behind on give and take roads with lots of speed changes such as roundabouts.
Most people will go to efr to add power though I.e. They are at 300 and want 500 bhp
So, drag strip, doubt much difference, road lots of extra performance.
Most people will go to efr to add power though I.e. They are at 300 and want 500 bhp
So, drag strip, doubt much difference, road lots of extra performance.
Forgetting spool up time and driveability
Cheers Paul
Mark
Mark
Random question ?
If you fit a 400hp EFR, then no it will not make more power than a 400hp T34.
If you fit a 600hp EFR, then clearly yes there would be an expectation of more power than a 400hp T34
But you would sort of expect that ? Much the same as if you fitted a 600hp GT35 you'd expect more than a 400HP T34
As like you say you could just fit a t4/gt30 etc.
Anyone out there switched turbos and gained a power difference on a similar size efr equivalent....
Cheers Paul
Hmmmm, you're not getting this, are you ?
Or what are you referring to when you state "size" ?
As said before, why would you expect them to be any different ?
400hp only changes from 400hp when pub dynos get involved.
Power/Torque may be the same but spool will be better on the EFR.
You can therefore fit a larger EFR & get the same response as the smaller Turbo. In my application a EFR9180 will make similar Power to a GT42 but will spool 1000rpm earlier. On the road this will be chalk & cheese making the car much easier to drive.
PassionFords Creator
iTrader: (12)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 28,824
Likes: 95
From: Blackpool, UK Destination: Rev limiter
I have this discussion quite a lot with customers looking for different turbos so understand where the fella is confused and understand what he is looking for. The question seems to be - if you already own a 420bhp .63 T34 car and fit a comparable EFR turbo in the hope of setting it also to 420bhp, will the car be faster?
As I'm lying in bed it's hard to show the difference visually without Dyno graphs but think of it this way.
A turbo just makes a small engine into a big one, and it does that with pressurised air, so the faster it delivers the air, the faster you get a bigger engine. At idle, the YB is a 2 litre. A good one, at 15psi is closer to a 4 litre. The faster you can get that 15psi, the quicker you have the 4 litre engine.
The EFR's SPOOL is better, so it will feed the engine with the boost faster than a T series. Also, the engines response time between you changing your foot from power fully off, to power fully on will be greatly reduced with a faster spooling turbo, so regardless of final power being the same, the EFR will deliver it sooner when asked as it can go from zero to say, 40psi faster than any T series.
Secondly, as spool is much improved, your torque band should move left as the engines getting bigger, faster, thus giving you more useable torque area UNDER THE GRAPH. As an example, the T34.63 tends to make peak boost on the Dyno, when floored at 2000rpm, by around 4000rpm. An EFR will deliver the same amount of air by around 3500rpm. This is because the EFR turbo requires less energy to rotate it so it rotates up to the required speed faster. for any engine driven in this lower engine speed area, the car WILL be faster than a comparable T series equipped car driven at the same speed in the same gear. IE: 70mph roll on in 5th gear side by side.
That's why folk are saying ignore drag strips, as that's about top end power and most turbos here will be equal, as BHP is BHP. Once your out of first gear, a drag car never sees low engine speeds or has worries about spool times as it's just wide open throttle and high revs all the way. That is NOT a test of a turbos responsiveness, it's only a test of is ability to flow air with its wastegate opening and open. A road car turbo test is all about what it does with the wastegate shut. Two very different metrics.
As I'm lying in bed it's hard to show the difference visually without Dyno graphs but think of it this way.
A turbo just makes a small engine into a big one, and it does that with pressurised air, so the faster it delivers the air, the faster you get a bigger engine. At idle, the YB is a 2 litre. A good one, at 15psi is closer to a 4 litre. The faster you can get that 15psi, the quicker you have the 4 litre engine.
The EFR's SPOOL is better, so it will feed the engine with the boost faster than a T series. Also, the engines response time between you changing your foot from power fully off, to power fully on will be greatly reduced with a faster spooling turbo, so regardless of final power being the same, the EFR will deliver it sooner when asked as it can go from zero to say, 40psi faster than any T series.
Secondly, as spool is much improved, your torque band should move left as the engines getting bigger, faster, thus giving you more useable torque area UNDER THE GRAPH. As an example, the T34.63 tends to make peak boost on the Dyno, when floored at 2000rpm, by around 4000rpm. An EFR will deliver the same amount of air by around 3500rpm. This is because the EFR turbo requires less energy to rotate it so it rotates up to the required speed faster. for any engine driven in this lower engine speed area, the car WILL be faster than a comparable T series equipped car driven at the same speed in the same gear. IE: 70mph roll on in 5th gear side by side.
