Originally Posted by
turbotrev
I'm totally getting that it's the response, low lag, quick spool up etc that these turbo packages deliver, and I know everyone who now has one or switched to one from other turbos praises them as well.
But has anyone noticed a difference performance wise?
Any of your customers ran quicker or slower times on the quarter Mark after switching turbos to an efr?
As Mark said that's all he's sold these past 5 years and I know cossies are not as common anymore it's just I'm yet to see any deliver good performance or stats compared to the 'old' technology....
Anyone out there know/experienced different??
Anyone using an efr on level 8 or P8??
Cheers Paul
Surely the fact they are praising them tells you their performance is better ?
And as I said, given the 1/4 mile is probably the worst "performance" test ever for an EFR, why would you think a result would change because of one ? Given it's virtually full throttle the entire way. There is almost no reason for a similar powered car to go faster because of an EFR vs a different turbo.
Now if you're simply comparing an EFR turbo car that makes more power, to a car with an alternative turbo that made less power...well that again isnt even a comparable test. They're just different so results will be different.
Originally Posted by
lee2cossies
There was a 700+hp 3 door at Central day yesterday running a efr, I seen it run 13.7 but not sure if it went faster later. There's also a 4wd that's running a efr around 500hp and that runs high 11's. Iv got a sx200 on mine and will be trying it over the 1/4 soon.
A car with 700+ should be trapping in the 140+ range. Whilst ET's arent always a great indicator, 13.7 is poor for that sort of power.