General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

rs2000 16v engine advice needed pls

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 20, 2013 | 04:30 PM
  #1  
tonysierra4x4's Avatar
tonysierra4x4
Thread Starter
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
From: pembrokeshire
Default rs2000 16v engine advice needed pls

hello all, could anyone tell me if a rs2000 16v engine can be fitted to a standard 3dr sierra shell without too many mods. what gearbox would i need to run rwd bearing in mind the tunnel is not the same as later models and is there much modification to engine mounts, coolant hoses etc. a few people on my rebuild thread suggested using this engine but realy don't want to buy it and have it sat in workshop because there is too much work to make it fit. the complete car is available to me incl' wiring loom and ecu (chipped) etc. also what would a good condition engine be worth, it is powder coated / painted to a good standard and runs very well.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2013 | 04:42 PM
  #2  
STeve's Avatar
STeve
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 49,079
Likes: 876
From: SITTING DOWN
Default

I4 engines in good working order dont fetch much as I have seen them go for Ł100 to Ł300 with gearbox
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2013 | 04:46 PM
  #3  
Turbo Zetec's Avatar
Turbo Zetec
Engine Machinist
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 32
From: Suffolk/Cambs
Default

I'd go for the scorpio version of the engine, or even the 2.3 as they're already suited to rwd. as for the gearbox, i'd imagine an mt75 would fit from a sierra 2.0 or a manual scorpio.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2013 | 04:55 PM
  #4  
tjRS500's Avatar
tjRS500
.
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 2
From: Co. Derry N.I
Default

Twincam 2.0 Sierra mounts bolt straight on as does the box
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2013 | 04:56 PM
  #5  
minder's Avatar
minder
PassionFord Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 426
Likes: 1
From: swansea south wales
Default

if you don't mind doing some work and mods why don't you fit a 2 litre 16v vauxhall red top
with a set of throttle bodies and a 4 2 1 manifold beats any of the ford engines that are out there today
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2013 | 05:29 PM
  #6  
costina's Avatar
costina
Live long and prosper!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,158
Likes: 373
From: area 51
Default

Originally Posted by MD Cos
I'd go for the scorpio version of the engine, or even the 2.3 as they're already suited to rwd. as for the gearbox, i'd imagine an mt75 would fit from a sierra 2.0 or a manual scorpio.
buy yourself a 2.3 scorpio estate and swap it all over job done
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2013 | 06:15 PM
  #7  
SapphyMike's Avatar
SapphyMike
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 9,156
Likes: 0
From: Sheffield
Default

I had this conversion done on my old Sierra Sapphire.

It all went in ok, but you will across some issues, chiefly the exhaust manifold and the inlet manifold.

The 2.3 Scorpio engine has a bit less power than the 2.0 RS2000 engine, but the manifolds will be correct. I recall back in the day people fitted the 2.3 bottom end and used the rs2000 cylinder head on the rs2000's. If memory serves then I think the 2.3 engine is a taller engine, which is why the Escort guys didnt use the full engine, perhaps it was the head that was taller.

Re the gearbox, a standard RWD MT75 from a 2.0 twin cam Sierra will bolt straight up to it.

Though, this begs the question, and its a question I've asked myself lately, even though I had the conversion done in 1999, why bother? If you want to go N/A, get a 2.9 24v unit from a scorpio. 200bhp out of the bag. I wish id of done that instead.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jan 20, 2013 | 06:28 PM
  #8  
tonysierra4x4's Avatar
tonysierra4x4
Thread Starter
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
From: pembrokeshire
Default

thanks for reply's. the reason for looking at these engines was originally i wanted to go 4 wheel drive so bought a complete xr4x4 2.9i as donor. most comments were not to go 4x4 as extra weight and without 4x4 power / weight ratio would be more than compensated by 2.0l dohc. i went and bought a sierra 2.0 gt for donor. most comments were then should have gone for 16v twin cam, which is a lot lighter but same power as 2.9 v6 which is where i am now. the car is for my son to use as road rally car. if the engine gets damaged it is easily replaced and cheap. the 2.3 engines and boa / bob are not quite as easily obtainable or cheap.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2013 | 06:36 PM
  #9  
SapphyMike's Avatar
SapphyMike
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 9,156
Likes: 0
From: Sheffield
Default

i think the 2.0 8v bottom end is the same as the 2.0 16v as well, except I think the 16v has valve cut outs in the pistons and an oil spray bar. I could be wrong as its been some 13 years since I had this conversion done.

The inlet manifold and the exhaust manifold from the 8v will NOT fit the 16v though. The 8v uses siamese ports on the head and the 16v uses individual ports.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2013 | 09:10 PM
  #10  
mk22door's Avatar
mk22door
Fart of the Purniture
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 41
From: Yorkshire
Default

Originally Posted by tjRS500
Twincam 2.0 Sierra mounts bolt straight on as does the box

I don't think it will bolt straight on.

Originally Posted by tonysierra4x4
a standard 3dr sierra shell...... bearing in mind the tunnel is not the same as later models
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2013 | 09:16 PM
  #11  
mk22door's Avatar
mk22door
Fart of the Purniture
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 41
From: Yorkshire
Default

The box that is, early shells had a fixed position for the type 9 mount, later shells have the sliding type point for the mount to accommodate different gearbox options / combinations.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2013 | 09:42 PM
  #12  
tonysierra4x4's Avatar
tonysierra4x4
Thread Starter
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
From: pembrokeshire
Default

Originally Posted by mk22door
The box that is, early shells had a fixed position for the type 9 mount, later shells have the sliding type point for the mount to accommodate different gearbox options / combinations.
cheers. had a look at both tunnels tonight and standard has fixed as you say for type 9. genuine shell has sliding so not a problem. i could unpick welding on tunnel and replace with later one as i have one available already.
is there any such thing as an easy project??? seems like the decision on what to fit will take longer than the build.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2013 | 10:03 PM
  #13  
mk22door's Avatar
mk22door
Fart of the Purniture
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 41
From: Yorkshire
Default

No - no easy projects i don't think, mines got the steering wheel at the wrong side Get there one day

Last edited by mk22door; Jan 21, 2013 at 10:04 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2013 | 06:09 PM
  #14  
gavrwdfiesta's Avatar
gavrwdfiesta
Wahay!! I've lost my Virginity!!
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 56
Likes: 1
From: clacton essex
Default

easy project

what you need is the type 9 5spd box, bolts straight on if you have the rs2k lump with clutch, youll need a spigot bearing b4 you do that, there all the same size.

dohc 8v engine mounts, sump and pick up pipe,
ive fitted the rs2k lump in a fiesta both fwd and rwd and now currently installing it in a triumph toledo, and if you wanna run it on carbs with a cheap ignition, go 4 the esc 2 pack
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
big_Rad
General Car Related Discussion.
8
Sep 15, 2017 09:36 AM
Rickyrustyfox
General Car Related Discussion.
0
Aug 13, 2015 01:11 PM
col93saphcos
Ford Sierra/Sapphire/RS500 Cosworth
5
Aug 7, 2015 03:21 PM
wheelwizardrefurbs
Technical help Q & A
10
Aug 4, 2015 06:23 PM
knight19770
Technical help Q & A
3
Aug 4, 2015 12:36 PM




All times are GMT. The time now is 11:32 PM.