That's why folk are saying ignore drag strips, as that's about top end power and most turbos here will be equal, as BHP is BHP. Once your out of first gear, a drag car never sees low engine speeds or has worries about spool times as it's just wide open throttle and high revs all the way. That is NOT a test of a turbos responsiveness, it's only a test of is ability to flow air with its wastegate opening and open. A road car turbo test is all about what it does with the wastegate shut. Two very different metrics.
Last edited by Stu @ M Developments; Apr 20, 2015 at 10:00 PM.
Power/Torque may be the same but spool will be better on the EFR.
You can therefore fit a larger EFR & get the same response as the smaller Turbo. In my application a EFR9180 will make similar Power to a GT42 but will spool 1000rpm earlier. On the road this will be chalk & cheese making the car much easier to drive.
You can therefore fit a larger EFR & get the same response as the smaller Turbo. In my application a EFR9180 will make similar Power to a GT42 but will spool 1000rpm earlier. On the road this will be chalk & cheese making the car much easier to drive.
I don't mean will a said 400 turbo make more than 400 as it won't because it's a 400hp turbo, so out of the two turbo setups at the same power which would be quicker?
I know the efr would spool up quicker but wouldn't the t34 (in this said example) make power higher up in the Rev range where the efr' tend to drop off?
Cheers Paul
Very good explanation there Stu, nice one, very interesting stuff.
So because if it's in a road application that's where the efr turbos are really good I get it.
So with them spooling up quick and moving air faster are they also losing the ability to do this at the top end of the scale hence their power is made earlier on low down?
Do they run out of steam quicker and it's just the power band on the efr turbos is lower than the T series/gt series turbos?
Just for the record I have a 2wd saff on a gt30.
I'm not looking to change it (not yet anyway) was just intrigued about finding out more on these efr turbos.
I just find it weird you don't see many being used on tracks/drag strips etc, or are they......
Cheers Paul
So because if it's in a road application that's where the efr turbos are really good I get it.
So with them spooling up quick and moving air faster are they also losing the ability to do this at the top end of the scale hence their power is made earlier on low down?
Do they run out of steam quicker and it's just the power band on the efr turbos is lower than the T series/gt series turbos?
Just for the record I have a 2wd saff on a gt30.
I'm not looking to change it (not yet anyway) was just intrigued about finding out more on these efr turbos.
I just find it weird you don't see many being used on tracks/drag strips etc, or are they......
Cheers Paul
Thanks Rod, that does make sense and yes Stevieturbo I do get it, maybe it's the way I'm trying to word posts, sorry about that.
I don't mean will a said 400 turbo make more than 400 as it won't because it's a 400hp turbo, so out of the two turbo setups at the same power which would be quicker?
I know the efr would spool up quicker but wouldn't the t34 (in this said example) make power higher up in the Rev range where the efr' tend to drop off?
Cheers Paul
I don't mean will a said 400 turbo make more than 400 as it won't because it's a 400hp turbo, so out of the two turbo setups at the same power which would be quicker?
I know the efr would spool up quicker but wouldn't the t34 (in this said example) make power higher up in the Rev range where the efr' tend to drop off?
Cheers Paul
For most part though, the EFR would be quicker in every respect. You're comparing literally an ancient T series to a modern turbo.
Almost any modern turbo will be faster of equivalent power rating. On the drag strip not so much, but that's already been explained.
Very good explanation there Stu, nice one, very interesting stuff.
So because if it's in a road application that's where the efr turbos are really good I get it.
So with them spooling up quick and moving air faster are they also losing the ability to do this at the top end of the scale hence their power is made earlier on low down?
Do they run out of steam quicker and it's just the power band on the efr turbos is lower than the T series/gt series turbos?
Just for the record I have a 2wd saff on a gt30.
I'm not looking to change it (not yet anyway) was just intrigued about finding out more on these efr turbos.
I just find it weird you don't see many being used on tracks/drag strips etc, or are they......
Cheers Paul
So because if it's in a road application that's where the efr turbos are really good I get it.
So with them spooling up quick and moving air faster are they also losing the ability to do this at the top end of the scale hence their power is made earlier on low down?
Do they run out of steam quicker and it's just the power band on the efr turbos is lower than the T series/gt series turbos?
Just for the record I have a 2wd saff on a gt30.
I'm not looking to change it (not yet anyway) was just intrigued about finding out more on these efr turbos.
I just find it weird you don't see many being used on tracks/drag strips etc, or are they......
Cheers Paul
Mark








